« Will the Decline in Union Membership be Reversed? Becker | Main | Protectionism in a Depression--Posner »

01/25/2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c031153ef0133efd38553970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Employee Free Choice Act--Posner:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Ken

Can you give us some examples of nonadversarial unions?

Ken

Jim

It is hard to decide which is more responsible for the decline in the US manufacturing base, the unions or the management. I suspect that both were greedy and shortsighted. But I digress; We all know that advocate organizations live on and on for their own selfish reasons long after there is no need for their function. I wonder if the unions fall into that category

Linda

In my opinion the unions do fall into that category.

Ron Efron

Would autoworkers have made it to the middle
class without the UAW ? Doesn't the UAW combine adverserial and nonadverserial features ? Isn't that what we need if we are going to combine economic growth with equity ?

neilehat

The same can also be said of Management. Remember, it takes two to Tango. Adversarial Unions are the result of Adversarial Management and vice-versa.

I wonder how the Courts would work without the Adversarial System. Would it be "Mitigate, don't Litigate"?

Peter

What about unions in the public sector (police, fire, public works employees)? Most of these types of workplaces aren't engaged in active competition, though you briefly bring up education unions, which I would think would operate along the same lines. Why do you feel adversarial unions in this context are just as harmful?

On another note, if I understand it correctly, the card signing provision would apply not just to new unionization, but also to existing workplaces that want to change their representation to a different union. Maybe this provision would make it easier for workers to change unions when the union isn't working in their best interest, which seems like a net benefit.

Jack

Would it be crass to discuss one of the strongest unions this side of the AMA? That of the American Bar Assn? A private association that has somehow become a monopoly for representing a citizen in our own public court system.

The high barriers to entry, and with much of the work done by low paid clerical help and paralegals while the hourly fees seem, curiously similar? If we were going for efficiency surely routine divorces and civil matters could be competently handled by paralegals with a few years of experience. Shouldn't the consumer have the right to choose the level of service desired?

Jack

The Union Way Up
Monday 26 January 2009
by: Robert B. Reich, The Los Angeles Times

America and its faltering economy need unions to restore prosperity to the middle class.

Why is this recession so deep, and what can be done to reverse it?

Hint: Go back about 50 years, when America's middle class was expanding and the economy was soaring. Paychecks were big enough to allow us to buy all the goods and services we produced. It was a virtuous circle. Good pay meant more purchases, and more purchases meant more jobs.

At the center of this virtuous circle were unions. In 1955, more than a third of working Americans belonged to one. Unions gave them the bargaining leverage they needed to get the paychecks that kept the economy going. So many Americans were unionized that wage agreements spilled over to nonunionized workplaces as well. Employers knew they had to match union wages to compete for workers and to recruit the best ones.

Fast forward to a new century. Now, fewer than 8% of private-sector workers are unionized. Corporate opponents argue that Americans no longer want unions. But public opinion surveys, such as a comprehensive poll that Peter D. Hart Research Associates conducted in 2006, suggest that a majority of workers would like to have a union to bargain for better wages, benefits and working conditions. So there must be some other reason for this dramatic decline.

But put that question aside for a moment. One point is clear: Smaller numbers of unionized workers mean less bargaining power, and less bargaining power results in lower wages.

It's no wonder middle-class incomes were dropping even before the recession. As our economy grew between 2001 and the start of 2007, most Americans didn't share in the prosperity. By the time the recession began last year, according to an Economic Policy Institute study, the median income of households headed by those under age 65 was below what it was in 2000.

Typical families kept buying only by going into debt. This was possible as long as the housing bubble expanded. Home-equity loans and refinancing made up for declining paychecks. But that's over. American families no longer have the purchasing power to keep the economy going. Lower paychecks, or no paychecks at all, mean fewer purchases, and fewer purchases mean fewer jobs.

The way to get the economy back on track is to boost the purchasing power of the middle class. One major way to do this is to expand the percentage of working Americans in unions.

