Becker makes the important point that growth in the deficit, because of an increased gap between government spending and tax revenues, is tolerable if GDP grows faster; for it is not the absolute size of the deficit, but its relation to the size of the economy, that is important. And there are, as he says, a number of reforms that would result in faster economic growth, including tax reforms and a rational immigration policy. And spending could be cut—just placing social security and Medicare on a means-tested basis would do wonders.
But there are two questions to ponder. One is whether reforms aimed at increasing economic growth (rather than reducing spending) would be likely to increase that growth by a large enough margin to make a growing deficit shrink as a percentage of GDP. I am skeptical. Americans are lightly taxed by international standards and the rate of formation of new businesses normally is very high. Small businesses are currently having trouble borrowing but that is a consequence of the continuing weakness of the banking system rather than of anything to do with the tax system, and the financial system is likely to revive before tax reform could be implemented. The higher tax rates of the Clinton years seem not to have inhibited economic growth. It would be great if the immigration laws were changed to encourage more immigration by high-IQ foreigners and also by wealthy ones, but, again because of the continuing weakness of the U.S. economy, the demand for skilled immigrants is at present weak.
There may also be a practical ceiling on the rate of economic growth of a mature, highly complex economy. Maybe at a growth rate above 3 percent, labor and materials shortages create bottlenecks and inflation that make it prudent for the Federal Reserve to push up interest rates in order to slow down growth. If this is right and if taxes are cut and spending rises, it is hard to see how the annual deficit can be kept from rising by more than 3 percent. It is illuminating to compare the increase in the national debt during the Presidency of George W. Bush—a period in which Congress (until 2007) and the Presidency were highly pro-business—with the increase in GDP during that period. In 2002, the debt increased by 5.5 percent and GDP by 1.3 percent. The corresponding figures for 2003 were 6.2 percent and 1.4 percent; for 2004, 5.7 percent and 3.4 percent; for 2005, 3.7 percent and 2.6 percent; for 2006, 3.4 percent and 2.9 percent; for 2007, 3.6 percent and 2.8 percent; for 2008, 5.0 percent and 2.0 percent; and for 2009, 5.5 percent and 2.6 percent. Since then of course the gap has widened, but that is because of the economic crisis. We would feel great if we were back in the Bush economy! Yet in every year of Bush’s Presidency, the deficit grew faster than GDP. That may be the “new normal.”
The second question (which relates to the hypothesis of a new normal) is the political realism of economic reforms that would increase the growth rate or reduce the deficit. As I have argued previously, both political parties seem to have converged on a policy of high spending and low taxes. The Democrats want even higher spending than the Republicans do, and the Republicans want even lower taxes than the Democrats do, but these differences should not blind us to the realization that neither party has serious plans for reducing the annual increases in the deficit. I do not see this changing in the new Congress. If the Republicans had won control of the Senate, they would be under pressure to produce legislation that the President would sign, lest the new Congress be accused of being a “do-nothing” Congress—the accusation that won Truman the Presidency in 1948. But since the Republicans do not control Congress, an oppositional stance is attractive. And it is more difficult for Obama to compromise with Republicans than it was for Clinton, because Obama is more liberal than Clinton was and the Republicans are more conservative today than in the 1990s.
The status of the dollar as the international reserve currency, and the mercantilist policies of countries like China and Germany, will enable us to finance our growing deficit, and thus postpone the day of reckoning, for some time. But at some point the wheels may start coming off the chassis.
Still, life is full of surprises. The prospects for the United States looked grim in the 1970s and bright for Japan. Then Reagan was elected and the sky cleared here, and then the Japanese housing and banking bubbles burst and Japan entered the long period of economic stagnation in which it still finds itself. Maybe we’ll get lucky again.
The invention is aregth big change of the world.
Posted by: Office 2010 | 03/13/2011 at 07:38 PM
We can see this effect w/o a "study", while the strapped middle class or lower income person will shoot off to the mall with even a small tax rebate -- new shoes for Jr, a trip to see grandparents, etc. the much larger check coming to the upper income home is likely to go in the bank.
Posted by: Acne Care | 03/26/2011 at 11:21 PM
Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same content as you
Posted by: Christian Louboutins | 03/27/2011 at 02:02 AM
the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up! Cheers.
Posted by: coach bags | 03/27/2011 at 02:03 AM
the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up
Posted by: coach bags | 03/27/2011 at 02:12 AM
DKNY footwear is a bit pricey, but well worth it. Women everywhere scour sales and the internet in the efforts of finding "just the right shoe for just the right price" for themselves.
Posted by: visvim | 04/21/2011 at 09:41 AM
You hit the nail on the head. People who realize the importance of connecting, communicating on an emotional level, and cooperating with others to enhance their greatness IMHO have a distinct edge.
