I consider myself a conservative (or classical liberal). But I don't understand Professor Becker's argument against the estate tax. If there was an estate (death) tax of 75% it would certainly be unfair, it would punish the proginy of the hardworker, but would it really discourage hardwork and economic success. The incentive for success seems to me to be rooted much more in the here and now.

I'm just thinking about this from a personal perspective. I have two daughters. I work hard and create a business, a product, a service, I manage and grow the business. When I die, my daughters get 25% of the capital that I accumulated, rather than 75% or 100% -- what is my alternative? Out of spite towards taxation, I punish my family even further by not working, not creating and not being successful. That doesn't seem rational.

I might just be bitter and bias, as I've known some truly iritating trustifundians.

The estate tax is the most unfair of all taxes. It tells individuals who have been paying the most taxes at the highest rates that when they die, the government will take half their money again. I don't see why dying wishes shouldn't be honored.

Furthermore, it makes a lot of people who have worked hard all their lives have to spend their dotage figuring out how to get rid of their excess, rather than being able to retire and relax.

It also punishes people who are succesful financially but have to misfortune of dying young before they can figure out what to do with their money.

Finally, it doesn't raise that much money and is a massive form of social engineering/government intervention into our private lives.

I was deeply touched by Warren Buffets gift, because the combination of competence and selflessness with which it was given was another testament to the potential for good that resides in human beings.

Warren Buffet also shares his opinion on inheritance. He calls those who are left big fortunes "members of the lucky-sperm club". DosPeros (above) is wrong, however, in suggesting that estate tax does not reduce the incentive to work hard to build a fortune. Assuming that each individual is facing a trade-off between creating a large estate and other goods (eg. leisure or time with the family), then that trade-off is tipped in the direction of the other goods as estate tax increases.

I have long thought the best solution to the estate issue is the following and wonder what you think of it.

For moral reasons (you should be able to do what you want with what you earned) other than paying the usual capital gains taxes at death, you may pass on your estate free of any additional taxes. At the death of your beneficiaries however, they may pass on only the excess they made over some benchmark (say the growth of the US Economy over the time period). This would for example mean that all fortunes such as the Rockefeller's would have vanished after one generation and wealth dynasties such as theirs would become essentially impossible. Obviously there are technical issues involved that may be insoluble but as a "modest proposal" this seem to cut through the knot.

Just a few things in regard to the estate tax.

(1) It is a steeply progressive policy (in fact, I'm not aware of any other tax policy which is more progressive), affecting only the richest of the rich in the US (300,000 at last count). The aims of a redistributive tax/transfer system seem well served by collecting tax here.

(2) In the US it is applied only on the "taxable estate" (less than the entire estate); there are significant deductions/exemptions available (which peak at an exemption up to an estate worth $3.5m in 2009 - but the status after this is unclear)

The current exemption stands at $1.5m - that is to say; it will not apply until it reaches this level. Even if it does, the current marginal tax rate (of every additional dollar of taxable estate value over $1.5m) is 50% (falling to 45% from 2007-2009).

I accept that it does distort incentives (as any redistributive policy is want to do). However, the inefficiencies created seem minor to those that would be created elsewhere (e.g. if the same taxation revenue were to be made up from increased income taxes).

Nonetheless, I am strongly in favour of such a tax. It has been recognised (especially amongst the richer people themselves - e.g. Warren Buffet) that the highgly progressive nature of this tax is beneficial.

It does not tax those who can least afford to pay (as many regressive taxes do), but targets the richest of the rich. Furthermore, the substantial exemptions and deductions available, and the marginal tax rate (45% of the taxable estate, as of 2007) leave substantial assets to be inherited (contrary to the claims of those who support the abolition of the tax; this tax does not 'strip' rich people of their assests).

