Many economists and others in the US are advocating a second fiscal stimulus program, believing that the close to $1 trillion in the Obama stimulus package was too modest. This call for another round of government spending is taking place despite the fact that about one third of the original package has not yet been spent, even though it is more than one and one half years since the package was signed by President Obama. Moreover, skeptics (including myself) about whether the US needs another spending package point out that leading economists in the President’s Council of Economic Advisers were far too optimistic about the effects of a big stimulus on unemployment rates. Instead of a predicted decline in unemployment due to the stimulus of more than 1½ percentage points, the total fall in seasonally adjusted unemployment has been only ½ of a percentage point from its peak of 10.2 percent.
Of course, perhaps other factors, such as the uncertainty about the business environment that Congress and the President created through their rhetoric, and also through their actual and proposed legislation, offset powerful effects of the fiscal stimulus itself in reducing unemployment. The unpleasant fact we economists have to face is that there is not strong evidence on the actual effects of governmental spending on employment and GDP. The usual claimed effects are generally based on predictions from highly imperfect theoretical models of the economy rather than from strong direct and clear evidence on the employment consequences of different fiscal stimuli.
This is why the UK’s experiment in reducing rather than raising government spending while Britain is still coming out of its serious recession is not only daring in the present economic climate, but it is also of great value in determining whether growing government spending is a valuable way to speed an economy out of a serious recession. In order to bring under control the large fiscal deficit of Great Britain that is well over 10% of the UK’s GDP, the Tory (coalition) government of David Cameron has proposed a fiscal tightening that amount to about 1.5 percent of GDP during each of the next four years. This will be accomplished by some increase in taxes, but mainly by cuts in spending on public services, public investments, and various benefits to families.
It is informative to contrast this British approach with that of the US. Federal government spending during the past few years increased to about 25 percent of GDP from a level that had been rather stable for a couple of decades, under both Democratic and Republican administrations, at close to20 percent of GDP. The federal fiscal deficit in 2009 was about 12% of GDP, and is expected (or hoped!) to decline in 2010 to about 8%. These are two of the highest deficit ratios in many decades. Essentially nothing is being done in Washington about these enormous deficits, aside from some proposals to raise taxes on the rich that will bring in very little additional tax revenue. Moreover, these proposals have been opposed by many Democrats in Congress as well as by most Republicans.
So which approach will be more successful: the British one that will sharply reduce government spending and fiscal deficits, or the American one that believes these deficits are necessary, and perhaps even too small, to get this country out of the recession? No one knows for sure about the short run effects on their respective economies of these very different approaches. Perhaps, and this is only a “perhaps” that I am by no means persuaded of, the British approach will cause more short-run harm to employment and GDP than will the American approach.
However, I am convinced that the British way is a far better way to improve the long-term growth prospects of an economy. That is, reductions in the bloated levels of government spending and fiscal deficits will do much more to stimulate the longer-term growth of the British economy, mainly by encouraging private investment and innovation, than will the present American approach. Perhaps in good part due to the gridlock in Washington that Posner discusses, this approach shows little desire to cut back on federal government spending, or on actual and projected fiscal deficits.
Merci pour ces informations tres intéressantes.
Posted by: Bonus bwin poker | 09/30/2011 at 05:32 AM
Really interesting.
Posted by: Cote et match | 09/30/2011 at 05:33 AM
What I can conclude is that in a few years UK will stand in front US as an economy. The "budget plan" that they have till 2022 will bring a lot of new investment ( ex. Olympic Games ). While, US spend too much on weapon manufacturing and wars.
Posted by: olympic london accommodations | 10/05/2011 at 01:05 AM
Jobs are going quickly. Just a day after opening the boards I’d heard back from numerous advertisers that they thought they’d already found someone for their jobs. While I’d encourage applicants not to rush the process (and come across as not having thought it through) I would suggest that you need to act reasonably quickly when applying for a blog job or you could miss out. 24 hours is a long time in blogging – take any longer than that to express your interest in a job and you might miss out on it.
http://www.2joygame.com.
http://www.gobuytera.com/Tera.items
Posted by: tera gold | 10/10/2011 at 08:18 AM
The post is very nicely written and yes it contains many useful facts. We are pleased to find your distinguished way of writing the post. So you allow me to learn and implement. Thank you sharing with us.
