In my first book on the economic crisis (A Failure of Capitalism: The Crisis of ’08 and the Descent into Depression), which was completed in February 2009, I argued that the crisis should be called a depression rather than a recession, in part because of the enormous debts that the government was assuming in an effort to overcome the crisis. In my second book (The Crisis of Capitalist Democracy), completed in January of this year, I further emphasized the potential long-term adverse consequences of the crisis, and argued that a depression or recession should not be considered over until GDP rejoins its growth path. GDP in real terms is essentially unchanged from what it was two and a half years ago (2007), which means it’s roughly 7.5 percent below the growth path (which assumes 3 percent real growth annually), and suggests that it will be years before the economy gets back on it.
I continue to insist that this is the proper way to evaluate an economic crisis. Most journalists and many economists believe that the “recession” as they like to call it (or “Great Recession”—indicative of a mindless proliferation of labels) ended in the third quarter of 2009, when GDP began to increase, after having been flat in 2008 (though falling sharply in the last quarter) and falling in the first half of 2009. But the current performance of the economy, and the likely political and long-term economic consequences, convince me that we are in the midst of a depression, much as we were in 1936 (before a sharp drop in 1937–1938), even though the economy had grown rapidly since the bottom of the depression in 1933.
Why is the economy so sluggish at present? The basic reasons are, I think, first, the reduction in household wealth, due to the fall in housing and common stock values (with the fall in housing values precipitating many foreclosures); second, the high rate of unemployment, underemployment, and reductions in wages and benefits; and third the continued weakness of the banks.
The reduction in household wealth increased the amount of leverage (debt-equity ratio) in consumers’ personal finances, and consumers have been deleveraging by increasing their personal savings rate (which has increased from 1.7 percent three years ago to 6.4 percent today), leaving them with less money for consumption. One might think that today’s very low interest rates would discourage savings, but the other side of this coin is that savers must increase the amount of their savings in order to obtain the interest income they obtained when interest rates were higher.
With less consumption, there is less production and hence less private investment. These effects are being compounded by the weakness of the labor market from the perspective of workers, which reduces incomes and, by increasing insecurity, increases the propensity to save. And while banks are making good profits because of the very low interest rates at which they can borrow, they continue to hold many sick assets (mainly investments in home and commercial mortgages) on their books, making them reluctant to lend. And anyway loan demand is way down. Most borrowers from banks are either small business or consumers (large businesses tend to borrow by issuing bonds or commercial paper rather than by taking out banks loans), and neither group is in the mood for increasing its indebtedness.
One spur to recovery from a depression is the need to rebuild inventories and replace durable goods that have worn out. This need may explain, along with the stimulus program enacted in February 2009, the growth in GDP that began in the third quarter of 2009 and seems now to be fading. As long as demand for consumption goods is weak, sales will slow after inventories are restocked and worn-out durable goods are replaced. Modern products tend to be highly durable and inventories tend to be much smaller than they used to be, so one cannot expect these standard spurs to economic recovery to have much staying power.
The uncertainties and long-term debt created by the Obama Administration excessively ambitious domestic programs (notably health care and financial regulatory reform) on top of the deficit spending of the Bush years, the plunge in federal tax revenues resulting from the depression-induced decline in taxable income, and uncertainty about which Bush tax cuts will be allowed to expire in the coming year, have impeded private investment. They have done this by exacerbating concerns about what the economic picture will look like both in general and for individual businesses and consumers in the next several years, and perhaps much longer.
A further worry is the volatility of the stock market. The tendency is to view the market’s gyrations as reflections of changing estimates of future corporate earnings and of efforts by investors in the market to guess what other investors are likely to do. But when as at present a large fraction of the population has a significant part of its savings invested in the stock market, market volatility increases economic anxieties and thus dampens spending.
As long as private investment and interest rates remain very low, there is a case for further stimulus (deficit spending), especially since federal stimulus spending has been offset to a degree by reductions in state and local government spending. Cautious or fearful consumers save in safe forms, such as insured bank deposits, Treasury bills, or cash. Such savings are inert; under present conditions they do not get translated into productive investment, since banks are reluctant to lend but instead keep most of the deposits they receive in either cash or government securities. The government, to whom no one is afraid to lend, could put all these inert savings to work on infrastructure and other projects that would employ the unemployed.
