The American War on Drugs is Not Only an American Disaster-Becker

 

 

Perhaps the “war on drugs”, initiated by President Nixon in the 1970s, was worth starting, in part for the reasons Posner gives. I say “perhaps” since I have always been skeptical of the war, particularly in light of the disastrous American experience with prohibition of alcohol between 1920-1933. Whatever one’s views on the initial case for making drugs illegal, the cost has been tremendous, and in many aspects unanticipated. Moreover, and this is the crux of my discussion, the costs of this war go far beyond those estimated in the recent study by Miron and Waldock discussed by Posner.

These authors do a good job of estimating the amount directly spent by the United States in fighting the war on drugs. They calculate about $41 billion is spent on this fight by state and local governments, and by the federal government, through policing efforts, the cost of court personnel and buildings used to try and convict drug offenders, and the cost of the guards and other resources used to imprison those convicting of drug offenses. They also estimate that a similar amount could be raised in tax revenue from “sin” taxes on drug use if that became legal. These estimated direct costs of the war are significant, yet they are regrettably only a small fraction of the total social costs due to the war on drugs.

It is no accident that much of the drug trafficking is found in poorer black and Hispanic neighborhoods since high school dropouts and other low earners are attracted to becoming involved in the drug trade. The result typically is a sizable deterioration in the quality of living in drug-dominated neighborhoods, with residents often terrorized by the drug dealers. No one to my knowledge has estimated the social cost of neighborhood deterioration due to drugs, but it is likely very high. 

Drug prices are much higher than they would be if drugs were legal- probably much more than 100% higher for most drugs- because drug traffickers must be compensated for the risks of going to jail and the violence from being in the drug business. The high prices of drugs tend to reduce drug use, but it also makes life very difficult for anyone who does become a heavy user. Since the cost of maintaining their drug habits and addictions often overwhelm their earnings, many heavy users turn to prostitution and other crimes to get enough money to pay for their drug use.

Most sellers of illegal drugs are high school dropouts who on average do not earn much from their sales, and they also face the risk of jail time. However, they continue selling drugs because their legal opportunities are limited, and also because occasionally a small time seller rises up in the drug organization and makes it big. Legalization of drugs will very likely increase the high school graduation rate because it would reduce these illegal opportunities for dropouts. As a result, drug legalization would radically reduce the numbers of young uneducated persons going into the drug trade, and increase their numbers in better paying legal jobs since they would be better qualified for these jobs. This would be another important indirect benefit from legalizing drugs.

Perhaps, however, the worse results of the American war on drugs are found in its effects on other countries, especially Mexico, Colombia, and other Latin American countries. Mexico is also engaged in a war on drugs, but it is a war almost entirely fought against drugs shipped from Mexico into the United States. The overwhelming majority of drugs that are either produced in Mexico, or that enter Mexico from other countries, are destined for shipment across the border to the United States. The two main drugs shipped from Mexico are marijuana and cocaine, the same two drugs that Miron and Waldock show constitute the vast majority of drugs used by American consumers.

Mexico is engaged in a real war, with advanced military equipment used by the drug gangs; often the gangs have better weapons than the army does. The casualties have been huge: an estimated 30,000 + persons have been killed in recent years as a result of the drug violence, far greater than the combined deaths of American and allied forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Many of these deaths are of drug cartel members, but a considerable number also are of soldiers and policemen, journalists, and innocent bystanders.

After the drug lords discovered that they are very good at violence and intimidation, they expanded geographically and into other activities. They have spread out from concentration in enclaves near the border or in the West of Mexico into many other areas, including major cities like Monterrey. Some towns have become uninhabitable, as former residents fled from the violence, some entering illegally into the US. Drug lords have taken control in many places of prostitution, gambling, extraction of monies from businesses for “protection” services, and indirectly also various local governments.

Colombia has fought a long and bloody war against its drug cartels that involved many deaths on both sides, including civilian deaths, and a major drain on government resources. A good part of the country had been fully under control of the drug lords. As in Mexico, the drugs produced and refined in Colombia were almost entirely shipped to the United States. Fortunately, the government finally appears to have won the war, at least for the present.

No one has estimated the social cost of American drug policy on Mexico, Colombia, and other countries, but it has to be immense. Perhaps these countries should just allow drugs to be shipped to the US, and put the full burden of stopping these shipments on American enforcement agencies. The American government would protest, but such a result would provide a clearer picture to the American people of the full cost of current policy, including the major costs imposed on other countries. One can hope that then we will get a serious rethinking of the American war on drugs, and some real political movement toward decriminalization and legalization of various drugs.

