The current issue of the Economist recognizes that the dramatic change in labor force participation of women is one of the most important transformations in the economic and social worlds during the past generation. I will discuss the main forces behind this change, and also consider whether the United States needs additional public policies to accommodate women at work.
Several crucial changes have contributed to transforming the position of women. Perhaps the most fundamental during the past half century were technological advances, such as the computer, and the shift in richer countries away from manufacturing and toward services. These developments put much greater emphasis on knowledge and information as opposed to physical strength and heavy work, which in turn greatly increased the importance of higher education.
Women have shown a greater capacity than men in completing universities and four-year colleges, largely because women have greater and less variable non-cognitive skills, such as study habits. While the fraction of men with four-year college degrees in the United States has stagnated since 1970, the fraction of women with these degrees has exploded, so that now women receive almost 60% of the four-year degrees in the United States compared to only 40% in 1970. Similar shifts in higher education toward women have taken place in European countries. Related trends are occurring also in developing countries, even in fundamentalist Iran.
The increased importance of skills and knowledge has greatly affected parental fertility and investment decision. As parents have recognized the importance of a good education and other training to succeed in the modern world, they have opted for fewer children since giving extensive education to many children would be too expensive. Therefore, modern parents have lower birth rates than parents did in the past, and instead invest much more in each child. This has produced sharply declining birth rates almost everywhere, and below replacement fertility rates in about 90 countries that include all European nations, much of Asia, including China, Japan, and South Korea, and even a few mainly Moslem nations.
The declines in fertility and shift toward greater investment in children have been accelerated by the growing education of women, who tend to be particularly concerned about providing a good education to their children. This helps explain why educated women have relatively few children and invest more in the schooling of each child. In addition, the time spent by educated mothers in child rearing is more expensive since they can earn more in the labor force. This too helps explain why women who graduate from college have always tended to have fewer children than other women did.
These trends toward greater emphasis on knowledge and information, low fertility, and much greater education of women, have all contributed to the large growth in the labor force participation of women during the past several decades. For example, about 80% of American women with a college education are in the labor force compared to less than 50% for female high school dropouts. Although women are more likely to work part time than men, the gap in their labor force participation rates has greatly narrowed.
The recession affected men much harder than women since men are more likely to work in construction and manufacturing, two sectors especially hit hard. As a result, in recent months women have made up about half the labor force in the United States. This fraction will fall as the economy recovers, but the trend is still strongly toward gender equality in labor force participation, and perhaps even toward a majority of participants being women. This is partly because low skilled men have been withdrawing from the labor force.
Although women still lag by a lot in their representation in the top managerial positions, they have greatly narrowed the gap between their full time earnings and that of men. Wives earn more than their husbands in perhaps 30% of all American families with two earners, and that percentage continues to grow. American women are starting new businesses at a much faster rate than they did in the past, and the number of female heads of large companies, although small in number, has been growing.
Although the United States has instituted various policies to help working women, unlike Sweden and other Scandinavian countries it does not provide extensive public subsidies to childcare, does not have a system of legislated paid leaves to women that allow them to care for newborn children, and does not guarantee that they can get their jobs back when they return to work. Yet, contrary to many claims, I believe that the less interventionist American approach may not have impeded, and may even have encouraged, women’s’ progress in the labor force.
Despite all the subsidies to childcare in Scandinavian countries, the US still has higher fertility rates than Sweden, Norway, or Denmark, and also than other European countries. Moreover, the labor force participation rates of women in the US are not much below those in Scandinavian countries, especially after considering that American birth rates are higher, and that some women in Scandinavian countries are counted as having jobs even when they are on paid child care leaves.
Married women in the United States with at least a high school education can “afford” to pay for childcare, and forego employment for months or even years after having children, since they are usually married to husbands who have decent to high earnings. Many of these women do leave work for a while to care for their children, even when that means they reduce their opportunities to advance when they return to work. I do not believe there is much of a case for the government to pay these married women to take leaves from work when they have children, or guarantee them their jobs when they return to work. Government policies should be rather neutral about whether women leave work to care for children or continue to work.
On the other hand, public policies to help children of poorer women, including children of many unmarried women, may be justified since these women tend to under invest in their children because they have limited incomes and often low education levels. Childcare assistance and other subsidies to investments in the young children of these women could well have a high social return. The US does subsidize childcare programs for low-income families, and could increase the subsidies to various head start programs.
But such interventions would not justify the Scandinavian approach of generously subsidizing all women, including well off women, to take paid leaves when they have children. Despite all their job guarantees after they return to work from childcare leaves, private sector opportunities for Scandinavian women, and women in several other European countries, are limited. For example, about three-quarters of employed women in Sweden work for the government compared to one-quarter of employed men, and women comprise a much larger fraction of senior managers of American companies than of Swedish companies.
Where do I find out about: at what age my daughter is allowed to participate in high school setting? Has there been a law passed that will allow her to continue until 22? She will be 21 on June 8. Her graduation/last day of school is June 1. At this time it would be better to our family situation/and her needs that she continues 1 more year. Is it true?
Posted by: jordan retro 5 | 10/09/2010 at 03:23 AM
Insightful post. Never thought that it was this simple after all. I had spent a good deal of my time looking for someone to explain this subject clearly and you’re the only one that ever did that. Kudos to you! Keep it up
Posted by: telelista | 10/14/2010 at 07:42 AM
You have to believe in yourself . That's the secret of success .