That is in principle, but because the Obama Administration botched the design, execution, and public relations of the $862 billion stimulus program (President Obama, despite his undoubted eloquence and intelligence, has proved to be a poor explainer of his economic policies), and because of the soaring public debt (to which the stimulus contributed), there is no political stomach for a further stimulus of any consequence.
What is to be done? With Congress in recess and the mid-term elections looming, probably very little. The best hope may be that the President’s bipartisan deficit commission (the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform) will issue a first-rate report. (Its report is due December 1.) If the commission, chaired by President Clinton’s chief of staff, Erskine Bowles, and former Republican Senator Alan Simpson, produces an economically sound and politically palatable program for restoring the nation’s long-term fiscal soundness—a program to which far-reaching tax reform will be central—this may alleviate economic uncertainty and encourage more consumption and private investment in the near term.
Once the U.S. linked itself with the organized criminal religious enclave of Israel, its future has been bleak. During my lifetime the U.S. has contributed more in foreign aid to this supposedly wealthy nation than any other, ignored its international criminal conduct including an attack upon an American naval vessel the USS Liberty and is now engaged in endless wars as a surrogate for the Israeli-Jewish bankers and the wealthy and powerful who desire to continue to control the world's resources. Wall Street, nothing but the latest edition of the Jewish money changers Jesus so vehemently protested. What do they contribute? Nothing. They manipulate the money supply and paper "investments", suck the money out of the pockets of those who are productive and control our government. And, gee, when their "investment banks" go bad, after raking off hundreds of billions, they run to the government for a "bailout." And who is in control of the Treasury and our supposed "money"? They just happen to be their Jewish friends. Facts are facts. Reality is reality. Everything else is B.S. If you did not notice, Obama is surrounded by Jewish "advisors" just as George W. Bush. Only 2% of the country is Jewish. How do they control most of the media, our government and just about everything else? Look it up. Is it their supposed benevolence? Ask the Palestinians. Ask the Iranians. Ask the Afghanis. With three TRILLION dollars down the drain by the end of these criminal wars, justified by false propaganda and greed, and with the deaths of a approximately a million human beings, maybe the world would be better off without us.The average American will be on the hook for $100000 for the current and residual costs of these "wars." As for Mr. Posner, this is a man who rationalizes and attempts to justify US terrorism, torture, analyzes rights in juxtaposition to economic cost, and has been WRONG about just about everything since he assumed his lofty position. Where was Mr. Posner, a member of my generation, when we were involved in the last criminal wars in Southeast Asia in which THREE MILLION human beings died from the use of OUR WMD? He now protests the protesters, suggesting that his arrogant attitude changed with their violence. Abbe Hoffman, Dellinger, Hayden and the rest, true AMERICAN HEROES. They were RIGHT to protest and more should have done so. The current silence in this nation with the criminal conduct of government, both domestic and foreign, is astounding. Posner, a synonym for an arrogant pseudo intellectual THUG. Economist? Hardly. Learned jurist? An apologist for the criminal politicians who have seized power over our nation resulting in our current calamity. Ivy League Idiots. It is no wonder poor Richard's cat hates him. What sane animal could like a clown like this? America is on the ropes. And with referees like Posner, I fear the worst. Yes, Richard, this is freedom of speech. Now, maybe you can assess the cost and attempt to determine whether it should be allowed.
Posted by: Citizen 1 | 09/11/2010 at 09:21 AM
Obama has promised so many things and he sounded so confident and so sure about everything but I have seen no recovery at all. It will be a year now and still we are in this uncertain situation. How is it going to end? Will there be hope for everyone?
Posted by: Kristine | 09/18/2010 at 07:40 AM
i was exited about obama administration for tax, still no hope.
Posted by: Pandora Bracelet | 09/23/2010 at 06:45 AM
Good topic and the whole blog to add to his forehead to favorites
http://www.answerbag.com/profile/1365630
http://www.answerbag.com/profile/1365654
http://www.answerbag.com/profile/1365684
http://www.answerbag.com/profile/1365690
http://www.answerbag.com/profile/1375643
dssd
Posted by: den | 10/11/2010 at 01:10 AM
I continue to insist that this is the proper way to evaluate an economic crisis...nice info...
Posted by: foreign exchange student | 10/11/2010 at 07:31 AM
You might have it if it belongs to you,whereas you don't kvetch for it if it doesn't look within your life.