 

 

 

Comments

[Roy Forsyth]

I don’t agree with the total legalisation of hard drugs (heroin, cocaine) but obviously can see the benefits i.e. reduced crime rates. With the prison rates so high in the US I don’t see them being able to sustain this for much longer, especially ridiculous sentences for possession of marijuana. In my eyes, the Netherlands have the correct approach to drugs. Licensed cafes and the likes decriminalise softer drugs, and also give the economy a boost.

Kind regards,

Brian Smith
http://www.debtscotland.net

[JohnzHopkinz]

Karen Millen Dresses - how can you call Professor Becker a fake professor? Not only is he one of the top economists in the world, but he has won a Nobel Prize for his contribution in the field. You should focus on giving us actual arguments in favor of drug prohibition rather than insult one of the smartest people in the world and his readers.

I personally find this article sound and informative.The human casualties caused by drug violence is enough to justify legalization.

[karen millen]

That is will help me a lotI believed that was extremeley interesting. Many thanks with the unusual data. I’ll retain using this….

[duvetica]

First, let me commend your clarity on this subject. I am not an expert on this subject, but after learning your article, my understanding has developed well. I know you must have more wonderful idea.

[duvetica]

Okay article. I simply found your blog site and wished to say I’ve definitely enjoyed reading through your thoughts. By any signifies I’ll be subscribing for a feed and I genuinely hope you write-up once more quickly….

[karen millen]

only for a moment and thr moment was gone.

[coach outlet]

Department of Theravada in the public believes that the other three thousand worlds

[slot makinaları]

Great post as always. Thank for creating time to write...Will continue to follow you.

[Jordans shoes]

Without too much efforts, a friend changed much, the burden lighter, and walked so easily, our hearts so open-minded, unique, epoch, Xinxin congenial, everything interlinked!

[Pharma]

The War on Drugs has become the longest and most costly war in American history, the question has become, how much more can the country endure?

[kelly]

I still say that media and a collective effort from world leaders, is our way out. http://www.stopoxy.com

[Andrés Moya]

Thank you for your post professor. You mention that countries torn by the drug wars could be better off allowing drugs to be shipped to the US, in order "to put the full burden of stopping these shipments on American enforcement agencies". Legalizing in the south but not in the north, however, would keep markups and profits considerably high. Drug dealers, cartels, and armed groups, who currently benefit from this war, would then want to protect their business and even set up entrance barriers by the use of violence and corruption. Sadly, unless there is a movement up north to legalize drugs, we still seem doomed by the extent of drug-related violence.

[Joel T.]

Before this silly war on crime, imposed by the US government to the Mexican government, drug trafficking had pretty much "free pass" through Mexico into the US. It was tolerated by the Mexican government, not legal.

If Mexico were to allow this "free pass" once again, I am certain that the violence would come to an end in many Mexican cities, but it could potentially spill into the US. That's why I doubt the Mexican government would make that decision and why the US government wouldn't allow such thing.

You see, contrary to popular belief, the Mexican government does what the American government asks or wants.

[True Religion]

Face up to the life with smile , no matter what will happened.

[Nike SB]

One particular of your principal differences involving a webpage along with a static site is the way people are able to interact along with your content material. What do you consider that? I've several strategies but have to have to feel twice. Wish your tommorrow might be better.

[Christian Louboutin]

The best thing is to keep cool~

[Cheap Jordans]

I think everyone has his own way of relaxing. Perhaps the most popular way is to participate in sports!

[Supra Footwear]

Because in my opinion, the language should be really beautiful, beautiful, and be able t o physical and mental pleasure.

[graduation gifts]

war on drug was a joke. Nancy Regan had a good run with it in the 80's. It got some attention on the subject, but the problem only gotten worse not better....

[graduation gifts]

War on drug focus on drugs that came through Mexico or South America. The problem only gotten worse cause now the drugs are all synthetic and far more deadly, worst of all, it's domestically made.

[discount mbt shoes]

This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.

[discount mbt shoes]

This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.

[Juradai]

America's war on drugs is the most successful war it has ever waged. Its goal was not the elimination of drug use but the creation of a way to criminalise the poor and certain ethnic groups who coincidentally are poor. why else is possession the rich white man's drug of choice have a lesser penalty than that of the poor black man's drug not of choice but affordability? Opps caught with a joint well Mr non-white you cant vote anymore or get a college loan so you will stay poor get paid crap and treated worse until you take more drugs to cope and get caught a third time then you go to a private run (profit for rich people) corporation owned prison for life! Now your life is in fact worth something to the elite.

[Alley]

Plus the control of quality of drugs by the State.

[Health Lab]

If you believe it is fair for all concerned, it will withstand the test of time.