Many economists and others in the US are advocating a second fiscal stimulus program, believing that the close to $1 trillion in the Obama stimulus package was too modest. This call for another round of government spending is taking place despite the fact that about one third of the original package has not yet been spent, even though it is more than one and one half years since the package was signed by President Obama. Moreover, skeptics (including myself) about whether the US needs another spending package point out that leading economists in the President’s Council of Economic Advisers were far too optimistic about the effects of a big stimulus on unemployment rates. Instead of a predicted decline in unemployment due to the stimulus of more than 1½ percentage points, the total fall in seasonally adjusted unemployment has been only ½ of a percentage point from its peak of 10.2 percent.
Of course, perhaps other factors, such as the uncertainty about the business environment that Congress and the President created through their rhetoric, and also through their actual and proposed legislation, offset powerful effects of the fiscal stimulus itself in reducing unemployment. The unpleasant fact we economists have to face is that there is not strong evidence on the actual effects of governmental spending on employment and GDP. The usual claimed effects are generally based on predictions from highly imperfect theoretical models of the economy rather than from strong direct and clear evidence on the employment consequences of different fiscal stimuli.
This is why the UK’s experiment in reducing rather than raising government spending while Britain is still coming out of its serious recession is not only daring in the present economic climate, but it is also of great value in determining whether growing government spending is a valuable way to speed an economy out of a serious recession. In order to bring under control the large fiscal deficit of Great Britain that is well over 10% of the UK’s GDP, the Tory (coalition) government of David Cameron has proposed a fiscal tightening that amount to about 1.5 percent of GDP during each of the next four years. This will be accomplished by some increase in taxes, but mainly by cuts in spending on public services, public investments, and various benefits to families.
It is informative to contrast this British approach with that of the US. Federal government spending during the past few years increased to about 25 percent of GDP from a level that had been rather stable for a couple of decades, under both Democratic and Republican administrations, at close to20 percent of GDP. The federal fiscal deficit in 2009 was about 12% of GDP, and is expected (or hoped!) to decline in 2010 to about 8%. These are two of the highest deficit ratios in many decades. Essentially nothing is being done in Washington about these enormous deficits, aside from some proposals to raise taxes on the rich that will bring in very little additional tax revenue. Moreover, these proposals have been opposed by many Democrats in Congress as well as by most Republicans.
So which approach will be more successful: the British one that will sharply reduce government spending and fiscal deficits, or the American one that believes these deficits are necessary, and perhaps even too small, to get this country out of the recession? No one knows for sure about the short run effects on their respective economies of these very different approaches. Perhaps, and this is only a “perhaps” that I am by no means persuaded of, the British approach will cause more short-run harm to employment and GDP than will the American approach.
However, I am convinced that the British way is a far better way to improve the long-term growth prospects of an economy. That is, reductions in the bloated levels of government spending and fiscal deficits will do much more to stimulate the longer-term growth of the British economy, mainly by encouraging private investment and innovation, than will the present American approach. Perhaps in good part due to the gridlock in Washington that Posner discusses, this approach shows little desire to cut back on federal government spending, or on actual and projected fiscal deficits.
The usual claimed effects are generally based on predictions from highly imperfect theoretical models of the economy rather than from strong direct and clear evidence on the employment consequences of different fiscal stimuli.
Posted by: ugg sale | 11/24/2010 at 02:47 AM
Searched Google and ended up here - its good so I posted the site on my Facebook account !
Posted by: directx 11 download | 11/24/2010 at 09:55 AM
Excellent powst ! You make some brilliant points liked the idea keep it up
Posted by: air max shoes | 12/02/2010 at 09:49 AM
This is a very good idea! Just want to say thank you for the information, you have to share. Just continue to write such a position. I will be your faithful reader. Thank you again.
Posted by: ugg boot | 12/06/2010 at 12:06 AM
Its great to be a Rockets fan again!He is happy.Thank you for your invitation and it is a great pleasure to be here today.
