Relative to initial expectations, and given that the heads of almost all leading nations attended, the recently concluded United Nations climate change summit in Copenhagen was an embarrassing failure. The final accord was only a statement of intention, and had no binding pledges on actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, although the majority of attending nations did agree to ''take note'' of a vague last-minute compromise document by President, Barack Obama, and the leaders of four major emerging powers: China, India, Brazil and South Africa.
The most important issue on the initial agenda was to reach agreement on major worldwide cuts during the next several decades in greenhouse gas emissions. Yet the final Copenhagen document removed from an earlier draft a proposal to target a 50% cut in world greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2050. The final document does acknowledge the need to limit world temperature rises to less than 2 degrees centigrade above pre-industrial levels, but it does not include any way to enforce achieving this goal.
The second major aim of the US, Europe, and other rich countries was to get agreement from China, Brazil, India, Russia, and other important developing countries to greatly reduce their greenhouse gas emissions during the next couple of decades. China has become the world’s largest producer of carbon dioxide, supplanting the US, now in second place. In return for agreeing to large reductions in emissions, developing countries hoped to receive substantial aid from the rich countries. This effort also failed. The only firm deal on aid in the final accord is for developed countries to provide a paltry $30 billion to help developing nations cope with the effects of climate change from 2010 to 2012, although the rich nations indicate that they will try to jointly provide $100 billion year to developing countries by the year 2020.
It is easy to see why the fundamental difference at the Copenhagen meeting was between the developed and developing world (the second most important difference was within the developed world, where Europe and Japan wanted more aggressive emission cuts from the US). A well documented finding by development economists is that as per capita income grows in the course of economic development, countries become more concerned about both local and global pollution, such as global warming. This is why the BRIC countries-Brazil, Russia, India, and China- and other developing countries feel it is unfair to ask them to take actions that the developed countries themselves did not take when they too were much poorer.
This fundamental conflict is the reason why rich countries were willing to discuss possible aid, or “bribes”, to developing countries if they undertook large cuts in their carbon dioxide emissions (see the proposal along these lines in my post in December 2004 on our old website Becker-Posner-blog.com.) This explains the goal of providing $100 billion of annual aid by 2020.
$100 billion is a lot of money, but it is paltry compared to the GDPs of the most important developing countries, and even to their industrial output base. For example, China, the largest of the developing countries, has a GDP of about $8 trillion, adjusted for purchasing power parity, compared to the $14 trillion of the United States. Since China is the world’s largest exporter of goods, its industrial sector- where carbon emissions are concentrated- accounts for almost half its total output. Even if we suppose, unrealistically, that China receives a full half of the proposed aid, or $50 billion annually, that is only 5/8 of one per cent of its current GDP. So China would be economically much worst off if, in return for this $50 billion, China had to cut emissions enough to reduce its growth rate by only a little. For example, if cuts in its carbon dioxide emissions reduced China’s annual growth rate for the next decade from 8% to 7.37%, the lose in GDP from the lower growth in the first year would just offset the $50 billion in aid. However, in later years, China would lose much more than the aid from rich countries since its GDP base would be much larger due to its rapid economic growth.
The difficulty in reaching agreement on enforcing compliance was a major obstacle to getting rich countries to agree to large amounts of aid. China and other developing countries argued that monitoring of their compliance with their pledges to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases infringed their sovereignty as independent nations. Yet without serious monitoring of compliance, such agreements are of dubious value since developing countries, especially non-democratic ones, may accept aid from rich countries, and then fudge their published records on degree of compliance.
The rich countries of Europe, Japan, and the United States may still implement further steep cuts in their own carbon emissions. But that is likely to have only a modest effect on worldwide carbon emissions if the BRIC countries and the other almost 200 countries are not included. A major reason why the 1997 Kyoto Protocol failed is that it exempted developing countries from any targeted cuts in emissions. Large cuts by rich countries alone would speed up the already rapid shift of economic power to Asian and other developing nations. Some companies in Western countries would transfer much of their most polluting outputs to developing countries, and industrial companies from China and elsewhere would grow at the expense of American, European, and Japanese companies.