Posted by: cheap supra shoes | 04/23/2011 at 03:52 AM
WHAT A NICE POST, REALLY IT'S GREAT JOB. KEEP IT ON....POST!VERY INFORMATIVE DUDE.
Posted by: Cheap Air Jordan | 05/06/2011 at 10:59 PM
Shoes should only be chosen because you look fine in them and not because they are the latest rave.
Posted by: cheap nike shoes | 05/18/2011 at 10:34 PM
Vibrams are basically shoes that have no padding and toe pockets. Now, the idea behind barefoot training is making your feet tougher,
Posted by: lebron james shoes | 05/19/2011 at 12:07 AM
There may also be a practical ceiling on the rate of economic growth of a mature, highly complex economy. Maybe at a growth rate above 3 percent, labor and materials shortages create bottlenecks and inflation that make it prudent for the Federal Reserve to push up interest rates in order to slow down growth.
Posted by: Rosetta Stone | 05/21/2011 at 02:59 AM
Thanks for the cool badgees! When do we find out who the Petties nominees are???
Posted by: MBT Sale | 07/09/2011 at 08:10 AM
That was my thought,too.
Posted by: mbt online | 07/18/2011 at 03:48 AM
Do you think that paying primary care physicians more will get better ones or do you agree with your recent WSJ article that paying judges more will not get better judges? After all, human nature is human nature.
Posted by: Discount Herve Leger | 08/15/2011 at 04:56 AM
USA jerseys supply for those people who are shy and have a hard time waiting for that someone to come, maybe you can try surfing in the customized mlb jerseys internet and mingle to those other single out there who is also searching for someone to be their partner.
Posted by: nfl jerseys cheap | 08/17/2011 at 02:54 AM
well this blog is great i love reading your articles.
Posted by: mbt online | 08/23/2011 at 05:49 AM
Thanks for sharing. This website is to I too have to help. Very good.
Posted by: jordan cool grey | 09/27/2011 at 09:05 AM
Do you think that Bush administration made some good changes in the economy? In my opinion only wars and weapon were "on demand". That`s why the situation is not bright in front of the US citizens. Since the "Credit rating" was down in a few weeks the ability US to get more credibility was also down.
Posted by: olympic london accommodations | 10/05/2011 at 01:16 AM
, [url=http://www.uggsbotas-es.com/]botas ugg[/url] , Si usted tiene una oportunidad para las vacaciones de metrópolis Lijiang, Yunnan en el suroeste de dominio, la mayoría de los locales, así como manuales de gira recomendaría para visitar Gorge Tiger mojando, sólo de los lugares más interesantes cerca de la metrópoli. En realidad, es que se rumorea de la Garganta de Salto Iger será el más profundo cañón del río en el mundo? Puede ser que sea un hecho. El George se suele medir más de 3, 000 metros (aproximadamente 9.842 pies) entre graves SU QUINTO, 596 metros (aprox. 18.360 pies) de alto Montaña del Dragón de Jade perfecto junto con 5, 396 metros (aprox. 17.703 pies) de altura de Montaña Haba perfecto , donde el río de arena de oro (un nombre local de la cuenca alta del río Yangtze) pasa al interior de una serie conectada con rápidos menos de los acantilados de difícil. La garganta puede ser no sólo el más profundo y también el más estrecho y el cañón más peligroso en el mundo. La parte más estrecha debe ser de 30 metros. Supongo que tiene que ser curioso sobre el nombre con la garganta mientras usted lee este artículo. En el punto, puede haber una leyenda con la garganta sucediendo desde primera dinastía del lejano oriente. Hubo un período, un tigre estaba tratando de escapar de su cazador persigue persistente, aun así, el lago Yangtze abrirse camino. El tigre redujo punto más estrecho de la garganta, además de un salto que rodea al río. Para garantizar la garganta que su nombre desde entonces.
Posted by: günstige ugg | 10/15/2011 at 01:37 AM
Wonderful tribute to your friend, Matt, and heartbreaking. I'm sorry you lost him.
Posted by: pvc panel manufacturers | 10/19/2011 at 02:10 AM
Thanks, Gary. It just occurred to me the euphoria could have been delusional. My estimation as to how high the bullets actually were might have been pure hallucination.
Posted by: pvc ceiling manufacturers | 10/19/2011 at 02:10 AM
Wonderful writing and a fascinating story, Matt! I was fearful all might not end well for a moment there but boy was I smiling when that jackrabbit took off!
Posted by: pvc door manufacturers | 10/19/2011 at 02:11 AM
This was excellent! Although it was ten years later and I had the M16, I was there with you pal, and just as scared!
Posted by: ceiling panel manufacturers | 10/19/2011 at 02:12 AM
Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view.
Posted by: nhl jerseys | 11/02/2011 at 10:00 PM
Thank you, great stuff as usual.y
Posted by: knockoff handbags | 12/02/2011 at 09:53 AM