The ghost of Congressman Chisolm (who died in January) in an interesting comment states that the rhetoric of cost-benefit analysis "dangerously backgrounds challenging ethical ramifications," by which she means the disproportionate impact of Hurricane Katrina on the poor people (mainly black) of New Orleans. Many poor do not own automobiles and so found it difficult or impossible to comply with the initial evacuation order; later, of course, evacuation became impossible. What this shows, however, is not that cost-benefit analysis ignores the fact that people and groups are different in their access to various resources, but that an evacuation plan that assumed that everyone has a car would flunk a cost-benefit test, because the benefits of providing public transportation for those people would exceed the costs. The City of New Orleans could have had a fleet of buses cruising the city street before the hurricane struck and offering free transportation from the city to people who didn't have a car.
Katrina does underscore a point that should be obvious but tends to be neglected: poverty does not mean just having fewer physical goods than the nonpoor. It means living a riskier life, because among the resources that the well to do acquire are resources for protecting one's life and health.
It is not correct, as another comment states, that Becker and I think that New Orleans should be abandoned to teach the City a "nasty lesson." The question is simply whether rebuilding is worth the cost. The same question would arise if Beverly Hills was destroyed by a North Korean nuclear missile. Or consider that the World Trade Center is not being rebuilt--is that to teach New York a "nasty lesson"?
Another comment suggests that the port of New Orleans should be preserved. That may well be true. The question should be what parts of New Orleans should be preserved (say, the historic districts, for their tourist value, and the port) and how much of a residential hinterland would be required for the persons employed in the preserved areas. Some, undoubtedly, but it should be located on high ground. I certainly agree, by the way, that in comparing the costs of relocating the former New Orleans population elsewhere and rebuilding the city so that they can return, the attachment to place that many people have should be factored in as a cost of the relocation option. I don't want to truncate cost-benefit analysis, but only insist that it has an important role to play in guiding so immense an allocative decision as whether or to what extent to rebuild New Orleans.
I agree emphatically with the comment that people's thinking about the abandonment option is fogged by familiar cognitive errors--failing to treat sunk costs as bygones and inability to understand the most elementary statistical theory. So many people think that since New Orleans cost a great deal to become the city it was before the catastrophe, we should pay whatever it takes to restore it; and that now that the hurricane has come and gone, we are not due for another one of comparable magnitude for a long, long time--in fact the probability of another such hurricane tomorrow is the same as the probability of Hurricane Katrina before it was formed. A value of cost-benefit analysis is in combating these cognitive errors.
A subtler mistake is to assume that the issue of abandonment can arise only after disaster strikes. In principle, if the expected cost of disaster is great enough, a city should be abandoned before the disaster occurs. Indeed, the case for abandonment could be stronger, because the benefit would include averting the first disaster. Cutting the other way, however, is the fact (related to the sunk-costs point) that once disaster has struck, the cost of recovery becomes another cost of not abandoning, along with the expected cost of a future disaster that would nullify rebuilding efforts.
ed hardy
tiffany jewelry
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 04:10 AM
tiffany jewellery
tiffany jewellery
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 04:10 AM
Great article, I had a good laugh!links of london
tiffany jewelry
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/28/2009 at 03:02 AM
Thanks very much for the compilation!links london
tiffany jewellery
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 01:18 AM
Pervert! Let's get out of here. There are so many perverts here.So what? You are such a bad person Who's gonna like you? Tiffany Jewelry Don't mind him. Don't mind him. He's just playing. Forget him. He saw me steal the diamond. Tiffany Jewelry You're dreaming! In your dreams. Wake up and smell the coffee.Where'd you get it!Good idea.Think it over.You can never tell about this sort of thing.Take a closer l Wake up and smell the coffee.Where'd you get it!Good idea.Think it over.You can never tell about this sort of thing.Take a closer look.When did I say that!You have to be on time. Don't be late. ook.When did I say that!You have to be on time. Don't be late.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 01:19 AM
بنت الكويت
دردشة بنت الكويت
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/13/2009 at 08:01 AM
Just love tiffany and ugg boots,thanks!!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 02:51 AM
nt suggests that the port of New Orleans should be preserved. That may well be true. The question should be what parts of New Orleans should be preserved (say, the historic districts, for their tourist value, and the port) and how much of a residential hinterland would be required for the persons employed in the preserved areas. Some, undoubtedly, but it should be located on high ground. I certainly agree, by the way, that in comparing the costs of relocating the former New Orleans population elsewhere and rebuilding the city so that they can return, the attachment to place that many people have should be factored in as a cost of the relocation option. I don't want to truncate cost-benefit analysis, but only insist that it has an important role to play in gui
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Shoes | 06/05/2011 at 03:00 AM
I just realized I'll still be typing next week if I keep talking about the great stuff we've gotten, so I'm going to list it!