Posted by: new balance | 10/15/2010 at 02:35 AM
MKP-1 plays the role of an off switch over a cascade of brain chemicals called MAPK that are crucial to the survival and function of neurons, according to the paper, which appears in the journal Nature Medicine.
Posted by: Nike Sneakers | 10/18/2010 at 04:27 AM
Great to know that
Posted by: Nike Sneakers | 10/18/2010 at 04:27 AM
The ability of the students to analyze newspaper stories, comprehend documents and balance a checkbook was assessed. Over half the graduates of four-year colleges and three-quarters of the graduates of junior and community colleges could not be categorized as possessing these "proficient" skills.
Posted by: lower back pain | 11/23/2010 at 10:12 AM
Very informative post. In our time today, women have become very aggressive and educated, not just about work, but life in general. It's true that families today tend to keep it small in terms of family size, since they know how hard it is to provide for a large family. As for the work environment, we're about to say hello to the Age of Equality. Though most managerial positions today are held by men, you'd see that some companies are starting to have women in higher positions. Women become more favorable than men since women are patient and they know how to handle stressful situations, but can still manage to keep themselves calm.
Posted by: Natalie Loopbaanadvies | 12/06/2010 at 05:47 AM
I’ve been thrown into so many situations where I had to develop a solution on the fly working off another developers code—so I can certainly relate to the tedious yet thrilling feeling of getting things patched up just in time.
Posted by: remi online | 12/06/2010 at 10:47 AM
Amazing post. Going to take a bit of time to think about this stuff:) good
Posted by: lacoste poloo | 12/28/2010 at 09:40 PM
Great post. Women today are starting to fight for equal rights. I mean it's only fair that they get the job they want. Because over the years, they've tried so hard to prove that they are deserving. You see women excel in school so it's just right that they'd be given a chance to prove they're good at work and that they can be an asset to the company.
Posted by: Maria Payroll | 01/06/2011 at 12:41 AM
As many proved women are more towards economic stability, which help empowering economy of country.
Posted by: bad credit mortgage | 03/14/2011 at 06:10 AM
We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable information to work on. You have done an impressive job and our whole community will be thankful to you.
Posted by: severe back pain | 03/26/2011 at 10:27 AM
This is really interesting, You're a very skilled blogger. I've joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I have shared your site in my social networks!
Posted by: Back Pain Relief Machine | 03/26/2011 at 10:34 AM
The increased importance of skills and knowledge has greatly affected parental fertility and investment decision. As parents have recognized the importance of a good education and other training to succeed in the modern world, they have opted for fewer children since giving extensive education to many children would be too expensive. Therefore, modern parents have lower birth rates than parents did in the past, and instead invest much more in each child. This has produced sharply declining birth rates almost everywhere, and below replacement fertility rates in about 90 countries that include all European nations, much of Asia, including China, Japan, and South Korea, and even a few mainly Moslem nations.
Posted by: Rosetta Stone | 05/21/2011 at 03:41 AM
A tragic tale interwoven seamlessly with childhood memories. I wonder if either of you, as children, could have imagined meeting your end under these circumstances. I too have suffered a loss due to gun violence. You honor your friend.
Posted by: booster cables | 07/17/2011 at 07:32 PM
Wonderful tribute to your friend, Matt, and heartbreaking. I'm sorry you lost him.
Posted by: battery cable | 07/17/2011 at 07:33 PM
This was amazing. The parallels of guns in your young lives and how things ended for your friend, the evolution of the men you became, just everything. Through it all I could feel your still-present shock. I am so sorry you lost someone whom you knew so well in a special time of your existences. I hope he and the other victims rest in peace.
Posted by: shelf hanging organizer | 07/17/2011 at 07:34 PM
Really great writing, Matt - it is more horrifying from the well crafted perspective you chose. I'm glad you finally got to write it, and that the years of mulling how to do so gave you this fine piece. All that said - the horror never recedes.
Posted by: glass bottle | 07/17/2011 at 07:35 PM
Thanks for sharing this. I hope it inspires people with undiagnosed maladies to get further medical care.
Posted by: dust maskss | 07/17/2011 at 07:36 PM
Thank you for this. Please don't worry about making people sad. Trying to get at the truth is the important thing.
Posted by: ratchet tiedown | 07/24/2011 at 08:54 PM
In my head I'm hearing this on the stage as a spoken-word performance. I would love to hear this at an open mic or poetry slam!! Beautiful. Provocative. Inspiring. Thanks.
Posted by: Bar stoors | 07/24/2011 at 08:56 PM
Of course, this only applied to dignified rifle-hunting of stags and boars.
Posted by: Hydraulic-Jack | 07/24/2011 at 08:58 PM
Wonderful writing and a fascinating story, Matt! I was fearful all might not end well for a moment there but boy was I smiling when that jackrabbit took off!
Posted by: Base cap | 07/24/2011 at 09:00 PM
Thanks for sharing. This website is to I too have to help. Very good.
Posted by: jordan cool grey | 09/27/2011 at 09:33 AM
Thank you, great stuff as usual.pui
Posted by: knockoff handbags | 12/02/2011 at 09:51 AM