Posted by: Nike Shox Clearance | 10/15/2010 at 09:18 PM
I wholly agree that simpler documents need to be used in smaller rounds. And unfortunately, many will be enticed to use these docs without the help of an attorney, while the investors will have attorneys on their side making sure the terms are favorable to them.and when you finish your things,pls link my name to see my website about Retro Jordan,thanks.
Posted by: Retro Jordan | 10/17/2010 at 09:49 PM
I like your blog!I want to collect it!
Posted by: handbags2006 | 10/18/2010 at 12:42 PM
There's no longer a missing, A friend will no longer lonely, About to have a permanent cold warm, Let's have a kind of love I met you in space.
Posted by: Nike Air Max 1 | 10/24/2010 at 10:20 PM
Very good friend i like your topics i suport your job!
Posted by: student | 10/25/2010 at 03:41 PM
Yes. System status, or system help reply.File status okay; about to open data connection.All he and the team want is to maintain the status quo.
Posted by: UGG Argyle Knit | 11/01/2010 at 10:22 PM
yes. it is good.
Posted by: UGG Argyle Knit | 11/01/2010 at 10:38 PM
So beautiful posts,but I saw someone said their opinions,and I think we should share the differents,and then we will be better,do you agree with me?link my name now!
Posted by: jordan 13 | 11/02/2010 at 02:38 AM
Happiness always generous person concomitant with, Riches always accompanies with faith, Wisdom always and noble person concomitant, Charm will always be with sunshine person concomitant, Let all the wishes with you always.
Posted by: Nike Air Max 1 | 11/02/2010 at 09:59 PM
may be you interest on Moncler Clairy Pink: http://www.monclerjacketsale.com/moncler-clairy-jacket-pink-piumini-moncler-donna.html ,SNAP CLOSURE STORM FLAP. FELTED LOGO PATCH AT UPPER ARM. ZIP POCKETS AT WAIST. ELASTIC SNAP SLEEVE CUFFS. HIDDEN DRAWSTRING HEM. TONE ON TONE STITCHING. SHELL AND LINING: 100% NYLON. FILL: 100% DOWN. MACHINE WASH COLD. IMPORTED. All moncler jackets 70% OFF on monclerjacketsale.com and free shipping to world.
Posted by: moncler | 11/04/2010 at 04:20 AM
Very well, thank you, and you?
Posted by: Ugg Boots | 11/12/2010 at 12:46 AM
Faced with you, I am shallow smile, there is no so-called;
Posted by: air yeezys | 11/16/2010 at 02:10 AM
i was exited about obama administration for tax, still no hope.
Posted by: lower back pain relief | 11/23/2010 at 09:23 AM
Many of the details of this write-up are great but had me personally wanting to know, did they really mean that? One thing I have got to say is your publishing expertise are very good and I will certainly be coming back for any fresh blog post you make, you may possibly have a new admirer. I saved the website for personal reference.
Posted by: lower back pain relief | 11/23/2010 at 09:46 AM
I added Google Reader to your site when I have spare time try to follow.Thank you.
Posted by: Shelia | 11/27/2010 at 10:31 AM
From where these people get this huge exact data. I am not at all convinced. http://www.debtmanagementplan.co.uk
Posted by: alyssabaker | 02/10/2011 at 03:53 AM
i thought this was funny. Natalie Dee's comic shows what happens between egg friends when one them becomes a chicken. As Serious Eats put it.
Posted by: supra skytop | 03/25/2011 at 03:00 AM
I think this is one of the most vital information for me. And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, The website style is great, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers
Posted by: health care | 03/29/2011 at 10:59 PM
The reduction in household wealth increased the amount of leverage (debt-equity ratio) in consumers’ personal finances, and consumers have been deleveraging by increasing their personal savings rate (which has increased from 1.7 percent three years ago to 6.4 percent today), leaving them with less money for consumption. One might think that today’s very low interest rates would discourage savings, but the other side of this coin is that savers must increase the amount of their savings in order to obtain the interest income they obtained when interest rates were higher.
Posted by: Rosetta Stone | 05/21/2011 at 03:08 AM
#*# I am a total geek with my title but I wanted to use a little play on words, you'll know what I mean when you see my card :=)
Posted by: oakley outlet | 05/27/2011 at 09:57 PM