Tax rebates won't work because they don't permanently raise wages. Most families used the rebate last year to pay off debt - not a bad thing, but it doesn't keep the virtuous circle running.

Bank bailouts won't work either. Businesses won't borrow to expand without consumers to buy their goods and services. And Americans themselves can't borrow when they're losing their jobs and their incomes are dropping.

Tax cuts for working families, as President Obama intends, can do more to help because they extend over time. But only higher wages and benefits for the middle class will have a lasting effect.

Unions matter in this equation. According to the Department of Labor, workers in unions earn 30% higher wages - taking home $863 a week, compared with $663 for the typical nonunion worker - and are 59% more likely to have employer-provided health insurance than their nonunion counterparts.

Examples abound. In 2007, nearly 12,000 janitors in Providence, R.I., New Hampshire and Boston, represented by the Service Employees International Union, won a contract that raised their wages to $16 an hour, guaranteed more work hours and provided family health insurance. In an industry typically staffed by part-time workers with a high turnover rate, a union contract provided janitors with full-time, sustainable jobs that they could count on to raise their families' - and their communities' - standard of living.

In August, 65,000 Verizon workers, represented by the Communications Workers of America, won wage increases totaling nearly 11% and converted temporary jobs to full-time status. Not only did the settlement preserve fully paid healthcare premiums for all active and retired unionized employees, but Verizon also agreed to provide $2 million a year to fund a collaborative campaign with its unions to achieve meaningful national healthcare reform.

Although America and its economy need unions, it's become nearly impossible for employees to form one. The Hart poll I cited tells us that 57 million workers would want to be in a union if they could have one. But those who try to form a union, according to researchers at MIT, have only about a 1 in 5 chance of successfully doing so.

The reason? Most of the time, employees who want to form a union are threatened and intimidated by their employers. And all too often, if they don't heed the warnings, they're fired, even though that's illegal. I saw this when I was secretary of Labor over a decade ago. We tried to penalize employers that broke the law, but the fines are minuscule. Too many employers consider them a cost of doing business.

This isn't right. The most important feature of the Employee Free Choice Act, which will be considered by the just-seated 111th Congress, toughens penalties against companies that violate their workers' rights. The sooner it's enacted, the better - for U.S. workers and for the U.S. economy.

The American middle class isn't looking for a bailout or a handout. Most people just want a chance to share in the success of the companies they help to prosper. Making it easier for all Americans to form unions would give the middle class the bargaining power it needs for better wages and benefits. And a strong and prosperous middle class is necessary if our economy is to succeed.

lower back pain

If I understand it correctly, the card signing provision would apply not just to new unionization, but also to existing workplaces that want to change their representation to a different union. Maybe this provision would make it easier for workers to change unions when the union isn't working in their best interest, which seems like a net benefit.

bar chairs

I really felt I was looking in your life's window and seeing a real person in your dad. Thanks for this.

floor jack

A great tribute. Having been reading your stories for a while, I'm not surprised that much that you come from such a wonderfully multi-dimensional fathe

hydraulic jacks

This was very nice. I enjoyed meeting your dad through your matured perception of him. When we are younger we often don't realize that which we appreciated in our parents all along, but weren't aware in the throes of our youth and ignorance.

booster cable

Words can't do this fine piece justice - I'd give you one of Linda's hugs if she'd lend me one.

non-woven fabric

But even without knowing all those logical fallacies and inconsistencies—I instinctively realized that entire debate fiasco was a crock of bullshit.

dust maskss

Wonderful to see your great hockey story from Minnesota, the 11th Canadian province and the land of pond hockey.

Medical mask

I'm the same as you about following hockey, but I live in Boston, so yay Bruins, and can we now return to normal?

Steroid

1960s rick muscle today world sites supplement physique fact workout workouts inhibit popular took phytoestrogens synthol bronze level adequate sports.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Become a Fan

May 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31