Both supporters and opponents of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 usually confuse its short term-stimulus effects on the economy, and its long-term effects on economic growth. I would give it a grade of C+ as a short-term stimulus to the economy, and a grade of B+ for its effects on longer-term growth.
The Act provides for a one-year two-percentage point reduction in employee contributions to social security taxes at an estimated cost in tax revenue of over $100 billion. This will add a significant amount to the budgetary deficit for the year going forward, while providing very little short-term stimulus. Even the most simplistic Keynesian analysis recognizes that a one-year tax reduction will be mainly saved in order to spread out the added consumption from this additional “wealth” of households over more than a single year. In economics terminology, a one-year tax relief would be considered a transitory increase in income rather than a permanent increase.
Evaluating the desirability of the extension of unemployment compensation to the long term unemployed (up to 99 weeks of unemployment) is more complicated. Although, like the social security rebate, this also is just a temporary windfall to these unemployed, they are likely to have exhausted their liquid assets during their long period of being unemployed. They would tend to become liquidity constrained, and hence would consume a large part of their unemployment benefits.
This extension of benefits to the long-term unemployed could have been made more or less revenue-neutral by reducing, or preferably eliminating, unemployment compensation to the men and women who have been unemployed for less than 3 months (they constitute about 40% of all unemployed). The great majority of the short-term unemployed are not liquidity constrained since they can finance their unemployment from savings, earnings of spouses, and borrowing from relatives and friends.
Unemployment benefits as insurance against the risks of becoming unemployed are best concentrated on the longer-term unemployed because they are more likely to have run out of assets. Just as with other insurance, the optimal unemployment insurance would have a sizable deductible-that is, little payment during the first several months of unemployment- and then significant insurance coverage for longer-term unemployment. Also, as with other insurance, a good program tries to protect against moral hazard; that is, against the unemployed not looking for jobs because they prefer to continue to collect unemployment checks. Such moral hazard considerations imply that payments should begin to fall, and eventually be eliminated, after say six months or so of unemployment. One exception would be during and shortly after severe recessions, as at present.
The largest component of this Tax Relief Act is the extension of the Bush-era tax cuts on incomes, dividends, capital gains, and estates. This extension will have some relatively short-term benefits to the economy by stimulating investments and the formation and expansion of small businesses, but the main case for extending these tax cuts is their effects on longer-term economic growth. The growth rate in per capita incomes is determined mainly by the rates of investments in human and physical capital, and by technological progress. Both these drivers of economic growth are in good part in turn determined by tax rates on personal and business incomes.
I view the maintenance of the Bush tax cuts as only the first important move of the American tax code toward a more effective income tax structure. That structure would have a broad-based low rate flat tax on personal incomes, with little, if any, taxation of corporate incomes, and with dividends and capital gains taxed as ordinary income. As the majority report of the recent National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform proposed, the income base should be greatly broadened by eliminating the deductibility of interest on mortgages, and a variety of other special deductions that result from the political influence of various special interests.
I showed in a post last month (see 11/07/10) that even a one-half percent increase in the American long-term rate of economic growth would have a large effect in 20 years on both per capita incomes, and on the size of the US debt relative to its GDP, as long as the rate of growth in government spending was not allowed to increase along with the growth in incomes. Control over the rate of growth of spending is essential even with faster economic growth in order to try to prevent the debt to GDP ratio from becoming a major problem.
A broad-based flat income tax could have a relatively modest tax rate- perhaps about 25%- and still raise as much revenue as the tax structure that would exist if the Bush tax cuts were allow to lapse. A flat consumption tax would be even better than a flat income tax since such a consumption tax would not distort the incentive to save. However, this type of consumption tax is unlikely to be introduced as a substitute for the income tax. It could play a role as a supplement to the income tax if that combination were necessary to prevent a narrow-based progressive income tax system from being imposed.
Nobody has ever before asked the nuclear family to live all by itself in a box the way we do. With no relatives, no support, we've put it in an impossible situation. ~Margaret Mead
Posted by: Our Daily Bread | 01/04/2011 at 09:07 PM
Im impressed. I dont think Ive met anyone who knows as much about this subject as you do. Youre truly well informed and very intelligent. You wrote something that people could understand and made the subject intriguing for everyone. Really, great blog youve got here.
Posted by: wireless headphones | 01/05/2011 at 07:13 AM
Okay article. I simply found your blog site and wished to say I’ve definitely enjoyed reading through your thoughts. By any signifies I’ll be subscribing for a feed and I genuinely hope you write-up once more quickly….
Posted by: karen millen | 01/09/2011 at 11:51 PM
only for a moment and thr moment was gone.