The incentives of the estate tax have been brought up, but no one has addressed the effects of large inheritances on incentives. While a high estate tax does lower incentives to be productive and/or amass great wealth [the two aren't congruent], doesn't a lack of estate taxes lower incentives to work in the next generation? That is, if Warren Buffet had left his entire fortune to his children and they had inherited it all tax-free, what incentive would they have to work at all? While I understand that in practice [not necessarily in theory] the very wealthy are necessary because their savings are used for investment, I feel that a large fortune destroys the incentives to work for the next few generations. This is especially damaging because the children of the very rich usually go to the best schools, receive the best health care and nutrition, and generally have the best potential to be productive members of society. While keeping them out does open the door for others, I am sure no one is advocating that productive members of society not work so that others have a chance, just like no one would want the best athletes in a sport to sit out so that more people get to be major leaguers.

Billionaries should simply start new universities instead of or besides giving money to a foundation. A really smart play on keeping foundations conservative would be to provide a seperate line of funding for incremental compensation for top officers of the foundation. True conservatives in the non-profit sector still care about their take home pay (more than others in the non-profit sector).

Prof. Becker -- You didn't address Buffett's comments about the failures of capitalism, something Levitt noted on his Freakonomics blog. What do you think about his public remarks on this topic?

What an interesting post by Prof. Becker.

As to whether Warren Buffett's wishes concerning his gift will be honored posthumously, I doubt it. Someone always has a better idea than the next person (or the deceased) about how money should be used. Were that not so, economists by and large would have little to do.

Abolishing the estate tax is not so important as lowering the confiscatory rates at which it is imposed. The estate tax is easily avoided by (A) paying attention to a smart financial advisor early in one's life path toward wealth accumulation, (B) spending it all before you go, or (C) giving it all to charity.

None of the three choices above is a "bad" decision our tax code should dissuade.

There is a name for those of us who believe in capitalism, competitive markets, free trade, free speech and free enterprise. We are liberals, liberals without the quote marks.

Becker: I do not know of any prominent examples that moved the other way, from initially liberal to becoming conservative over time.

The Catholic Church and the Republican Party come to mind as non-profit organizations (though not ones founded by a single wealthy benefactor) that have arguably followed this trajectory.

