Some of these excellent comments put me in mind of the following crude but suggestive way of stating the difference between liberals and conservatives: liberals think that the average person is good but dumb, conservatives that he or she is "bad" (in the sense of self-interested) but smart. Liberals trust the intellectual elite (because they are good) to guide the masses (because they cannot guide themselves); conservatives distrust the elite (because the elite are bad and therefore dangerous) and think the masses can guide themselves. So in the social security debate, liberals oppose private accounts because they do not think the average person competent to manage money for retirement but think government can be trusted to manage it; conservatives support private accounts because they give the opposite of the liberals' answers to the goodness and competence questions.
The basic contrast that I have suggested (something of a caricature, I admit) between the liberal and conservative world views has a further implication for the social security debate. Beleving that people are good and therefore never, or at least very rarely, deserve to be poor, liberals favor redistribution of wealth from rich to poor, which a self-financed retirement system would be incapable of bringing about because everyone would be paying for his own retirement rather than for the retirement of others. Conservatives recognize that people can be unlucky, and also (because in the conservative view people are "bad") that the elderly may free ride on their children, and on these grounds support public welfare for the indigent elderly.
Several comments take issue with my suggestion that social security is prone to politicization because the elderly vote disproportionately to their percentage of the population. The commenters argue that the young could vote more if they wanted to and if they don't, it suggests that they are content with the status quo. I disagree on two grounds. The first is that the cost of voting is greater for the young because they are more likely to be employed and therefore to have a high opportunity cost of time--not only time spent voting but also time spent studying the candidates and the issues. Second, children are disfranchised. This creates serious distortions in public policy. For example, it would make better sense to subsidize health care for children than for old people, because in the first case one would be adding to the stock of human capital. I have argued that each parent should be given an extra one-half vote for each of his or her children, in order to redress the arbitrary imbalance of political power in favor of the elderly.
I would like to underscore a point made by Becker. Compelling and providing are separable. There are good reasons to require people to save for their retirement just as there are good reasons to require children to be educated. But in neither case does it follow that the government should provide the required service. That decision should depend on the relative competence of the public and private sectors in producing particular products and services.
دليل
دليل
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/04/2009 at 11:52 PM
Pervert! Let's get out of here. There are so many perverts here.So what? You are such a bad person Who's gonna like you? Tiffany Jewelry Don't mind him. Don't mind him. He's just playing. Forget him. He saw me steal the diamond. Tiffany Jewelry You're dreaming! In your dreams. Wake up and smell the coffee.Where'd you get it!Good idea.Think it over.You can never tell about this sort of thing.Take a closer l Wake up and smell the coffee.Where'd you get it!Good idea.Think it over.You can never tell about this sort of thing.Take a closer look.When did I say that!You have to be on time. Don't be late. ook.When did I say that!You have to be on time. Don't be late.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/07/2009 at 03:13 AM
بنت 18
شات بنت 18
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 05:06 AM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 11:04 AM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 01:06 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 02:06 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 04:51 PM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 09:31 PM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 08:19 AM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 08:19 PM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 09:23 PM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 10:29 PM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/13/2009 at 04:29 AM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/13/2009 at 05:12 PM
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/13/2009 at 06:01 PM
I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/14/2009 at 03:43 AM
Great work,webmaster,nice design!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/14/2009 at 05:55 AM
بنت الكويت
شات بنت الكويت
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/15/2009 at 09:17 AM
Just love tiffany and ugg boots,thanks!!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 01:19 AM
Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/19/2009 at 07:31 AM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/19/2009 at 10:40 PM
food hypertrophy energy steroids cause champion build year physique overtraining take main high ifbb develop nutrition hyper body generally
weight.
Posted by: Steroid Sale | 04/26/2012 at 02:49 AM