The statistics on education and earnings presented by Becker are dramatic, but also puzzling, at least superfically. Why should the sex ratio of either education or earnings change over a relatively short period of time (30 or 40 years)? It is fairly easy to explain the growth over this period in the percentage of women who work full time in the market rather than in the household—improvements in contraception, a fall in the marriage rate (though that is a function in part of women’s higher market earnings potential), a reduction in the demand for children (also, however, in part a function of that higher potential), the shift from a manufacturing to a service economy (and the growing automation of manufacturing), and the growth in household labor saving appliances—all these things have contributed to increased female participation in the labor force, but it is not obvious that they would increase the ratio of full-time female earnings to full-time male earnings.
It’s not as if there’s been a relative increase in the number of jobs for which women are better suited than men. Women are not as well suited to perform jobs requiring upper-body strength as men are, but men can perform virtually all service jobs as well as women can. So an increase in demand for service workers should draw men as well as women into such jobs, leaving the gender wage ratio unchanged. Similarly, one would expect an increase in the returns to education to affect men the same way it would affect women, so that relative graduation rates would not change and therefore would not affect relative earnings.
One factor in the increased ratio of female to male earnings is undoubtedly that until quite recently most women who worked full time were unable, unless they were unmarried, or married but childless, to spend as many years working full time as they are able to do today. They would have to take years off from full-time employment to take care of their children, and so would be investing less in their human capital than male workers and therefore earning less. And they would tend to cluster in full-time jobs that involve short work days, notably teaching, and so more of their compensation (relative to men’s) would take the form of leisure, as distinct from pecuniary income, than men’s compensation would. Law, and especially medicine, fields that require protracted education and long hours—and are compensated accordingly—would be unattractive professions for most women.
Another factor is discrimination. Women were largely excluded from the major professions until the 1960s (in part at least because of expectations that they would become full-time practitioners), and their educational opportunities were limited until then as well—many elite colleges and professional schools did not admit women. Beginning in the 1970s, antidiscrimination laws corrected but also overcorrected sex discrimination, by placing pressure on employers to hire and compensate women at higher rates than justified by labor costs. For, in order to avoid accusations of discrimination, employers began bending over backwards to hire and retain women, even ones who were slightly less qualified than men. And the laws forbade employers to charge higher health insurance or life insurance premiums to female employees, even though they tend to use more medical services than men, and live longer, and so cost more to health and life insurers.
But all this leaves unexplained why women would be graduating at higher rates from colleges and from graduate and professional schools than men. One possibility is differences between men and women in variance in IQ—the issue that got Larry Summers into trouble when he was president of Harvard. Suppose as he conjectured (with some evidence) that men and women have the same IQ but the distribution of male IQs is flatter than that of women—a higher proportion of men than of women have very high and very low IQs. As graduation from most college and most graduate or professional programs requires a normal or high but not very high IQ, the greater male variance in IQ would tend to truncate male but not female graduation (and hence enrollment) rates: low-IQ males would be underrepresented in higher education, but high-IQ males would be overrepresented in just a few programs, such as high-energy physics, and so would not balance the males who were not admitted or dropped out at high rates. Males would continue to be overrepresented in jobs involving upper-body strength, but these tend not to require a high level of education.
Cultural factors may also be at work, especially in the black community, where academic performance is disparaged among young men but not young women. For example, 42 percent of black women who graduate from high school go on to college, compared to only 37 percent of black males; and just 35 percent of black male college students graduate within six years, compared to 45 percent of black female college students. This implies that 19 percent of black women who graduate from high school are graduating from college within six years compared to only 13 percent of black males. The overall situation is actually worse, because only 48 percent of black males graduate from high school, compared to 59 percent of black females (implying that the college graduation rate for black females is almost twice that for black males); and the disparity is almost as great for Hispanics. Blacks and Hispanics constitute a sizable fraction of the U.S. population. Nevertheless, there is a gap between white male and white female graduation rates as well; the high school graduation rate for white males, for example, is 74 percent, compared to 79 percent for white females, and the college graduation rate is 43 percent for white males compared to 57 percent for white females.
Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance.
Posted by: Taobao auction | 01/23/2011 at 01:10 AM
I cant wait to read more from you. I just feel like you know so much and know how to make people listen to what you have to say.
Posted by: ClubPenguinCheats | 03/03/2011 at 11:35 PM
Thank you for all the information you provide
Posted by: medyum | 03/04/2011 at 05:24 AM
Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the net the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think about worries that they just do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks
Posted by: sciatic nerve | 03/26/2011 at 12:29 AM
Apparently, because ownership of wealth (land) was matrilineal, when the men returned from overseas, many sought employment off-Reservation rather than returning to their traditional role of planting, tending crops etc. Perhaps Veblen's "barbarian status" critique is reversible.
