Thanks once more for interesting comments. I have a few reactions.
I argued in my entry that it was in the interest of a country like China to pay little attention to intellectual property rights since it is a net importer of knowledge. I suggested this will change not only because of WTO pressures, but also because as China continues to grow, it will be producing more knowledge itself, and would then have more incentives to protect knowledge. I was well aware of American violation of European intellectual property rights during 19th century.
The rural countryside is poor protection for unemployed urban workers since farmers are still dirt poor compared to urban workers. That is why there is such strong pressure for rural persons to move to cities, a pressure that the present regime is trying to slow down.
I agree the absorption of East Germany in a very inefficient way, such as the one for one exchange rate between eastern and western marks, hurt the German economy. But many of its problems in labor markets and elsewhere really are independent of this, and Germany was already slowing down before the absorption.
To be sure, the size of China is important for many questions of trade and global military influence. And the aggregate GDP of China is likely to become the world’s largest before long since its population is so large. But surely per capita GDP is the relevant measure for understanding what is happening to the economic well being of the typical individual?
The evidence supporting the causation from economic growth to greater democracy is not based on a single study, but a history of studies for the past 40 years. I know of no respectable recent evidence that overthrows this conclusion.
It is not true that I neglected civil rights. I did discuss the authoritarian regime of China, the greater freedom to farmers, the freedom to change jobs, etc. I could have added greater access to computers, internet, etc, although a lot remains to be done before China is a free society by any standard.
I am not familiar with Slate’s criticism of de Soto. I believe he has done very important work on the underground economy, and his emphasis on the latent property of the poor is a keen insight. However, he carries that insight much too far. Bad property rights are a real problem in many countries, but China is a good example of a country that is growing from poor income levels at a rapid rate with weak property rights. I do not believe the poor of Latin America-de Soto’s example-have a lot of property, even if they had rights over all of it.
I do not know Barnett’s work, but I will try to look into it, and see if it justifies a topic.
« Will China Become the Leading Nation of the 21st Century? Perhaps Not!-BECKER | Main | COMMENTS ON THE SEXUAL REVOLUTION-BECKER »
04/10/2005
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Search
Become a Fan
Home Pages
May 2014
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent Posts
- Farewell
- Sabbatical Notice
- The Embargo of Cuba: Time to Go- Becker
- End the Cuban Embargo—Posner
- Should Marijuana Be Decriminalized Nationwide?—Posner
- Why Marijuana Should be Decriminalized- Becker
- The War on Drugs
- The Myth of Excess Enrollments in College-Becker
- Excess Enrollments in College? Could Be. Posner
- Has the United States, by Virtue of Its Size and Complexity, Become Ungovernable?—Posner
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/18/2009 at 03:13 PM
Give please. Speak when you are angry--and you will make the best speech you'll ever regret.
I am from Israel and learning to speak English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Specializes in final expense and medicare supplement leads for insurance agents."
Waiting for a reply :P, insurance sales lead training.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 05:17 AM
Great work, webmaster, nice design!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 05:23 AM
very thanks for article sesli sohbet
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 08:04 PM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 08:45 PM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/21/2009 at 03:09 AM
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/21/2009 at 07:29 PM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/22/2009 at 07:21 AM
Great site. Good info.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/22/2009 at 10:29 PM
بنت 18
شات بنت 18
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/24/2009 at 02:14 AM
tiffany jewellery
ed hardy
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/24/2009 at 03:00 AM
links of london
abercrombie and fitch
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/24/2009 at 03:01 AM
ed hardy
tiffany jewelry
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/25/2009 at 03:46 AM
tiffany jewellery
tiffany jewellery
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/25/2009 at 03:46 AM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/25/2009 at 04:06 PM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 04:53 AM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 08:31 AM
I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 10:20 AM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 07:30 PM
I want to say - thank you for this!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 11:13 PM
Great article, I had a good laugh!links of london
tiffany jewelry
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/29/2009 at 12:43 AM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/30/2009 at 03:48 AM
Thanks very much for the compilation!links london
tiffany jewellery
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 02:28 AM
Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 08:06 AM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 01:56 PM