Many comments imagine scenarios in which, the comment argues, foreign purchase of a U.S. firm would harm the United States. One comment asks whether I would favor allowing Iran to purchase Boeing. The answer is "no," because Boeing is a defense contractor and foreign nations should not be allowed to purchase companies that do highly classified defense work, unless the companies agree to spin off the defense-related parts of their business to U.S. firms. Parenthetically, I do not think that Iran poses anywhere near as great a long-term threat to the United States as China does. China may within a few decades become as powerful as the United States, and both China and the U.S. are Pacific powers. Iran is not a potential superpower and Iran and the United States do not share an ocean.
Another comment suggests that if China owned Unocal it might order it to export all its U.S. oil production to China, and then we would have to buy more foreign oil and so we would become even more dependent than we are on foreign oil nations, many of which are unstable or hostile. But if we are worried about our dependence on foreign oil, forbidding foreign purchases of U.S. oil producers is an extremely oblique response compared to, for example, imposing higher gasoline taxes, which would reduce demand for oil and hence for imported oil.
Another comment states that even if China had trillions of dollars invested in the United States, this would not inhibit it from invading Taiwan. Well, it would certainly increase the cost to China of such an invasion!
Finally and ingeniously, one comment suggests that if China had bought Unocal it could have infiltrated spies into the United States in the guise of oil workers and managers and also exert malign political influence on U.S. government policy. The first concern can I think be dismissed; China has sufficiently extensive business relations with the United States already to be able to plant as many spies in this country as it wants to, and it would certainly not replace more than a tiny fraction of Unocal employees (if that) with Chinese; nor would we permit it to do so.
The second concern has somewhat more merit. Although foreigners are not permitted to make contributions to American political campaigns, in the 1990s the Chinese apparently did make some indirect contributions, and conceivably American middle and upper management of a foreign-owned company might be inclined to make contributions or provide other support to politicians who favored the nation that owned the company. I have never heard of such a thing, however, and I am skeptical that Americans working for a company owned by a nation such as China with which the United States has somewhat tense relations would seek to aid that nation--or even would find a politican wishing to do so for the manager to support. Such a politician would be (moviegoers will recognize) a true Manchurian Candidate!
« On Chinese Ownership: Some Reactions-BECKER | Main | Comment on the State and Religion-BECKER »
08/14/2005
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Search
Become a Fan
Home Pages
May 2014
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent Posts
- Farewell
- Sabbatical Notice
- The Embargo of Cuba: Time to Go- Becker
- End the Cuban Embargo—Posner
- Should Marijuana Be Decriminalized Nationwide?—Posner
- Why Marijuana Should be Decriminalized- Becker
- The War on Drugs
- The Myth of Excess Enrollments in College-Becker
- Excess Enrollments in College? Could Be. Posner
- Has the United States, by Virtue of Its Size and Complexity, Become Ungovernable?—Posner
links of london
abercrombie and fitch
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/24/2009 at 04:32 AM
ed hardy
tiffany jewelry
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/25/2009 at 04:58 AM
tiffany jewellery
tiffany jewellery
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/25/2009 at 04:58 AM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/25/2009 at 11:00 PM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 09:58 AM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 01:37 PM
Great article, I had a good laugh!links of london
tiffany jewelry
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/28/2009 at 03:29 AM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/30/2009 at 08:57 AM
Thanks very much for the compilation!links london
tiffany jewellery
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 01:40 AM
I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 01:34 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/02/2009 at 05:27 PM
Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/03/2009 at 03:17 AM
I want to say - thank you for this!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/09/2009 at 03:08 AM
بنت 18
شات بنت 18
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/10/2009 at 12:11 AM
Great work,webmaster,nice design!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 04:13 PM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 05:14 PM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/11/2009 at 08:51 PM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 04:59 AM
I want to say - thank you for this!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 11:53 AM
Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 06:01 PM
Great work,webmaster,nice design!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 07:05 PM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 08:10 PM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/12/2009 at 08:31 PM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/13/2009 at 08:19 PM
I want to say - thank you for this!
Posted by: Anonymous | 09/14/2009 at 01:50 AM