The comments on my post indicate strong feelings and powerful disagreement, mirroring the strong feelings and powerful disagreement in Congress and in the nation as a whole. It should, however, be possible for Congress to work out a compromise along the following lines:
1. By a combination of sticks and carrots, it should be possible to induce the vast majority of illegal immigrants in this country either to step forward, admit their illegal status, regularize it, and thus enter the path to eventual citizenship (without having to leave the country), or depart for good. The only objections to this course that I can see are "unfairness" to would-be immigrants waiting patiently in the immigration queue--and I do not think the interests of foreigners should weigh heavily in U.S. public policy--and the injustice of "rewarding" illegality (the "amnesty" issue). But illegal immigration is not so serious a crime as to demand obeisance to Kant's claim that even if a society were about to dissolve, justice would require that it execute any condemned criminals. I take a more relaxed, pragmatic view of the dictates of legal justice.
2. By a combination of mandatory biometric ID for all people in the United States (a measure that would have independent value in crime control and terrorism prevention) and heavy penalties on employers of illegal immigrants, future illegal immigration could be largely halted without need to build an expensive Berlin Wall between the United States and Mexico.
3. Reform of immigration law and reorganization of the various agencies in the Department of Homeland Security that administer the law would shorten the queue for legal immigrants (and thus alleviate the "fairness" objection to "amnesty"), adjust the supply of immigrants to the demand of American employers, and switch preferential teratment from foreigners who have family connections in the Unied States to foreigners who have valuable skills.
The only objections to this course that I can see are "unfairness" to would-be immigrants waiting patiently in the immigration queue--and I do not think the interests of foreigners should weigh heavily in U.S. public policyFor the purposes of the present debate, when you say you do not think that the interests of foreigners should carry much weight in determining U.S. immigration policy, are you considering the illegal immigrants currently present in the United States as foreigners? If the illegales are deemed foreigners (as aurely they are), should our policy be formulated in terms of our interests not theirs?
What I can't quite understand is why - in this post and your previous post - it almost seems that you have more respect and concern for the illegales than for those who immigrated legally. I apologize if this inference is incorrect, but that seems the natural inference to draw.
Posted by: Simon | 05/27/2006 at 11:37 PM
"He supports increased immigration because this correction of the presently distorted labor market will likely benefit U.S. citizens."
Why is the current wave of illegals without high school educations a "correction of the presently distorted labor market"? As I said in my last post, we need more high school drop outs digging ditches, but we don't need more nurses, computer programmers, engineers, or doctors? How could anybody in their right mind believe such nonsense?
Posted by: Hans Gruber | 05/28/2006 at 10:35 AM
No amnesty. Period. I opposed the 1986 amnesty believing it would only encourage more illegal aliens. If the best we can do is throw our say, 2 million a year, fine. It will take us six years to deport them all. We do not need illegal aliens here with questionable loyalty to the US. We have enough welfare recipients as it is. Throw them out.
Posted by: George Weinbaum | 05/30/2006 at 02:36 PM
مركز تحميل
Posted by: Anonymous | 06/27/2009 at 01:18 AM
thanks for your post.perhaps you will like ed hardy
Posted by: Anonymous | 06/29/2009 at 03:25 AM
بنت الزلفي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/07/2009 at 01:03 PM
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™ ŸÖÿµÿ±
--
دردشة مصرية
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/15/2009 at 06:11 AM
Good Day. Challenge is a dragon with a gift in its mouth?Tame the dragon and the gift is yours.
I am from Mauritania and now teach English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Askville comforter sets community page contains questions, answers and people interested in comforter sets."
With best wishes :D, Clemens.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/16/2009 at 11:31 PM
ÿØÿ±ÿØÿ¥ÿ©
___
صور
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/17/2009 at 03:10 AM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™
دردشه
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/19/2009 at 12:10 PM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 05:03 AM
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 12:59 PM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 08:44 PM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 04:31 AM
Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 10:50 PM
Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/30/2009 at 11:44 AM
دردشة برق
دردشة الخليج
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/30/2009 at 05:36 PM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/01/2009 at 05:39 AM
Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/01/2009 at 02:24 PM
chvCDH Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/02/2009 at 01:33 AM
thanks to tell me that,i think thats so usefully----
tiffany
links london
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/03/2009 at 01:49 AM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/03/2009 at 07:07 AM
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/03/2009 at 01:28 PM
It is the coolest site, keep so!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/03/2009 at 04:03 PM
Great site. Good info.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/04/2009 at 02:37 PM