By all accounts, President Obama's visit to China last week was pretty much a failure on all the major issues, which include China's contributions to climate change, nuclear weapons, and various aspects of the world economy. I will concentrate my discussion on two of the most important and closely related economic issues: the valuation of the Chinese currency, the renminbi, and the huge assets accumulated by China that are mainly held in the form of US Treasury bills and other US government assets.
The Chinese central bank held the value of the renminbi fixed relative to the US dollar at a little over 8 renminbi per dollar during the 1990s, and until 2005. It then allowed the renminbi to appreciate gradually to less than 7 per dollar until 2008, when it again fixed the rate of exchange between these currencies at about 6.9 renminbi per dollar. This exchange rate is considerably above a free market rate that would be determined in a regime of flexible exchange rates. So there is no doubt that China is intentionally holding the value of its currency below the rate that would equate supply and demand.
The dollar has depreciated substantially relative to other currencies since May of 2009. Since the renminbi is tied again to the dollar, the renminbi has depreciated by the same amounts, including 16% against the euro, 34 % against the Australian dollar, 25% against the Korean won, and 10 % against the Japanese yen. This substantially depreciation of the Chinese currency has made many other countries angry at China's policy of locking it to the US dollar.
President Obama apparently complained to Hu Jintao, President of the People's Republic of China, about the low value of the renminbi, and urged China to allow it to appreciate substantially. The US and other countries worry that the undervaluation of the Chinese currencyi increases the demand for Chinese exports, and reduces China's demand for imports from countries like the US because China keeps the dollar and the currencies of other countries artificially expensive relative to their currency. America and other countries hope that greater demand from China for their exports resulting from a higher value of the renminbi will help these countries resume sizable economic growth as they recover from this severe recession. They especially want to help reduce the high levels of unemployment found in many of these nations.
Indeed, in good part due to the low value of its currency, China has run substantial surpluses on its current trade account as it imports fewer goods and services than it exports. The result is that China has accumulated enormous reserves of assets in foreign currencies, especially in the form of US government assets denominated in dollars. As of September of this year, China had the incredible sum of over 2 trillion dollars in foreign currency reserves, such as US Treasury bills. This is by far the highest reserve in the world, and it amounts to the enormous ratio of more than one quarter of China's GDP of about $8 trillion (purchasing power parity adjusted).
I am dubious about the wisdom of both America's complaints about China's currency policy and of China's responses. On the whole, I believe that most Americans benefit rather than are hurt by China's long standing policy of keeping the renminbi at an artificially low exchange value. For that policy makes the various goods imported from China, such as clothing, furniture, and small electronic devices, much cheaper than they would be if China allowed its currency to appreciate substantially in value. The main beneficiaries of this policy are the poor and lower middle class Americans and those elsewhere who buy Chinese made goods at remarkably cheap prices in stores like Wal-Mart's that cater to families who are cost conscious.
To be sure, US companies that would like to export more to China are hurt by the maintenance of the Chinese currency at an artificially low value relative to the dollar. As a result, employment by these companies is lower than it would be, so that this may contribute a little to the high rate of US unemployment. But I believe the benefits to American consumers far outweigh any loses in jobs, particularly as the US economy continues its recovery, and unemployment rates come back to more normal levels.
Since the opposite effects hold for China, I cannot justify their policies from the viewpoint of their interests. Their consumers and importers are hurt because the cost of foreign goods to them is kept artificially high. Their exporters gain, but as in the US, that gain is likely to be considerably smaller than the negative effects on the wellbeing of the average Chinese family.
I reach similar conclusions about China's accumulation of their excessive reserves. The US has little to complain if China wants to hold such high levels of low interest-bearing US government assets in exchange for selling goods cheaply to the US and other countries. China's willingness to save so much reduces the need for Americans and others to save more, but is not differences in savings rates also part of the international specialization that global markets encourage? To be sure, why China is willing to do this is difficult to understand since they are giving away goods made with hard work and capital for paper assets that carry little returns.
One common answer is that China hopes to increase its influence over economic and geo-political policies by holding so many foreign assets. Yet it seems to me just the opposite is true, that China's huge levels of foreign assets puts China more at the mercy of US and other policies than visa versa. China can threaten to sell large quantities of its US Treasury bills and other US assets, but what will they buy instead? Presumably, they would buy EU or Japanese government bills and bonds. That will put a little upward pressure on interest rates on US governments, but to a considerable extent, the main effect in our integrated world capital market is that sellers to China of euro and yen denominated assets would then hold the US Treasuries sold by China.
On the other hand, the US can threaten to inflate away some of the real value of its dollar denominated assets-not an empty threat because of the large US government fiscal deficits, and the sizable growth in US bank excess reserves. Inflation would lower the exchange value of the dollar, and also of the renminbi, as long as China keeps it tied to the dollar. That would further increase the current account surpluses of China, and thereby induce China to hold more US and other foreign assets, not a very attractive scenario to China.
So my conclusion is that the US in its own interest should not be urging China to appreciate its currency- countries like India have a much greater potential gain from such an appreciation. On the other hand, I see very little sense at this stage of China's development in maintaining a very low value of its currency, and accumulating large quantities of reserves. Paradoxically, President Obama and President Jintao should each have been arguing the others positions on these economic issues.
