Five Major Defects of the Financial Reform Bill-Becker

A 2300 page bill is usually an indication of many political compromises. The Dodd-Frank financial reform bill is no exception, for it is a complex, disorderly, politically motivated, and not well thought out reaction to the financial crisis that erupted beginning with the panic of the fall of 2008. Not everything about the bill is bad-e.g., the requirement that various derivatives trade through exchanges may be a good suggestion- but the disturbing parts of the bill are far more important. I will concentrate on five major defects, including omissions.

1. The bill adds regulations and rules about many activities that had little or nothing to do with the crisis. For example, it creates a consumer financial protection bureau to be housed at the Fed that is supposed to protect consumers from fraud and other abusive financial practices. Yet it is not apparent that many consumers were victimized during the financial boom years, or that consumer behavior had anything of importance to do with the crisis. For example, consumers who took out subprime mortgages that required almost no down payments and had low interest rates were not victimized since these conditions enabled them to cheaply own houses, at least for a while. The “victims” were the banks, and especially Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that were foolishly willing to hold such risky mortgages.

 

The bill gives the Fed authority to limit interchange or “swipe” fees that merchants pay for each debit-card transaction, although these fees had not the slightest connection to the financial crisis. Such price controls are in general undesirable, and hardly seem to require the attention of the Federal Reserve. The bill also gives the SEC authority to empower stockholders to run their own candidates for corporate boards of directors. Corporate boards often receive some blame for the crisis-mainly unjustified in my opinion- but stockholder election of some members will not improve corporate governance, and will probably make that worse.

 

2. The Dodd-Frank bill gives several government agencies considerable additional discretion to try to forestall another crisis, even though they already had the authority to take many actions. The Fed could have tightened the monetary base and interest rates as the crisis was developing, but chose not to do so. The SEC and various Federal Reserve banks-especially the New York Fed- had the authority to stop questionable lending practices and increase liquidity requirements. These and other government bodies did not use their authority to try to head off the crisis partly because they got caught up in the same bubble hysteria as did banks and consumers. In addition, regulators are often “captured” by the firms they are regulating, not necessarily because the regulators are corrupt, but because they are mainly exposed to arguments made by the banks and other groups they are regulating.

 

Despite the fact that regulators failed to use the powers they already had, the bill mainly adds not clear rules of behavior for banks, but additional governmental discretionary power. For example, the bill creates the Financial Stability Oversight Council, a nine-member panel drawn from the Fed, SEC, and other government agencies, that is supposed to monitor Wall Street’s largest companies and other market participants to spot and respond to any emerging growth in systemic risk in the economy. With a two-thirds vote this Council could impose higher capital requirements on lenders and place hedge funds and dealers under the Fed’s authority. Given the regulators reluctance to use the power they already had to forestall the crisis, it seems highly unlikely that this Council will act decisively prior to the emergence of a crisis, especially when a two thirds majority is required.

 

3. Insufficient capital relative to bank assets was an important cause of the financial crisis. The bill does reduce the ability of banks to count as bank capital certain risky assets, such as trust preferred securities, and gives the Fed authority to impose additional capital and liquidity requirements on banks and non-bank financial companies, including insurers. I would have preferred a simple rule that raised capital requirements of banks relative to their assets, especially capital of larger and more interconnected banks. As suggested by Raghu Rajan and the Squam Lake group of economists, the bill probably should have required larger banks to issue “contingent” capital, such as debt that automatically converts to equity when the banks are experiencing large losses, or when a bank’s capital to asset ratio falls below a certain level.

 

4. One of the most serious omissions is that the bill essentially says nothing about Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae. In 2008 these organizations were placed into conservatorship of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. During the run up to the crisis, Barney Frank and others in Congress encouraged Freddie and Fannie to absorb most of the subprime mortgages. In 2008 they held over half of all mortgages, and almost all the subprimes. They have absorbed even a larger fraction of the relatively few mortgages written after 2008. Freddie and Fannie deserve a considerable share of the blame for the crisis, but they continue to have strong political support. I would like to see both of them eventually dissolved, but that is unlikely to happen. Instead we are promised that they will be dealt with in future legislation, but I am skeptical that anything will be done to terminate either organization, or even improve their functioning.

 

5. Many proposals in the bill will have highly uncertain impacts on the economy. These include, among many other provisions, the requirement that originators of mortgages and other assets retain at least 5% of the assets they originate, that many derivatives go on organized exchanges (may be an improvement but far from certain), that hedge funds become more closely regulated, and that consumer be “protected” from their financial decisions. 

