Many economists and others in the US are advocating a second fiscal stimulus program, believing that the close to $1 trillion in the Obama stimulus package was too modest. This call for another round of government spending is taking place despite the fact that about one third of the original package has not yet been spent, even though it is more than one and one half years since the package was signed by President Obama. Moreover, skeptics (including myself) about whether the US needs another spending package point out that leading economists in the President’s Council of Economic Advisers were far too optimistic about the effects of a big stimulus on unemployment rates. Instead of a predicted decline in unemployment due to the stimulus of more than 1½ percentage points, the total fall in seasonally adjusted unemployment has been only ½ of a percentage point from its peak of 10.2 percent.
Of course, perhaps other factors, such as the uncertainty about the business environment that Congress and the President created through their rhetoric, and also through their actual and proposed legislation, offset powerful effects of the fiscal stimulus itself in reducing unemployment. The unpleasant fact we economists have to face is that there is not strong evidence on the actual effects of governmental spending on employment and GDP. The usual claimed effects are generally based on predictions from highly imperfect theoretical models of the economy rather than from strong direct and clear evidence on the employment consequences of different fiscal stimuli.
This is why the UK’s experiment in reducing rather than raising government spending while Britain is still coming out of its serious recession is not only daring in the present economic climate, but it is also of great value in determining whether growing government spending is a valuable way to speed an economy out of a serious recession. In order to bring under control the large fiscal deficit of Great Britain that is well over 10% of the UK’s GDP, the Tory (coalition) government of David Cameron has proposed a fiscal tightening that amount to about 1.5 percent of GDP during each of the next four years. This will be accomplished by some increase in taxes, but mainly by cuts in spending on public services, public investments, and various benefits to families.
It is informative to contrast this British approach with that of the US. Federal government spending during the past few years increased to about 25 percent of GDP from a level that had been rather stable for a couple of decades, under both Democratic and Republican administrations, at close to20 percent of GDP. The federal fiscal deficit in 2009 was about 12% of GDP, and is expected (or hoped!) to decline in 2010 to about 8%. These are two of the highest deficit ratios in many decades. Essentially nothing is being done in Washington about these enormous deficits, aside from some proposals to raise taxes on the rich that will bring in very little additional tax revenue. Moreover, these proposals have been opposed by many Democrats in Congress as well as by most Republicans.
So which approach will be more successful: the British one that will sharply reduce government spending and fiscal deficits, or the American one that believes these deficits are necessary, and perhaps even too small, to get this country out of the recession? No one knows for sure about the short run effects on their respective economies of these very different approaches. Perhaps, and this is only a “perhaps” that I am by no means persuaded of, the British approach will cause more short-run harm to employment and GDP than will the American approach.
However, I am convinced that the British way is a far better way to improve the long-term growth prospects of an economy. That is, reductions in the bloated levels of government spending and fiscal deficits will do much more to stimulate the longer-term growth of the British economy, mainly by encouraging private investment and innovation, than will the present American approach. Perhaps in good part due to the gridlock in Washington that Posner discusses, this approach shows little desire to cut back on federal government spending, or on actual and projected fiscal deficits.
By increased spending & so called dollar printing, US is in a rare position to devalue its debt over a period of time.
If British govt. did this, their debt load would increase in proportion to currency devaluation. Doesn't sound like a kool incentive does it?
Posted by: Acne Care | 03/27/2011 at 12:06 AM
Yeah, if they just let him in because he's a celebrity. But it seems that they aren't, which is pleasantly surprising.
Posted by: ghd straighteners | 04/14/2011 at 09:31 AM
Kanye can be the next Miss Cleo and host a call-in show. It needs to be done.
Posted by: tiffany jewelry | 04/14/2011 at 09:35 AM
You should have learnt the basic of design technique on your BA or even before then.
When I did my BA only 3 people in the class knew how to pattern cut
Posted by: chanel bags | 04/14/2011 at 09:38 AM
At 9 or 10 on the scale, the anger has led to major problems/crime. Maybe they are in prison for some crime committed during an outburst of anger. They may need major deliverance from an obvious demonic problem.
Posted by: true religion outlet | 04/18/2011 at 02:17 AM
However, it holds up with the best of them. The Globe Vagrant also comes in a version endorsed by Canadian pro skater Mark Appleyard.