Posted by: karen millen | 01/09/2011 at 11:53 PM
so wonderful
Posted by: karen millen | 01/09/2011 at 11:54 PM
Good post. More related discount information up to 50%-80% at http://www.rosettastoneca.com/ , http://www.toysgiftsrus.com
Posted by: rose | 01/10/2011 at 02:02 AM
Department of Theravada in the public believes that the other three thousand worlds
Posted by: coach outlet | 01/14/2011 at 12:05 AM
In my opinion tax means getting some money from rich and give that money to the poor people. But now a days its so different.
Posted by: çocuk sandalyesi | 01/16/2011 at 05:23 AM
Living in the lap of luxury isn't bad except that you never know when luxury is going to stand
Posted by: supra tk society | 01/21/2011 at 08:32 PM
I love that we can sit in the silence together and know that silence is ok!
Posted by: Coach Competitive Products | 01/26/2011 at 07:39 PM
Really want information from expert in auto insurane. It seems that several people who have given their specific info to one of the numerous "online auto insurance quotes" and after this they have solicitors all around them, e-mails, on their phone, junk postal mail and not to mention one case of Social Security Identity theft. Therefore my question for you is: Are these web based car insurance quotes really risk-free? Doesn't it seem appropriate to stay with a local car insurance agent you're able to do business with both on the phone or in person.
Posted by: Alliance United | 01/27/2011 at 06:05 AM
Those on the left deemed it to be very pro-business, while conservatives criticized it as placing too much emphasis on new spending programs.
Posted by: Gorge | 01/27/2011 at 10:27 PM
Learn much happier, even though sad, also want to smile.
People must learn to do things XinHen honey-lipped cold-blooded, only despiseth learn selvesor I good good person.
Learn to loneliness, no one will take you as treasure protect a, the world is always lonely.
Posted by: google | 03/11/2011 at 02:05 AM
I think So time has inevitably come for the middle class and poor to start paying a non trivial portion of the bill, a bill that their very own central planning and class-warfare utopia created...
Posted by: Bathroom Wholesale | 03/15/2011 at 01:22 AM
This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.
Posted by: mbt walking shoes | 03/16/2011 at 03:19 AM
This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.
Posted by: mbt walking shoes | 03/16/2011 at 03:19 AM
this in formation are very important
related to the short term employment and all the comment related to the tax relief are absolutely so good that i like it .and i am seeing on tax attorney
Posted by: santy02 | 03/18/2011 at 12:07 AM
those parents split up at higher rates. That is dangerous and unsupported territory, unsupported if only because there is not enough data - openly gay couples raising children being a relatively new phenomenon. A couple staying married throughout their childrens' youth does not necessarily equal a happily-married couple. Many couples stay together "for the kids," which often breeds resentment which is often directed at the marriage partner. I would venture that kids observing this dynamic growing up might have more problems forming healthy adult relationships than those exposed to a happily-married gay couple, even if that couple eventually splits up
Posted by: asics running shoes | 03/18/2011 at 03:36 AM
Unemployment benefits as insurance against the risks of becoming unemployed are best concentrated on the longer-term unemployed because they are more likely to have run out of assets. Just as with other insurance, the optimal unemployment insurance would have a sizable deductible-that is, little payment during the first several months of unemployment- and then significant insurance after say six months or so of unemployment. One exception would be during and shortly after severe recessions, as at present.
all the above comment are very good and this blg provide the very good information related to the tax relief it also provide benefit the information related to the unemployment benefit related to the insorance and tax relief provided by the tax attorney are very good service related to the all
the information of taxTax Relief
Posted by: santy02 | 03/18/2011 at 11:16 AM
Well Just as with other insurance, the optimal unemployment insurance would have a sizable deductible-that is, little payment during the first several months of unemployment-and then significant insurance coverage for longer-term unemployment.
Posted by: Organic Baby Products | 03/25/2011 at 05:51 AM
The title of the post is Tax and Spending compromise. But there is only a Tax compromise, virtually nothing is done on the Spending front. Spending remains more or less on autopilot. The spending heavyweights of Social Security, Medicare, Military Capability/Operations and now ObamaCare added to the mix, continue unabated their march towards subduing significant portions of future incomes to serve central plans and thus moving towards an eventual environment of much reduced incentives to produce – hence loss of America’s fundamental differentiating factor from the rest of the world, and an inevitable vicious cycle of economic decline.
Posted by: Alley | 03/25/2011 at 11:38 PM
I like the helpful info you provide in your articles. I??ll bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly. I am quite sure I??ll learn many new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!
Posted by: Health Lab | 03/25/2011 at 11:59 PM
We're a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your site offered us with valuable information to work on. You have done a formidable job and our whole community will be thankful to you.
Posted by: Sciatica | 03/26/2011 at 01:09 AM
Hi, i think that i saw you visited my web site so i came to ??return the favor??.I'm trying to find things to improve my website!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!
Posted by: Safe | 03/26/2011 at 02:10 AM
The largest component of this Tax Relief Act is the extension of the Bush-era tax cuts on incomes, dividends, capital gains, and estates...
Posted by: Amy Laurent | 03/29/2011 at 10:07 AM