So my conclusion is that either rich nations have to pony up a lot more money to get developing countries to agree to large cuts in their greenhouse gas emissions when monitoring of compliance would be limited. Or rich countries have to go it alone in cutting their emissions, and then accept a much smaller impact than they would like from their own cuts on worldwide emission reduction. Even the strongest proponents of immediate sharp cuts in world emissions of greenhouse gases –which I am not- have to recognize the implication from the failure of the Copenhagen meeting that large worldwide reductions in emissions are not achievable in the near future.
Yoga is a vital part of any fitness regimen, and is an absolute must for an extreme program like P90X. This routine combines strength, balance, coordination, flexibility, and breath work to enhance your physique and calm your mind. Yoga X will leave you feeling energized, invigorated, and maybe even a little enlightened.
Posted by: Video Games | 03/22/2011 at 02:06 AM
Get ready to squat, lunge, and pull for a total-body workout like no other. While the main focus of this workout lies in strengthening and developing the leg muscles (quads, hamstrings, glutes, and calves), there's also a handful of great pull-up exercises to give your legs a quick breather while you work the upper body.
Posted by: RevAbs 90-Day Ab Workout | 03/22/2011 at 02:08 AM
No more "made by china" unless approved by a green label.
We make china transparent! That should be done anyway.
Digital democracy of the third millennium: how can you expect your
government to take responsibility if you do not even bother about a green
label ?
Posted by: pirates of caribbean 4 movie | 03/31/2011 at 01:06 PM
Hey, I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part
people lack substance but I just wanted to make a quick comment to say GREAT blog!…..
I’ll be checking in on a regularly now….
Keep up the good work!
Posted by: Supra Shoes | 04/12/2011 at 04:59 AM
Yo. I think to write well, worth looking at, hope to continue to work, I will continue to focus on your blog.
http://www.picksuprashoes.com/
Posted by: Account Deleted | 04/17/2011 at 11:56 PM
What you wrote good continue to work hard
Posted by: Moncler Jacket | 04/18/2011 at 01:46 AM
I get a lot of knowledge from here.Thank you so much
Posted by: birkenstocks | 05/07/2011 at 12:17 AM
Good point. I hadn't toguhht about it quite that way. :)
Posted by: Loran | 05/19/2011 at 05:09 PM
Another great job in the challenge -- just as we all suspected, though! Keep up the good work -- the writing, the cooking, all just so genuine.
Posted by: louboutin shoes | 06/01/2011 at 04:21 AM
Another great job in the challenge -- just as we all suspected, though! Keep up the good work -- the writing, the cooking, all just so genuine.
Posted by: louboutin shoes | 06/01/2011 at 04:22 AM
I can probably get some ideas here for my coming thesis.
Posted by: hawaii helicopter tours | 06/21/2011 at 04:08 AM
fake">http://www.fakeraybanswholesale.com/fake-ray-bans-a-c-1.html">fake ray bans wholesale site. Fake Ray Ban Sunglasses encompass the form that started everything.The fake Ray Ban Sunglasses may be the brand staple originally designed for the U.S.military fighter pilots in 1937.Ray Ban Replica Sunglasses have the timeless look using the unmistakable tear drop shaped lenses.This style allowed Aviators to p>Welcome to visit fake ray bans wholesale site. Fake Ray Ban Sunglasses encompass the form that started everything.The fake Ray Ban Sunglasses may be the brand staple originally designed for the U.S.military fighter pilots in 1937.Ray Ban Replica Sunglasses have the timeless look using the unmistakable tear drop shaped lenses.This style allowed Aviators to quickly spread beyond their utility,becoming popular among celebrities,rock stars and citizens world wide alike.It becomes an iconic look that has endured for pretty much a hundred years.Fake Rar Ban Aviator sunglasses can also be found with polar lenses.Fake Ray Ban Sunglasses are retro and timeless,and as fashionable today because they were when they were the sunglasses associated with preference of counter-culture intellectuals and civil rights leaders.Ray Ban Replica Clubmaster sunglasses are perfect for the generation that grew up with its classic curved lines in addition to young whipper snappers who are discovering the iconic shape the very first time.quickly spread beyond their utility,becoming popular among celebrities,rock stars and citizens world wide alike.It becomes an iconic look that has endured for pretty much a hundred years.Fake Rar Ban Aviator sunglasses can also be found with polar lenses.Fake Ray Ban Sunglasses are retro and timeless,and as fashionable today because they were when they were the sunglasses associated with preference of counter-culture intellectuals and civil rights leaders.Ray Ban Replica Clubmaster sunglasses are perfect for the generation that grew up with its classic curved lines in addition to young whipper snappers who are discovering the iconic shape the very first time.Welcome to visit http://www.fakeraybanswholesale.com .