Very educated and specially FX trader have taken knowledge of foreign exchange for increasing large money balance by this website. So very much people, business man, traders have become richest. If you want to increase your balance you should click on http://www.onlineforexfuturestrading.com/
Posted by: Robin William | 08/06/2010 at 08:25 AM
You gave great points here. I did some research on the subject and have found nearly all people agree with your blog.
Posted by: oil paintings | 09/01/2010 at 10:26 PM
Many of the details of this write-up are great but had me personally wanting to know, did they really mean that? One thing I have got to say is your publishing expertise are very good and I will certainly be coming back for any fresh blog post you make, you may possibly have a new admirer. I saved the website for personal reference.
Posted by: lower back pain | 11/23/2010 at 10:17 AM
I won't give up*_*
Posted by: supra skytops | 11/27/2010 at 09:11 PM
I liked the information you contained in it. I will bookmark your site to check if you write more about in the future. Many thanks!
Posted by: air max shoes | 12/02/2010 at 09:50 AM
'Tis beauty truly blent, whose red and white
Nature's own sweet and cunning hand laid on.
Posted by: Air Jordan 13 | 12/16/2010 at 03:27 AM
Whether your design project is a new building or a retro fit, Automatic door offers a door to meet
your needs. We only sell and install products that are developed using the latest in
technology and you can be assured that our certified AAADM installers will do the job
right so you can enjoy your Automatic
door for years.
There is currently an overstock on aluminium
Posted by: coach tote bags | 12/18/2010 at 02:57 AM
*People enjoy the characters are not happy.
Posted by: Replica Christian Louboutin Shoes | 12/21/2010 at 12:47 AM
Lying in the mud only people who never before would not fall into a pit.
Posted by: supra shoes | 01/10/2011 at 08:03 PM
In last year's State of the Union, Obama declared job creation his "No. 1 focus," then spent much of 2010 on other priorities like overhauling healthcare and Wall Street rules.
With the elevated unemployment rate still ranking as Americans' top concern, there is little doubt jobs will again be the centerpiece of Obama's speech.
But more than ever before, Obama is also expected to use the annual address to cast himself as more of a fiscal hawk, possibly a tough sell for a leader presiding over trillion-dollar-plus annual budget deficits.
Posted by: employment genius | 02/07/2011 at 07:07 AM
This is the kind of thing that continues me though out the day. I’ve been searching around for your article after I heard about them from a buddy and was pleased when I was able to find it after searching for some time. Being a avid blogger, I’m happy to see others taking initiative and contributing to the community. I just wanted to comment to show my appreciation for your post as it’s very encouraging, and many writers do not get the credit they deserve. I am sure I’ll be back and will send some of my friends.
Posted by: ugg slippers | 03/09/2011 at 09:07 PM
Yes, China should allow its currency to appreciate. This will help the value of the dollar.
Posted by: Funeral Home Supplies | 03/15/2011 at 08:28 PM
This is really interesting, You're a very skilled blogger. I've joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I have shared your site in my social networks!
Posted by: cureme | 03/26/2011 at 10:22 AM
is really interesting, You're a very skilled blogger
Posted by: supra shoes | 04/12/2011 at 05:29 AM
thanks for taking the time in making it and sharing it
now everytime someone asks a question related to B&W coloring I will refer them to this list
Posted by: cheap Sunglasses | 04/14/2011 at 09:00 PM
Second Day: Fast. Severely restrict your calories on this day and you will burn fat rapidly. Think about it, on Day 1 you created a fantastic fat-burning body that has a fast
Posted by: lebron james shoes | 05/20/2011 at 10:05 PM
Just the fact that you noticed your anxiety about his need for autonomy makes you a great mother to Jake. Be sensitive to this as you are but I would keep a sharp eye out for him. I only say that because I am a nervous mom myself.
Posted by: dust maskss | 06/27/2011 at 10:04 PM
You are a hockey fan indeed. You are right though, if one is not a hockey fan, one must look for it if one wants to watch it. I am glad I read this nice story, I learned much. R
Posted by: Protective masks | 06/27/2011 at 10:05 PM
This was just terrific - real bits of human emotion woven into fan appreciation and your trademark brand of humor. I am very happy to see this on the cover.
Posted by: extension cords | 06/27/2011 at 10:07 PM
Just goes to show that however well you think you might know someone, there are depths, angles and aspects that can surprise you. Nicely written piece Mary.
Posted by: crystal laser | 06/27/2011 at 10:09 PM
Thanks for sharing your story Mary, and its sweet ending.
Posted by: crystal box | 06/27/2011 at 10:10 PM
I had a similar issue happen to me only it was cyberly. It hurts but like you said everyone seems to go along with it and it is wrong.
Posted by: folding umbrella | 06/27/2011 at 10:12 PM
This strikes me as an extended rationalization regarding why this particular book isn't worth the effort.
Posted by: Umbrella Company | 06/27/2011 at 10:13 PM
I loved this.. instead of the usual missive about what was missing in your relationship, you embraced it and told about it well. I can picture you in the truck with the open road and Willie Nelson. Well done, enjoyed.
Posted by: Outdoor umbrella | 06/27/2011 at 10:14 PM
How sweet. You two should take one last fun road trip together before he goes to the great highway in the sky.
Posted by: Garden umbrella | 06/27/2011 at 10:14 PM