Since a college education is expensive, many students would be unable to receive a higher education unless they got help with the financing. Some students are lucky to receive the needed resources from their parents, but many others in the United States and elsewhere have to borrow in order to attend college. The vast majority of loan programs available to students are highly subsidized by governments, either through direct government loans with generous interest rates and other terms, or through government insurance of loans from private banks combined with restrictions on the interest rates banks can charge students.
Even though student loans cannot be discharged through personal bankruptcy, default rates have been high. The average rate of default in 2007 was high, about 7%, but still much below the over 20% rate in 1990. In addition, many borrowers with lower incomes work out terms that involve slow and usually only partial repayments of the amounts borrowed. As Posner indicates, for-profits have a high default rate of close to 25% on their student loans. There is a clear hierarchy in default rates by type of school: For-profits have the highest default rates, followed by public and non-profit junior colleges, then by graduates of four year colleges, and graduates of medical and law schools, and other high earning professionals have the lowest default rates.
Since student loans are heavily dependent on government financing, governments have a legitimate and important interest in these default rates. Consequently, it is proper for governments to impose limits to colleges on both the fraction of their students who can default, and also on the fraction of students at a school who can receive government loans. However, the present default limits of 25% for profit-making institutions are too generous. Banks would be forced out of business if the default rates on their commercial loans were so high. The maximum allowable default rates should be cut to 15% %, or so. That itself, without any other changes, would give for-profit and other colleges much stronger incentives to police better who they accept as students since they would not want to exceed such more stringent ceiling on default rates.
A lowering of the permitted default rate is a far superior approach to reducing defaults than is the proposed limit on the amount of loans available to students who are expected to have low incomes. For it is hard in most cases to know in advance how much a student borrower will eventually earn. Students entering well-paying fields may turn out to do badly, whereas those entering poorly paying fields might do extremely well. Colleges have a strong incentive to police their default rates in order to remain eligible for student loans, but one can hardly expect government officials to be able to predict with any accuracy the eventual earnings of students applying for loans.
Unfortunately, various proposals to restrict loans to low earning students partly reflect the federal government's desire to bash for-profit colleges. Yet these colleges play a significant role in the portfolio of college choices available to students. For-profit colleges appeal to older and fulltime working students who never received a college education. To be sure, the quality of the courses offered by for-profit colleges are generally are not so high. But many public colleges, such as Loop College in Chicago, or Santa Monica Junior College, also offer courses at the low end of the quality spectrum, and also have high loan default rates. That for-profit colleges can compete against highly subsidized public and private non-profit schools indicates that the for-profits are offering an education valued by certain students that is not available to them at other schools.
In addition, comparison of default rates between for-profit colleges and public colleges is not the right measure of how much government subsidies they receive. All public colleges and most private ones receive large direct subsidies from various governments that enable them to offer much lower tuition levels than are offered by for-private colleges. Many students in public colleges, especially the lower quality ones, also drop out without finishing, and also receive low earnings, after having been generously subsidized by governments. The right comparison between for-profit and public schools might be the increase in earnings of students per dollar of government subsidy, no matter what form these subsidies take. The for-profits may still look worse on this measure than do the public colleges they compete against, but the difference would be much smaller than the differences in default rates.
Some argue that for-profits can only compete by misleading students into believing they will benefit much more from such an education than they will actually benefit. Clearly, some of that does occur. However, even some of the best colleges and universities are quite misleading in their advertising and other attempts to attract students. For example, very few philosophy, French, or English Lit departments warn incoming students that jobs in their fields are scarce, and that most entering students may never get a decent job using their specialized training. To be sure, for-profits tend to be more flagrant in their efforts to attract students, but it is a difference in degree.
So my conclusion is that while stiffer default rules on government subsidized student loans are needed, for-profits should not be discriminated against in these rules since they offer valuable forms of education. Moreover, public colleges receive substantial direct government subsidies that for-profit colleges do not receive. With lower allowable default rates, for-profit (and other colleges) would cut back on the number of students accepted whom they expect to eventually default on their student loans.
Power invariably means both responsibility and danger.
Posted by: new balance | 10/15/2010 at 01:30 AM
I like your blog!I want to collect it!
