Raising Public-College Tuition—Posner

A number of states are in quite desperate financial straits. They have huge debt, and like members of the eurozone, cannot lighten their debt load by inflating their currency or by improving their trade balance by devaluation. It is natural that they should be raising fees, such as college tuition. Whether this is the best way to reduce debt is a separate question, but probably an academic one; the pattern of revenue enhancement and cost reduction that a state embraces depends on the political balance in the state, rather than on what is efficient or otherwise in the public interest.

As Becker points out, there are external benefits to higher education. In the narrowest terms, college-educated persons (especially college graduates) have significantly higher incomes than the non-college-educated population, and those higher incomes generate higher tax revenues, which finance government expenditures that are used to finance government programs that largely benefit other people. The amount of the external benefits cannot actually be measured, however, because the decision to attend college is not random; generally, it is the intellectually abler who attend college, and their higher incomes are the combined result of their personal characteristics and the increased skills that college imparts to them. Nevertheless there is little doubt that college does generate external benefits, which creates a case for subsidy. 

Whether it is a good case is a separate question. Because college contributes to higher earnings, which are not taxed until earned (that is, the asset, consisting of future expected earnings, that is obtained by attending college is not taxed), attending college is attractive to anyone who has sufficient intelligence and discipline to benefit from it, and he or she can borrow to finance tuition and living expenses.

In any event, there is no case at all from an overall social standpoint for subsidizing students who would pay full college tuition, without the inducement of a subsidy; the subsidy does not induce students to obtain a college education who otherwise would not because they could not afford to; it is a windfall to their families. Private colleges recognize this. They charge very high tuition (though not high enough to cover all their costs—but they have other sources of funds, such as alumni donations), but grant scholarships or loans to students whose families can’t afford the tuition. Charging low tuition to everyone, as public colleges do for residents of the state in which the college or university is located), does not make economic sense; it merely as I said provides windfalls to families willing and able to pay the full tuition. As Becker points out, this results in regressive redistribution of income,  because families that can pay full tuition are wealthier than the average taxpayer, who pays for the costs of public colleges that tuition doesn’t cover.

This situation presents a case for a virtuous tax increase (raising a fee for a public service is the equivalent of a tax): the increase helps to close the state’s fiscal gap; the burden of the increased tax is borne entirely by the well-to-do; and some of the higher revenue can be used to subsidize students unable to afford the higher tuition.

There is still an argument against the tuition increase, which resembles the economic argument for the moratorium on increasing the federal income tax rate even on taxpayers who have very high incomes—even incomes of a million dollars or more a year (a proposal for eliminating the Bush tax cuts for those taxpayers was made by liberals but rejected by Congress). The argument is that any tax increase will reduce private spending (consumption and investment) unless the tax revenues are used to increase such spending; and given the still very shaky state of the U.S. economy, any measure that reduces such spending is suspect. Well-off families will have to allocate more of their income to their children’s education, and so will reduce their other spending. The revenue from the higher tuition will flow into the state’s coffers, but the question is whether the effect of that flow in stimulating investment and consumption will be greater than the decline in personal spending by persons paying the higher tuition. Conceivably, increasing tuition could retard economic recovery, though it is nevertheless a sensible long-term measure of fiscal reform because there is no reason to subsidize tuition of persons able and willing to pay it without subsidy.

I said earlier that the combination of tax (or fee) increases and spending cuts that states are adopting in an effort to alleviate their debt burden depends on the balance of politically effective interest groups. Well-to-do families will fight efforts to increase college tuition across the board. So of course will the state universities and other public colleges. Low tuition, made up for by public subsidies, helps state and city colleges and universities attract students who would otherwise go to private colleges and universities. Increasing tuition may increase state college revenues, assuming that demand is inelastic (meaning that the percentage fall in demand because of the higher price is less than the proportionate increase in price, so that revenue rises) within the range of the increase, but it will reduce the quality of the student body. 

The proposed tuition increases raise the broader question whether states should be in the position of providing higher education, rather than leaving it to the market to private. In fact state universities have been weaning themselves from state support. At prestitgious public universities such as the University of Michigan, state subsidies now account for only about 10 percent of the university’s budget. The fact that a state legislature can raise state university tuition at will, or stated otherwise reduce subsidy at will, creates the kind of financial uncertainty that has brought English universities low. Universities supported by diverse financial sources are more stable, which is the main reason for the trend toward public universities’ seeking private support. The recession-driven tuition increases will accelerate this trend. That would be a good thing.

