Why Aren’t Americans Happier?—Posner

On December 14, Becker and I blogged about the shortcomings of  GDP (Gross Domestic Product) as a welfare measure. A related question is the relation between GDP or other measures of economic prosperity and happiness, or what utilitarians and welfare economists refer to as “utility.” The great utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham defined utility as the excess of pleasure over pain, or equivalently (for he did not confine pleasure and pain to purely physical sensations) happiness.

 

Most people, including most economists, do not regard per capita income or other measures of economic welfare (such as GDP, which is the market value of all goods and services sold in the United States, whether for consumption or investment, in the course of one year) as an end in itself, but as a contributor to human happiness broadly conceived. They expect the contribution to be positive, however. Most people devote much of their time to trying to increase their income, which suggests that income and welfare are positively correlated. I will question this expectation and this suggestion.

 

The United States has the highest per capita income of any large country, and so one might expect it to have the highest per capita happiness. But surveys indicate that this is not true; in one well-known study (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisfaction_with_Life_Index#International_Rankings_2006) (visited Jan. 9, 2010), for example, the United States ranked 23rd out of 178 countries. Denmark was first, Burundi last; nevertheless there was a general though rough correlation between happiness and per capita income: the happiest countries are rich, the unhappiest poor. And generally as countries become richer, their inhabitants become happier. These correlations are confirmed in an important and careful study by the economists Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers, available at http://bpp.wharton.upenn.edu/betseys/papers/happiness.pdf (visited Jan. 10, 2010).

 

Cross-national comparisons are of limited significance because other things affect happiness besides income, such as health, population density, religious beliefs, quality of public services, internal and external security, family structure, climate, and income equality (given declining marginal utility of income, the more equal incomes are—holding other things constant, an essential qualification, obviously—the higher average utility can be expected to be). Thus the fact that the United States ranks only 23rd in happiness is not terribly meaningful.

 

However, an important finding in another article by Stevenson and Wolfers, “The Decline of Female Happiness,” available at http://bpp.wharton.upenn.edu/betseys/papers/Paradox%20of%20declining%20female%20happiness.pdf (visited Jan. 9, 2010), is that in the United States men’s happiness is essentially unchanged since 1970, and women’s happiness has declined significantly, so that average U.S. happiness has declined. In 1970, the average woman was happier than the average man; today the reverse is true. In most other developed countries, average male and female happiness has grown, but male happiness has grown relative to female happiness.

 

The authors adjust for compositional effects in the United States—such as changes in the racial and ethnic composition of the society, labor force participation, education, marriage and divorce, and age—and, surprisingly, find few differences. (One difference is that blacks, especially but not only black women, are happier today than in 1970.) They speculate (plausibly, in my opinion) that because women are on average more risk-averse than men, they find the range of career and relationship choices open to women nowadays a source of unhappiness. The United States has become more competitive in the last 40 years, and relatively to most other developed countries as well, and this may explain the different overall happiness trends, though it does not explain why male happiness in the United States has not declined.

 

Probably the most notable finding in the Stevenson-Wolfers study, though not emphasized by them, is that increases in per capita income, at least in the United States, do not seem to increase happiness. U.S. per capita income, adjusted for inflation, has more than doubled since 1970, yet happiness has declined.

 

The reason that happiness has not increased even though per capita income has increased may be that in comparing happiness at year t and at year t + 40, one is asking the inhabitants of two very different societies (whether it is the same person asked at both times or different people). The people at year t didn’t know what conditions would be 40 years hence, and so couldn’t feel unhappy because they couldn’t experience those conditions. If happiness is relative to existing opportunities, a change in those opportunities needn’t affect it.

 

Happiness moreover is a psychological, which is to say a biological, state, and biological states are not as variable as income is. There are people in the world today who earn $1 a day, and people who earn $1 million a day, but it would be inconceivable than the latter was one million times happier than the former, just as no person in any society can run a million times faster than the slowest runner. The human biology may simply be such that the elasticity of happiness to income is very low.

 

But one should distinguish between happiness and preferences, and hence between maximizing happiness and maximizing preference satisfaction. People have a strong preference for more income over less and thus for a rising standard of living. Adam Smith argued in The Wealth of Nations that people fooled themselves in thinking they would be happier with more money. Maybe so; but as long as people do have this strong preference, economics can explain a great deal of human behavior.

Comments

[Obadiah Shoher]

Sorry, it's 2am here, I've misquoted. It's, "Who's a rich man," of course, but "rich" is understood in the ethical sense, so it is close to "happy."

[www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=2233984]

I haven't read the other comments, so forgive me if another reader brought it up:

Prof. Ronald Inglehart at the University of Michigan is director of the World Values Survey.

He and his colleagues propose that happiness is a relative psychological state, so increased income or improved welfare only causes an increase in happiness when there is (a) an improvement in the position of a select person or group as compared to the whole, or (b) widespread equality. Gini coefficient comparisons support the idea that nations of dramatically different prosperity can have similar measures of happiness when their citizens are "mostly" secure, poor, etc. Happiness also correlates with the recognition and preservation (and consciousness) of civil liberties, which I would say is well-connected to democratic, wealth-stable nations.

As much as professors drilled it into my head that it is inappropriate to use wikipedia as a go-to, here are a few helpful links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Values_Survey
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Inglehart

http://www.amazon.com/Modernization-Cultural-Change-Democracy-Development/dp/0521609712

[Randy]

As was pointed out, places like the U.S., Japan, and the U.K. rank high in GDP, but are mediocre in "happiness." Perhaps their advanced workforces have hit a critical point with happiness as they encounter the increasingly steep promotion/income curves of their cutting-edge economies.

