When a sport or other game is played all over the world (chess for example, or soccer), it is natural that there should be international competition. The oddity of the Olympics is that they are presented as athletic competitions between nations, rather than between teams each of which presumably would have a permanent residence in one nation yet might recruit team members from other nations as well. Nations in the grip of nationalist emotion or wanting to advertise their power to the world (nations such as Hitler's Germany, which made the 1936 summer Olympics, held in Berlin, a major propaganda event; East Germany and other communist countries; and now China) invest heavily in training their Olympic athletes. China is estimated to have spent as much as half a billion dollars to train their athletes for the Olympic games now underway in Beijing. The heavy investments that nations that regard Olympic competition as a propaganda opportunity in turn spur other nations to invest heavily in training their own Olympic athletes.
The nationalistic fervor and great-power aspirations that Olympic competition stimulates seem to me a negative externality. In addition, some unknown but doubtless large fraction of the expenditures on training athletes have no social product, but are in the nature of "arms race" expenditures. If one nation spends very heavily on training its Olympic athletes, other nations, if they want to win a respectable number of medals, have to spend heavily as well. The expenditures are offsetting to the extent that the objective of competition is to win rather than to produce an intrinsically better performance. Economic competition produces better products at lower quality-adjusted prices, and this effect dominates the costs of competition in duplication of facilities and offsetting advertising. The balance in athletic competition is different, because the main product (as in war) is winning, and it makes little difference to the consumer whether the winner ran a mile in 3.05 minutes or in 3.01 minutes. Moreover, Olympic competition is inherently lopsided since, as Becker explains, success is largely determined by a nation's population, per capita income, and (in the winter Olympics) climate. Why should Americans feel good if an American team beats a team from Costa Rica?
Since the United States is acknowledged to be the world's most powerful nation, it has nothing to prove by doing well in the Olympics, and so we are sensible not to allot any tax revenues to financing the training of our Olympic athletes. Doubtless we would were it not for the private donations that generously support the United States Olympic Committee. Since other countries do not have the same tradition of charitable giving as the United States, and so rely on tax revenues to finance activities that in the United States are financed by private charity, our charitable support of Olympic competition actually places pressure on other nations to support their Olympic teams out of tax revenues.
Becker raises an interesting point by asking whether Olympic competition creates a positive externality that might warrant public subsidy, though he recommends against subsidization. The Olympic games are immensely popular, but, given advertising-supported television, it is apparently impossible to finance them (and in particular the training of the Olympic athletes) out of television-advertising revenues. There are, however, as he notes, other (private) sources of revenue of Olympic participants, such as endorsements by champion athletes. Moreover, were there no public subsidies of Olympic competition, this would not doom the Olympic games; it would just reduce the amount of training that Olympic athletes received (the arms-race effect). This would reduce the number of new world records set, and marginally reduce the quality of play and hence the pleasure that the audience for the Olympic games derives, but would actually tend to sharpen Olympic competition by reducing the effect of a nation's per capita income on its Olympic prospects.
We firmly believe that the Olympic spirit is the essence of human civilization and the Olympic flame is the symbol of peace and friendship
Posted by: chanel j12 watch replica | 11/16/2010 at 08:15 PM
Many of the details of this write-up are great but had me personally wanting to know, did they really mean that? One thing I have got to say is your publishing expertise are very good and I will certainly be coming back for any fresh blog post you make, you may possibly have a new admirer. I saved the website for personal reference.
Posted by: lower back pain | 11/23/2010 at 10:56 AM
Hello, i think that i saw you visited my weblog thus i came to ??return the favor??.I am attempting to find things to improve my site!I suppose its ok to use some of your ideas!!
Posted by: Sciatica Treatment | 03/26/2011 at 09:47 AM
Pervert! Let's get out of here. There are so many perverts here.So what? You are such a bad person Who's gonna like you? Tiffany Jewelry Don't mind him. Don't mind him. He's just playing. Forget him. He saw me steal the diamond. Tiffany Jewelry You're dreaming! In your dreams. Wake up and smell the coffee.Where'd you get it!Good idea.Think it over.You can never tell about this sort of thing.Take a closer l Wake up and smell the coffee.Where'd you get it!Good idea.Think it over.You can never tell about this sort of thing.Take a closer look.When did I say that!You have to be on time. Don't be late. ook.When did I say that!You have to be on time. Don't be late.
Posted by: True Religion Jeans outlet | 08/11/2011 at 04:25 AM
It is a misconception that every action you take will produce the desired result you expect. As you travel down the road toward your goals and dreams you have to understand that not evety action you take will work or be perfect. Making mistakes is all in the process of of eventually getting it tight. You sometimes have to experiment and see what will happen in that process. Getting it almost right is a vital part of the learning attitude needed to succeed.
Posted by: Louis Vuitton Outlet | 08/23/2011 at 04:33 AM
It is a misconception that every action you take will produce the desired result you expect. As you travel down the road toward your goals and dreams you have to understand that not evety action you take will work or be perfect. Making mistakes is all in the process of of eventually getting it tight. You sometimes have to experiment and see what will happen in that process. Getting it almost right is a vital part of the learning attitude needed to succeed.
Posted by: Louis Vuitton Outlet | 08/23/2011 at 04:36 AM
It is a misconception that every action you take will produce the desired result you expect. As you travel down the road toward your goals and dreams you have to understand that not evety action you take will work or be perfect. Making mistakes is all in the process of of eventually getting it tight. You sometimes have to experiment and see what will happen in that process. Getting it almost right is a vital part of the learning attitude needed to succeed.
Posted by: Louis Vuitton Outlet | 08/23/2011 at 04:40 AM
i come here first time. Thank you for sharing your admin would get ready a severely beneficial write-up I congratulate.s I very agree with your views from here.
Posted by: retro air jordans | 09/26/2011 at 05:45 PM
I'm interested in such offer,The sound quality in these podcasts is really poor. I feel bad about complaining about something that is free, but I think it is important.
Posted by: Designer Louis Vuitton | 03/08/2012 at 12:46 PM
Warm touch of color of nature, discerning craftsmen to show it was perfect; warm is the music notes on a beat, emotions of the singer to put it to the true expression of pure
Posted by: Nike Free Run | 08/10/2012 at 10:27 PM