Posner gives an excellent analysis of the possible risks from consuming too much trans fats, but I believe he reaches the wrong conclusion about whether the NY ban of trans fats in restaurants is warranted. In my view this ban is a further example of the tendency for local and federal government in the United States and other countries to act as nanny states. They presume with insufficient evidence that consumers are typically too ignorant to make decisions in their own interests, particularly regarding health, but in other areas as well.
Posner provides a well-presented case for what he calls the "Chicago" argument for why such an ordinance as New York's is unnecessary and undesirable. Perhaps it is no surprise to many readers that I find his argument unconvincing. He rejects these arguments because of his belief about consumer ignorance of trans fats. Posner does not mainly argue that restaurant-goers do not know which restaurants use trans fats, or even that they may be bad for you, or that restaurants possess private information not known to consumers about the adverse effects of trans fats.
His main concern is what he considers to be the great difficulty consumers have in "absorbing" information about trans fats. Posner gives a few reasons why he believes absorbing trans fat information is particularly difficult: that there is still considerable ignorance about the health risks of trans-fats, that consumers do not know their total intake of these fats, and that consumers are unaware that alternatives are often claimed to be more or less equally tasty. In short, according to Posner, consumers do not absorb the alleged fact that the benefits of avoiding or cutting down trans fats far exceed their costs.
As far as I can judge, the evidence is rather strong that trans fats contribute to heart disease, but the degree of harm from different levels of these fats is still to be determined. The best summary of the scientific evidence that I know of is "Trans Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease" in the April 2006 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. The authors carefully review many studies, including several with quite small random samples. The estimated mean effects of common levels of trans fats on cardiovascular disease are typically large, but one of the best data sets that they analyze cannot reject (at the 95 percent confidence interval) the conclusion that there is either no effect of trans fats on this diseunase, or only a small one. So I have only modest confidence from the studies analyzed that typical trans fats consumption levels have large effects on cardiovascular disease.
To be sure, evidence cannot disprove Posner's claim about consumer ignorance of, and inability to process, information about trans fats. However, the fact that about half of all NYC restaurants did not use trans fats even prior to passing this ordinance--although these may be the restaurants where it was easier to eliminate trans fats-- that many foods sold in ordinary supermarkets and other groceries have become trans fat free in a short time period, that we do not know much about whether consumers who eat high trans fat foods in restaurants eat little of these fats at home, that young persons are the primary consumers of heavy trans fat diets, and other unknown and relevant variables should make us skeptical of the ignorance argument. Indeed, it is remarkable how fast the food industry and restaurants have responded to the greater evidence during the past few years that trans fats in sufficient quantities contribute to heart disease. The article I cited earlier appeared only about 8 months ago.
There is evidence in other areas that consumers respond quickly to health news. For example, studies have documented the rapid reduction in salt intake and growth of low salt foods in response to evidence in the 1980's--now considered exaggerated--that high salt levels have been an important source of high blood pressure.
The prominence of young persons among the big consumers of trans fats, cholesterol, and calories in foods like French fries and big Macs may not be due to ignorance. Rather, they may have an unarticulated awareness that when they reach older ages where heart disease and other diseases are more common, drugs are likely to have been developed that offset the negative consequences of what appears now to be unhealthy diets. Lipitor and similar drugs have greatly reduced the consequences of high levels of "bad" cholesterol, and drug companies believe they will pretty soon have drugs that will raise levels of "good" cholesterol. So even if prolonged consumption of trans-fats has sizable negative health consequences in today's knowledge environment, that is likely to change many years down the road when today's youth are at risk for heart disease. Taxpayers may pay for a good share of their future expenditure on such drugs, but that is a wholly different and more complicated issue
On Posner's assumptions, one might expect either that restaurants would be pressured to eliminate trans fats, or that eliminating trans fats would cause consumers to be worse off. Posner's first order estimate of the benefits from eliminating trans fats in New York City restaurants is $3.5 billion, and he takes $60 million as a generous estimate of the cost to restaurants from becoming trans fat free. Then the cost of trans fat consumption would exceed the expected benefits from lower prices in restaurants with trans fats, even for quite but not completely ignorant consumers who attach no more than a 2% chance to the likelihood that these fats have serious consequences for their health (0.02 x $6.5 billion exceeds $100 million). These largely ignorant consumers too would only go to restaurants that are trans fat free; hence other restaurants would have to adjust or go out of business.
Posner also gives a kind of lower bound estimate of the benefits as $100 million, and also suggests a much lower cost to restaurants of becoming trans fat free--I take this as $30 million. With a small taste benefit from the use of trans fats-- the New England Medicine Journal article I cited earlier does admit positive effect of trans fats on "palatability"-- the total cost of the ban would equal or exceed total benefits. For example, suppose 1 million persons on average eat 200 meals per year in NYC restaurants with trans fats. If they value the taste of trans fats in their foods only by 35 cents per meal, the taste cost to consumers of the ban would be $70 million per year. Then the total cost of the ban would equal the benefits from the ban.
