Thanks once more for interesting comments. I have a few reactions.
I argued in my entry that it was in the interest of a country like China to pay little attention to intellectual property rights since it is a net importer of knowledge. I suggested this will change not only because of WTO pressures, but also because as China continues to grow, it will be producing more knowledge itself, and would then have more incentives to protect knowledge. I was well aware of American violation of European intellectual property rights during 19th century.
The rural countryside is poor protection for unemployed urban workers since farmers are still dirt poor compared to urban workers. That is why there is such strong pressure for rural persons to move to cities, a pressure that the present regime is trying to slow down.
I agree the absorption of East Germany in a very inefficient way, such as the one for one exchange rate between eastern and western marks, hurt the German economy. But many of its problems in labor markets and elsewhere really are independent of this, and Germany was already slowing down before the absorption.
To be sure, the size of China is important for many questions of trade and global military influence. And the aggregate GDP of China is likely to become the worlds largest before long since its population is so large. But surely per capita GDP is the relevant measure for understanding what is happening to the economic well being of the typical individual?
The evidence supporting the causation from economic growth to greater democracy is not based on a single study, but a history of studies for the past 40 years. I know of no respectable recent evidence that overthrows this conclusion.
It is not true that I neglected civil rights. I did discuss the authoritarian regime of China, the greater freedom to farmers, the freedom to change jobs, etc. I could have added greater access to computers, internet, etc, although a lot remains to be done before China is a free society by any standard.
I am not familiar with Slates criticism of de Soto. I believe he has done very important work on the underground economy, and his emphasis on the latent property of the poor is a keen insight. However, he carries that insight much too far. Bad property rights are a real problem in many countries, but China is a good example of a country that is growing from poor income levels at a rapid rate with weak property rights. I do not believe the poor of Latin America-de Sotos example-have a lot of property, even if they had rights over all of it.
I do not know Barnetts work, but I will try to look into it, and see if it justifies a topic.
Thanks
Posted by: killy | 04/11/2005 at 04:57 PM
Dr. Becker,
A recent article by Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Pierre Robinson, and Pierre Yared (http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=1090 ) suggests that the link between wealth and democratization is not causal and can be explained by omitted variable bias.
You say above that "The evidence supporting the causation from economic growth to greater democracy is not based on a single study, but a history of studies for the past 40 years. I know of no respectable recent evidence that overthrows this conclusion." Do you have any opinion of the above study? Is it simply not compelling (either due to flaw or simply because of the weight of previous evidence)?
Respectfully,
Ryan Peterson
Posted by: Ryan Peterson | 04/12/2005 at 04:59 PM
I think property rights are important in a poor country because they allow begining of an individual business that is not farming.
Such small stake holders advance the desire for republican democracy.
Posted by: M. Simon | 04/12/2005 at 06:01 PM
Thanks once more for interesting comments. I have a few reactions.
Posted by: killy | 04/13/2005 at 12:50 PM
I am amazed at how many people think that until you have a "study" on some idea, you can't know whether it's true or not. Many social phenomena are unmeasureable by studies.
Posted by: John Smith | 04/15/2005 at 07:23 PM
thanks for your post.perhaps you will like ed hardy
Posted by: Anonymous | 06/29/2009 at 03:21 AM
nice
مركز تحميل
Posted by: Anonymous | 06/29/2009 at 09:20 PM
thanks
بنت الزلفي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/06/2009 at 04:51 AM
العاب
___
شات
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 03:03 AM
ابراج
___
دليل
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 03:12 AM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
شات صوتي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 05:17 AM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
شات
دردشة
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 09:09 AM
دردشة
___
صور
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 10:26 PM
Hello. We have really everything in common with America nowadays except, of course, language.
I am from Turkey and learning to speak English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "On this site you can get free renters insurance quote."
Thanks for the help 8-), Bob.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/16/2009 at 02:15 AM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/22/2009 at 10:30 PM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 01:48 PM
دردشة الشلة
دردشة تعب قلبي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 04:49 PM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 09:33 PM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 04:06 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 11:53 PM
شات الخليج
الشلة
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/25/2009 at 07:16 PM
دردشة برق
دردشة الخليج
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/29/2009 at 06:19 PM
I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/30/2009 at 12:34 PM
ua2IRa Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/02/2009 at 03:11 AM
thanks to tell me that,i think thats so usefully----
tiffany
links london
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/03/2009 at 01:54 AM