The Health Care Bill—Posner’s Comment

The bill has now become law. Its length alone (some 2,700 pages, including the modifications made in the “reconciliation” process) precludes a full analysis within reasonable length limitations.

 

Although on balance I think the new law is a mistake, there are three things that can be said in its favor. The first is that it is a genuine social experiment, and we are bound to learn a lot from it—about the size and elasticity of demand for medical services, the reliability of cost estimates by the Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office, the reliability of advice given by health economists, the relative perceptiveness of liberal and conservative commentators, the ability of the federal government to manage a vast and highly complex program of social welfare, and, a related point, the relative efficiency of a lightly regulated market, versus a government-controlled market, in providing health services, and perhaps goods and services more generally.

 

Second, the very cost of the health-care program, which is likely to be far higher than predicted by its sponsors and not nearly offset by tax hikes, spending cuts, or economies in the provision of health care, may act as a wake-up call for the need for fiscal reform. Greece is making real reforms in its economic system, because it has to; it’s broke. If the new health law, piled on top of all the other measures that are causing the federal deficit to explode, causes real damage to the United States, the stage will be set for real reform.

 

Third, and related, the health law does contain some economizing measures, though fewer than the sponsors pretend. (The best may be the tax on “Cadillac” health-insurance plans, which I discuss at the end of this comment.) For example, the requirement that all chains with more than 20 stores must publish calorie information on menus and signs may contribute to reducing obesity, though the effect will be modest. But a typical measure included in the new law that is touted as economizing—subsidizing preventive care—is unlikely to reduce overall health expenses. The reason is not only that preventive care is often more costly than treatment, especially because it tends to be repetitive (annual tests for this and that, for example), but also that it is consumed by the healthy as well as by the sick, and there are more healthy than sick. Even the sick, moreover, are potential users of preventive care—to prevent the illnesses they don’t yet suffer from.

 

More than the tepid economizing measures, however, the Administration will be under pressure to prove that the bill really will save money. Responding to this pressure may produce significant economies, or at least raise the public consciousness concerning the need and opportunity for reducing health costs.

 

That’s the bright side of the new health law. The dark side includes the timing of the measure: the uncertainty that the health law and the deliberations leading up to it have generated for business and consumers alike has probably retarded our economic recovery from the financial crisis. But the law’s biggest negative is its costs. The $100 billion or so of annual subsidies that the law mandates is just the beginning, but it is an ominous beginning. It is true that these are transfer payments, rather than costs in an economic sense; but they are federal transfer payments and so increase the federal deficit, which even without them is growing by more than $1 trillion a year. The subsidies will grow at the rate at which medical costs grow, which is between 5 and 10 percent a year—much greater than any plausible estimate of annual economic growth. Indeed, as Greg Mankiw has argued, the health bill is likely to reduce the nation’s annual growth by increasing the income taxes on the well to do.

 

The biggest cost is likely to come from the law’s effect on the demand for health care. One effect that can be expected is that, if one assumes (plausibly) that the supply curve of health care is upward-sloping, meaning that unit costs increase as demand increases, adding 30 million people to the health-insurance rolls (whether private or Medicaid) will increase overall health-care costs by more than the percentage increase in the number of persons insured.

 

A second demand-related cost effect will result from the fact that insurance,(even with deductibles and copayments, drives a wedge between the cost of a service and its price, and so increases demand. (It’s like a restaurant with a buffet: the marginal cost of eating all you want is zero.) Persons who are uninsured are deterred from consuming medical services in quantity— because of cost (they are billed for such services at very high prices and may be forced into bankruptcy if unable to pay), because of difficulty of obtaining quality service from charity hospitals or other “free” providers, or simply because, though they can “afford” insurance, they prefer to gamble on remaining healthy. These persons, when they become insured, will increase their utilization of medical services, because those services will now be cheaper to them.

 

Health insurance may even induce some people to take worse care of their health: the lower the expense of treatment, the less benefit one derives from prevention, including nonmedical preventives such as a healthy diet, exercise, and avoidance of dangerous activities.

 

The additional costs of health care are likely either to be defrayed by higher taxes on upper-income people or avoided by reductions in the quantity or quality of medical services. The idea that the costs of our health-care system can be significantly reduced by eliminating “unnecessary” treatment is as quixotic as the idea that the Pentagon budget can be significantly reduced by eliminating the “fat” in it. One person’s “unnecessary” medical treatment is another person’s last hope for survival. Cutting medical costs means reducing treatment, which will impair outcomes.

