Much has been written about the rioting by mainly Muslim youths of African descent in France, but few discussions have related them to the race riots by African-American youths in the 1960's. The lessons from these earlier riots are disturbing, but they have a couple of reassuring aspects as well.
Many economists have recognized for more than a decade that the generous minimum wages and other rigidities of the French labor market caused unemployment rates that have remained stubbornly high since the early 1990's. Immigrants, youths, and other new entrants into the labor market have been hurt the most since they have had the greatest difficulty finding jobs. The overall French unemployment rate is now almost 9 per cent- compared to about 5 per cent in the US- with a rate over 20 per cent for young persons. About 40 per cent of the unemployed have been without a regular job for over a year, a rate that is far higher than the American long-term unemployment rate. The French have intentionally avoided collecting separate economic data on Muslims, but the Muslim unemployment rate is estimated by labor economists in France at more than 20 per cent, with the unemployment rate for young Muslims probably exceeding 30 per cent.
The French labor market is sick, and needs reforms to make it more flexible, so that "insiders" with jobs have less of an advantage over "outsiders" looking for work. These reforms include making it easier for companies to let go of workers without expensive severance pay packages, lower minimum wage levels-the French minimum is one of the highest anywhere- reduced regulatory barriers to the formation of new companies, and lower social security and other taxes on employees. If the riots help exert greater pressure on French politicians to greatly free up the French labor market, they would have been of some value not only to Muslim youths, but also to all other French men and women who have been priced out of jobs.
An old and well-established rule of life is that the thoughts of young men turn to mischief when they have lots of time on their hands. Muslim and other African youths in many poor outer-city suburbs, the notorious banlieues, clearly have had lots of free time because many drop out of secondary school before receiving a diploma, and then they cannot easily get jobs. Seemingly small events, such as the violent accidental deaths of two youths in the French case, often set off a series of reactions that spread by word of mouth, and in these modern days also by cell phones and the internet. Copy-cat behavior, burning cars has been a favorite activity in the French riots, have spread to different poor French suburbs with African immigrants outside Paris, and then to the banlieues surrounding other cities.
The race riots in the US during the 1960's also started from what in retrospect looks like misinformation and relatively minor events. Yet there were more than 750 riots during the period 1964 to 1971 (the Watts riot was in 1965) that killed over 200 persons and injured thousands of others. After more than 10,000 incidents of arson, many black communities were in ruins.
Sociologists and economists have not succeeded in explaining which cities had riots and which avoided them. The likelihood of a riot is not explained by differences among cities in the black unemployment rate, in black incomes relative to those of whites, in rates at which blacks were advancing economically, in the education of blacks relative to whites, and so on for many other variables. Cities with relatively many blacks were more likely to have riots, and Northern cities were far more likely to have race riots than cities in the South, even though blacks were more numerous and worse off in the South.
Segregation of blacks into largely separate neighborhoods is an important factor, but practically all cities in the North with significant numbers of blacks have been highly segregated. It is interesting that Marseilles is one of the few major French cities that essentially escaped any rioting (at least so far). Its large Muslim population is not segregated into poor suburbs, but Muslims live in many different parts of Marseilles.
Although the cities and neighborhoods that experienced American race riots in the 1960's cannot be well explained even in retrospect, the economic position of blacks in rioting cities did suffer badly. The economic historian, Robert Margo, and a colleague at Vanderbilt examined the effects of the ‘60's riots on employment, incomes, and property values. They find that from 1960 to 1970 median black family income dropped by about 9 percent, and the median value of black-owned homes dropped even more, in cities with major riots compared with similar cities without such riots. From 1960 to 1980, male employment in cities with severe riots dropped several percentage points compared with otherwise similar cities.
This analysis suggests that the suburbs with riots in France will also suffer compared to Muslim and other African immigrant communities that did not riot. One bit of good news from the American riots for France and its Muslim population is that they have not reoccurred on a large scale during the subsequent more than 30 years. For example, the riots in black communities of Los Angeles in 1992 that began after a video film on television showed graphically the beating administered by LA policemen to a black man, Rodney King, caused considerable damage, but these riots did not result in many copy-cat riots in other American cities. Perhaps the negative effects of 1960's rioting on the jobs and wealth of blacks influenced their behavior during other later tense periods.
It is worth noting that whereas black families did advance a lot economically relative to white families during the 1960's and 1970's, my colleague Derek Neal has shown that the economic position of black families relative to that of white families fell a lot since 1980. This is in the face of greater affirmative action that may have benefited a small number of blacks. The main causes of the decline since 1980 are a further fall in the stability of black families, and the widening skill differential in earnings that started in the late 1970's. This decline in the relative position of blacks did not lead, as I indicated earlier, to any resumption of large-scale rioting. Although black unemployment has remained about twice that of whites, young blacks have been far more likely to find jobs than are young Muslims in France.
Perhaps these riots will give greater power to the few politicians in France who recognize that important economic reforms are needed to help all young Frenchmen get jobs, and to allow them to advance in the economic hierarchy when they demonstrate the requisite talent and ambition. Economics cannot predict with any confidence how such reforms will affect the prospects of further riots, but these reforms would surely improve the position of young immigrants, regardless of their religion or country of origin.
