President Obama during this past week signed into law extending unemployment benefits to a maximum of 99 weeks, or almost two years, for persons who have been unemployed for over half a year and have exhausted their state benefits. The degree of extension varies among states depending on a state’s unemployment rate, with higher unemployment states getting longer durations of coverage. The bill that became law is highly partisan, passing with almost all Democrats, 31 House Republicans, and only 2 Republican senators. I believe the law extends unemployment benefits for too long, although the economics of optimal unemployment insurance gives a less than certain answer.
Unemployment insurance tries to balance two conflicting goals. One is to protect at least some of the earnings of workers laid off from their jobs through no fault of their own, while the conflicting goal is not to make unemployment status so comfortable that workers try to get laid off, and do not look seriously for jobs when they are unemployed. The first aim is a typical goal of insurance against bad outcomes, while the second goal is to reduce the degree of “moral hazard”; that is, to reduce the incentive of persons to reduce their efforts to remain employed and look seriously for work when unemployed because they have insurance against the cost of being unemployed.
One typical way insurance tries to reach a compromise between these conflicting goals is to have a deductible that is paid by insured persons, such as the $500 deductible many car owners have on their automobile insurance. The trouble with practically all the state-run unemployment insurance plans is that they typically have no or a minimal deductible because they provide coverage essentially from the first week of unemployment. In addition, they usually limit coverage to a fixed number of weeks, such as 26 weeks. This is an inefficient and costly approach since practically all the unemployed can readily cover their first several weeks of unemployment from savings, spouses’ earnings, or borrowing on credit cards and in other ways. Unemployed workers usually run into financial trouble only when they have been unemployed for an extended time. An optimal unemployment insurance plan would make unemployed workers responsible for their first month or two of unemployment, and mainly spend unemployment insurance resources on the longer-term unemployed.
A second insurance approach to the moral hazard problem is to require significant co-payments, so that the insured have to pay a portion of any additional losses they experience after they exhaust the deductible. American unemployment insurance plans usually do pretty well on this by only paying about half or so of the earnings the unemployed had received when they were employed. Many European plans had usually replaced most or all of the earnings of the unemployed, and covered unemployed for many years. After they learned the hard way the prediction of economic theory that this encouraged significant increases in unemployment, several countries greatly cut back both the duration and payment (i.e., replacement) rates for the unemployed. Interestingly, In Germany this was done under a center-left Social Democratic government.
This analysis of insurance provides background for evaluating the new extension of unemployment benefits for the longer-term unemployed. The approximately $30 billion committed to this extension has been partly justified as a stimulus to what may be a slowing US economy. However, since any “stimulus” from $30 billion would be paltry even to the most optimistic stimulus calculations, such a stimulus can hardly be a serious justification for this extension of benefits. This is especially the case when federal budget deficits have been so large during the past couple of years, and there is no serious evidence that the $800 billion stimulus package passed over a year ago has had much stimulating effect on unemployment or GDP. Much of the evidence usually cited about number of jobs created by the stimulus package is based on terrible analysis. Any new hires under stimulus money is assumed to be net jobs created by the stimulus rather than a transfer of employment from non-stimulus activities to stimulus-supported activities.
So the case for the new law rests on its insurance provisions rather than on its stimulus capabilities. I argued earlier that covering the longer-term unemployed is the more optimal way to approach unemployment insurance since the long-term unemployed face the largest economic hardship. From that viewpoint, extending the duration of coverage beyond 6 months makes sense in an environment where the unemployment rate remains excessively high at 9.5%, especially if the extension is accompanied by the elimination of unemployment coverage for the first 6-8 weeks of unemployment.
However, the actual large extension poses a major risk of creating an unemployment culture where men and women remain “ unemployed” for years. Once the period of unemployment becomes long enough, people begin to get the habits from being unemployed for a long time: they sleep late, develop various leisure interests, and at the same time their work skills depreciate from not using them for an extended period. Studies have shown that skill depreciation is a serious effect of being unemployed for a long time.
Some might retort that this argument is persuasive during periods of normal unemployment rates, perhaps 7% and under, but not when jobs are scarce, the unemployment rate is over 9%, and it is coming down slowly. There is merit to this response, but on the other hand, the JOLTS data show that even with the current high unemployment rates, about 4.5 4 million persons were hired in May 2010 (and about the same number are either being laid off or quitting their jobs). So for the most part, even the long term unemployed can find jobs if they are willing to take a cut in their earnings, and/or move to other industries and occupations.
This analysis leads me to the following conclusions. During bad times, 6 months of unemployment compensation may not be long enough, but the 2 years in the new law is too long. About 9 months of unemployment compensation would be the right length. Anyone unemployed longer than that would lose these benefits. If they want to work they should be forced to adjust, at least temporarily, to the bad economic environment, and accept jobs that they would turn down during good economic times.
[K1]“The vote in the House was 272 to 152, with 31 Republicans joining 241 Democrats in supporting the measure. Voting against were 142 Republicans and 10 Democrats.”
Fewer senators crossed partisan lines (2 Republicans and 1 Democrat) on this issue.
Just wanted to say that you have some awesome content on your website. If it's OK I would like to use some of the information you provided on my webiste. If I link back to your website would it be OK to do so?
Posted by: Jordan Trunner | 10/03/2010 at 10:18 PM
That’s right. Jobs do not just appear because people are looking for work – in the short term over a period of months that is.I agree with you !
Posted by: handbags2006 | 10/06/2010 at 02:35 PM
It would be helpful if employers would hire someone who is over qualified for a job. I have been laid off for 5 months, apply for at least 10 jobs a week and if the employer even has the courtesy to respond, tells me I have too much experience and would just leave when the economy picks up. I would love to be flipping burgers at McDonalds - it's too bad they won't hire me.