Posted by: mbt trainers | 08/01/2011 at 03:39 AM
The idea that anybody has some sort of obligation to answer every comment strikes me as absurd as claiming that blogs should be disregarded because they have no editors or fact checkers. It's an attempt to take over the discussion on someone else's bandwidth and dictate to the blog proprietors what they can write about.
Posted by: Discount Herve Leger | 08/15/2011 at 05:02 AM
I "like" you on Facebook. Would love these for my oldest boy!
Posted by: supra vaider shoes | 09/28/2011 at 08:19 AM
I had always wanted to learn about this topic ... I think it's great the way you expose .. great work and continuing on with this great blog
Posted by: muska supra shoes | 10/12/2011 at 12:21 PM
1940年代のドレスは、戦争の反射だった。単にレーヨンのような安価な生地で作られた、より洗練された結婚式ドレスへの彼女のクローゼットの中に最高のスーツだったささやかパーティードレスから、1940年代の花嫁はまだ彼女の結婚式の日に美しく見えると思った。
あなたがビンテージスタイルに興味があれば、1950年代の結婚式よりもあなたの大切な日に、古典的な性格を誇示するためには良い方法はありませんウェディングドレス格安.ほとんどの場合、白とスタイルに伝統的には、ささやかな、無邪気な花嫁の一部を見ていきます。
Posted by: vitabella | 12/08/2011 at 06:10 AM
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
But when it comes to getting those pet furs, a pet vacuum cleaner would be a perfect fit. Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black. Different people prefer different lures, lines, flies, leaders, hooks, weights, reels and rods. Laser printers in the less-than-300 dollar niche don't normally have the sort of array of features that this Brother has.. Of course this is a good service if you do not have the time to rifle through endless county records. Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black. he Pens Like all of their products, Cross fountain pens are truly masterpieces, revealing several features that add value to the instruments. There are other ways to find good antique tea sets and other tea items at wholesale prices. Nike Air Max 2012.
Article Source: http://www.sellairmax2012.com/
Posted by: sellairmax2012 | 05/30/2012 at 03:04 AM
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
But when it comes to getting those pet furs, a pet vacuum cleaner would be a perfect fit. Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black. Different people prefer different lures, lines, flies, leaders, hooks, weights, reels and rods. Laser printers in the less-than-300 dollar niche don't normally have the sort of array of features that this Brother has.. Of course this is a good service if you do not have the time to rifle through endless county records. Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black. he Pens Like all of their products, Cross fountain pens are truly masterpieces, revealing several features that add value to the instruments. There are other ways to find good antique tea sets and other tea items at wholesale prices. Nike Air Max 2012.
Article Source: http://www.sellairmax2012.com/
Posted by: sellairmax2012 | 05/30/2012 at 03:17 AM
Nike Air Max 2009 Womens Mesh Shoes Gery Pink
Nike Air Max 2009 Womens Mesh Shoes Gery Pink
Nike Air Max 2009 Womens Mesh Shoes Gery Pink
No matter what it may be, the Orion Cooker will do the same fine job for you too.. Nike Air Max 2012. You can get this case in different colors like black, red, yellow, blue, pink and so on and you can select according to your choice. Nike Air Max 2009 Womens Mesh Shoes Gery Pink. Bar stools are seats that are specifically designed for seating in public houses and bars. Definitely an inconvenience. Nike Air Max 2009 Womens Mesh Shoes Gery Pink. The most basic materials used on systems are: plastic, polycarbonate, acrylic, and glass. It might be shocking to you but it is true.
Article Source: http://www.sellairmax2012.com/
Posted by: sellairmax2012 | 05/30/2012 at 10:50 PM
Japans DJ Muro og kinetik linke op med Adidas Originals igen for et helt nyt samarbejde, der finder dem bringe luxe appel til den klassiske Ultrastar XL.
Posted by: nike free run tilbud | 06/30/2012 at 12:07 AM