The Tunisian and Egyptian political eruptions were pretty much totally unexpected by the governments of the United States and of other countries, and by the vast majority of experts on Egypt and the Islamic world. To be sure, experts were aware that the government of say Egypt was not popular among many segments of the population, including The Muslim Brotherhood, most intellectuals, and many members of the growing middle class. However, the timing and speed of the uprising there (and in Tunisia) was rather a complete surprise since Mubarak and Ben Ali were in power for over 20 years, and seemingly in rather complete control.
I was first impressed by the unexpected and speedy nature of the overthrow of authoritarian regimes in 1979 when a combination of religious and leftwing groups forced the Shah of Iran from power. Until very close to the end he looked invulnerable: he seemed to be in full control of a strong and well-equipped army, and had an active and dreaded secret police, the SAVAK, that imprisoned anyone who vocally attacked the government. That the overthrow was unexpected is objectively measured by the stability of the international value of the Iranian currency, the rial, until just a few weeks before the Shah was ousted. Had the overthrow been anticipated, the value of the currency would have plunged as Iranians and others tried to get out of rials into dollars and other hard currencies. The rial did plunge in value shortly after the revolution appeared to be succeeding.
The rapid disintegration of the Soviet Union is another telling example. In 1989 my wife and I took a train from West Berlin through East Germany to go to Warsaw. The customs agents in East Germany were unpleasant, and the East German government headed by Erich Honecker seemed totally in charge. Much to my surprise, less than six months later, close to one million younger men and women were demonstrating in the streets, and the government was soon quickly gone, along with most of the Russian empire.
The unexpected nature and the speed of the overthrow of these and other authoritarian regimes is what is so glaring and challenging to theories of authoritarian rule. Analytically, what happens is that over time such a regime may be shifting in unnoticed ways from stable equilibrium positions, where the government is in rather complete control, to an unstable equilibrium where seemingly small events trigger massive changes, including the ouster of the government. The overthrow of the government may be quick and without much violence, as in the East German and Tunisian cases, or involve considerable violence, as during and especially after, the Iranian revolution.
Such unstable equilibria are sometimes called “tipping points”. This term was first used to describe rapid changes in housing neighborhoods from being mainly white and Christian to “tipping”, and then rapidly becoming mainly black or Jewish. A neighborhood may remain basically say all white until a few black families move in. If more black households move in over time, their fraction may become large enough that many white residents begin to panic, and put their houses up for sale. After that the neighborhood quickly “tips” into becoming a mainly black neighborhood.
The basic underlying reason that authoritarian regimes fall quickly, with or without violence, is that, as Posner emphasizes, they do not have any natural succession process. A strong man like Mubarak would be in power, but as he ages and gets weaker who is to succeed him? His son or confidants? Opposition groups may begin to see opportunities, or the unhappiness and frustration of young people and others may spontaneously erupt into mass demonstrations, as in Egypt, or in Iran after frustration over the outcome of the presidential elections two years ago. Sometimes these demonstrations succeed, as in Tunisia and apparently now in Egypt, and sometimes they fail, as in Iran after those elections, and in the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations in China.
Will similar demonstrations spread to the rest of the Arab world in North Africa and the Middle East that without exception have non-democratic regimes? Already the Jordanian government and a few others have started to make concessions to the opposition, including giving greater representation to various disaffected groups. I do not know how many of these governments will change radically and speedily. The theory offers little guidance on the timing of major political changes, but I do believe that large changes in this region toward freer elections and greater representation will occur before very long.
The Internet, Facebook and other online social networks, are changing the dynamics of the political landscape in all countries, including Islamic countries. In addition, the middle classes are growing in importance throughout Middle East and North Africa. As a result, these countries will experience the same aspirations for greater freedom of expression and greater representation in the government, as is found in other parts of the world. Eventually, these aspirations will force a conversion of the political institutions of these Islamic countries into something that may not be the same as Western democracies, but will offer more contested elections, greater political and social freedoms, and probably also greater economic freedom.
Another reason that dictatorial regimes tend toward long term instability has to do with Bruce Bueno De Mesquita's concept of the selectorate - the body of individuals who collectively hold sufficient power to maintain a figurehead in power. In dictatorships the selectorate is small, just a handful of privileged people who control commerce, media, and military powers. Under democratic institutions the selectorate is, perforce, very large. Often as much as 20% or more of the national population (depending on voter turnout).
With a small selectorate, only a few individuals need to defect to an opposing side in order for the figurehead to be weakened and removed from power. In the short term, this is balanced by the powers the figurehead wields to dispense patronage and punishment. In the long run, the unsatisfied ambitions and grievances of the selectorate create an ever-present threat to the stability of the figurehead's administration.
Posted by: Robert Johnson | 02/07/2011 at 12:11 PM
Becker points out:
"The Internet, Facebook and other online social networks, are changing the dynamics of the political landscape in all countries, including Islamic countries."
Ha! Indeed! To an economist knowledge of the market place is all important! I'm certain that improvements in communication was THE major force in the collapse of the USSR, and perhaps China.