Posted by: Cheap Ugg Boots | 12/07/2010 at 03:19 AM
The art of giving presents is to give something which others cannot buy for themselves.
http://www.soooogo.com
Posted by: wholesale electronics gadgets | 12/07/2010 at 09:17 PM
OK. Point taken. But there are so many other things that are involved with happiness. things like, job satisfaction, achieving your goals, respect and family relationships.
Posted by: Cheap Jordans | 12/14/2010 at 05:09 AM
Glad to know friends like you.
Posted by: Cheap Louis Vuitton | 12/16/2010 at 07:54 AM
Is necessary to hope. . . for hope itself is happiness
Posted by: porn | 12/17/2010 at 05:19 AM
wa,I thought it was enjoyable at best.Very good have nothing to say.
Posted by: ugg boots | 12/21/2010 at 01:04 AM
polarization was specially significant, or is 30-40 sq. meters, or is over 2000 sq. meters.
Posted by: Nike Free Run | 12/22/2010 at 09:41 PM
Seriously, it is an art.
Posted by: Dominic | 12/26/2010 at 02:34 PM
It was a hard choice for me when I get to choose between two items to what I get my girlfriend for Christmas. It was either an Apple Ipad or an Iphone 4 with an Iphone 4 cases. Its a good thing that I made the right choice of choosing an Iphone4. She loved it.
Posted by: wireless headphones | 01/05/2011 at 07:34 AM
All things in their being are good for something.
Posted by: Supra Shoes | 01/05/2011 at 06:53 PM
I find life an exciting business,The point is succinctness of expression.
Posted by: UGG Lynnea Boots black suede | 01/19/2011 at 02:51 AM
Moreover, skeptics (including myself) about whether the US needs another spending package point out that leading economists in the President’s Council of Economic Advisers were far too optimistic about the effects of a big stimulus on unemployment rates. Instead of a predicted decline in unemployment due to the stimulus of more than 1½ percentage points, the total fall in seasonally adjusted unemployment has been only ½ of a percentage point from its peak of 10.2 percent.
Posted by: UGG Sale | 01/19/2011 at 09:04 PM
Interessant comme dhab merci lami!
Posted by: bonus winamax | 01/28/2011 at 08:00 PM
We also have assist have a look at the type of oakley for sale is lined due to leather, both of the actual template the fact that the exact sides, toe and as a consequence midsole . It must be particularly leather or else soft cloth and to never man-made leather, faux leather and plastic material as all of these resources enable you sweat ones own skin and therefore the particular rubbing will pull in blisters. So that the feet definitely not so inclined, decide to buy louboutin wedges shoes equipped with high heels, but yet customers posses platform . Problem a little bit of models ?n which typically the platform may hidden, giving the type of appearance you'll come with the foot too low, despite the fact that in no way, the way having platform at front helps make all your foot has an inclination lower, giving more exciting help and support and even without just saying end up with tired such wonderful ps3 jailbreak
Posted by: ps3 jailbreak | 01/30/2011 at 12:32 AM
I'm not sure I agree on the idea of South Durham as a "dumping ground" for such projects. I tend to think the presence of Southpoint has made residential more desirable around it, not less
Posted by: Supra Skytop | 02/11/2011 at 01:05 AM
If British govt. did this, their debt load would increase in proportion to currency devaluation. Doesn't sound like a kool incentive does it?
Posted by: football customized jerseys | 02/11/2011 at 01:07 AM
Please post more of this. I largely enjoyed it.
Posted by: Coach Outlet | 02/22/2011 at 12:39 AM
Your article is nice.Thanks for your sharing,it helps me more.I will look forward to your more wonderful articles.Have a good time.
Posted by: pdu | 03/02/2011 at 09:00 PM
The invention ertgrtg is a big change of the world.
Posted by: Office 2010 | 03/13/2011 at 07:38 PM
Nice topic and post, as we were just talking about what things can happen in the medicine industry.
Posted by: air max shoes | 03/16/2011 at 05:01 AM
This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. This is rather nice one and gives in-depth information. Thanks for this nice article
Posted by: rystal | 03/25/2011 at 04:35 AM