Let me respond briefly to some of the comments.
I do not know on what basis Mr. Fallows in the Atlantic Monthly believes that we have broken al Qaeda's operational capacity. Granted, we have seized or killed many of bin Laden's henchmen, and his sanctuary in Pakistan is less secure than his pre-9/11 sanctuary in Afghanistan, so it is fair to surmise that we have weakened al Qaeda. But the Heathrow plot suggests (though does not prove) that al Qaeda can still orchestrate a devastating, though fortunately foiled (well, al Qaeda's 1995 plot to blow up airliners over the Pacific was also foiled, and that didn't prove that al Qaeda had been broken), attack on the United States. It makes no difference whether al Qaeda employs British Muslims or Saudi Arabians to carry out the attacks that it plans.
I disagree with the comment that says that we should spend less on antiterrorism because terrorism kills fewer people than ordinary crimes. First, it is harder to limit terrorism than to limit ordinary crime; the terrorists are more determined and less deterrable. More important, the potential threat posed by terrorists in an era of proliferation is much greater than the potential threat posed by ordinary criminals.
When I said that our current expansive conception of civil liberties dates from a time we felt safer, I didn't mean to disparage the fear of nuclear war during the Cold War. After communist subversion in the United States was defeated in the late 1940s and early 1950s, we felt pretty safe from domestic threats, the kind of threats that put pressure on civil liberties. We no longer have that feeling of safety.
Finally, I was asked about profiling. I am not an enthusiast for profiling. Apart from the resentment it causes on the part of people (American Muslims) whom we very much want to keep loyal to the United States, it can be circumvented by recruitment of terrorists who do not fit th eprofile. More and more "white" Europeans are being converted to Islam and some of them may become terrorists. On the other hand, some limited, discreet profiling is efficient and I very much agree with the commenter who said there should be a "pass" from security checks for people who have security clearances or are otherwise certifiable as safe.
« Counteracting Terrorism-BECKER | Main | Response on Counteracting Terrorism-BECKER »
08/20/2006
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c031153ef013482fd900d970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Response to Comments on Terrorism--Posner:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Search
Become a Fan
Home Pages
June 2013
Recent Posts
- Reform of the Tax Code-Becker
- Tax Reform—Posner
- Abenomics and Japan’s Stagnation-Becker
- Should the European Union Emulate Japan's Inflationary Monetary Policy?—Posner
- China’s Tilt Toward the Private Sector? Becker
- The Chinese Economy—Posner
- Security Surveillance Cameras—Posner
- The Internet, Surveillance Cameras, and Misuse of Big Data-Becker
- The Rise in College Tuition and Student Loans-Becker
- College Costs and Quality—Posner
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 01:12 AM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 10:52 AM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 12:49 PM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/08/2009 at 08:32 PM
I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/08/2009 at 10:29 PM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/09/2009 at 06:18 AM
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/09/2009 at 02:09 PM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/09/2009 at 06:03 PM
بنت 18
شات بنت 18
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/09/2009 at 11:39 PM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/15/2009 at 02:12 PM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/15/2009 at 04:11 PM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/16/2009 at 02:01 AM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/16/2009 at 07:58 AM
Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 06:50 AM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 12:44 PM
Just love tiffany and ugg boots,thanks!!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/19/2009 at 02:38 AM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/07/2009 at 01:37 AM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/07/2009 at 01:38 AM
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/07/2009 at 03:48 AM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 04:32 PM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 04:33 PM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 06:19 PM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 06:19 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 09:54 PM
Great site. Good info.
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 11:39 PM