mmxq.html

mmxr.html


mmxu.html


mmxw.html


mmxx.html


mqaa.html


mqab.html


mqac.html


mqad.html


mqam.html


mqaq.html


mqar.html


mqau.html


mqaw.html


mqax.html


mqba.html


mqbb.html


mqbc.html


mqbd.html


mqbm.html


mqbq.html


mqbr.html


mqbu.html


mqbw.html


mqbx.html


mqca.html


mqcb.html


mqcc.html


mqcd.html


mqcm.html


mqcq.html


mqcr.html


mqcu.html


mqcw.html


mqcx.html


mqda.html


mqdb.html


mqdc.html


mqdd.html


mqdm.html


mqdr.html


mqdq.html


mqdu.html


mqdw.html


mqdx.html


mqma.html


mqmb.html


mqmc.html


mqmd.html


mqmm.html


mqmq.html


mqmr.html


mqmu.html


mqmw.html


mqmx.html


mqqa.html


mqqb.html


mqqc.html


mqqd.html


mqqm.html


mqqq.html


mqqr.html


mqqw.html


mqqu.html


mqqx.html


mqra.html


mqrb.html


mqrc.html


mqrd.html


mqrm.html


mqrq.html


mqrr.html


mqru.html


mqrw.html


mqrx.html


mqua.html


mqub.html


mquc.html


mqud.html


mqum.html


mquq.html


mqur.html


mquu.html


mquw.html


mqux.html


mqwa.html


mqwb.html


mqwc.html


mqwd.html


mqwm.html


mqwq.html


mqwr.html


mqwu.html


mqww.html


mqwx.html


mqxa.html


mqxb.html


mqxc.html


mqxx.html


mraa.html


mrab.html


mrac.html


mrad.html


mram.html


mraq.html


mrar.html


mrau.html


mraw.html


mrax.html


mrba.html


mrbb.html


mrbc.html


mrbd.html


mrbm.html


mrbq.html


mrbr.html


mrbu.html


mrbw.html


mrbx.html


mrca.html


mrcb.html


mrcc.html


mrcd.html


mrcm.html


mrcq.html


mrcr.html


mrcu.html


mrcw.html


mrcx.html


mrda.html


mrdb.html


mrdc.html


mrdd.html


mrdm.html


mrdq.html


mrdr.html


mrdu.html


mrdw.html


mrdx.html


mrma.html


mrmb.html


mrmc.html


mrmd.html


mrmm.html


mrmq.html


mrmr.html


mrmu.html


mrmw.html


mrmx.html


mrqa.html


mrqb.html


mrqc.html


mrqd.html


mrqm.html


mrqq.html


mrqr.html


mrqu.html


mrqw.html


mrqx.html


mrra.html


mrrb.html


mrrc.html


mrrd.html


mrrm.html


mrrq.html


mrrr.html


mrru.html


mrrw.html


mrrx.html


mrua.html


mrub.html


mruc.html


mrud.html


mrum.html


mruq.html


mrur.html


mruu.html


mruw.html


mrux.html


mrwa.html


mrwb.html


mrwc.html


mrwd.html


mrwm.html


mrwq.html


mrwr.html


mrww.html


mrwu.html


mrwx.html


mrxa.html


mrxb.html


mrxc.html


mrxd.html


mrxm.html


mrxq.html


mrxr.html


mrxu.html


mrxw.html


mrxx.html


muaa.html


muab.html


muac.html


muad.html


muam.html


muaq.html

muaq.html

www.swf


muar.html


muau.html


muaw.html


muax.html


muba.html


mubb.html


mubc.html


mubd.html


mubm.html


mubq.html


mubr.html


mubu.html


mubw.html


muca.html


mubx.html


mucb.html


mucc.html


mucd.html


mucm.html


mucq.html


mucr.html


mucu.html


mucw.html


mucx.html


muda.html


mudb.html


mudc.html


mudd.html


mudm.html


mudq.html


mudr.html


mudu.html


mudw.html


mudx.html


muma.html


mumb.html


mumc.html


mumd.html


mumm.html


mumq.html


mumr.html


mumu.html


mumw.html


mumx.html


muqa.html


muqb.html


muqc.html


muqd.html


muqm.html


muqq.html


muqr.html


muqu.html


muqw.html


muqx.html


mura.html


murb.html


murc.html


murd.html


murm.html


murq.html


murr.html


muru.html


murw.html


murx.html


muua.html


muub.html


muuc.html


muud.html


muum.html


muuq.html


muuu.html


muur.html


muuw.html


muux.html


muwa.html


muwb.html


muwc.html


muwd.html


muwm.html


muwq.html


muwr.html


muwu.html


muww.html


muwx.html


muxa.html


muxb.html


muxc.html


muxd.html


