Are the Democratic-controlled Congress and President Obama very much pro union? Unquestionably. Do the economic effects of unions on the welfare of workers as a whole justify that union bias? No. Has their pro-union orientation seriously retarded the recovery from the recession? Probably. The following discussion tries to justify these answers.
The pro-union orientation has been demonstrated in many ways. Posner gives a few examples, and I will add some more. The automobile industry would not have been bailed out so generously were it not for the political power of the United Auto Workers. The alternative would likely have been bankruptcy without a federal bailout, which I favored. Bankruptcy without government involvement would have cut health and other fringe benefits of autoworkers more sharply, and might have led to more plant closings in the industry. It would also, however, have led to a more robust recovery of the surviving American auto companies, and possibly even in the longer run raised employment in auto plants located not in the South because wages and fringe benefits would then have been lower at these plants.
An important example this past week offers another illustration of the pro union orientation. For the first time the US has cited for labor violations a country, Guatemala, that is a free trade partner with the US. That the American government has the presumption to interfere in the labor policies of another country is disturbing in itself. All commentators agree, however, that it was done at the urging of American unions. This was likely an attempt to reduce the competition of goods and services from Guatemala and especially from other free trade partners-such as Mexico-for goods made by unionized American companies.
Congress tried to pass, and President Obama supported, The Employee Free Choice Act to eliminate private elections for union certification. Fortunately, enough moderate Democrats and Republicans have been able to beat back these proposals, and they have been shelved, perhaps only temporarily.
Economists distinguish competitive from monopoly unions. A competitive union system, like Japan’s, has unions at companies when the employees of these companies prefer to bargain collectively. However, competitive unionism does not allow a single union to control the majority of companies in the same industry, which is monopoly unionism. The US typically has monopoly unions, such as the steelworkers union, autoworkers union, or service workers union, but a long time ago the Clayton Act of 1914 explicitly exempted unions from anti-trust laws under most circumstances.
Monopoly unions do tend to raise the earnings and fringe benefits of workers in the industries where they exist. This is seen from the ridiculously high fringe benefits that the United Auto Workers unions squeezed out of American auto companies during the days when they were profitable but not well managed. Higher union earnings come partly at the expense of the profits of the industries unionized, but also at the expense of lower employment than would have occurred with more competitive wages and other benefits. The prospective employees priced out of jobs in unionized sectors seek employment in other sectors, which lowers the earnings of workers in these latter sectors. The net effect is a misallocation of labor compared to an efficient allocation, and possibly even a reduction in the income received by workers as a whole, including workers in the non-union sectors.
During this recession, wages did fall for many workers, but mainly among non-union workers. A telling example is what happened at many state and local governments that are in serious fiscal difficulties. Since wages of their union workers have been set by contract, they were forced primarily to cut wages of administrative staff and other non-union employees. For example, the state of Illinois has the largest fiscal deficit as a percent of its budget of any state. It required many of its high level non-union employees to take 24 unpaid leave days, or about a 9% cut in their salaries, since the state government cannot touch the wages of their many unionized employees.
As Posner indicates, only about 7% of all non-government American workers are unionized, compared to over 35% of workers at federal, state, and local governments. During the past 40 years, the fraction of unionized civilian workers fell steeply-and not only in the United States- while the unionization of government workers fell only a little. It might seem unlikely that workers which comprise only about15% of the total labor force would have a major effect on the speed of the recovery from the recession.
The real threat to a robust recovery on the labor side has come from employer and entrepreneurial fears that once the economic environment improves, a Democratic Congress and administration will pass pro-union and other pro-worker legislation that will raise the cost of doing business and cut profits. In this way the obvious pro-union-pro-worker bias of the present government has contributed to a slower recovery, especially in labor markets. This helps explain the depressingly slow decline in unemployment rates and in the number of workers who have given up looking for jobs.
Greetings, I love your blog. This is a cool site and I wanted to post a little note to tell you, good job!
Best wishes,
cassie
Posted by: louis vuitton handbags | 09/16/2010 at 09:59 PM
Differnt people have different choices, I like these handbags very much, at the same time, another handbag Louis Vuitton Mahina Lunar PM in my oppion is also classic!
Posted by: moda lover | 09/17/2010 at 02:47 AM
http://www.gloriafeldt.com/heartfeldt-politics-blog/2010/9/2/no-excuses-well-just-a-few-countdown-to-publication.html?lastPage=true#comment9793726
Posted by: moda lover | 09/17/2010 at 03:02 AM
Talking about the clock,we always think about the time,time is useless,but if we don't use it truely,we will lose it,so now let us take some good relation each other,firstly,take a look at my website,thanks.