Posted by: new balance | 05/18/2011 at 11:53 PM
This is why the UK’s experiment in reducing rather than raising government spending while Britain is still coming out of its serious recession is not only daring in the present economic climate, but it is also of great value in determining whether growing government spending is a valuable way to speed an economy out of a serious recession.
Posted by: Rosetta Stone | 05/21/2011 at 03:00 AM
We must realize that the democratic cover for the left in the West is as vacuous as taking a vote at a wow power leveling(http://www.deansale.com/wowus/wow-power-leveling.php) g.
Posted by: Sexy girl! | 05/30/2011 at 10:36 PM
If British govt. did this, their debt load would increase in proportion to currency devaluation. Doesn't sound like a kool incentive does it?
Posted by: louboutin shoes | 06/01/2011 at 01:55 AM
If British govt. did this, their debt load would increase in proportion to currency devaluation. Doesn't sound like a kool incentive does it?......
Posted by: louboutin shoes | 06/01/2011 at 01:56 AM
Thanks for the cool badgees! When do we find out who the Petties nominees are???
Posted by: MBT Sale | 07/09/2011 at 08:14 AM
You make blogging look like a walk in the park! I've been trying to blog daily but I just cant find writing material.. you're an inspiration to me and i'm sure many others!
If British govt. did this, their debt load would increase in proportion to currency devaluation. Doesn't sound like a kool incentive does it?
Posted by: mercato | 07/14/2011 at 05:59 AM
That was my thought,too.
Posted by: mbt online | 07/18/2011 at 03:56 AM
I just realized I'll still be typing next week if I keep talking about the great stuff we've gotten, so I'm going to list it!
Posted by: mbt trainers | 08/01/2011 at 03:34 AM
Maybe the knowledge that the debt ceiling could be a dramatic face-off can help the government try to avoid having to raise the debt limit in the future.
Posted by: Discount Herve Leger | 08/15/2011 at 04:51 AM
well this blog is great i love reading your articles.
Posted by: mbt online | 08/23/2011 at 05:49 AM
You can find many online retailers, wedding dress designers and boutiques offering a variety of styles and bridal gown designs in respect of prom gown cheap. Prices may be identical or different faith. Just record a price for your future references to each folwer girl design and be prepared to visit your local mall or store.
Posted by: wedding | 08/29/2011 at 01:10 AM
It is difficult, regardless of their intelligence, their behavioral factors, are very rare events, such as a major earthquake, the consequences of exposure, and cause significant damage when they do occur. It often takes several decades, including a typical life cycle of most or all of another such event occurs. In addition, it is not always clear-cut protective effect, should be taken of the number of such incidents. From this event, which is a small number (probability events), and large (causing damage to the incident) the expected loss of the product itself may be only moderate in size. This is expected to moderate damage to the protective measures not very expensive.
Posted by: mulberrys | 09/16/2011 at 04:27 AM
These activities may increase the economic prosperity in the region, the appearance, but it is false "prosperity", as they will mainly be to replace or repair damaged and destroyed buildings and equipment.
Posted by: nike shoes | 09/16/2011 at 05:11 AM
Nice post I like this 2 countries
Posted by: jouer au poker avec ticket premium | 09/23/2011 at 05:21 AM
Super cute! My little man would look so stylin' in those!
Posted by: jordan jams | 09/25/2011 at 04:26 PM
Super cute! My little man would look so stylin' in those!
Posted by: jordan jams | 09/25/2011 at 04:26 PM
Thanks for sharing. This website is to I too have to help. Very good.
Posted by: jordan cool grey | 09/27/2011 at 06:55 AM
Thanks for sharing. This website is to I too have to help. Very good.
Posted by: jordan cool grey | 09/27/2011 at 06:57 AM
Es symbolisiert den reifen und einen neuen Anfang. So wählen Sie einen geeigneten brautkleider für die große Tag ist sehr wichtig. Sweet 16 hochzeitskleider Sie können wählen kurzen Heimkehr abendkleider oder Quinceanera Kleider! Jetzt haben wir mehrere Stile vorzustellen, sie sind sehr schön und eignen sich für diesen großen Tag.
Posted by: hochzeit | 09/28/2011 at 08:48 PM