The conservative position on gun control has been that people who commit crimes (whether they use guns or some other weapon, or no weapon for that matter) should be punished heavily, depending on the gravity of crime and the probability of detection of crimes of that character, but that the possession of a gun should not be punished. This position is not responsive, however, to the problem of lunatics who use guns to commit mass murder as a prelude to committing suicide. When neither deterrence nor incapacitation is effective against some type of crime, preventive measures must be taken, and they include raising the price of some essential input. Because guns are more lethal than knives or fists, measure to raise the price of guns will not cause large-scale substitution into these other methods of murdering people; but it is important that measures to raise the price of guns also be taken against other efficient methods of mass murder, including explosives and biological weapons.
Becker's post explains convincingly how to raise the price of guns. I want to address the question whether Americans'love of guns is primarily an economic phenomenon or primarily a cultural one, for if the latter maybe some other method of reducing the demand for guns would be more effective. Most countries that we consider our peers, or at least approximate peers, have far lower rates of gun ownership. The proximate cause is restrictive gun laws, but these are democratic countries and they would not have such strict gun laws if their population had the same love of guns that ours does.
Building on Becker's interesting discussion of social interactions, one might speculate that the reason for widespread gun ownership by Americans is an arms-race phenomenon. Given a high rate of gun crimes, law-abiding people feel threatened and arm themselves. The more people who are armed, and thus the larger the demand for and supply of guns, the easier it is for criminals to procure guns through theft; also, the criminal demand for guns rises because criminals want to protect themselves against armed victims. And the more armed criminals there are, the more gun ownership by law-abiding people--the potential victims of gun crimes--there is. The result is a spiraling increase in gun ownership.
But I do not find this explanation convincing, since the spiral could be broken by the type of measures that Becker describes that would raise the price of guns. Moreover, it is apparent that a vast number of Americans like guns, rather than thinking of them merely as instruments of self-protection. Their attitude towards guns is different from their attitudes toward locks and alarm systems.
History seems relevant here. The United States was born in a revolution in which the arms used by the revolutionaries were to a large extent privately purchased and owned. Hunting was widespread (in contrast, in England and other European countries, hunting was a monopoly or aristocrats), and guns were also required for personal defense against Indians in frontier settlements, which were numerous. Hostility to standing armies led to the adoption of the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which created a right to bear arms tied to a policy of relying on the state militias as a defense not only against foreign invaders but also against domestic tyranny. Private ownership and use of guns continued to play a large role in American life with the settlement of the West amidst Indian threats and widespread lawlessness memorialized in the immensely popular "Westerns" of twentieth-century cinema. The Colt .45 revolver (the "Peacemaker") became the symbol of the pacification of the West. Private violence, much of it gun-inflicted, characterized the South in the Reconstruction era and later much of the country during Prohibition. Violent criminals such as Billy the Kid and John Dillinger became celebrated and in some quarters even admired. I am not aware of another developed country that has had a similar romance of the gun. The paranoid Right in the United States fears that efforts to disarm the population are a prelude to a military coup d’état, though they do not explain how the possession of pistols, rifles, and shotguns would enable civilians to foil such a coup.
Suppose, then, that the demand for guns is more cultural than instrumental, in the same way that the demand for particular foods is often a function of upbringing rather than cost, nutrition, or healthfulness (though these factors of course influence demand). How might such a demand be altered? Higher prices could do it, but the problem is that as long as the cultural demand is strong, the political system is unlikely to adopt measures that would make guns significantly more costly. The National Rifle Association, an enormously skillful lobbying organization, has persuaded the public that measures to keep guns out of the hands of criminals are bound to limit, as a practical matter, gun ownership by the law abiding as well.
Government sometimes engages in campaigns of public education to change people's habits; smoking is a notable example. Political opposition can be circumvented, to a degree anyway, when the campaign is mounted by a federal agency that enjoys a degree of autonomy--the Surgeon General of the United States, for example, although a presidential appointee, has often displayed a degree of political independence. In addition, the politics of gun ownership and gun control are not uniform across the country. In most cities, and throughout much of the northeast, guns are more feared than loved. High-visibility local politicians, such as Mayor Bloomberg in New York and Mayor Daley in Chicago, can command large audiences for messages proclaiming the desirability of stronger gun controls. A few more college mass-murder suicide episodes, and antigun messages may begin to strike strongly responsive chords.
بنت الزلفي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/07/2009 at 01:17 PM
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™ ŸÖÿµÿ±
--
دردشة مصرية
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/15/2009 at 06:17 AM
2g49qb
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/15/2009 at 08:24 AM
Thanks for all the great information.
I am from Croatia and , too, and now am writing in English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "Allen overy has advised deutsche bank ag dubai as arranger on the establishment of a programme for shari compliant securities referenced."
:-( Thanks in advance. Mortimer.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/22/2009 at 06:22 PM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 02:11 AM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 11:13 AM
thanks for your
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™
دردشه
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 06:33 PM
thanks to tell me that,i think thats ao usefully----
tiffanys
links of london
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 04:49 AM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 09:06 AM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 06:53 PM
Great site. Good info.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/31/2009 at 09:00 AM
دردشة برق
دردشة الخليج
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/31/2009 at 05:26 PM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/31/2009 at 05:43 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/01/2009 at 02:22 AM
ZDrisl Great work, webmaster, nice design!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/02/2009 at 10:58 AM
227upn If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/03/2009 at 01:09 AM
SM1Czf Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/03/2009 at 03:03 AM
I have been here many times and have always found this to be.
I am from Qatar and know bad English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "Ibibo blogs wedding is proudly powered by ibibo blogs.Suppliers products stores buying leads product id."
Regards 8) Lara.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/07/2009 at 08:59 AM
Hi everyone. I love my past. I love my present. I'm not ashamed of what I've had, and I'm not sad because I have it no longer.
I am from Pakistan and too poorly know English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Piemonte bathroom range by be modern."
Thank you so much for your future answers :-(. Bathroom log furniture.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/11/2009 at 02:52 AM
Good evening. I am doomed to an eternity of compulsive work. No set goal achieved satisfies. Success only breeds a new goal. The golden apple devoured has seeds. It is endless.
I am from Mauritania and too bad know English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "Has maryland medical insurance lead experts and maryland medical insurance lead expert witnesses."
With love :D, health insurance lead generation.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/17/2009 at 02:13 PM
شات حبي
شات الحب
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 09:00 PM
شات الشلة
دردشة تعب قلبي
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 09:00 PM
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™ ÿØŸÑÿπ
شات الود
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 09:01 PM
tiffany jewellery
ed hardy
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/22/2009 at 01:34 AM
links of london
abercrombie and fitch
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/22/2009 at 01:34 AM