Cash for Clunkers--Posner's Comment

I agree with Becker that it's a silly program. Like the bailout of the auto companies, the program had dual environmental and economic-recovery goals. The environmental goal, to reduce carbon emissions, was trivial; the aggregate improvement in gas mileage from the program is certain to be minuscule. The contribution to economic recovery was probably very small as well--possibly negligible. The program was one of transfer payments, not government investment. The distinction is important to Keynesian deficit spending (what is now referred to as "stimulus") as a method of fighting a depression. The idea behind such programs is to replace deficient private investment with public investment, for example, the construction of a new highway. The government hires a contractor who hires workers and by doing so increases employment, which raises incomes and therefore spending. A transfer payment does not do that, at least immediately. It is true that people who participated in the "cash for clunkers" program couldn't pocket rather than spend the money they received from the government, as they could with the other transfer payments included in the stimulus program; they had to use it to help them buy a new car. But that is different from paying a road contractor to build a new highway. The contractor as I said has to go out and hire people to build it, so unemployment falls (on the assumption, correct with regard to construction, that there is a high rate of unemployment in the industry). The purchase of a new car merely reduces a dealer's inventory, and whether the reduction leads to new production will depend on estimates of future demand. Those estimates are likely to be inverse to the success of the "cash for clunkers" program. For, as Becker notes, the program may to a large extent merely have caused people to accelerate a previously determined intention to trade in their old car. Timing is important; had the program been put into effect in the winter, the buying spurt that it induced might have had a bracing effect on consumer confidence. But by August the economy had sufficiently improved that the need for confidence-boosting measures that had no other effect on economic activity had waned. Unlike Becker, I do not conclude from this unhappy episode that the Keynesian approach to fighting depression is misconceived. The problem with the $787 stimulus package that Congress enacted in February, to which the "cash for clunkers" program was a belated addition, was that it was poorly designed and has been lackadaisically executed. Roughly two-thirds of the program consists of transfer payments rather than public works, and because the Administration has failed to push the public-works components (it should have appointed an expediter to try to cut the red tape that smothers public projects), virtually all the stimulus disbursements to date have consisted of transfer payments (including, what are not really transfer payments, tax reductions that don't put cash in people's pockets until they are reflected in reductions in withholding or estimated tax payments, or in increased rebates when one files one's year-end return on April 15). Keynesians recognize that timing is key to the success of a stimulus program in fighting an economic collapse. The stimulus program should have been enacted last fall and heavily weighted in favor of public works concentrated in areas and industries of high unemployment, with provisions for cutting red tape even at the risk of a higher incidence of fraud and waste, which are constants in government programs.

Comments

[Anonymous]

While it is true that that accelleration of the purchase of a vehicle that would have been purchased anyway net-net is not stimulative, there is one other effect.

That $4500 that is left in the consumer's bank account as a result of the cash-for-clunkers program is not all saved. (That is assuming the market value of the clunker in the first place was close to zero. OK, that isn't a good assumption, but there were many clunkers turned in that were worth not much at all.) Some of the cash-for-clunkers money is spent on other consumer durables.

[Anonymous]

In a world of normal economic conditions, I would oppose the cash-for-clunkers program. But, since the feds are in the business of spending 100s of billions of dollars to stimulate the economy in the short term, what is wrong with trying to help consumers directly and give the economy a badly needed boost at the same time? How can one oppose a policy that seems to have stimulated the economy now at relatively little cost and favor giving gigantic handouts to banks and financial institutions, culprits of our recent economic recession? I can understand the importance of keeping our financial institutions from collapsing, but why not stimulate the economy in the short term, which is the intent of the Administration's Stimulus Package, at relatively low cost?

[Anonymous]

Dr. Posner,
I usually hesitate to proofread and post typos...

'The problem with the $787 stimulus package that Congress enacted in February, to which the "cash for clunkers" program was a belated addition, was that it was poorly designed and has been lackadaisically executed.'

I think a "billion" is missing in that sentence.

[Anonymous]

"Cash for Clunkers" illustrates the great peril that is at the heart of skepticism regarding Keynesian deficit spending or stimulus efforts - that the funds will not be allocated in some optimal manner but instead corruptly handed out as transfers to special interests. This is facilitated by a, "any government spending whatsoever is helpful and therefore justified" attitude.

If we had a decent and generally accepted theory on what should and should not be done by government in the event of a crisis then perhaps the suspicion could be overcome, but for now it is altogether reasonable to shift the burden of proof to the proponents of these efforts and maintain a presumption against the efficacy of these ad hoc, improvised giveaways.

-Indy

[Anonymous]

Keynesian stimulus can fail in many ways. Becker notes that it is usually late. Posner suggests that it doesn't have to be late, but it should be better designed. Both the timing and the design failures, however, derive from the political nature of any large special stimulus. Becker seems closer to the point. Whether its late our designed with an eye to political favorites, stimuli passed by legislatures are bound to be economically inefficient.

