There were a number of interesting comments. I cannot reply to all of them, but I will reply to a few. One comment was that "wealthy private donors often take an interest in the results they are purchasing with their donations. Few would argue that government is equally demanding with its funds. Thus, an increase in government spending to replace charitable donations seems counter productive." I do not agree. The reason is that charitable foundations are perpetual, and are controlled by self-perpetuating boards of trustees. As a result, the original donors do not control a foundation. There is thus less monitoring of foundations than there is of government programs.
Another comment questions how eliminating charitable deductions from the estate tax would generate much tax revenue. "People will simply give whatever money they had otherwise intended to charity while they are still alive, noting they don't need tax deductions to do so." This might be largely true if there were no gift tax (it would not be completely true because, not knowing when they die or what their future expenses will be, people are reluctant to give away almost all their money before they die). There is and must be a gift tax to back up the estate tax.
The same commenter said that I am "radically underestimating the incentive effects of giving to one's offspring. Assume you can close all the 'loopholes' permanently and it is impossible to give one's wealth to one’s children (what a hideous thought) after death or while alive, then I assure you an awful lot of our most prolific job creators would either retire or stop being workaholics and instead take time out to smell the roses." This comment conflates closing loopholes with confiscatory tax rates. Even if there were no deductions, an estate tax of less than 100 percent would allow people who accumulated an estate to pass some of the money in the estate to their children or others, including charities.
Another commenter makes the following good point in defense of the estate tax: "Most of the wealth of these billionaires is not from income and has not been taxed, e.g. Balmer has not sold and rebought his Microsoft stock on which to pay capital gains, but has held it and his wealth is from appreciation that has not been taxed. So the estate taxes, for the most part, are taxes on money as it passed to heirs that has not yet been taxed.” When the heirs sell the stock, moreover, they pay income tax only on the difference between the value of the stock at the time of the donor's death and its current value, so that the appreciation in stock value during the donor's life is never taxed.
Finally, one unrelated and very strange comment: "I take great offense at your recent statements that all Muslims in America should be under surveillance." Neither recently nor ever have I made such a suggestion.
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/04/2009 at 05:01 AM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/04/2009 at 09:21 AM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/04/2009 at 10:48 AM
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/04/2009 at 06:53 PM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/04/2009 at 08:24 PM
Incredible site!.
I am from Burkina and also now'm speaking English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "The capacity of your vacuum cleaner is one of the main factors to consider."
Thank you so much for your future answers :o. Handheld vacuum cleaners.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/08/2009 at 06:27 AM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/08/2009 at 05:14 PM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/08/2009 at 07:46 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/12/2009 at 10:23 PM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/13/2009 at 03:49 AM
Great site. Good info.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/14/2009 at 02:38 AM
How are you. How we remember, what we remember and why we remember form the most personal map of our individuality.
I am from Andorra and learning to read in English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "The cpa flow conditioner is the simplest and most technically advanced."
Waiting for a reply 8), Homemade hair conditioners.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/14/2009 at 08:20 AM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/15/2009 at 02:19 AM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/15/2009 at 01:20 PM
I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/15/2009 at 05:01 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/15/2009 at 07:40 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/16/2009 at 01:05 AM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/16/2009 at 03:45 AM
I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/16/2009 at 09:23 AM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/16/2009 at 09:19 PM
I want to say - thank you for this!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/17/2009 at 04:07 PM
I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/18/2009 at 12:54 AM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 01:52 AM
شات الشلة
دردشة تعب قلبي
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 07:17 PM
شات حبي
شات الحب
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 07:21 PM