Posted by: Acne Care | 03/27/2011 at 12:07 AM
Ich wollte nur einen kurzen Kommentar zu sagen, ich bin froh, dass ich einen Blog zu machen. Dank
Posted by: refrigerator repair los angeles | 04/03/2011 at 12:18 AM
I really liked your article and I shared with my friends in my facebook account.welcome visit us.I rally like your article!It is so beneficialPolo Outlet
Posted by: Polo Outlet | 04/04/2011 at 01:13 AM
At 9 or 10 on the scale, the anger has led to major problems/crime. Maybe they are in prison for some crime committed during an outburst of anger. They may need major deliverance from an obvious demonic problem.
Posted by: true religion outlet | 04/18/2011 at 03:03 AM
You want to select shoes that will provide the proper ankle support, are lightweight as mentioned earlier and have plenty of material to cushion the shock of the dance movements.
Posted by: sexy bikini | 04/21/2011 at 09:27 AM
One thing that the author might have missed is that in certain working class households, school is seen as a waste of time, and there is pressure on the male family members to get a job, whereas there is less pressure on female members, for whom school is seen as a frivolous venture that they might as well waste their time with until they get married.
Posted by: d w m | 04/28/2011 at 06:06 PM
Or of course, school costs money. Lots of it. And with approximately 45% of African Americans born into poverty, it's simply not an option for many.
Posted by: d w m | 04/28/2011 at 06:07 PM
Interesting content, keep up your good work, i will be following your blog.
Posted by: Blinds | 05/17/2011 at 11:23 AM
Heat the wax as instructed, apply it to the cloth strips, and place the strips on the area where you want to remove your pubic hair. Following the timed recommendations on the package, pull the strips off. Repeat this process on each area where you want to remove your pubic hair.
Posted by: lebron james shoes | 05/19/2011 at 01:44 AM
It’s not as if there’s been a relative increase in the number of jobs for which women are better suited than men. Women are not as well suited to perform jobs requiring upper-body strength as men are, but men can perform virtually all service jobs as well as women can. So an increase in demand for service workers should draw men as well as women into such jobs, leaving the gender wage ratio unchanged. Similarly, one would expect an increase in the returns to education to affect men the same way it would affect women, so that relative graduation rates would not change and therefore would not affect relative earnings.
Posted by: Rosetta Stone | 05/21/2011 at 03:00 AM
You raised some interesting issues with this article. It's always encouraging to see gender equality.
Posted by: sailing vacation | 05/23/2011 at 09:13 AM
This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.
Posted by: cheap jewelry online | 05/23/2011 at 07:35 PM
Das wird eine tolle Webseite sein, knnen Sie sich fr ein Interview ber, wie Sie es erstellt interessiert sein? Wenn dem so ist e-mail me!
Posted by: buy anabol tablets | 06/07/2011 at 01:57 PM
However, for many thousands of Londoners, who are being asked to pay more than most towards the cost of the games, it will be the preserve of rich and/or well-connected people
Posted by: Polo Shirts Men | 06/11/2011 at 01:38 AM
In the next 50 years, i think the states shall be owning all the land in each nation in the continent.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Sale | 06/29/2011 at 02:07 AM
Apologies for the negativity, its just average folk like me simply don't see the point.
Posted by: Abercrombie et Fitch | 07/05/2011 at 01:52 AM
Thanks for the cool badgees! When do we find out who the Petties nominees are???
Posted by: MBT Sale | 07/09/2011 at 08:11 AM
The doosra was being talked about by many commentators of the game and the apparent ability to bowl one got even someone like Alex Loudon into the international arena.
Posted by: cheap Ralph Lauren | 07/15/2011 at 02:12 AM
I don't think the UN are doing good job in Africa; the UN forces have accussed of mass rape in the DR Congo, and illegal trade with the rebel groups.
Posted by: ralph lauren us polo | 07/20/2011 at 01:46 AM
Maybe it is the prevalence of hormones in our food chain. Or, could it be the EXTREME emphasis placed on "athletic" competition for our youthful males. While female students are concentrating on their studies, the boys are "studying" baseball or some other glorified sport and playing military war games promoted by the federal government. Be all you can be. That equates in the Madison Avenue agenda promoted by our government as bulking up like Arnold, carrying a gun, and behaving like a moron. As an example, my son, a person with a high IQ, spent much of the time of his youth in sport, playing these antisocial games and falling for this image promoted by our government and society. Fortunately, as he neared graduation from high school, he began to mature and recognize his delusions. Meanwhile his sister was ahead of him. It took a few years of junior college for him to catch up. Why are women earning more? They are typically more reliable, responsible, socially more adept, and caring than the men WHO RELY upon their services. As an example, it is very likely that both Posner and Becker rely upon women.
Posted by: kredisi | 07/20/2011 at 06:01 PM
There is no real scholarship going on, only propaganda dressed as fiction.
Posted by: Nike sb shoes | 07/29/2011 at 01:29 AM