Thanks for correcting two errors: the name of the energy consulting company I referred to is Cambridge Energy Research Associates (my friend, Dan Yergin, the head of this company, will be unhappy I made this mistake). BRCA1 AND BRCA2 are the correct names of the gene mutations that induce breast cancer.
I do not know where the calculations came from about the enormous number of nuclear plants necessary to replace oil, but I believe they are way off. I mentioned nuclear power as replacing oil in the context of hydrogen fuel cells becoming a substitute for the internal combustion engine. No work in this area that I have seen provides any detailed estimates yet of the nuclear power needed, but those given are far below the ones stated in the comment. Nuclear electric power would mainly replace coal and natural gas, and already 20% of the power in US is from nuclear plants, and about 70% in France.
I do not fully exclude catastrophes from my analysis since I mention that nuclear power would reduce emissions of the greenhouse gases that appear to be causing global warming. I exclude terrorism and wars since I admit I do not know how to link their likelihood to economic development and medical advances. Medical advances reduce the consequences of pandemics and probably biological warfare, but economic development probably raises the spread of nuclear and other destructive weaponry.
I certainly do not believe nor did I state that economic development of Africa and other terribly poor regions is unimportant because of medical advances. Of course, economic development is also important, but it remains very possible if poor countries follow India and China and begin to adopt the right economic policies. However, bad health is terrible too, and also a cause of limited economic development, so it is worth emphasizing that the health of the populations of most poor nations has greatly advanced during the past several decades.
Wouldn't medical advances increase the danger and likelihood of biological warfare, rather than the reverse? It seems to me that the science is the same, only the specific use differs.
Posted by: Ray | 09/25/2005 at 11:48 AM
The calculations for the number of nuclear plants needed to replace oil are mine, Dr. Becker. I'm not pro or anti nuclear power, but even though it was hasty, I think my estimate is fairly accurate.
Oil, nuclear, hydroelectric, solar and wind power each have unique properties but they all come from the sun. Oil is used to power cars for a couple key reasons:
1. It's easy to transport
2. It stores energy well
The amount of energy America uses moving cars, trucks and busses along our roads each day is equal to three times the current capacity of our electrical energy grid. It doesn't matter how electrical power will be used to move vehicles around in the future, our electrical supply will have to quadruple if it is going to replace oil.
I would like to see a serious study into this matter, but not even politics or big brains can change the laws of thermodynamics and electro-magnetism...
Posted by: monkyboy | 09/26/2005 at 01:16 AM
I believe there are two more pertinent reposts to the sustainability of energy consumption problem.
First, Peter Huber's point that what matters is not the short-term cost of energy, but the long-term cost of energy acquisition.
One of our savant blogger hosts mentions that increasing prices fetched by energy in recent years means that the rewards for aquiring usable energy will be increasing, thereby increasing proven reserves. True enough.
$25/bbl prices are enough for Canadian producers to harvest oil shale, and they're slated to double production through this decade.
One of the most impressive of recent pilot programs in the US west has oil shale extracted in situ, using creative common-sense to keep ground water from contamination. http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/news_columnists/article/0,1299,DRMN_86_4051709,00.html
US sources are vast under this regime of oil extraction.
Estimates vary, but one surmises that 1 trillion barrels is recoverable - up from 500 billion twenty years ago, and equal to all current proven reserves.
Discussion
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=597
RAND and Dept of Energy report
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002463368_oilstudy01.html
Posted by: Orson | 09/27/2005 at 02:09 PM
مركز تحميل
Posted by: Anonymous | 06/27/2009 at 12:48 AM
thanks for your post.perhaps you will like ed hardy
Posted by: Anonymous | 06/29/2009 at 04:47 AM
بنت الزلفي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/07/2009 at 12:51 PM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
شات صوتي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/10/2009 at 03:20 PM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
شات صوتي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/10/2009 at 03:21 PM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™
ÿØÿ±ÿØÿ¥ÿ©
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 10:14 AM
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™ ŸÖÿµÿ±
--
دردشة مصرية
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 08:59 PM
Good evening. Assuming either the Left Wing or the Right Wing gained control of the country, it would probably fly around in circles.
I am from Lesotho and learning to write in English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "We carry a line of quality queen comforter sets."
Best regards :), Darrius.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/16/2009 at 01:34 PM
دردشة برق
دردشة الخليج
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/29/2009 at 07:43 PM
thanks to tell me that,i think thats so usefully----
tiffany jewelry
links london
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/01/2009 at 04:50 AM
Hi everyone. Newspapermen learn to call a murderer 'an alleged murderer' and the King of England 'the alleged King of England' to avoid libel suits.
I am from Faso and learning to write in English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "Enter our free prize draw for your chance to win of fantastic vax vacuum cleaners listed below."
Regards :-) Production of vacuum cleaners.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/07/2009 at 11:15 AM
Hi all. O, it is excellent to have a giant's strength; but it is tyrannous to use it like a giant.
I am from Mozambique and know bad English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Whitening protection toothpaste combo."
Regards :o Teeth whitening london.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/13/2009 at 02:38 PM
شات الشلة
دردشة تعب قلبي
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/16/2009 at 07:58 PM
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™ ÿØŸÑÿπ
شات الود
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/18/2009 at 06:30 PM
شات حبي
شات الحب
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/18/2009 at 06:31 PM
very thanks for article
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/21/2009 at 10:43 PM
بنت 18
شات بنت 18
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/24/2009 at 02:15 AM
tiffany jewellery
ed hardy
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/24/2009 at 04:44 AM
links of london
abercrombie and fitch
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/24/2009 at 04:45 AM
ed hardy
tiffany jewelry
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 04:12 AM
tiffany jewellery
tiffany jewellery
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 04:12 AM
Great article, I had a good laugh!links of london
tiffany jewelry
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/28/2009 at 04:45 AM