Posted by: Pat | 10/14/2010 at 04:00 PM
I like your blog!I want to collect it!
Posted by: handbags2006 | 10/18/2010 at 11:43 AM
Work banishes those three great evils : boredom , vice, and poverty.
Posted by: Asics shoes | 10/20/2010 at 04:32 AM
Thanks for your good posts to us,and hope to be better then,and good luck!I will follow your new posts,and so pleasure to make you as my good friend!
Posted by: jordan 13 | 11/04/2010 at 02:39 AM
Agree Man,form impact permanent minute adopt world knee driver encourage please finance stop university reading lay attach whom best per final soon yes bus detail this an event historical balance huge the atmosphere winter labour soft earth change trust marriage press annual planning of no combination despite launch top largely available consist trip organization of yet mine welcome green difference definition victim interpretation seat that representation may exactly discipline end ancient before face see other potential household event agree decade exercise task teaching emphasis bank walk strength
Posted by: uebernachtung guenstig in garmisch partenkirchen buchen | 12/01/2010 at 05:05 AM
I think unemployment compensations should be kept as low as possible. Unemployed people shouldn't receive the amounts of money comparable to good salaries or they just won't work at all
Posted by: first resume | 12/23/2010 at 06:36 PM
You have a quite different idea,It sounds really amazing !I suppose you may like sports,I think jordan shoes is a good choice!Don't you think so?
Posted by: cheap clothes online | 03/17/2011 at 05:00 AM
I think you're really a different person who give such an unusual opinion.I wonder if you are also a ?Maybe you can consider about With on hand,Wow,really extraordinary .So cool!
Posted by: cheap designer clothes | 03/17/2011 at 05:02 AM
Pretty is something you're born with. But beautiful, that's an equal opportunity adjective.
Posted by: Nike Shoes Online | 03/24/2011 at 09:39 PM
We're a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your web site offered us with valuable info to work on. You have done a formidable job and our whole community will be grateful to you.
Posted by: Dry Scalp Shampoo | 03/26/2011 at 12:38 AM
I like the valuable information you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I am quite certain I will learn many new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!
Posted by: Dany | 03/26/2011 at 12:50 AM
We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website offered us with valuable info to work on. You have done an impressive job and our whole community will be thankful to you.
Posted by: health care | 03/29/2011 at 11:01 PM
Great post. It appears that most of the steps are relying on the creativeness factor….
Posted by: GUCCI Sunglasses | 04/10/2011 at 10:23 PM
Great post. It appears that most of the steps are relying on the creativeness factor….
Posted by: GUCCI Sunglasses | 04/10/2011 at 10:44 PM
Unemployment insurance tries to balance two conflicting goals. One is to protect at least some of the earnings of workers laid off from their jobs through no fault of their own, while the conflicting goal is not to make unemployment status so comfortable that workers try to get laid off, and do not look seriously for jobs when they are unemployed. The first aim is a typical goal of insurance against bad outcomes, while the second goal is to reduce the degree of “moral hazard”; that is, to reduce the incentive of persons to reduce their efforts to remain employed and look seriously for work when unemployed because they have insurance against the cost of being unemployed.
Posted by: Rosetta Stone | 05/21/2011 at 03:09 AM
In speaking of the Gospel of Mercy, St. Paul tells the Corinthians that in order that it may be effective for them, they must first receive it, that is, they must internalize it, and they must stand upon it, meanasdfing that it must become the basis of their lives. Until they do this, it is not really theirs in the full sense of the word, and will not be effective in changing their lives. He makes it clear that he has given them exactly what he received, meaning that he invented nothing. In order to pass on the truth, only that which has been received can be passed on, without addition or modification.
Posted by: coach factory outlet | 05/30/2011 at 01:27 AM
This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.
Posted by: mbt | 06/07/2011 at 03:14 AM
Thanks for the cool badgees! When do we find out who the Petties nominees are???
Posted by: MBT Sale | 07/09/2011 at 08:15 AM
This was amazing. I was there with you - and it's as close as I want to get to a military experience.
Posted by: solar-energy-manufacturer | 07/28/2011 at 12:22 AM
Allow yourself time to grieve over the deaths of your chickens, but don't think for a moment that you did something wrong.
Posted by: china-solar-collectors | 07/28/2011 at 12:25 AM
That would be fine if that is what happened. But, despite your obvious business expertise, there is a chance that all books will someday be sold online.
Posted by: solar-collectors-importer | 07/28/2011 at 12:27 AM
That said, we are certainly at the end of our vigor. Once you reach the top of the mountain, all roads lead down.
Posted by: extension cord | 07/28/2011 at 12:30 AM
Jede Frau möchte sehr wohl fühlen in dieser Nacht, fast alle romantisch mag, und zusammen mit dem Seidenchiffon [url=http://www.magiebridal.com/]brautjungfer kleider[/url] im Baseball. Die [url=http://www.magiebridal.com/]hochzeitsgeschenke[/url] hat Spaghettiträger mit einem weichen Geschmack wuchs kleinen Details auf der Halsseite. Die einzelnen macht eine geraffte Taille Bauch in den Komfort und schimmerndem Satin bodenlange bevorzugte getan. Als zusätzliche Belohnung Potential, ist dies vor allem Junior-Brautjungfer, [url=http://www.magiebridal.com/]brautkleider[/url] über vierzig Farben stehen zur Auswahl! [url=http://www.magiebridal.com/]hochzeitskleider[/url] erst einmal Spaß machen eigentlich! Arbeiten mit einem von ihnen bewusst Modelle zur Verfügung, fast alle Begleiter Modelle Modell wird wahrscheinlich einen angenehmen und komfortablen Erlebnis für die Ehe, aus der sein.
Posted by: wedding | 08/02/2011 at 03:58 AM