The politburo could easily lie to 'em when information could be corralled in costly printing presses and easily controlled broadcast media. But then came inexpensive copy machines, faxes, and satellite TV. Music recording too, the Soviet tried to ban Beatles and other "subversive western music" but LP's were smuggled in and they learned to copy them on used X-ray film, that could be rolled up under a coat sleeve and ha! marketed as "bones".
When joint venture fishing began in Alaska in the early 80's (our catchers delivering to Russian factory ships) what the crews wanted were our magazines, Levi's, T-shirts, etc.
Our info during the "cold war" was flawed too, despite having satellites and spies the CIA seems to have estimated USSR GDP at twice what it actually was and thus responding to a "bear" twice the size it actually was.
Ha-ha! "How ya gonna keep 'em down on the farm when they've seen gay Paree?"
Posted by: Jack | 02/07/2011 at 07:21 PM
^ Unbelievable as it may sound, the USSR economic policy was based on CIA estimates on the USSR economy . They did not trust their own economists, apparently.
Posted by: Anonymous | 02/09/2011 at 11:03 AM
The only rational phrase in the article is "Sometimes these demonstrations succeed... sometimes they fail".
Everything else is smoke and mirrors. It's all "will happen" as if the author could read minds and foresee the future. In 2nd century Rome there must have been a Garius Beckerius telling the emperors "When the Germans see our civilization, they will fall in awe and will overthrow their leaders".
Posted by: Ernesto | 02/11/2011 at 01:41 PM
There are real possibilities for liberty unfolding in Egypt, but real possibilities for greater tyranny as well. I hope that their revolution will take a liberal (in the classical sense) turn. But I have reason to doubt that it will or, if it does for a time, other forces will supplant it. One reason for my pessimism is the authoritarian nature of the regime that has just exited the stage. Average Egyptians might not have built up the habits, attitudes, and skills of discernment, determination, autonomy and responsibility that are necessary to make independent judgements necessary to function in a free society. Egypt may also lack the degree of development of the social and political institutions that would have provided an alternative to state action to meet people's needs and to offset governmental power.
Closely related to these possible lackings is the nature of the dominant religion of Egypt, Islam. While Islam does teach a sense of moral restraint that we see missing in large part from our contemporary free society in America that our Founders correctly thought necessary to provide social order, Islam does not seem to internalize many of these norms in the same way that Christianity does, especially Protestant Christianity. Consequently, people are not as free under Islam to make moral decisions that are truly autonomous. We, too, are failing to foster a true sense of autonomy in individuals for very different reasons, but, in any case, political liberty is dependent upon moral autonomy that might be lacking in Egypt.
Another, related problem with Islam is its lack of focus on the individual's relationship to God. There is no theological doctrine in Islam that is comparable to "the priesthood of the believer" that is central to Protestant Christianity. Hence, there is nothing comparable in Islam to the separation of church and state and religious toleration that we enjoy in historically Christian nations. Religious toleration in Europe and America developed straight out of its religious heritage dating back to the practices of Judaism that included separating the duties of the king and the High Priest continuing with the teachings of Jesus who famously said, "Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and to God the things that are God's." This trend was taken up with a newly found vigor by Protestants, who unevenly practiced these teachings at first, but came to form the basis of our modern concepts of religious liberty. According to Protestant teaching, one must come to accept Christ in a heartfelt personal decision. A coerced conversion is worthless. Hence, coercion is of no value in religious matters.
Princeton historian Perez Zagorin argues along these lines in this 2003 book, *How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West.*
"Religious intolerance, so terrible and deadly in its recent manifestations, is nothing new. In fact, until after the eighteenth century, Christianity was perhaps the most intolerant of all the great world religions. How Christian Europe and the West went from this extreme to their present universal belief in religious toleration is the momentous story fully told for the first time in this timely and important book by a leading historian of early modern Europe.
Perez Zagorin takes readers to a time when both the Catholic Church and the main new Protestant denominations embraced a policy of endorsing religious persecution, coercing unity, and, with the state's help, mercilessly crushing dissent and heresy. This position had its roots in certain intellectual and religious traditions, which Zagorin traces before showing how out of the same traditions came the beginnings of pluralism in the West. Here we see how sixteenth- and seventeenth-century thinkers--writing from religious, theological, and philosophical perspectives--contributed far more than did political expediency or the growth of religious skepticism to advance the cause of toleration. Reading these thinkers--from Erasmus and Sir Thomas More to John Milton and John Locke, among others--Zagorin brings to light a common, if unexpected, thread: concern for the spiritual welfare of religion itself weighed more in the defense of toleration than did any secular or pragmatic arguments. His book--which ranges from England through the Netherlands, the post-1685 Huguenot Diaspora, and the American Colonies--also exposes a close connection between toleration and religious freedom.