[pariuri sportive]

Indeed, as a reader to this blog I am truly impressed by it`s content, have been coming across posts that are so very informative for me, keep impressing us! well worth the read.I found it very informative as I have been researching a lot lately on practical matters such as you talk about.

[Soccer Gear]

This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I ever saw.

[sesli chat]

While the marginal utility of income is decreasing, maybe the marginal (and perhaps dismal) labor required to increase income is far higher in advanced countries. Even if practically pointless, people - especially in richer nations - still strive to obtain a higher paycheck, often going to great lengths to do so.

As was pointed out, places like the U.S., Japan, and the U.K. rank high in GDP, but are mediocre in "happiness." Perhaps their advanced workforces have hit a critical point with happiness as they encounter the increasingly steep promotion/income curves of their cutting-edge economies.

My conjectures and generalizations could, however, be entirely wrong. The issue seems less related to economics and more to sociology, though there undeniably is at least a hint of positive monetary correlation with happiness. Did somebody say "scatter-plot?"

[Grow Taller]

Its right you say that one can not buy happiness with money.

[Markin Ambuh]

Happiness is a state of mind and it is up to us to decide. We all have the choice to be happy or not regardless of where we are on earth.

Thanks.

[oil paintings]

Thanks for all information which you gave us. Its very usefull. I ll come back For sure. So see you soon!!!

[lower back pain]

The higher one gets, the less money one needs to be happy once the basics have been achieved. Americans are unhappy because they have been hoodwinked by the media and political indoctrination of what "success" or "happiness" mean which in large measure is unattainable, in particular for women.

[severe back pain]

We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable information to work on. You have done an impressive job and our whole community will be thankful to you.

[Back Pain Relief Machine]

This is really interesting, You're a very skilled blogger. I've joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I have shared your site in my social networks!

[Rosetta Stone]

Most people, including most economists, do not regard per capita income or other measures of economic welfare (such as GDP, which is the market value of all goods and services sold in the United States, whether for consumption or investment, in the course of one year) as an end in itself, but as a contributor to human happiness broadly conceived. They expect the contribution to be positive, however. Most people devote much of their time to trying to increase their income, which suggests that income and welfare are positively correlated. I will question this expectation and this suggestion.

[shelf hanging organizer]

Thanks for your comment. I liked my first one. It brought back the pain of finding out how unfair life and education can be.

[Protective-mask]

This sheds some light on the possible roots of your misogynistic tendencies Matt.

[power socket]

This was amazing. I was there with you - and it's as close as I want to get to a military experience.

[china crystal]

Allow yourself time to grieve over the deaths of your chickens, but don't think for a moment that you did something wrong.

[Moncler Jackets Outlet]

We meant to share with you our first visit here in November, not to mention our stay at the Ace New York last early June. We're definitely smitten with this fledgling chain, and are even looking forward to popping up to asdfPortland soon, in part because of the original Ace there.

[Supra Trainers]

Welcome to Supra Trainers online shop. Here we supply an extensive selection of super-fashion Asics Shoes with different styles and colors. Like Asics Running Shoes, Asics Trainers, Puma First Round and Supra Footwear and so on. Because of the high fashion, unique design and good function, Puma Shoes can make your feet more comfortable and make your life more stylish. So nowadays, Asics Uk Online shop offer the best Asics Running Shoes which are loved by more and more people all over the world. We try our best to make all of you enjoy the top fashion and become the most charming and handsome with the fashional and stylish Puma Shoes. Our mission is to provide the best products and service and also the lowest prices to you. Just enjoy yourself Supra Shoes UK store. Choose your favorite cheap Asics Australia online, just click"Add to cart". Or you can first register for future visit conveniently. As a creatative company, Supra Trainers always gives us more surprise. Order your favorite Puma Running Shoes here, and enjoy high quality, big discount, fast delivery, free shipping and without any sale tax. Don't hesitate! Act right now!

[Hochzeitskleider]

Irene Bridal Online Shop bieten Ihnen günstige Brautkleide,brautkleid, Hochzeitskleider,abendkleider,Herrenmode,Cocktailkleider und Brautjungferkleider mit Massanfertigung

[Abendkleider]

Europa Braut ist wunderbare Fantasie, Romantik! Suchen und finden Sie Ihren süßen Fest bei Europa Braut! brautkleider, abendkleid,herrenanzüge,Brautmode Brautkleid, Hochzeitskleider, Abendkleider, Abendmode, Cocktailkleider, Mädchenkleider, etc. können Sie hier finden. Eine grosse Auswahl der Farben und kompletten Größen bieten wir. Wir können auch nach Ihren eigenen Massen anfertigen(Massanfertigung). Was mehr ist, bieten wir Ihnen schöne Hochzeit Accessories Brautschleier, Brauthandschuhe und Braut Bolero, sowie einige zarte Braut Schmuckstück. Jedes Mädchen hat einen Traum, eine schönste Braut der Welt zu werden. Kommen Sie hier und lass Europa Braut Ihre Wünsche zu realisieren!

[Mulberry Purses Outlet]

So cute! I already like you on FB and also get your posts on Google Reader. :)

[QCGabriel]

ПОМОГУ ПРОДАТЬ БЕСПЛАТНО ПОЧТИ ЛЮБОЙ ТОВАР.
Все, что не запрещено Законом.
Страна любая.

Найду нужное Вам оборудование или иной товар.

ПРЯМЫЕ ПРОДАЖИ ОБОРУДОВАНИЯ, ТЕХНИКИ И др,
Самое разное без посредников, напрямую от Заводов или Владельца.
В редком случае посредники.

Образцы продаж на сайте

http://1541.ru

z1017@mail.ru

[Pandora Bracelets]

well this blog is great i love reading your articles.

[Microsoft Office]

Valuable information ..I am delighted to read this article..thank you for giving us this useful information. Great walk-through. I value this post.