Does one really want to go down the road of a ban on trans fats when the net gains to consumers are dubious, and probably negative, and when reversing directions is politically difficult? As an example of the difficulty in adapting politically, new evidence indicates that requiring child car seats may increase their risk of injury in accidents, yet there is no movement to reverse these laws.
These and related calculations suggest that while city and other governments should continue to help provide the best information available about the effects of trans fats and other foods on health, market forces of supply and demand should determine the fats consumed. Otherwise, we encourage further attempts to legislate fat and calorie content of permissible foods not only in restaurants but also in foods consumed at home, and absurdities such as the new Italian ordinance that models cannot be too slim because it sets a bad weight example for young women. There are just too many opportunities for ill-considered attempts to override on limited evidence individual judgments about what they want to consume.
thanks to tell me that,i think thats ao usefully----
tiffanys
ed hardy
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/22/2009 at 03:48 AM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 02:45 AM
Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 09:42 AM
Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/25/2009 at 05:06 AM
kameralı sesli sohbet
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/27/2009 at 10:29 AM
Music Tv
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/27/2009 at 10:31 AM
دردشة برق
دردشة الخليج
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/30/2009 at 06:37 PM
Great work, webmaster, nice design!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/31/2009 at 06:20 PM
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/01/2009 at 08:27 PM
4qQyAE Beautiful site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/02/2009 at 12:09 PM
zAS8kH Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/03/2009 at 04:18 AM
Hello. Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
I am from Africa and learning to speak English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "French quarter festival poster lion king orpheum memphis all the easier; a the brick furniture store wall dr rey bio hide langley federal credit union hampton va record store dayton ohio kxan weather radar austin dr rey plastic surgery record store daytona of the hut, new sidekick lx bangladesh weather today enzo vs david haye tickets john ziegler show the oldest dhea sulfate of david haye tickets that chaka chittagong bangladesh weather when dingaan and rush limbaugh listen live chicago had stabbed him movie harry potter and the half blood prince release date bangladesh weather news fort lauderdale executive airport travelodge him."
Thank you very much :(. The brick furniture store st.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/07/2009 at 06:27 AM
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™
شات صوتى
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/12/2009 at 07:39 PM
just started reborning and just hooked on as much info as poss; thank you.
I am from Arabia and also now am reading in English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "You will be able to lose some weight in the process and as a result you will have a smart young look and you can feel that you are getting more attraction in your office or in any party."
Best regards :o, Colon cleanse message boards.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/14/2009 at 06:29 AM
Good evening. Doubt 'til thou canst doubt no more...doubt is thought and thought is life. Systems which end doubt are devices for drugging thought.
I am from Barbados and know bad English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "Discount travel site for budget minded travelers seeking cheap airline tickets, cheap flights, fly cheap on lowest airfare flights, and fly for less at the last minute."
Regards :p Low airfare search.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/16/2009 at 04:33 PM
شات الشلة
دردشة تعب قلبي
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/17/2009 at 02:44 PM
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™ ÿØŸÑÿπ
شات الود
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 10:39 AM
شات حبي
شات الحب
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/19/2009 at 10:40 AM
tiffany jewellery
ed hardy
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/21/2009 at 02:32 AM
links of london
abercrombie and fitch
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/21/2009 at 02:32 AM
links of london
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/22/2009 at 03:16 AM
very thanks for article
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/26/2009 at 08:37 AM
Provides the best tiffany jewellery, including Necklaces, Pendants, Bracelets, Earrings,
Ringsat the lowest prices.Tiffany jewellery
is the best online United Kingdom jewelry stores where you can buy the cheapest Tiffany &
Co silver Our huge selection of
tiffany jewelry
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/29/2009 at 02:20 AM
good post,I think so!Abercrombie & Fitch on Sale, Hoodies, Jeans, T-Shirts, Pants, Polos abercrombie and fitch abercrombie and fitch cheap abercrombie fitch Abercrombie Men Tee abercrombie womens polos Abercrombie & Fitch Men, women, and children's clothing and accessories edhardylife a famous ed hardy store which sell directly ed hardy clothing, shoes, boots, swim suit and other cheap ed hardy ed hardy cheap Ed Hardy ed hardy clothing,Providing authentic Ed Hardy Clothing with competitive price and fast,secure delivery.The famous brand by Don Ed Hardy 's Vintage Ed Hardy
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/29/2009 at 02:21 AM
Thanks very much for the compilation!links london
tiffany jewellery
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/29/2009 at 04:48 AM