Posted by: replica oakley sunglasses | 06/23/2011 at 03:13 AM
This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.
Posted by: discount mbt shoes | 06/29/2011 at 03:22 AM
I’ve been reading your blog all along, I simply don’t have the words. I just wanted you to know that I’m fond of your blog so much.
Posted by: oilpaintings | 07/01/2011 at 04:43 AM
Read the book and then you will learn something!
Posted by: nike air max 2011 | 07/31/2011 at 09:05 AM
Image examinating outside many of your posts in addition to it’s extremely great junk. I am going to most definitely take a note of your web site.
Posted by: uk viagra sales | 09/02/2011 at 03:09 AM
Europa Braut ist wunderbare Fantasie, Romantik! Suchen und finden Sie Ihren süßen Fest bei Europa Braut! brautkleider, abendkleid,herrenanzüge,Brautmode Brautkleid, Hochzeitskleider, Abendkleider, Abendmode, Cocktailkleider, Mädchenkleider, etc. können Sie hier finden. Eine grosse Auswahl der Farben und kompletten Größen bieten wir. Wir können auch nach Ihren eigenen Massen anfertigen(Massanfertigung). Was mehr ist, bieten wir Ihnen schöne Hochzeit Accessories Brautschleier, Brauthandschuhe und Braut Bolero, sowie einige zarte Braut Schmuckstück. Jedes Mädchen hat einen Traum, eine schönste Braut der Welt zu werden. Kommen Sie hier und lass Europa Braut Ihre Wünsche zu realisieren!
Posted by: herrenanzüge | 09/29/2011 at 01:17 AM
Irene Bridal Online Shop bieten Ihnen günstige Brautkleide,brautkleid, Hochzeitskleider,abendkleider,Herrenmode,Cocktailkleider und Brautjungferkleider mit Massanfertigung
Posted by: Hochzeitskleider | 09/29/2011 at 01:19 AM
Merci pour le partage. Je suis entièrement d'accord avec vous, vous obtiendriez probablement plus de lecteurs, si vous avez interviewé des gens controversés pour votre blog.
Posted by: oil paintings | 11/10/2011 at 11:56 PM
Amazing! I am impressed by your knowledge on this particular subject. I'm so astounded. You are so talented. Continue doing good great topics.
Posted by: angry birds seasons help | 12/09/2011 at 06:05 AM
Hey just a thought, I completely agree with you. I really like this article. It contains a lot of useful information.
Posted by: Oil Painting Reproductions | 01/03/2012 at 09:04 PM
I love your blog very much, more more info, I will concern it again!
Posted by: Redwing Boots | 03/16/2012 at 03:00 AM
Great!
Thanks for your sharing, is so great and i learned something from this article, i like this very much!
i waiting for your regular update!
Tks!
Posted by: art oil painting | 04/12/2012 at 10:53 PM
Now we know who the sesnlibe one is here. Great post!
Posted by: Oil Painting Reproduction | 04/25/2012 at 03:39 AM
I love your blog very much, more more info, I will concern it again!
Posted by: Discount Oakley Sunglasses | 06/16/2012 at 02:51 AM