muxm.html


muxq.html


muxr.html


muxx.html


mwaa.html


mwab.html


mwac.html


mwad.html


mwam.html


mwaq.html


mwar.html


mwau.html


mwaw.html


mwax.html


mwba.html


mwbb.html


mwbc.html


mwbd.html


mwbm.html


mwbq.html


mwbr.html


mwbu.html


mwbw.html


mwbx.html


mwca.html


mwcb.html


mwcc.html


mwcm.html


mwcd.html


mwcq.html


mwcr.html


mwcu.html


mwcw.html


mwcx.html


mwda.html


mwdd.html


mwdb.html


mwdc.html


mwdm.html


mwdq.html


mwdr.html


mwdu.html


mwdw.html


mwdx.html


mwma.html


mwmb.html


muxu.html


muxw.html

muxx.html

mwaa.html


mwab.html


mwac.html


mwad.html


mwam.html


mwaq.html


mwar.html


mwau.html


mwaw.html


mwax.html


mwba.html


mwbb.html


mwbc.html


mwbd.html


mwbm.html


mwbq.html


mwbr.html


mwbu.html


mwbw.html


mwbx.html


mwca.html


mwcb.html


mwcc.html


mwcd.html


mwcm.html


mwcq.html


mwcr.html


mwcu.html


mwcw.html


mwcx.html


mwda.html


mwdb.html


mwdc.html


mwdd.html


mwdm.html


mwdq.html


mwdr.html


mwdu.html


mwdw.html


mwdx.html


mwma.html


mwmb.html


mwmc.html


mwmd.html


mwmm.html


mwmq.html


mwmr.html


mwmu.html


mwmw.html


mwmx.html


mwqa.html


mwqb.html


mwqc.html


mwqd.html


mwqm.html


mwqq.html


mwqr.html


mwqu.html


mwqw.html


mwqx.html


mwra.html


mwrb.html


mwrc.html


mwrd.html


mwrq.html


mwrm.html


mwrr.html


mwru.html


mwrw.html


mwrx.html


mwua.html


mwub.html


mwuc.html


mwud.html


mwum.html


mwuq.html


mwur.html


mwuu.html


mwuw.html


mwux.html


mwwa.html


mwwb.html


mwwc.html


mwwd.html


mwwm.html


mwwq.html


mwwr.html


mwwu.html


mwww.html


mwwx.html


mwxa.html


mwxb.html


mwxc.html


mwxd.html


mwxm.html


mwxu.html


mwxw.html


mwxq.html


mwxr.html


mxaa.html


mxab.html


mxac.html


mxad.html


mxam.html


mxaq.html


mxar.html


mxau.html

mxaw.html

mxax.html


mxba.html


mxbb.html


mxbc.html


mxbd.html


mxbm.html


mxbq.html


mxbr.html


mxbu.html


mxbw.html


mxbx.html


mxca.html


mxcb.html


mxcc.html


mxcd.html


mxcm.html


mxcq.html


mxcr.html


mxcu.html


mxcw.html


mxcx.html


mxda.html


mxdb.html


mxdc.html


mxdd.html


mxdm.html


mxdq.html


mxdr.html


mxdu.html


mxdw.html


mxdx.html


mxma.html


mxmb.html


mxmc.html


mxmd.html


mxmm.html


mxmq.html


mxmr.html


mxmu.html


mxmw.html


mxmx.html


mxqa.html


mxqb.html


mxqc.html


mxqd.html


mxqm.html


mxqq.html


mxqr.html


mxqu.html


mxqw.html


mxqx.html


mxra.html


mxrb.html


mxrc.html


mxrd.html


mxrm.html


mxrq.html


mxrr.html


mxru.html


mxrw.html


mxrx.html


mxua.html


mxub.html


mxuc.html


mxud.html


mxum.html


mxuq.html


mxur.html


mxuu.html


mxuw.html


mxux.html


mxwa.html


mxwb.html


mxxr.html


mxxu.html


mxxw.html


mxxx.html


xaaa.html


xaab.html


xaac.html


xaad.html


xaam.html


xaaq.html


xaar.html


xaau.html


xaaw.html


xaax.html


xaba.html


xabb.html


xabc.html


xabd.html


xabm.html


xabq.html


xabr.html


xabu.html


xabw.html


xabx.html


xaca.html


xacb.html


xacc.html


xacd.html


xacm.html


xacq.html


xacr.html


xacu.html


xacw.html


xacx.html


xada.html


xadb.html


xadc.html


xadd.html


xadm.html


xadq.html


xadr.html


xadu.html


xadw.html


xadx.html


xama.html


xamb.html


xamc.html


xamd.html


xamm.html


xamq.html


xamr.html


xamu.html


xamw.html


xamx.html


xaqa.html


xaqb.html


xaqc.html


xaqd.html


xaqm.html


xaqq.html


xaqr.html


xaqu.html


xaqw.html


xaqx.html


xara.html