Posted by: handbags2006 | 10/18/2010 at 12:51 PM
Charges for everything... how did it happen that life became so expensive?
Posted by: Instant Loans | 10/21/2010 at 04:20 AM
Thank you for sharing this information. The information was very helpful and saved a lot of my time.
Posted by: Graduate Dissertation | 11/01/2010 at 09:58 AM
Having graduate degree is one of the most pleasant dreams of every student. The number of graduate students is decreasing day by day only those who can afford or get financial aid from colleges can afford higher education. It is necessary that the government take necessary steps and lower down the interest rates so that the students can easily afford finance or loans for their higher education.
Posted by: lower back pain | 11/23/2010 at 09:53 AM
When I am still college before, I have a money in a bank so that I can support myself in that moment.
Posted by: high interest savings account | 12/19/2010 at 03:28 AM
Greatpost. I always like your stuff. You sure do make the point clear.
Posted by: best wireless headphones | 01/05/2011 at 08:03 AM
Louboutin shoes are effortlessly recognizable from a distance as well, since the red leather sole could be the attraction that catches each eye.
Posted by: jj boots | 01/07/2011 at 02:55 AM
I find life an exciting business,The point is succinctness of expression.
Posted by: UGG Womens Lynnea Boots | 01/10/2011 at 03:18 AM
I find life an exciting business,The point is succinctness of expression.
Posted by: UGG Womens Lynnea Boots | 01/11/2011 at 02:54 AM
I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.
Posted by: mbt shoes | 03/07/2011 at 02:15 AM
This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!
Posted by: Dry Scalp Shampoo | 03/26/2011 at 12:33 AM
Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I've really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I will be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again very soon!
Posted by: howme | 03/26/2011 at 02:20 AM
Some people claim that IQs are rising, but Derek Bok had a book a few years ago that brought up some interesting research -- a claim that the average college graduate of today knows what the average high school graduate knew about fifty years ago.
Posted by: skincare | 03/27/2011 at 12:13 AM
It took me 8 years to get a degree. When I graduated, I still had to pay my student loan. It was a long journey but I'm glad I made it.
Posted by: Job Description | 04/06/2011 at 05:03 AM
Imagine how much I paid to study there in the US. I am from Asia and it cost me a fortune.
Posted by: jobdescriptions.net | 04/06/2011 at 06:03 AM
But i dont think so, Studying in Asia cost you much? May i know you are from which Stream?
-syed-
Posted by: Job descriptions | 04/19/2011 at 07:06 AM
Thank you for sharing. Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view. Have a good time.
Posted by: baby products | 05/04/2011 at 02:27 AM
Thank you for sharing. Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view. Have a good time.
Posted by: Exterior Accessories | 05/04/2011 at 02:58 AM
A lowering of the permitted default rate is a far superior approach to reducing defaults than is the proposed limit on the amount of loans available to students who are expected to have low incomes. For it is hard in most cases to know in advance how much a student borrower will eventually earn. Students entering well-paying fields may turn out to do badly, whereas those entering poorly paying fields might do extremely well. Colleges have a strong incentive to police their default rates in order to remain eligible for student loans, but one can hardly expect government officials to be able to predict with any accuracy the eventual earnings of students applying for loans.
Posted by: Rosetta Stone | 05/21/2011 at 03:12 AM
I feel like for-profit colleges only benefit "them" increasing the tution cost every year till the top of the food chain is happy.
Posted by: Grant | 07/10/2011 at 03:30 PM
This story generated feeling of fear and dread until the end. Euphoria can happen from this type of contrasting dread and realization.
Posted by: Dust-mask | 07/27/2011 at 10:16 PM
It is amazing what fear can lead us to believe. You brought me along with you, though I started getting a little pissed the Army would risk killing it's own soldiers. Nice piece of writing my friend. Glad to see it is where it belongs...on the cover.
Posted by: power strips | 07/27/2011 at 10:19 PM
If you thought that dating after forty was scary, try it a decade later! Though I looked at it as an incredible learning curve, most of the learning was about myself.
Posted by: crystal laser | 07/27/2011 at 10:21 PM
Thank you everyone for your kind comments. I will catch up with each one of you this evening...I have urgent business in the studio today.
Posted by: golf umbrella | 07/27/2011 at 10:24 PM