A number of states are in quite desperate financial straits. They have huge debt, and like members of the eurozone, cannot lighten their debt load by inflating their currency or by improving their trade balance by devaluation. It is natural that they should be raising fees, such as college tuition. Whether this is the best way to reduce debt is a separate question, but probably an academic one; the pattern of revenue enhancement and cost reduction that a state embraces depends on the political balance in the state, rather than on what is efficient or otherwise in the public interest.
As Becker points out, there are external benefits to higher education. In the narrowest terms, college-educated persons (especially college graduates) have significantly higher incomes than the non-college-educated population, and those higher incomes generate higher tax revenues, which finance government expenditures that are used to finance government programs that largely benefit other people. The amount of the external benefits cannot actually be measured, however, because the decision to attend college is not random; generally, it is the intellectually abler who attend college, and their higher incomes are the combined result of their personal characteristics and the increased skills that college imparts to them. Nevertheless there is little doubt that college does generate external benefits, which creates a case for subsidy.
Whether it is a good case is a separate question. Because college contributes to higher earnings, which are not taxed until earned (that is, the asset, consisting of future expected earnings, that is obtained by attending college is not taxed), attending college is attractive to anyone who has sufficient intelligence and discipline to benefit from it, and he or she can borrow to finance tuition and living expenses.
In any event, there is no case at all from an overall social standpoint for subsidizing students who would pay full college tuition, without the inducement of a subsidy; the subsidy does not induce students to obtain a college education who otherwise would not because they could not afford to; it is a windfall to their families. Private colleges recognize this. They charge very high tuition (though not high enough to cover all their costs—but they have other sources of funds, such as alumni donations), but grant scholarships or loans to students whose families can’t afford the tuition. Charging low tuition to everyone, as public colleges do for residents of the state in which the college or university is located), does not make economic sense; it merely as I said provides windfalls to families willing and able to pay the full tuition. As Becker points out, this results in regressive redistribution of income, because families that can pay full tuition are wealthier than the average taxpayer, who pays for the costs of public colleges that tuition doesn’t cover.
This situation presents a case for a virtuous tax increase (raising a fee for a public service is the equivalent of a tax): the increase helps to close the state’s fiscal gap; the burden of the increased tax is borne entirely by the well-to-do; and some of the higher revenue can be used to subsidize students unable to afford the higher tuition.
There is still an argument against the tuition increase, which resembles the economic argument for the moratorium on increasing the federal income tax rate even on taxpayers who have very high incomes—even incomes of a million dollars or more a year (a proposal for eliminating the Bush tax cuts for those taxpayers was made by liberals but rejected by Congress). The argument is that any tax increase will reduce private spending (consumption and investment) unless the tax revenues are used to increase such spending; and given the still very shaky state of the U.S. economy, any measure that reduces such spending is suspect. Well-off families will have to allocate more of their income to their children’s education, and so will reduce their other spending. The revenue from the higher tuition will flow into the state’s coffers, but the question is whether the effect of that flow in stimulating investment and consumption will be greater than the decline in personal spending by persons paying the higher tuition. Conceivably, increasing tuition could retard economic recovery, though it is nevertheless a sensible long-term measure of fiscal reform because there is no reason to subsidize tuition of persons able and willing to pay it without subsidy.
I said earlier that the combination of tax (or fee) increases and spending cuts that states are adopting in an effort to alleviate their debt burden depends on the balance of politically effective interest groups. Well-to-do families will fight efforts to increase college tuition across the board. So of course will the state universities and other public colleges. Low tuition, made up for by public subsidies, helps state and city colleges and universities attract students who would otherwise go to private colleges and universities. Increasing tuition may increase state college revenues, assuming that demand is inelastic (meaning that the percentage fall in demand because of the higher price is less than the proportionate increase in price, so that revenue rises) within the range of the increase, but it will reduce the quality of the student body.
The proposed tuition increases raise the broader question whether states should be in the position of providing higher education, rather than leaving it to the market to private. In fact state universities have been weaning themselves from state support. At prestitgious public universities such as the University of Michigan, state subsidies now account for only about 10 percent of the university’s budget. The fact that a state legislature can raise state university tuition at will, or stated otherwise reduce subsidy at will, creates the kind of financial uncertainty that has brought English universities low. Universities supported by diverse financial sources are more stable, which is the main reason for the trend toward public universities’ seeking private support. The recession-driven tuition increases will accelerate this trend. That would be a good thing.
Just a suggestion try rec video in a sipmler manner with less CRAP . probably that way it wud b mo infomative ..PS: I did not even see the complete vid as by 3:34 you alrdy choked me..
Posted by: Mouloud | 07/22/2012 at 08:22 PM
Posted on Betul MAS Afsyah Siapapun PEMENANG BUSBY SEO TEST, yang PENTING mah Harus dari IndoNESIA. . .Semoga SUKSES deh Previewnya..kali aja SiR BC berbaik hati , degnan bangga memberikan HP n yang lainnya pada mas Afsyah.. wekekeekekek ( Boleh dunk pasang mode Ngarep ON )kalo dapet inget2 saya ya mas
Posted by: Gabriela | 07/22/2012 at 09:36 PM
notsodomesticated September 25, 2011 Ooh that pumpkin show looks aemoswe! But I'm bummed because that's the weekend of my high school reunion, so we wouldn't be able to go! Maybe next year I love all things pumpkin-related!