xarb.html


xarc.html


xard.html


xarm.html


xarq.html


xarr.html


xaru.html


xarw.html


xarx.html


xaua.html


xaub.html


xauc.html


xaud.html


xaum.html


xauq.html


xaur.html


xauu.html


xauw.html


xaux.html


xawa.html


xawb.html


xawc.html


xawd.html


xawm.html


xawq.html


xawr.html


xawu.html


xaww.html


xawx.html


xaxa.html


xaxb.html


xaxc.html


xaxd.html


xaxm.html


xaxq.html


xaxr.html


xaxu.html


xaxw.html


xaxx.html


xbaa.html


xbab.html


xbac.html


xbad.html


xbam.html


xbaq.html


xbar.html


xbau.html


xbaw.html


xbax.html


xbba.html


xbbb.html


xbbc.html


xbbd.html


xbbm.html


xbbq.html


xbbr.html


xbbu.html


xbbw.html


xbbx.html


xbca.html


xbcb.html


xbcc.html


xbcd.html


xbcm.html


xbcq.html


xbcr.html


xbcu.html


xbcx.html


xbcw.html


xbda.html


xbdb.html


xbdc.html


xbdd.html


xbdm.html


xbdq.html


xbdr.html


xbdu.html


xbdw.html


xbdx.html


xbma.html


xbmb.html


xbmc.html


xbmd.html


xbmm.html


xbmq.html


xbmr.html


xbmu.html


xbmw.html


xbmx.html


xbqa.html


xbqb.html


xbqc.html


xbqd.html


xbqm.html


xbqq.html


xbqr.html


xbqu.html


xbqw.html


xbqx.html


xbra.html


xbrb.html


xbrc.html


xbrd.html


xbrm.html


xbrq.html


xbrr.html


xbru.html


xbrw.html


xbrx.html


xbua.html


xbub.html


xbuc.html


xbud.html


xbum.html


xbuq.html


xbur.html


xbuu.html


xbuw.html


xbux.html


xbwa.html


xbwb.html


xbwc.html


xbwd.html


xbwm.html


xbwq.html


xbwr.html


xbwu.html


xbww.html


xbwx.html


xbxa.html


xbxb.html


xbxc.html


xbxd.html


xbxm.html


xbxq.html


xbxr.html


xbxu.html


xbxw.html


xbxx.html


xcaa.html


xcab.html


xcac.html


xcad.html


xcam.html


xcar.html


xcaq.html


xcau.html


xcaw.html


xcax.html


xcba.html


xcbb.html


xcbc.html


xcbd.html


xcbm.html


xcbq.html


xcbr.html


xcbu.html


xcbw.html


xcbx.html


xcca.html


xccb.html


xccc.html


xccd.html


xccm.html


xccq.html


xccr.html


xccu.html


xccw.html


xccx.html


xcda.html


xcdb.html


xcdc.html


xcdd.html


xcdm.html


xcdq.html


xcdr.html


xcdw.html


xcdu.html


xcdx.html


xcma.html


xcmb.html


xcmc.html


xcmd.html


xcmm.html


xcmq.html


xcmr.html


xcmu.html


xcmw.html


xcmx.html


xcqa.html


xcqb.html


xcqc.html


xcqd.html


xcqm.html

The estate tax is a huge straw man for the simple reason that we have a full capital gains basis step-up at death.

Warren Buffet for example is reputed to have never sold a share of Berkshire Hathaway. We can assume however, that he has amassed massive capital gains on the initial value of his stock. Removing the estate tax simply strengthens the lock-in effect and distorts all incentives to trade the stock when nearing old age.

Talking about the estate tax w/o mentioning the treatment of capital gains at death vs. other occasions is silly.

PS: thanks for that great comment Collestro!

What is the evidence that there is substantial competition among foundations? Competition exists among businesses because the purpose of a business is to make money, and my competitors' income often comes at the expense of mine. There's no analogy with foundations. While charitable foundations must pay attention to their revenue, a foundation that acts as a donation-maximizing institution is betraying its donors and its institutional role.

There is surely at least some competition between foundations, but I am unconvinced that it is a substantial driving force of foundation action, or should be.

