Given the current and projected large scale budget deficits of the United States, many people are advocating that the US follow the example of Europe and many other countries, and introduce a value added tax (VAT). President Obama suggested only a few days ago that a VAT for Americans is still on the table. The case for a VAT is that it is a relatively efficient tax that induces less distortion in behavior than say a progressive income tax that raises the same amount in revenue. On the other hand, once introduced the VAT almost always tends to rise over time, which increases the burden of government spending and taxation. If a country were starting a new tax system I would on the whole (I discuss my concerns later) recommend relying mainly on a VAT. However, countries like the US that already have complicated tax systems would make a mistake to simply add a VAT to the tax system without radical surgery in income and other taxes.
Since a VAT is a tax on the value added by companies at each stage of production of consumer and investment goods, it is similar to a sales tax levied directly on these consumer and investment goods. Usually, a VAT is a fixed percent, such as 10 or 20 percent, of the value added by each company, although often medicines and certain other necessities are exempt. A VAT does not distort consumption decisions relative to savings and investment decisions since it taxes consumer and investment goods at the same rate. An income tax, by contrast, discourages savings and investment because it taxes savings twice: once on the income from which any savings are taken, and again on the income earned later on from any savings.
Like an income tax, a VAT does distort the decision whether to work more, or take more leisure and earn less. Since leisure time is not taxed, a VAT encourages an increase in leisure time and a decline in working time. A VAT is usually a flat tax, with the same tax rate for richer people who spend a lot on consumption and poorer persons who spend much less, whereas income taxes are usually progressive, with higher marginal tax rates on higher incomes. The higher the marginal tax rate, the greater the labor-leisure and other distortions-economists call the inefficiencies introduced by these distortions dead weight losses. A flat VAT tax would be more efficient for two reasons than a progressive income tax that raises the same revenue: it does not discourage savings relative to consumption, and it induces fewer distortions on other behavior because it has flat rather than rising tax rates. A flat income tax eliminates the effects of rising tax rates, but still distorts savings behavior.
The downside of a value added tax to anyone concerned about growing government spending and taxing is very much related to its upside; namely, that a VAT is a more efficient and relatively painless tax. As with all taxes, proposals to increase the rate of taxation on value added runs into opposition from individuals and companies hurt by a higher VAT. However, since a VAT is easy to collect and causes fewer distortions in behavior than income and most other taxes, governments have an incentive to raise the VAT over time. In fact, value added tax rates do usually start low, but tend to grow rapidly over time. For example, the VAT rate in Europe started low but now ranges from 15 to 25%, and averages about 20%. In Denmark, for example, the VAT rate was 9% in 1962, but quickly rose to 25% by 1992, and has remained at that level.
So the greater efficiency of a VAT and its easy of collection is a two-edged sword. On the one hand, it would raise a given amount of tax revenue efficiently and cheaply. Since economists usually evaluate different types of taxes by their efficiency and easy of collecting a given amount of tax revenue, economists typically like value added taxes. The error in this method of evaluating taxes is that it does not consider the political economy determinants of the level of taxes. From this political economy perspective, the value added tax does not look so attractive, at least to those of us who worry that governments would spend and tax at higher levels than is economically and socially desirable (see the discussion by Mulligan and me “Deadweight Costs and the Size of Government”, The Journal of Law and Economics, October 2003).
In deciding how to close the sizable fiscal deficits facing the US and other countries, introducing or expanding a VAT appeals to many economists and politicians because of the features already discussed. However, the problems is that a VAT would be introduced not as a partial or full substitute for personal and corporate income taxes, but rather as an additional tax. This would make it much easier to close the fiscal gap by maintaining or increasing government spending and overall tax levels.
Since high taxes and high levels of government spending would discourage economic growth and raise rather than lower the overall distortions in an economy, I am highly dubious about introducing a VAT into the federal tax system unless accompanied by a major overall of this system. One big improvement that does not involve a VAT would be to flatten the present income tax rates and greatly reduce the various exemptions, so that the tax basis is widened. Even then it is necessary to be vigilant about combating the incentives government officials have to increase flat taxes over time, whether they are flat income taxes or flat value added taxes.
Jack -- thanks for your reply.
Posted by: Brooks | 05/02/2010 at 07:35 AM
wow i love t hat SO much... can i cut and paste it into my blog?? but give u credit, of course???
Posted by: Gucci Shoes | 05/12/2010 at 09:28 PM
Your article is written very content, All of the projects look great! you make it look so simple to make this purse that I'll have to try it myself! Thanks!
Posted by: Jordan Sneakers | 05/29/2010 at 08:15 PM
Your blog brings me a great deal of fun. Really glad to possess the opportunity to meet you. Take ralax and give yourself a surprise, and we will reside a lot more delighted.
Posted by: Creative Recreation | 06/29/2010 at 01:41 AM
As you mentioned, VAT is more efficient and relatively harmless tax. We shouldn't forget what damage it could make if were not carefully managed. If the VAT is introduced, the income tax could be immediately reduced or abolished. To prevent policymakers' temptations to increase VAT later on, as many countries have experienced, VAT should be written as an amendement to the Constitution, next to law that would prevent policymakers to increase VAT together with income tax. Otherwise, the US economy would resemble the European model of high-tax welfare state.
Posted by: sesli chat | 07/01/2010 at 07:09 AM
It is easy to be wise after the event?You never know what you can do till you try?
Posted by: Lacoste shoes | 07/05/2010 at 07:24 PM
Very honoured to see your blog,your blog is specific, I benefited a lot from it. Many thanks,welcome to our website http://www.supras.cc/ . we can exchange our idea.