Most of these and other changes in the bill are not based on a serious analysis of what contributed to the financial crisis, but rather are the result of political and emotional reactions to the crisis. Usually, such reactions do more harm than good. That is likely to be the fate of the great majority of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank bill.

Comments

[b makowsky pumps]

I keep listening to the news speak about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the best site to get one.:)

[cheap clothes online]

You have a quite different idea,It sounds really amazing !I suppose you may like sports,I think jordan shoes is a good choice!Don't you think so?

[cheap designer clothes]

I think you're really a different person who give such an unusual opinion.I wonder if you are also a ?Maybe you can consider about With on hand,Wow,really extraordinary .So cool!

[Dry Scalp Shampoo]

We're a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your web site offered us with valuable info to work on. You have done a formidable job and our whole community will be grateful to you.

[Dany]

I like the valuable information you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I am quite certain I will learn many new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!

[Acne Care]

All of this nonsense about uncertainty causing 10% unemployment and firm's hoarding trillions in reserve because of government uncertainty is utter nonsense. They're holding cash because they've got excess capacity as it is because there isn't any demand for goods, which, as a tech entrepreneur, I can tell you is a bigger deal to my margins than some voodoo uncertainty caused by government.

[birkenstock sandals]

I really like your writing style, wonderful information, thanks for putting up : D.

[health care]

We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website offered us with valuable info to work on. You have done an impressive job and our whole community will be thankful to you.

[Frye Paige Boot]

found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later ..

[Rosetta Stone]

The bill gives the Fed authority to limit interchange or “swipe” fees that merchants pay for each debit-card transaction, although these fees had not the slightest connection to the financial crisis. Such price controls are in general undesirable, and hardly seem to require the attention of the Federal Reserve. The bill also gives the SEC authority to empower stockholders to run their own candidates for corporate boards of directors. Corporate boards often receive some blame for the crisis-mainly unjustified in my opinion- but stockholder election of some members will not improve corporate governance, and will probably make that worse.

[Toe Shoes]

I am looking forward to another great article from you. Because I'd like to read more from you,expecting your new articles.thank you.

[mbt]

This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.

[jordan 11]

These information helps me consider some useful things, keep up the good work.

[Designer deals]

There is obviously a lot to know about this. I think you made some good points in Features also.

[Account Deleted]

nice to post in this comments
=========
capital gold

[MBT Sale]

Thanks for the cool badgees! When do we find out who the Petties nominees are???

[crystal-customized-trophy]

It's funny to look at what we decide to ban and what we consider basic freedoms.

[crystal-truck-model]

This was excellent! Although it was ten years later and I had the M16, I was there with you pal, and just as scared!

[buy-solar-water-heater]

Thanks for your comment. I liked my first one. It brought back the pain of finding out how unfair life and education can be.

[solar-water-heater-importer]

The writing here was exquisite, with great flow and a compelling tale. I relaxed at your epiphany when you figured out that the danger was being exaggerated.

[dresses]

Jede Frau möchte sehr wohl fühlen in dieser Nacht, fast alle romantisch mag, und zusammen mit dem Seidenchiffon brautjungfer kleider im Baseball. Die hochzeitsgeschenke hat Spaghettiträger mit einem weichen Geschmack wuchs kleinen Details auf der Halsseite. Die einzelnen macht eine geraffte Taille Bauch in den Komfort und schimmerndem Satin bodenlange bevorzugte getan. Als zusätzliche Belohnung Potential, ist dies vor allem Junior-Brautjungfer, brautkleider über vierzig Farben stehen zur Auswahl! hochzeitskleider erst einmal Spaß machen eigentlich! Arbeiten mit einem von ihnen bewusst Modelle zur Verfügung, fast alle Begleiter Modelle Modell wird wahrscheinlich einen angenehmen und komfortablen Erlebnis für die Ehe, aus der sein.

[nfl jerseys]

Hopefully online marketing jobs don't dry up in the wake of this ongoing economic collapse. The Dow dropped, what, 512 points today?! It's starting to feel like 2008 all over again. Ever wonder what's really going on? I think I know.

we sale nfl jerseys:http://www.nflsporter.com

[UGGs On Sale]

No matter how many times I read it, it never gets old. You definitely hit the nail on the head on this one. This is something people need to know about.

[Eleazar]

Dr. Becker and Judge Posner hit the mark in pinpointing the major defects of the financial reform bill. Hoping this bill was revised and benefits more Americans in need than those who have the luxuries in life.

[Scholarship Grants Online]

This financial reform bill should benefit more to those who are in need of low interest loans and business loan grants than those companies on the verge of bailout.