Posted by: nike dunk high | 09/17/2010 at 10:44 PM
A lightly honey, my heart is greeting sweet. A heartfelt greeting is light, as a permanent. A distant care is the person, waiting. A wisp of soft water, with people concern is autumn.
Posted by: New Balance Shoes | 09/29/2010 at 03:15 AM
Thank you for sharing, my families and I all like you article ,reading you article is our best love.
Posted by: nike sb dunks | 10/03/2010 at 09:04 PM
They got me a low fee mortgage, and helped with my solicitor. They were always there to advise and assist.
Posted by: reebok nfl jersey | 10/09/2010 at 01:34 AM
Good topic and the whole blog to add to his forehead to favorites
http://www.answerbag.com/profile/1365630
http://www.answerbag.com/profile/1365654
http://www.answerbag.com/profile/1365684
http://www.answerbag.com/profile/1365690
http://www.answerbag.com/profile/1375643
vvvvvvv
Posted by: den | 10/11/2010 at 01:13 AM
An excellent article and well worth the read. Thanks for sharing!
Posted by: SEO Agency | 10/16/2010 at 04:30 AM
I think the article is silly. I am a business owner and I am not hiring because i do not see demand to hire not because I am afraid of unions. Furthermore, profits do not go down in unionization, but rather prices go up. Profit margins may actually increase. Corporations have more than one cost, they have product cots, labor cots, and shipping, RD and advertising cots. If one goes up the others will come down and/or price will go up. Stop BSing the American people, let us balance the extreme crony capitalism with a balanced social and capital market space.
http://www.pumab2c.com/ Puma Shoes
http://www.eccob2c.com/ Ecco Shoes
http://www.sneakershow.us/ Nike Sneakers
Posted by: Oil Painting Reproductions | 10/18/2010 at 04:43 AM
I like your blog!I want to collect it!
Posted by: handbags2006 | 10/18/2010 at 11:40 AM
I like your blog!I want to collect it!
Posted by: handbags2006 | 10/18/2010 at 12:47 PM
Unions have brought people through rough economies before so I can see where you are basing your position. I am not sure that is the answer though. Many union workers are unemployed and looking for work as well.
Posted by: pop up displays | 11/09/2010 at 12:11 PM
I feel wonderful!
Posted by: Ugg Boots | 11/12/2010 at 01:41 AM
I feel wonderful!
Posted by: Ugg Boots | 11/12/2010 at 01:42 AM
I think the article is silly. I am a business owner and I am not hiring because i do not see demand to hire not because I am afraid of unions
Posted by: lower back pain | 11/23/2010 at 09:48 AM
I can see that you are an expert in this area. I am launching a website soon, and your information will be very useful for me.. Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success in your business.
Posted by: Shelia | 11/27/2010 at 10:33 AM
I am a businessman for several years now, and I can really attest how union affect some businesses. I think,it would be much bettet to hear the opinions of the public, so that they will be aware of the changes happening on their countries.
Posted by: Ronald | 01/10/2011 at 04:27 AM
JO JO JO JO LOVE THIS POST!
Posted by: Air Jordan 13 | 01/28/2011 at 02:29 AM
Merely wanted to talk about in which I am after this forum for some weeks today, and I come once weekly. Great house elevators it, hence thanks a lot internet marketer intended for making all of us have this particular forum !
Ps3 : remorseful regarding this speech, Now i am from france...
Posted by: BradMayot | 01/28/2011 at 10:29 AM
Thank you for your post, I look for such article along time,today i find it finally.this postgive me lots of advise it is very useful for me .i will pay more attention to you ,i hope you can go on posting more such post, i will support you all the time.
Posted by: WHOLESALE PHONES | 02/24/2011 at 01:10 AM
Money is soming, not every. But without money, you can't do anything in this world!
Posted by: cheap coach bags | 03/01/2011 at 01:15 AM
Money is soming, not every. But without money, you can't do anything in this world!
Posted by: cheap coach bags | 03/01/2011 at 01:26 AM
DON'T PRETEND YOU ARE SORRY....I KONW YOU ARE NOT....HAHAHA....
Posted by: Supra Skytop | 03/03/2011 at 07:00 PM
That is will help me a lotI believed that was extremeley interesting. Many thanks with the unusual data. I’ll retain using this….
Posted by: bcbg dresses | 03/04/2011 at 12:24 AM