There were a number of interesting comments on these two posts, and it was especially interesting to hear from a number of pilots and air controllers with regard to the problem of deteriorating airline service. One controller straightened me out about the financing of the air control system--it is mainly by ticket taxes rather than airline fuel taxes. This is unfortunate, because number of tickets is a very crude proxy for scheduling that causes congestion which in turn increases the costs of the air traffic control system. Compare two airlines, flying the same number of passengers (hence selling the same number of tickets), but one flies large planes infrequently and the other small planes frequently. The second will cause more congestion but will not pay higher ticket prices.
I did not focus on solutions to the problem of air traffic congestion, but the logical solution would be some form of congestion pricing--for example a tax based on number of flights, which would create an incentive for fewer flights (with larger planes). This would be an efficient solution, however, only if consumer surplus would be greater with less delay but also less frequent flights, and that is a difficult calculation which as far as I know has not been made.
One commenter pointed out that my observation that the per-vehicle cost of gasoline is higher than the per-airline-passenger cost of aviation fuel, and that this retards the substitution of auto for air transportation in response to air traffic congestion, is incomplete. The proper comparison is per-vehicle-passenger gasoline cost, since if a vehicle has more than one passenger the gasoline cost per passenger falls.
Turning now and very briefly to the credit-crunch posting, one commenter complains that as a result of other people's reckless borrowing (and lending), he--a conservative borrower and investor--is experiencing a loss of market value of his home and of his stock portfolio; and so wouldn't it be appropriate for the Federal Reserve Board, if it could, to do something to alleviate his loss, for which he is blameless. I think not. Everyone's investments are at risk from unforeseen external shocks, and it would be infeasible for government to compensate everyone who experienced a loss as a result of those shocks. Even when average house prices are rising, the price of a number of houses will be falling; and the stock market gyrates quite apart from the occasional bubble.
« Should Central Banks Intervene During This Financial Crisis? Becker | Main | The Infrastructure "Crisis" Once Again-Becker »
08/26/2007
The comments to this entry are closed.
Search
Become a Fan
Home Pages
May 2014
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Recent Posts
- Farewell
- Sabbatical Notice
- The Embargo of Cuba: Time to Go- Becker
- End the Cuban Embargo—Posner
- Should Marijuana Be Decriminalized Nationwide?—Posner
- Why Marijuana Should be Decriminalized- Becker
- The War on Drugs
- The Myth of Excess Enrollments in College-Becker
- Excess Enrollments in College? Could Be. Posner
- Has the United States, by Virtue of Its Size and Complexity, Become Ungovernable?—Posner
'is experiencing a loss of market value of his home and of his stock portfolio;"
No he was experiencing an excess valuation of his home and portfolio due to too-easy credit. He's back where he would have
been anyway. (Well, he will be.)
Posted by: Jonathan Cronin | 08/27/2007 at 01:54 PM
We would have less wild swings in the market if predatory lending incentives like 33% usury were reduced to 18%.
Tony Zirkle
Posted by: Tony Zirkle | 08/28/2007 at 08:57 PM
Good, thank you, wonderful
بنت مكه
Posted by: Anonymous | 06/24/2009 at 12:16 AM
مركز تحميل
Posted by: Anonymous | 06/26/2009 at 10:21 PM
thanks for your post.perhaps you will like ed hardy
Posted by: Anonymous | 06/29/2009 at 03:30 AM
بنت الزلفي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/07/2009 at 04:23 AM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
شات صوتي
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/09/2009 at 09:39 AM
thanksss
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™ ŸÖÿµÿ±
--
دردشة مصرية
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/14/2009 at 07:18 PM
ÿØÿ±ÿØÿ¥ÿ©
___
صور
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/17/2009 at 02:55 PM
Thank you, you always get to all new and used it
ÿ¥ÿßÿ™
دردشه
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/20/2009 at 05:56 PM
Good afternoon! Thanks for the invitation so much. I will try to come back as soon as possible. ;).
I am from Morocco and too bad know English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Learning center how to buy buying overview."
Best regards :-D, Nitika.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/21/2009 at 12:18 PM
Great. Now i can say thank you!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/22/2009 at 01:42 PM
Great site. Good info.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/22/2009 at 09:14 PM
Great work, webmaster, nice design!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 04:51 AM
Great site. Good info.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/23/2009 at 12:30 PM
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 12:50 PM
Perfect work!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 01:47 PM
Great site. Good info.
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/24/2009 at 10:14 PM
دردشة برق
دردشة الخليج
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/30/2009 at 07:33 PM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 07/31/2009 at 08:30 PM
thanks to tell me that,i think thats so usefully----
tiffany jewelry
links london
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/01/2009 at 04:28 AM
Incredible site!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/01/2009 at 05:09 AM
QEWBUX Great site. Keep doing.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/02/2009 at 12:36 AM
mZ4RD4 Perfect site, i like it!
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/02/2009 at 04:27 PM
Great site. Good info.
Posted by: Anonymous | 08/03/2009 at 03:58 PM