Comments

[Gaston Cantens]

I suspect the real issue is that colleges are generally left-wing institutions and Posner is right-wing.

[Gaston Cantens]

the best way to reduce debt is a separate question, but probably an academic one; the pattern of revenue enhancement and cost reduction that a state embraces depends on the political balance in the state, rather than on what is efficient or otherwise in the public interest. Also, how about majors that really do not contribute to societal goals or the future financial and economic security of the students who major in them.

[Internet Slander Lawsuits]

College-educated persons (especially college graduates) have significantly higher incomes than the non-college-educated population,as they are educated they have lots of knowledge...So it's quiet obvious..

[Danny DeMichele Photos]

Well attending college is attractive to anyone who has sufficient intelligence and discipline to benefit from it, and he or she can borrow to finance tuition and living expenses...

[Pepe Fanjul]

Do these requirements really create better students or future employees, or rather create an artificial demand for less desired and needed classes and majors. Also, shouldn't universities be challenged to engage in cost effective means of distributing education through the Internet.

[Pepe Fanjul]

The amount of the external benefits cannot actually be measured, however, because the decision to attend college is not random; generally, it is the intellectually abler who attend college, and their higher incomes are the combined result of their personal characteristics and the increased skills that college imparts to them.

[Alley]

This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I have shared your site in my social networks!

[Health Lab]

This is really interesting, You're a very skilled blogger. I've joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I've shared your site in my social networks!

[Health Lab]

This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I've joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I've shared your website in my social networks!

[Spinal Stenosis]

Charging low tuition to everyone, as public colleges do for residents of the state in which the college or university is located), does not make economic sense; it merely as I said provides windfalls to families willing and able to pay the full tuition. As Becker points out, this results in regressive redistribution of income, because families that can pay full tuition are wealthier than the average taxpayer, who pays for the costs of public colleges that tuition doesn’t cover".

[Danyme]

We are a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable info to work on. You have done an impressive job and our entire community will be grateful to you.

[Safe]

I loved as much as you'll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.

[Acne Care]

I suggest we do better as a country to extend the birthright to advanced education and not expect the parents to pay directly. Let us recognize we are all the "parents" and spread the cost, much as we do with children's education.

[health care]

Excellent post. I was checking continuously this blog and I'm impressed! Extremely helpful information particularly the last part :) I care for such information a lot. I was looking for this particular info for a long time. Thank you and best of luck.

[Appraiser Now]

The private sector does not support the longterm development of such experts. Having experts provides enormous benefits to the society at large. Academic tenure is one of the most positive innovations of our society.

[shower room]

Sylvester and the Magic Pebble has some very adult themes and could be really touching.

Hm- I'll have to think some more- there's a book I want to read called Everything I Need to

Know I Learned From a Children's Book. It's a collection of essays from public figures on

what they learned reading as a kid. Sounds pretty great.

[power cable]

I really like your take on this. At my daughter's college the mood was celebratory. She

told me she questioned it, but at the same time understood it.
"Sometimes you don’t realize how you feel until you don’t feel that way any more.

[speaker cable]

Very insightful. How long ago 10 years seems in terms of what you can shield kids from

In these days of 24 hour news and twitter and blogs, not to mention the Daily Show, that

salvation of the online generation who will never read a newspaper, there is no possibility

of shielding kids from major news.

[leisure chair]

Parents might even be forced to discuss issues with their kids. The celebrations in

the street reminded me of the celebrations in various Arab countries--I specifically

remember Palestine--where 9/11 was celebrated.

[bamboo furniture]

In Massachusetts, it seems like the most reliable route to adoption is

fostering first. It's certainly true for would-be adoptive parents who are

not what the state considers ideal. Did Meridian's foster parents foster

her with the hopes of one day adopting her?

[bamboo kitchen]

Ouch! I'm glad that you had a nice visit here and that you didn't let

the clueless girls get to you. Congrats on the EP!

[cash for old mobiles]

There are two problems leap out, one is that of unserious kids partying for several years and the other is the problem of containing costs when "no one cares what they are" but it would seem those can be handled much as we handled K-12 budgets.

[friendship bracelet]

I think the Race Between Education and Technology by Caludia Goldin and Lawrence Katz has been often cited for this explanation.

[Toronto Real Estate]

A major problem is find that is Posner makes the very significant assertion, in my view unsubstantiated, that the high tuition rates do not actually cover costs.

[Toronto Real Estate]

I think we have a shortage of highly educated people.It is not the time to discourage people from a higher education but to motivate lower people for education get a higher skills,they need for all of us to prosper.