A large number of mainly interesting comments. I shall try to respond and clarify my position.
I believe corporations have as much right to lobby for laws as other interest groups, and should not be under any obligation to ignore the laws that are passed, even those that favor them. To take an example from the non-corporate world, the most powerful interest group in the United States is probably the AARP, the association of older, and mainly retired, men and women. They have managed to pass many laws dealing with social security and medicare that are too generous to richer retirees, and are on balance harmful to the general welfare. But I do not hear many people argue that rich persons should refuse the social security checks that they receive because in a better system that money and perhaps still more resources would go to poorer persons.
Some of the comments claim that since stockholders often cannot get rid of their top management, they cannot get their views known other than by selling their stock. I dealt with that case in my comment. The market for top management is indeed not perfect, and that means entrenched management gets greater compensation then they would receive in a more competitive market for managers. Entrenched managers do not have to fully consider stockholder interests in their decisions, and can take higher compensation, and have the corporations they manage engage in various actions. Perhaps they will be “socially responsible”, but surely we do not want to rely on entrenched management to set the standards for corporate behavior? Entrenched and powerful management was the heart of the problem with World Com, Enron, and most other companies that had corrupt leadership.
I said several times in my entry that if stockholders of a company are willing to pay for various “socially responsible “ non-profit maximizing actions of the company, then the company should indeed deviate from pure profit maximizing behavior to cater to the stockholder interests. But such a company would still be maximizing stockholder value, including the values of stockholders about pollution behavior, employee compensation, and charitable giving of the corporation. But we know from the relatively small number of funds that claim to invest only in socially responsible companies that the vast majority of owners of stock do not want their companies to deviate much from profit and value maximization.
Of course, if corporations can find charities better than stockholders can, then my criteria imply that corporation should do that. I even gave the example of fair trade coffee. But that is hardly the most common situation.
Some hard questions were raised about whether corporations should knowingly pollute, encourage use of unhealthy milk formula, and the like. Some of these cases would be consistent with my criteria because corporations might be sued if they knowingly encouraged behavior that would poison water, or stockholders would not hold stock in companies that they knew used slave labor, and so forth. However, I do not believe corporations have the obligation in the pollution case to go beyond their legal and contractual requirements. For example, corporations should not follow the Kyoto Agreement with regard to their production in the United States. I take this position because it is impossible to know where to draw the line. Why stop at the reduction in emissions called for by Kyoto? After all, many environmentalists believe Kyoto is far too limited. Pollution standards should be set by legislation and judicial decisions. Corporations should obey those standards, not lie about what they are doing, and follow the environmental wishes of their stockholders, but not try to be substitutes for voters and legislators.
Someone remarked on the death of Jack Hirshleifer. Not directly relevant to our subject, but he was an outstanding and creative economist, and a good friend since my graduate student days. I believe he would have adopted a position on this subject similar to mine; perhaps he has written on corporate goals.
Great article, I had a good laugh!links of london
tiffany jewelry
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 01:57 AM
I want to say - thank you for this!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/27/2009 at 02:57 AM
I love this site! great site and great webmaster. Thank you bye.
I am from Great and now study English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "there is a impossible pickup between the symbols of the three challenges of shapes."
THX :-(, Lavender handmade soap.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/28/2009 at 08:10 AM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/30/2009 at 03:48 AM
Thanks very much for the compilation!links london
tiffany jewellery
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/01/2009 at 02:46 AM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 08:06 AM
I want to say - thank you for this!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 01:56 PM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 05:51 PM
دليل
دليل
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/05/2009 at 12:29 AM
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/08/2009 at 05:46 PM
Pervert! Let's get out of here. There are so many perverts here.So what? You are such a bad person Who's gonna like you? Tiffany Jewelry Don't mind him. Don't mind him. He's just playing. Forget him. He saw me steal the diamond. Tiffany Jewelry You're dreaming! In your dreams. Wake up and smell the coffee.Where'd you get it!Good idea.Think it over.You can never tell about this sort of thing.Take a closer l Wake up and smell the coffee.Where'd you get it!Good idea.Think it over.You can never tell about this sort of thing.Take a closer look.When did I say that!You have to be on time. Don't be late. ook.When did I say that!You have to be on time. Don't be late.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/09/2009 at 01:12 AM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/09/2009 at 09:11 PM
Pervert! Let's get out of here. There are so many perverts here.So what? You are such a bad person Who's gonna like you? Tiffany Jewelry Don't mind him. Don't mind him. He's just playing. Forget him. He saw me steal the diamond. Tiffany Jewelry You're dreaming! In your dreams. Wake up and smell the coffee.Where'd you get it!Good idea.Think it over.You can never tell about this sort of thing.Take a closer l Wake up and smell the coffee.Where'd you get it!Good idea.Think it over.You can never tell about this sort of thing.Take a closer look.When did I say that!You have to be on time. Don't be late. ook.When did I say that!You have to be on time. Don't be late.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/09/2009 at 09:58 PM
بنت 18
شات بنت 18
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 03:39 AM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 11:20 AM
I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 02:50 AM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 10:08 AM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 04:00 PM
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 05:01 PM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/13/2009 at 08:17 AM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/13/2009 at 09:04 AM
I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/13/2009 at 09:52 AM
Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/14/2009 at 04:52 AM
بنت الكويت
شات بنت الكويت
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/15/2009 at 02:36 PM
Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/15/2009 at 05:35 PM