My ignorance of popular culture has once more been exposed by alert readers of this blog. I had never heard of Chris Farley. I have now looked him up on Google Images. I get it.
Several comments suggest that I ignored the biological basis of obesity. Let me clarify. Of course obesity is a biological phenomenon (though also a social one to the extent that in our society "obesity" carries negative connotations). I meant only that, since human biology changes only very slowly, changes in human biology can't explain the recent increases in obesity. But the biological foundations of obesity do require more emphasis than I gave them. In what evolutionary biologists call the "ancestral environment," a period ending some 20,000 years ago when our biological development reached approximately its current level, a genetic propensity to eat as much high-calorie food as possible had great survival value because the food supply was uncertain, and high-calorie food converts to fat that people can live off for a time if they have no food. When the good supply becomes assured and people become sedentary, they continue wanting to eat high-calorie foods because that is a genetic predisposition. They can avoid becoming fat by eating less than their genes tell them to, as it were, but this--fighting the genes--requires great self-discipline. It is much easier to control one's weight if one is physically active, in effect recreating the conditions of the ancestral environment in the gym or equivalent. But that is costly, especially in time.
Biology plays a further role. Differences in biology between people make it much easier for some people than for others to control their weight, sometimes without any exercise. This blurs the value of thinness as a signal of trustworthiness as a result of having a low discount rate.
Notice, as a curious historical note, that as late as the nineteenth century obesity was taken as a signal of prosperity and attractiveness, and thinness (including of women) was taken as a signal of poverty and ill health. This was because poor people tended to be undernourished and hard working, and tubeculosis and other wasting disseases were disproportionately diseases of the poor. Since food was expensive and leisure a privilege of wealth, being fat was a sign of success and valued accordingly.
I may have been precipitate in suggesting that reducing obesity would not affect aggregate medical costs. What I had in mind is that because on average a very high percentage of one's total lifetime medical costs are incurred in the last few months of life, and because the older one is, the greater on average one's medical needs, the principal financial effect of improving health in youth and middle age may be to increase the elderly population, and of course death can only be postponed, not eliminated. But I am painting with too broad a brush; careful study is required to assess the costs of lifestyle changes that might improve health.
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 06:38 PM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 08:25 PM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 08:26 PM
Great work, webmaster, nice design!
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 10:11 PM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 11:56 PM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/08/2009 at 11:58 PM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/09/2009 at 01:41 AM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/09/2009 at 01:42 AM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 12/22/2009 at 05:32 PM
ther diseases, to replace and repair hips and other parts of the body, and simply to keep people alive. A reasonable question would be why complain since the value placed on advances in both the quantity and quality of life at older (and younger) ages have far exceeded the increased spending on medical care- my colleagues Kevin Murphy and Robert Topel have demonstrated this in important studies. But the system can be made much better, as long as changes bolster the weak parts of the American medical system, and do not tear down the many strong parts. I concentrate these brief comments on one problem only, the excessive use of hospitalization and expensive surgeries under both private and public systems of payment. One
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Sale | 06/05/2011 at 02:45 AM
dvertising of goods like Big Macs and Coke Cola has less influence over the consumption of adults, particularly that of older men and women. Moreover, obesity has grown in all developed countries, even those with much sharper controls over advertising. Obesity in the United States and elsewhere started increasing particularly rapidly in the early 1980's. Studies by economists, especially those by Richard Posner and Tomas Philipson, Jesse Shapiro, David Cutler, and Edward Glaeser
Posted by: Christian Louboutin | 06/05/2011 at 03:55 AM
For career, dare not say what improvement. Because have been jobs, and although some of his about go hard, but not really is successful, recently came to a new company, is very hard, I went for business, and then give me the opportunity to learn, also let I good effort.
Posted by: air jordan retro | 09/26/2011 at 09:09 PM
For this statement, Jochen Zeitz argued that a considerable part of the product had being through wind and rain to counter the trend of fail for decades
Posted by: justin bieber shoes | 09/28/2011 at 05:54 PM
If you wish to be the best man, you must suffer the bitterest of the bitter.
Posted by: bieber supra shoes | 10/08/2011 at 03:28 PM
I'm going home tonight to take a pick, i'm very excited about this (clearly you see how sad and crazy i am about shoes.) Will post the picture
Posted by: bieber supra shoes | 10/08/2011 at 03:29 PM
Those are super cute. I like you on Facebook.
Posted by: suprayouth | 10/20/2011 at 03:17 PM
The article is very good, I like it very much.Here I learned a lot, then I will pay more attention to you
Posted by: Emmitt Smith Jersey | 11/01/2011 at 08:46 PM
i went to the same school as patrick. i remeber those girls from my school who wrote in. they were white trash...i always felt so bad for them.
Posted by: supra vaider | 11/09/2011 at 04:54 PM
This article tell the reality of very important organization and clearly gives the reasons that what they are doing. Very information article and actions should be taken against such organizations
Posted by: supra for kids | 11/09/2011 at 04:57 PM
HHH Yes, the design of national policy is important, how our economic development plans for the next five years, how the implementation, how to make our economy even faster. Are designed to advance our focus to invest money in what ways it should be carefully arranged.
Posted by: moncler switzerland | 11/09/2011 at 04:59 PM
Good stuff as per usual, thanks. I do hope this kind of thing gets more exposure.
Posted by: supra vaider | 11/15/2011 at 09:35 AM