I serve on the boards of two foundations, and I agree with Elliot's post.

Also, Richard Mason is mistaken in his notion that the Catholic Church was initially liberal but is now conservative. From its inception the Church always taught what we would today regard as "conservative family values" in social matters, and never really espoused an economic philosophy at all since She never confused economic systems with a way of life. She always advocated charity, but the specific role of government in these matters is not a part of the Magisterium.

"That Buffett could resist the temptation to have a foundation monument in his name testifies not only to his wisdom but also to the inner confidence of the man."

Confidence? I can't help but wonder whether a dozen different terms might be more fitting. Selflessness, perhaps?

Selflessness, however, is less attractive from a micro-economics perspective. Is it rational to be selfless? What are rational acts to pursue as one nears death?

I love free markets and capitalism as much as the next man, but it is important to consider where its theoretical and real boundaries end. People don't always act rationally and in many cases, we ought to celebrate this! Buffet and Gates are spectacular examples of people who have achieved their self-interested goals in life, and have progressed on to a higher plane of contribution - humanity triumphing over rational self-interest.

What rationality is there in being rich and dead?

I am surprised by the fact that Buffett seems to be drawing negative feedback from some in the press. In the website Comment is Free, run by the UK's Guardian newspaper, there is a piece by Gavyn Davies, former Goldman Sachs partner and head of the BBC. Davies says: "So Gates will probably become the all-time champion giver before he dies. But whether this will get him to heaven is another matter entirely. The Gates foundation currently employs fewer than 300 people to decide how to give away the $3bn a year that a foundation of $60bn will create. Can they get a good return on this money, in terms of lives transformed for the better? And can they do this better than governments, who could tax these massive bequests and then spend the proceeds? We shall see"

Well given the wastage that is legendary in Government spending, I doubt the last comment very much. And although Davies has recently been on the public payroll, it isn't where he's spent most of his career and I would be amazed if he suddenly announced that he finds the government departments in which he's now involved to be more efficient than the likes of Goldman Sachs.

And what is with the comment about the number of employees at the Gates foundation? There aren't that many more at Goldman Sachs relative to the amount of billions they make decisions on day to day; in fact, I'd wager there are less.

I find Professor Becker's anaysis rather more convincing.

I think it is less that charitable organizations drift liberal over time, but that the act of giving is liberal leaning and giving draws this out. Conservatives don't give that much over their lifetime because they are conservative and believe people should fend for themselves.

While the estate tax is nominally a wealth tax, it is best considered an income tax, income on which no tax was ever paid on or it would never have amounted to that much, and for which the recepient has done nothing but chosen the correct parents. As motivating as demotivating. If you want to leave a particular size inheritance, you would just have to accumulate that much more. Leaving children to live lives of indolence and squander is about as immoral as it gets.

Buffett deserves the praise he is getting for his philanthropy, but his decsion to let Bill Gates control his money rather than the government seems to indicate a lack of confidence in the government's ability to allocate resources. But if he considers the government a poor allocator, why does he want the rest of us to give our estates to the U. S. Treasury?

He shows great wisdom in keeping his estate away from the government. I wish he would let the rest of us do the same.

Everyone seems to be talking about Buffet's and Gate's billions and what "really" should be done with them. Do I detect a green eyed demon in all of this? As for myself, I'm just hoping and praying that my pension will still be there when it comes to retire. As for understanding Buffet's actions you really need to be a graduate of Rose Hill school. ;)

I personally support the estate tax. I think a moderated estate tax is useful. I think all estates should be taxed at a flat rate. I think it would be fair to tax the transfer as a capital gains to the recipient.

I think progressive tax structure create poor incentives.

We cannot control our parents, and it seems unfair to me to tax the income on the living but not the transfers of the deceased.

An estate tax is useful to raise funds. There are many tax planning techniques that will preserve an estate.

The law and economics issues are very legitimate. But I feel that income taxes are too high, and any means towards income tax relief for the middle class is highly desirable.