 

The only durable and culturally acceptable ways of reducing the nation’s health costs—which are, by comparison with other wealthy countries, excessive—are by eliminating the tax deductibility of employer-provided health benefits (and thus decoupling health insurance from employment, reducing the cost of insurance to the taxpayer, and discouraging overconsumption of medical services because the tax treatment of health benefits encourages employers to substitute them for wage increases), increasing deductibles and copayments in health-insurance policies in order to give people a greater incentive to take care of themselves, and changing Medicare from an entitlement program to a means-tested welfare program. Unfortunately, there is no political support for any of these measures—although the heavy tax on “Cadillac” employer-provided health insurance, which is to go into effect in 2018—is a step in the direction of reducing the tax deductibility of employer-provided health insurance. In practical effect, it will eliminate the tax deductibility of expensive employer-provided plans.

Comments

[nfl jerseys]

"Japan made a good living a generation ago through 'talented copying' rather than innovating."
lol

[Moncler Jackets UK]

It's so lucky for me to find your blog! So shocking and great! Just one suggestion: It will be better and easier to follow

-----------------------------------------

[Puma Outlet]

The best way to go down is holding on to your friends tubes. The more people, the merrier. More weight makes for a faster ride. This picture is of all the kids going down together.

[Coach outlet]

I'm very excited to be coming to BlogPaws and I must have been distracted by my inspiration

[Coach outlet]

I did have fun, and I worked on it a little more one week night.
I'll tell ya if you ever have a baby, get a walker, Sadie has one and that's what allowed me to do some work, she zipped back and forth around my feet while I painted!!!

[nike shoes]

Thanks for division this attractive post. There are some points here that I have not hear of earlier than. Perfect!Just keep your work!Once again, thanks for this useful post. This will be very helpful for me.

[jordan cool grey]

Thanks for sharing. This website is to I too have to help. Very good.

[PaulTien Nguyen]

Why are you targeting religious liberty, which is guaranteed by the United States Constitution?

[Sergio Wilson]

Nice post. It is interesting to read and it is very useful for the readers to choose a best health insurance. Anyway, thank you for the information. I really appreciated your blog. I will check this out. Thank you and keep it up.

Pa health Insurance

[nhl jerseys]

Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view.

[Compare Part D]

This is an excellent article, but I can't say that I completely agree. It maybe true that healthcare might not be able to sustain itself for a much longer time. But the change shouldn't be about on cutting down the cost but on improving the health care quality, which will result to fewer hospitalization, thus in effect bringing down the cost.

[P90X DVD]

y that I completely agree. It maybe true that healthcare might not be able to sustain itself for a much longer time. But the change shouldn't be about on cutting down the cost but on improving the health care quality, which will result to fewer hosp

[P90X DVD]

at a varying range of costs that depend on the extent of the coverage, the annual deductible, the out-of-pocket cap (if any), limits on out-of-network health care providers, and other variable that a rational economic decision maker should

[P90X DVD]

However, when you are the sufferer in any of these circumstances, and the wrong diagnosis of your illness

[P90X DVD]

effect will result from the fact that insurance,(even with deductibles and copayments, drives a wedge between the cost of a service and its price, and so increases demand. (It’s like a restaurant with a buffet: the marginal cost of eating all you want is zero.) Persons who are uninsured are deterred from consuming medical services in quantity— because of cost (they are billed for such services at very high prices and may be forced into bankruptcy if unable to pay), because of difficulty of obtaining quality service from charity hospitals or other “free” providers, or simply because, though they can “afford”

[amadahomecare]

lthough on balance I think the new law is a mistake, there are three things that can be said in its favor. The first is that it is a genuine social experiment, and we are bound
to learn a lot from it—about the size and elasticity of demand for medical services, the reliability of cost estimates by the Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office, the reliability of advice given by health economists, the relative perceptiveness of liberal and conservative commentators, the ability of the federal government to manage a vast and highly complex program of social welfare, and, a related
point, the relative efficiency of a lightly regulated market, versus a government-controlled market, in providing health services, and perhaps goods and services more generally.

Secondly, the very cost of the health-care program, which is likely to be far higher than predicted by its sponsors and not nearly offset by tax hikes, spending cuts, or economies
in the provision of health care, may act as a wake-up call for the need for fiscal reform.Greece is making real reforms in its economic system, because it has to; it’s broke. If
the new health law, piled on top of all the other measures that are causing the federal deficit to explode, causes real damage to the United States , the stage will be set for
real reform.

Now, AmadaHomeCare is also a part of American Board of Home Care (ABHC) which offers 24 hours home care service for serving seniors with extraordinary home care, health aids and
elderly companionship in Orange County.

For more info,please visit:(http://www.amadahomecare.com).

[Exiciouctot]

Exiciouctot, [url=http://www.aresanimepage.com/]cheap xanax no prescription[/url] xanax no prescription Alprazolam is offered in both extended release as well as instant-release preparations. http://www.aresanimepage.com/ - xanax no rx

[crulululk]

crulululk, http://www.buetresearchers.org/ - alprazolam online pharmacy A patient that takes Xanax should contact a medical doctor if they notice any unusual side-effects are taking Xanax, especially if these negative effects persist or worsen. [url=http://www.buetresearchers.org/]buy xanax online no prescription[/url]

[Healacassie]

check this link, chanel handbag 2010 online shopping chanel handbag 2010 online shopping

[Parkland Acupuncture]

Looks like your site is getting alot of visitors.