It seems from the comments that people feel that education, not adjustment of the minimum wage is the way to get at the problem of poverty in the US. The minimum wage is just that, minimum. It is not designed to be a "living wage" which is far different.
The other key is education. From my personal experience, the poor in the United States generally attend public schools that are not as good as the schools attended by children in more monied areas. No surprise there. But the culture of family life among the poor in the US is also very self destructive. Education has no value, and there is no family to provide any sense of value. It is very clear that to me that the poor need to begin taking responsibility for themselves in this regard. The break up of their families, the violence and general disregard for any set of moral standards is decaying all of US society. The government cannot help with this problem. Bill Cosby has been castigated by the African-American community as being not in touch, and an Uncle Tom by telling them they have to take responsibility for the poor value systems they are instilling in their children. He is correct though. The government needs to rethink its approach to education so that the children in impoverished neighborhoods have a chance at a good one.
Read Becker's and Milton Friedman's comments about vouchers. It would be a good start.
Posted by: jeff | 11/19/2005 at 05:47 AM
How can you speak of "the culture of family life among the poor"? Do you really think that family life is so homogenous that it is safe to make such a generalization because I certainly don't. In my experience the culture of family life among the poor is no better than the culture of family life among the rich. I have known more rich kids that were prone to steal, do drugs, and generally fail to recognize the negative consequences of their selfish actions on others than I have ever met poor kids who do so. The real secret behind the "culture of family life" is that if you are born with more resources and opportunites than others than you are more likely to possess those same resources and opportunities later in life and pass them on to your own kids.
Posted by: parrhesiastes | 11/19/2005 at 08:10 AM
Professor Becker,
I'm pretty sure there are thousands of people around the world, that have been unemployd for long, and have been struggling to make it. and I'm pretty sure that most of them do not express their disgrace by burning cars and causing riots... Do you think factors like, religion, education and perhaps family values / relations may be the important determinants to whether an individual will react with agression when in economic problems?
Posted by: Erich Kleiber | 11/20/2005 at 12:34 PM
Professor Becker, let me recommend you those two articles written by two professors:
http://www.vaisse.net/BiblioJustin/Articles/BiblioJustin-Understanding_Urban_Riots_in_France-NER-Nov05.htm
http://www.vaisse.net/BiblioJustin/Tribunes/BiblioJustin-Marx_not_Bin_Laden9Nov05.pdf
Sincerely,
Laurent
Posted by: guerby | 11/20/2005 at 01:42 PM
the issue here is that people have rioted becuase they view government (and their policies) as a source of their economic frustration.
Posted by: sand bass | 11/20/2005 at 02:08 PM
The 1992 L.A. riots were not prompted by the video of Rodney King being beaten, but instead by the "not guilty" verdict in the trial of the police officers in the incident.
Posted by: Jonny | 11/20/2005 at 05:08 PM
"By culture and family life" I mean exactly that. Is there a break down in the family among the poor in the United States? Of course there is. Not to pick on one segment of the population, but I think 80% of all black children are born out of wedlock. I would call that a break down of the family. Sure, others get divorced etc, but the morality in the poorer cultures is not at the same level as the richer segments of the population. For sure, the work ethic among the poor is not good. Because of the cycle of government give aways, they are looking for a hand out rather than a hand. Personal experiences aside, statistics are what they are. Until the poor in the United States begin to take resposibility for their own actions, no one can help them. Organized society has broken down, and the anarchy in New Orleans after the storm gave you a hint of that. It obviously is easy to pick on blacks, but I think that poor whites are in the same boat. They just are not featured as much in the mainstream media.
Posted by: Jeff | 11/21/2005 at 11:20 AM
The best analysis but I think you didn't consider the education system inefficiency in france and its effect on labor market.
Posted by: Ali | 11/22/2005 at 04:57 AM
nice
مركز تحميل
Posted by: Anonymous | 06/29/2009 at 09:19 PM
thanks
بنت الزلفي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/06/2009 at 04:43 AM
cr5ARc
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 02:41 AM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
شات صوتي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 06:14 AM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™
ÿØÿ±ÿØÿ¥ÿ©
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 11:14 AM
ÿØÿ±ÿØÿ¥ÿ©
___
صور
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 10:56 PM
Nice, this place is full shit, make me oral sex.
I am from Great and also now teach English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "It is better to have renters insurance and not need it than need it but not have it."
Thank you so much for your future answers :(. Finley.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/17/2009 at 04:56 PM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/22/2009 at 05:12 PM
I want to say - thank you for this!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 09:09 AM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 11:51 PM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 07:38 AM
I want to say - thank you for this!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 05:06 PM
دردشة برق
دردشة الخليج
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/29/2009 at 08:06 PM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/30/2009 at 10:53 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/31/2009 at 07:31 AM
I want to say - thank you for this!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/31/2009 at 04:14 PM
tvq58X Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/02/2009 at 10:07 PM