A far-reaching and incisive discussion of the major writers, thinkers, and controversies responsible for the emergence of religious tolerance in Western society--from the Enlightenment through the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights--this original and richly nuanced work constitutes an essential chapter in the intellectual history of the modern world."
http://press.princeton.edu/titles/7638.html
Posted by: Christopher Graves | 02/13/2011 at 10:13 PM
Timing isn't that surprising, food prices almost doubling sucks when you live on $2 a day.
Posted by: blake k | 02/15/2011 at 01:51 PM
Chloe Handbags affect most women’s feeling. Chloe Bag is catching with soft leather and elegant style. Chloe is a brand of well-deserved reputation and there is no question about it. http://www.discountchloe.com
Posted by: chloe | 02/16/2011 at 12:40 AM
Blake: Indeed. Must be some sort of economic sin to fuel three ton tip-over rigs carrying one person with someone else's tortillas. Craziness.
Posted by: Jack | 02/16/2011 at 05:31 AM
We must accept finite disappointment, but we must never lose infinite hope!
Posted by: Cheap Coach Bags | 02/17/2011 at 06:45 PM
Have you ever felt lost for words and pondered what matters to discuss on your own website web page? Very well, in place of feeling perplexed, your time could be spent on improving your writing skills.
Posted by: Nike Air | 02/22/2011 at 12:38 AM
honestly these social sites are changing the dynamics of political landscape in almost every country i must say..but still we should never lose hope..thanks for sharing
http://www.onlinecheck.com/business_loans.html Fast Loan Service
Posted by: Tracy faust | 02/23/2011 at 01:19 AM
I'm amazed that the author and commenters have not mentioned "the weakness of strong states." The strong state is illegitimate. Every grievance, economic, political, agricultural, infrastructure ... piles on over the years. The ruler and his bureaucracy all know this. Everyone, including the ruling class, knows their pronouncements are lies.
Eventually a small group would rather risk death than continue. A larger group will risk massing in the public places. The ruler or some of his underlings will refuse to kill them ... the end is at hand.
Regards,
Bill Drissel
Posted by: Bill Drissel | 02/23/2011 at 07:42 PM
Chloe Handbags affect most women’s feeling.Chloe Bag is catching with soft leather and elegant style.The ruler and his bureaucracy all know this. Everyone,including the ruling class,knows their pronouncements are lies.
Posted by: dreambox 500s | 03/02/2011 at 10:27 PM
I have reason to doubt that it will or, if it does for a time, other forces will supplant it. One reason for my pessimism is the authoritarian nature of the regime that has just exited the stage.
Posted by: Gaston Cantens | 03/09/2011 at 05:53 AM
We provide hospitality consulting services to help developers, investors for their projects. Consulting services rendered during the past 24 years to 84 hotel projects, 41.800 beds in total in Turkiye, Russia, Poland, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Ukraine. Please visit us.
Posted by: true religion jeans | 03/09/2011 at 09:11 PM
The overthrow of the government may be quick and without much violence, as in the East German and Tunisian case..
Posted by: cadillac allante parts | 03/10/2011 at 01:18 AM
This article is very interesting, I like it. I will always come to visit after.I would recommend to friends more.
Posted by: mbt walking shoes | 03/15/2011 at 04:45 AM
To put it another way, put yourself in say the shoes of Danger Ehren and pretend you're about to lay your ass (or tooth) on the line for something that may or may not make the movie—believe me, you're going to want Pontius in your peanut gallery corner because his verbal presence may just be the deciding factor in the fate of your segment.
Posted by: Supra Shoes | 03/17/2011 at 04:24 AM
More importantly if you quantify the actual cost/benefit of college by looking at the cost of attendance and the gains in salary using US Census data college it is barely a positive investment and for some demographics the median is actually negative! You'll find articles analyzing the data at these URLs. This data is a few years old but if anything the economics have worsened since college admission costs continue to skyrocket and wages have shown little to no growth.
Posted by: GHD Hair Straighteners | 03/18/2011 at 09:07 PM
"So my conclusion is that America will benefit greatly from increasing the numbers of young men and women who go to and graduate from colleges and universities. To do that, however, will require improving the preparation received at K-12 levels, including the education at the very earliest school levels for young children poorly prepared for school. The challenges are enormous, but the potential gains are worth considerable effort from public and private bodies."
Posted by: chi flat iron | 03/18/2011 at 09:09 PM
Chloe Handbags affect most women’s feeling.Chloe Bag is catching with soft leather and elegant style.The ruler and his bureaucracy all know this. Everyone,including the ruling class,knows their pronouncements are lies.
Posted by: Alley | 03/25/2011 at 11:31 PM
I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this increase.
Posted by: Spinal Stenosis | 03/26/2011 at 12:18 AM
We're a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable information to work on. You have done a formidable job and our whole community will be grateful to you.
Posted by: sciatic nerve | 03/26/2011 at 12:27 AM
Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Extremely helpful information specially the last part :) I care for such information much. I was seeking this particular info for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.
Posted by: howme | 03/26/2011 at 02:17 AM
I loved as much as you'll receive carried out right here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this hike.
Posted by: buzz | 03/26/2011 at 09:06 AM