[Coconut Creek Acupuncture]

Looks like your site is getting alot of visitors.

[Http buy xanax online.zikle.nl]

sheldvdijdbhpmbx, Buy Xanax, qEgELZU, [url=http://www.topcarcrashes.com/]Buy cheap xanax online[/url], huKAflh, http://www.topcarcrashes.com/ Buy xanax without a prescription or membership, ORZVKPA.

[Cialis us pharmacy]

lnpoqvdijdbhpmbx, Order modafinil, jzYgTPS, [url=http://www.bairbros.com/]Modiodal[/url], jhtuiVJ, http://www.bairbros.com/ Modafinil half life, zRtkOnA, Cialis, OmVWZaD, [url=http://www.oleani.com/]Cialis[/url], uDzktlz, http://www.oleani.com/ Buy Cialis, FkErbEH, Alli coupons, rbjelIv, [url=http://www.onlinemedsreview.com/ViewMedInfo_1454.html]Alli travis[/url], hxyjGHG, http://www.onlinemedsreview.com/ViewMedInfo_1454.html Alli recall, wIgbted, Xanax online pharmacy drugs without, swYLhyG, [url=http://www.foodieatlanta.com/]Order xanax no rx[/url], HKETreu, http://www.foodieatlanta.com/ Purchase xanax pills, ejJWovy, Infra red home security camera systems, HqtLRtj, [url=http://homesecurity-info.org/]Home security system comparison[/url], vYpcTLE, http://homesecurity-info.org/ Home security store, mzijfKg, Meri chaheti hindi pdf velvet deer antler plus, zIEAvwy, [url=http://deerantlerplus4u.net/]Meri chaheti hindi pdf velvet deer antler plus[/url], dAsqraa, http://deerantlerplus4u.net/ Deer Antler, DTijwlg.

[Online pharmacy vicodin]

tozjlvdijdbhpmbx, Clonazepam, vmZDesr, [url=http://lightbodies.com/products.html]Cheap clonazepam cod[/url], ffBNWuK, http://lightbodies.com/products.html Clonazepam 5mg, PTpAahC, Baby Sitting, GWBLYYe, [url=http://babysitting-blog.org/]Baby sitting courses[/url], KKeZnuX, http://babysitting-blog.org/ Sitting on baby, BTwaRbT, Intivar, bIFNQOq, [url=http://intivar-direct.com/]Intivar[/url], KzxNsiu, http://intivar-direct.com/ Intivar, jfnNEus, Dietrol, biCPqyI, [url=http://dietrolonline.com/]Dietrol[/url], darDgLu, http://dietrolonline.com/ Dietrol, jUOHNOs, Modafinil online pharmacy, zNrmxVz, [url=http://www.wcsbid.com/logon.cfm]Online prescription pharmacy[/url], AwXPOTq, http://www.wcsbid.com/logon.cfm online pharmacy, AAQTOUx, Buy cheap order klonopin, hscQCff, [url=http://www.btxformfactor.com/klonopin.html]Sale klonopin[/url], WLNEVqK, http://www.btxformfactor.com/klonopin.html Buy no prescription cheap klonopin, HdPqIip.

[Lordavie cream scam]

rcqmhvdijdbhpmbx, best eye creams, MWvOFWF, [url=http://naturalbeautyreview.com/lordavie-anti-aging-serum-review]chemical peel[/url], AchFktP, http://naturalbeautyreview.com/lordavie-anti-aging-serum-review lordavie, iGffsPF, Stilnox online, DxBciTt, [url=http://www.brandzolpidem.com/]Stilnox zolpidem tartrate[/url], uWJVyVZ, http://www.brandzolpidem.com/ Stilnox side effect, MrCbhbm, Impotence Treatment, uwWbjty, [url=http://impotenceblog.org/]Male impotence treatment[/url], eHLxzop, http://impotenceblog.org/ Treatment impotence after brachytherapy, JqCRERo, Quicken quick books software personal finance, ivBwkoq, [url=http://personalfinance1.org/]Personal finance help[/url], DKlSufC, http://personalfinance1.org/ Free personal finance software debut split, cfAkxLp, Eazol ingredients, OmpZRbi, [url=http://eazol4u.net/]Eazol[/url], oOnBCyE, http://eazol4u.net/ Eazol, OQTyGmU, Ativan lorazepam, RcgygUT, [url=http://karenectoninteriors.com/contact/]Cheap lorazepam online[/url], KuuDAXy, http://karenectoninteriors.com/contact/ Ativan cheap, SSFaqkB.