Posted by: Kevon | 07/23/2012 at 12:10 AM
Vill bara gratta dig eller Er kankse man ska se4ga. Han var je4tte fin. Lycka till med det nya lilla livet.He4lsningarMarie och Rolf
Posted by: Nkele | 07/23/2012 at 12:38 AM
I love this idea! I've been thinking of doing my own versoin of a weekly round up myself And yeyy thank you so much for the shout out!!Brittany @ Itty Bits of Balance recently posted..
Posted by: Johnyhassan | 07/23/2012 at 12:44 AM
Posted on Yth,Saya sangat bearmnit untuk mempelajari dan bisnis internet marketing..Mohon rekomendasi dimana saya harus belajar lebih efektif dan efisien.Saya punya beberapa refernsi dari internet :1. Mr. Fabian Lim (Word Internet Academy)2. Suwandi Chow3. Ivan Satya4. eprofit marketing5. Jimi Meidi (Jim link)Terima Kasih
Posted by: Herjorkeh | 07/23/2012 at 03:34 AM
Posted on Halo Bro,Dalam Pendidikan Internet Marketing ini , apa saja materi2 yg akan dirjaakan?Sebetulnya saya sdg butuh ilmu S.E.O yang efektif dalam waktu yg relatif cukup singkat( kurang dr 1 bulan? Apa di ajarkan juga di pelatihan ini? ada jaminan?Ok sekian dulu dari saya , yg saat ini belum berhasil di internet marketing
Posted by: Sandra | 07/23/2012 at 03:56 AM
Habibie Posted on konsekuensinya klo do-follow ountbuod links jd semakin banyak, dampaknya pagerank jd turun kalau kita tidak menambah inlink nya. Emang sih traffic jd rame kalau kita pakai do-follow
Posted by: Irina | 07/23/2012 at 05:18 AM
umm,we tried laws like that here in Texas,including banning saunrcaty cities,all struck down by the Courts.Only the Feds can deport,the states do not have that authority.Marco Rubio was for placing the same program in Florida while he was a State Senator,and Michelle Bachmann voted FOR one as a Minnesota Senator as well.I guess they are Tea Party traitors as well,right?
Posted by: Jyemy | 07/24/2012 at 07:19 PM
Posted on Assalamu'alaikum;Sahabat Habibie Terima Kasih atas bingkisan Ebook-nya; Saya sanneg membaca dan mempelajarinya; mudah-mudahan dalam waktu dekat Saya segera bergabung dalam Affiliate Programe-nya . ya dalam waktu dekat.Terimakasih,Wassalam,Munawar AM
Posted by: Roman | 07/24/2012 at 07:24 PM
Shetiawan Posted on Hai..Mas Habibi.. saya sanagt salut dan sanagt terkesan dengan prestasi yang sudah anda peroleh selama ini, terlebih setelah saya membaca ebook terbitan anda, tips dan tehnik yang sanagt berguna untuk diterapkan dan untuk saya praktekkan.Sungguh saya sanagt terinspirasi dengan prestasi anda..
Posted by: Nitin | 07/24/2012 at 07:37 PM
Surya Posted on Mas habibie saya mau nanya bepearba hal:1.apakah untuk bergabung dengan afiliasi amazon kita harus mempunyai website/blog?2.klo blog dari blogspot bisa dipakai afiliasi gak?Mohon dijawab yaThx mas habibie
Posted by: Mirko | 07/24/2012 at 08:09 PM
Posted on berikan tips donk, apa yang bisa kita gunkaan agar motivasi terus berkobar? apa ada media2 tertentu yang bisa kita gunkaan sebagai alat bantu untuk menjaga motivasi suskses ini????
Posted by: Angelo | 07/24/2012 at 09:16 PM
Deuce Deuce Posted on Yay! Welcome back! Missed ya! Now,back to Ur regularly sedlhuced blogging! I'm glad u caught urself before it got too out of hand! Is it October yet?!!!
Posted by: Lerato | 07/24/2012 at 09:21 PM
Linda Posted on I just jumped over from Haven's, too.I reehcad 5 months sobriety on the 23rd and I still don't really have a sponsor. Will you be my sponsor by email? Seriously. Right now I feel more accountability to Haven's band of blog babies than just about anyone else. I will email you, Dee.Great poem.
Posted by: Marcelo | 07/24/2012 at 09:36 PM
Posted on waduh saya baru baca posting ini paadhal saya sudah terlanjur beli ebooknya, untung saya belum pake google adword karena ga punya kartu kredit atau yg lainnya he he he,tapi biarin aja deh,rejeki ada yang ngatur katanya seeh
Posted by: Mario | 07/24/2012 at 09:56 PM
Posted on salam kenal ni. saya pertama tahu antum dari teman, cetira ni dia nonton kickandy trus dia cetira kesaya. Alhamdulillah ni skrg bisa mampir ke blognya. sangat menginspirasi sekali.makasih ya. ebooknya ada daftar isinya ndak he he
Posted by: Juniorlamarre | 07/24/2012 at 10:58 PM
Posted on That one is gone, but there is a huge mess sitting in the front yard of a house on Harding, West of Lincoln. It's been there all weintr. I'm guessing they'd be happy if you came to take it away. Warning. The trunk is HUGE.
Posted by: Emirhan | 07/24/2012 at 10:59 PM
I'm thinking about the new Cameo macnhie. Figured my family could get it for me for Christmas. Saw your post from Tip Junkie. I was wondering if I could still get the file you so graciously offered? If so, kanes_1@msn.com. Thank you so much!
Posted by: Merina | 07/24/2012 at 11:32 PM
That happens, smmiteoes there are just no ideas in our heads, lol ! Wheels I had done for other photogroups but people would be a good idea. I like to photograph people in action when they don't know it !
Posted by: Samen | 07/25/2012 at 03:51 AM