These were a fine set of comments, and let me reply briefly to some of the major points made.
One interesting suggestion is that a tax limited to net emissions would create a private market (contrary to what I suggested in my post) for devices for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. A power plant, say, would willingly pay a license fee for such a device if the fee were less than the tax savings from being able to offset the plant's emissions by carbon dioxide that the device removed from the atmosphere.
Another commenter points out, correctly but misleadingly, that water vapor in the atmosphere blocks more heat from the earth's surface than carbon dioxide does. That is true. But an increase in atmospheric temperatures brought about by an increased atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide increases the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere (because warmer air holds more water), and thus has a multiplier effect. It is also true but, to me at least, not reassuring that climate has fluctuated a great deal in the course of the earth's activity quite apart from any human influences on climate. I am not reassured because a human-engendered increase in global temperatures could coincide with and reinforce a natural increase, rather than offsetting it.
In this connection, I emphasize the possibility of a runaway greenhouse effect. Becker discusses the underlying problem in terms of multiple equilibria. A less technical way to describe it is in terms of tipping, feedback, or a "vicious cycle." For example, higher atmospheric temperatures cause melting of the permafrost in Alaska and Siberia, which releases methane (stored in great abundance in permafrost), which causes a further temperature rise, which causes more melting and so more release of methane.
The fact that severe climatic effects might unfold quite rapidly is a reason not to be comforted by the argument that, after all, the earth might be better off if it were warmer--Greenland would once again be green, Siberia would support agriculture, and so on. If abrupt global warming destroyed tropical agriculture, it would take decades to relocate that agriculture to formerly frigid areas; the transition costs would be immense.
It is thus the possible rapidity of extreme climate changes that worries me; and it also makes me doubt that we can count on technology to bail us out. In the long run, yes; but we are probably decades away from the development of economical technologies for arresting human-engendered global warming. We are thus in a vulnerable period in which technology-forcing taxes (or quotas, as discussed by Becker) may be a prudent response.
Finally, the fact that abrupt global warming is less probable than gradual global warming is small comfort, because a proper cost-benefit analysis of safety measures takes into account not only the probability of a harm but also the magnitude of the harm should it occur.
شات سارق القلوب
شات التحلية
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 06:58 PM
شات حبي
شات الود
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:01 PM
شات قلبي
شات قلوب
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:01 PM
شات الساهر
شات الخليج
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:02 PM
شات الغلا
شات الرياض
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:02 PM
شات دلع
شات الحب
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:03 PM
شات الشلة
شات تعب قلبي
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:05 PM
شات الشلة
شات تعب قلبي
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:07 PM
شات الشلة
شات تعب قلبي
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:07 PM
شات الشلة
شات تعب قلبي
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:30 PM
شات الشلة
شات تعب قلبي
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:47 PM
شات بنت السعودية
شات عالم الرومانسية
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:50 PM
دردشة كتابي
شات صوتي
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/18/2009 at 07:51 PM
Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article. I??ll be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I??ll definitely return.
Posted by: buzz | 03/26/2011 at 09:12 AM
Beautiful!!! You truly have an eye for colour.
Posted by: supra vaider shoes | 10/04/2011 at 09:34 AM
It's great to hear from you and see what you've been up to. In your blog I feel your enthusiasm for life. thank you.
Posted by: Justin Bieber Shoes | 10/22/2011 at 05:19 AM
I "like" you on Facebook. Would love these for my oldest boy!
Posted by: Jordans Pas Cher | 03/09/2012 at 06:06 AM
motion print organizations europe rick energy brands gain weeks back inhibit 1970s training large compound person decrease synthol involving apply.
Posted by: Anabolic Steroids Sales | 04/25/2012 at 01:55 PM
good evening: may be in future it became a warst evening because we people are not warried about global warming at all . now a days we people are educated. planned everything for our future in moneymaking tarms but for our environment ,we did nothing. we all read every things in school. suddenly we forgot everything . In summer our country's tempareture is very hot.around 400 people unofficially died under hot burst. our agriculture system also disturbed by this hotty atmosphere but still nobody on television or newspapper discussed this problem regarding globalwarming view. we all celebrate a date for for green day. along with our great civilions we are not aware about planting a tree. but we know how to clean our vision by cutting several trees.to maintain our luxurious life e cut a garden and made a big luxurious fecilated building.i think our govt should take a first step regarding global awareness. they have to aware first , after came the country people .
Posted by: sreya mukherjee | 06/23/2012 at 06:37 AM