Posted by: Supra Shoes | 07/23/2010 at 03:12 AM
Since a VAT is a tax on the value added by companies at each stage of production of consumer and investment goods, it is similar to a sales tax levied directly on these consumer and investment goods.
Posted by: guanacaste costa rica real estate | 07/27/2010 at 08:29 PM
If Americans consume less then foreigners will have fewer funds to invest in US treasuries. It is not at all clear that the interest rate on the public debt would decrease
Posted by: chinese tea supplier | 07/28/2010 at 08:29 PM
There are plenty of people who are perfectly capable of moving to locations even within the US with lower overall tax rates and a lower cost of living and/or getting their income down to a no or little income tax levels. The other trick of course with a VAT is to buy as little as possible; That would really help the economy. Of course I would mind paying more taxes a lot less if the governments which tax me would waste less of my tax money, say like the SEC attorney who makes 200 K plus per year and has been surfing porn sites 8 hours a day on his government computer. The SEC announced the other day that he was Disciplined. Wow, thank God he wasn't fired. My own personal goal is to find a spot within the 40-50% of American tax filers who pay NO federal income tax. The VAT I can handle simply by living simply and , I might add, more freely from the desires of those who wish to be supported by my labors, the weak and needy excepted. Do you think that it has ever occured to governments
Posted by: sesli chat | 07/30/2010 at 08:28 AM
wow...
maybe it's something in the toxic mold around there that causes violent car ramming impulses?
I know I've felt it coming on occasionally.
But wait. The guy was already wearing a helmet. Was this planned or was he psychic? Very strange!!!
Posted by: costa rica investments | 07/31/2010 at 12:21 PM
Is the upcoming tax rebate free money or an advance on next years tax refund?
Posted by: mortage new york | 09/24/2010 at 06:21 AM
There is no royal road to science ,and only those who do not dread the fatiguing climb of gaining its numinous summits .
Posted by: new balance | 10/14/2010 at 03:31 AM
Companies are right in that they are not privileged to be citizens in the same manner as individuals under the Constitution. Nothing could be clearer in their desire to locate offshore to avoid American taxes. Like illegal immigrants, they prefer to be "stateless" and thereby avoid obligations which ordinarily would come from nationalism and national obligations, not to mention state obligations.
In recognizing their stateless, nationless status, however, doesn't necessarily excuse them from legal obligations which could be created through the VAT by which other nations control their ability to influence and regulate the quasi-affiliation of corporates who claim one, and make an oath to operate within the framework of that nation's laws, or state laws.
Ending income tax for companies may make sense, but it would only be replaced by VAT tax by which it may be recognized that excise taxes are the proper method of taxing foreign companies, whether for imports, exports, or for services.
There is no need to have an income tax for corporations, and most simply use avoidance techniques anyway. That is why they are offshore - to avoid laws, and regulation, to avoid costs of American labor, and to maximize profits.
In recognition of that self-initiated aggression, leaving America high and dry, it seems reasonable that imposing a VAT tax upon them is more just by recognizing the status they are signaling they desire, while still holding them liable for harms caused in the course of their business.
Globalization requires a new tact, and a new attitude toward companies freely able to locate offshore but need not impose restrictions upon America whose best interest is to secure, preserve, and protect its own country, and its taxpaying citizens.
Posted by: Pat | 10/22/2010 at 10:13 AM
How much you enthusiastically!Thank you for sharing your stuff on blog. Something of your blog informations are very helpful to me. Wish you have a good time at this weekend. OANGY.
Posted by: air jordan 2 | 10/29/2010 at 08:54 PM
How much you enthusiastically!Thank you for sharing your stuff on blog. Something of your blog informations are very helpful to me. WISH YOU HAVE A GOOD TIME AT THIS WEEKEND.TKPEYUK.
Posted by: air jordan 2 | 10/29/2010 at 09:30 PM
There is no doubt that your blog is specific,I've learnt a lot from you. Something of your blog informations are very helpful to us. WISH YOU HAPPY EVERYDAY!WTYEPKY.
Posted by: air jordan 6 | 10/29/2010 at 10:17 PM
good blog,I like it very much, give me very good mood.
Posted by: ugg gloves | 10/30/2010 at 04:12 AM
Penitence is a thing that enervates our spirit, major to a higher decrease compared to decrease alone and producing a bigger mistake compared to mistake itself. So by no implies regret.
Posted by: UGG Nightfall | 11/04/2010 at 03:47 AM
Penitence is a thing that enervates our spirit, major to a higher decrease compared to decrease alone and producing a bigger mistake compared to mistake itself. So by no implies regret.
Posted by: UGG Nightfall | 11/04/2010 at 03:47 AM
her wishful cope with haunts my dreams such as the bad weather at night.
Posted by: Nike Shox Turbo | 11/07/2010 at 08:19 PM
Consciously heart is the mother of progress, Self-abandon is the source of degeneration,So heart not consciously without;Humbleness shall have no.
Posted by: Nike Air Max Wright | 11/11/2010 at 08:23 PM
Many of the details of this write-up are great but had me personally wanting to know, did they really mean that? One thing I have got to say is your publishing expertise are very good and I will certainly be coming back for any fresh blog post you make, you may possibly have a new admirer. I saved the website for personal reference.
Posted by: lower back pain | 11/23/2010 at 09:59 AM
ping guo shi shu de hao chi haishi sheng de haochi ne? ni xihuan chi na yi zhong.
Posted by: Air Yeezy | 11/23/2010 at 09:59 PM
I really enjoy your blog, Its outstanding to observe not every body is just posting a mess of waste now a days!
Posted by: best wireless headphones | 01/05/2011 at 08:12 AM