Posted by: buy tera gold | 10/15/2011 at 04:42 AM
This was amazing. I was there with you - and it's as close as I want to get to a military experience.
Posted by: Dust masks | 10/19/2011 at 01:07 AM
wonderful story. I was expecting a different ending. Cool, marvelous story....
Posted by: Protective mask | 10/19/2011 at 01:08 AM
If we guys spot a good fish, we will cast long and hard to get her to rise to our fly. I got one halfway across the country.
Posted by: Protective masks | 10/19/2011 at 01:09 AM
If you thought that dating after forty was scary, try it a decade later! Though I looked at it as an incredible learning curve, most of the learning was about myself.
Posted by: Medical mask | 10/19/2011 at 01:09 AM
Everyone deserve the right to find the right one. Sometimes it just takes time which is pretty precious at some ages.
Posted by: power strips | 10/19/2011 at 01:10 AM
Allow yourself time to grieve over the deaths of your chickens, but don't think for a moment that you did something wrong.
Posted by: extension cords | 10/19/2011 at 01:11 AM
[url=http://www.uggsbotas-es.com/]ugg Australia[/url] , True de su tío conductores de NASCAR Mark Martin se refiere como su "Superman" Jimmie Kenneth Manley casi tuvo la suerte;. floreciente carrera de un vehículo de la posición del conductor, bella novia de Chandra y la hermosa infantil Genevieve Marie.Speedy NASCAR trabajo Johnson recibió un bono en las carreras dentro del período de licitación de six.From moto de carreras que / se hizo el movimiento en particular sobre cuatro llantas racing.He comenzó a competir en un número fuera de la carretera ligas en las que resultó hacia su puesta al día la posición entre los más grandes driversin NASCAR pista record.He profesó su quinto informe sin demora Campeonato Copa Sprint de NASCAR en busca de terminar el segundo set situado en Nascar de final de temporada los resultados kind.Johnson en ser justo, finalmente conducir dentro de la serie la historia y triunfó en 53 carreras de contenedores Nascar y la nacionalidad, además, un nacional de la serie en la carrera de su pareja.
Posted by: zyq | 10/19/2011 at 03:19 AM
[url=http://www.uggsbotas-es.com/bot%C3%83%C2%B3n-ugg-mujer-bailey-5803-c-23.html]Bot贸n UGG Mujer Bailey 5803[/url] , el tiro se utilizó como Jimmie celebra este quinto año consecutivo Nascar Sprint Cup great.Personalized accesorios niño al igual que la joyería junto con la ropa hacen los regalos del bebé persona más adorable.Yet otra cosa es que las compras de regalos niña no será aburrido en comparación con el anterior, debido a la llegada conectados en línea con bebé recién nacido shop.With varios regalos bebé hembra diseñado en la muestra de la diversión, colorido y con estilo para, posiblemente, mejorar su bebé 閳 ユ 獨 artículos vision.Related - niño, niña, regalos,.
Posted by: zyq | 10/19/2011 at 03:21 AM
Macbeth, the popular play of William Shakespeare, with the yr 1950. Franco
Posted by: Uggs Boots Sale | 11/11/2011 at 02:58 AM
quite a bit. On the other hand, it can be incredibly difficult for making a
Posted by: Sale Uggs | 11/11/2011 at 03:01 AM
I like you on facebook and follow through google reader!
Posted by: Belstaff Blouson moto | 11/12/2011 at 06:22 PM
This post is awesome,ecpecting the newest!!!LIKE IT LIKE IT LIKE IT!!!
Posted by: Moncler Salg | 03/06/2012 at 10:49 AM