[Anonymous]

Keynesian stimulus can fail in many ways. Becker notes that it is usually late. Posner suggests that it doesn't have to be late, but it should be better designed. Both the timing and the design failures, however, derive from the political nature of any large special stimulus. Becker seems closer to the point. Whether its late our designed with an eye to political favorites, stimuli passed by legislatures are bound to be economically inefficient.

[Anonymous]

I Say. I Say. Yessserie Bob. You can pay on my new car because some "un-selfish" legislator without pride, morals or principles says so. Yup. I keeps a pitch'in 'em and the public keeps a missin' 'em.

Posted by John Galt (or is that Fogg Horn Leg Horn).

[Anonymous]

Provides the best tiffany jewellery, including Necklaces, Pendants, Bracelets, Earrings, Ringsat the lowest prices.Tiffany jewellery is the best online United Kingdom jewelry stores where you can buy the cheapest Tiffany & Co silver Our huge selection of
tiffany jewelry

[Anonymous]

good post,I think so!Abercrombie & Fitch on Sale, Hoodies, Jeans, T-Shirts, Pants, Polos abercrombie and fitch abercrombie and fitch cheap abercrombie fitch Abercrombie Men Tee abercrombie womens polos Abercrombie & Fitch Men, women, and children's clothing and accessories edhardylife a famous ed hardy store which sell directly ed hardy clothing, shoes, boots, swim suit and other cheap ed hardy ed hardy cheap Ed Hardy ed hardy clothing,Providing authentic Ed Hardy Clothing with competitive price and fast,secure delivery.The famous brand by Don Ed Hardy 's Vintage Ed Hardy

[Anonymous]

Great, well-thought out position.
New Teen Sex

[Anonymous]

Just love
tiffany
and
ugg boots,thanks!!

[buy kamagra online]

Peat is does appear that someone has shaved their legs...Good observation...Being unfamiliar with this process, I looked it up on Wikipedia and the definition is: "It is a very common practice among women in Western countries
http://www.buykamagraonline.com/
http://www.buykamagraonline.com/100mg-oral.html

[oil paintings]

So happy to enjoy such a insightful article that does not depend on base posturing to get the topic fulfilled. The post is in reality the greatest on this laudable topic. Keep it up!

[lower back pain]

If we had a decent and generally accepted theory on what should and should not be done by government in the event of a crisis then perhaps the suspicion could be overcome, but for now it is altogether reasonable to shift the burden of proof to the proponents of these efforts and maintain a presumption against the efficacy of these ad hoc, improvised giveaways.

[air Jordan]

*A good heart, a pair of industrious hand.

[coach outlet]

The goal is to get citizens designing and discussing facilities. The project does not address system design, but you could use the same model.

If citizens addressed system design in this project it would probably be useful for discussion purposes only, though, as professionals have more tools and knowledge to create good designs. By crowdsourcing bus stop designs, they are gathering ideas that otherwise might not surface.

[air jordans]

If you can give your son or daughter only one gift, let it be enthusiasm

[English taobao]

* be happy together is good enough. I am not asking for things that I could never get.

[Taobao English site]

Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance.

[Nike Air]

Regardless of what we're, most of us should to warmly ask your reader to read about our own superb task. Excellent character is one of the decisive factors in English research. Perseverance, persistence, self-confidence and determination are badly needed

[Coach Poppy]

All sentences are about a little something or another person. The a little something or anyone that the sentence is about is called the topic on the sentence. From your blog, I see that, and study a thing I'd like. Thanks for sharing.

[low back pain]

We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable information to work on. You have done an impressive job and our whole community will be thankful to you.

[Louis Vuitton Outlet]

I started blogging about the dangers of buying stuff almost two years ago, made a few posts and then kind of forgot about it. This is the fate of many blogs, I guess, and since I never really told anyone about it, I figured it would just sit there, which, by and by, it did. Except for one part - the BAD McAfee part, which took on a life of its own while I was off doing other things.

[ugg boots]

Keynesian stimulus can fail in many ways. Becker notes that it is usually late. Posner suggests that it doesn't have to be late, but it should be better designed. Both the timing and the design failures, however, derive from the political nature of any large special stimulus. Becker seems closer to the point. Whether its late our designed with an eye to political favorites, stimuli passed by legislatures are bound to be economically inefficient.

[ugg boots]

Keynesian stimulus can fail in many ways. Becker notes that it is usually late. Posner suggests that it doesn't have to be late, but it should be better designed. Both the timing and the design failures, however, derive from the political nature of any large special stimulus. Becker seems closer to the point. Whether its late our designed with an eye to political favorites, stimuli passed by legislatures are bound to be economically inefficient.