The United States along with many other rich countries encourages widespread so-called preventive screening for various diseases, including breast, prostate, and other cancers, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, kidney functioning, and many other serious, and even not so serious, diseases. It is often claimed that prevention of diseases should be given the highest priority in order to early detect treatable serious medical problems. But these gains have to be balanced against the considerable cost of extensive preventive screening. The US and other nations are very likely over-screening for various medical problems.
The benefits of screening depend on the seriousness of the disease, and the gain from early detection. The latter in turn depend crucially on the treatment success when a disease is detected early compared to when it is detected at a later stage. For example, treatments for both prostate and breast cancers seem to be more effective when these diseases are detected early, although that is disputed by reputable researchers and physicians. However, it is clear that early detection of Alzheimer’s’ disease has little advantage since there are no effective treatments for this highly debilitating disease. Early detection of this disease may have other advantages if that enables individuals to plan for their increasing mental feebleness, such as preparing or modifying wills, and takng other decisions that require some mental acuity. On the other hand, it may reduce quality of life by causing great fear of the impending disease.
Along with the benefits often come major costs of widespread screening, costs that frequently outweigh the advantages. For example, if only a very small fraction of the population were likely to have a disease, perhaps one chance in 500 or less, it may not make much sense to screen everyone. Take, for example, Huntington’s disease, which affects a very small fraction of the population. With such a low general risk of having the genes that cause this disease, it is much more cost efficient to screen only individuals with a much higher probability of having the disease. These are persons who have family members with Huntington’s. Even then, studies show that many potential carriers of the deadly genes prefer not to be tested since no treatments are available, and they fear living with the news that they will eventually get this disease.
More generally, worry about test results is sometimes a sizable cost of widespread screening. This is partly because many medical tests frequently give false positives that may lead to unnecessary, worrisome, and sometimes risky additional tests and treatments before it is determined that nothing is really wrong. The widely used PSA test to screen for prostate cancer is a good example. Elevated or rapidly rising PSA levels are often indications of tumor in the prostate. However, many individuals have relatively high PSA levels without any tumor presence, sometimes because they have enlarged prostates. Others have rising PSA levels also for other reasons. Annual PSA tests may be indicated for men over age 45 or so with family histories of prostate cancer, but they are less frequently needed for men who have little prostate cancer in their family.
Many tests sometimes lead to serious complications, and any complications should be balanced against the gains from early detection of medical problems. Every blood test carries some risk of infection and contamination. X-rays, MRIs, CT scans, ultrasounds and the like have radiation and other risks. Probing for tumors with biopsies, colonoscopies, and other invasive tests carry a variety of risks.
The benefit-cost evaluation of any suggested widespread screening would depend on the net effect of the factors I discussed. First of all, benefits depend on the size of the gain in treatment from early detection of a disease or other medical problems. This gain has to be adjusted for the probability of finding a serious problem since the lower that probability, the less the expected gain from extensive screening. Costs start with the cost of the methods used to screen, including the value of the time and inconvenience of individuals being screened. The likelihood of various side effects from these methods also must be weighed. The fear engendered by false positives can be important, although that has to be balanced against the peace of mind that comes from getting (true) negative results.
Preventive care is often considered the gold standard of good medical practice. It is easy to get both doctors and patients to agree when either the government (i.e., taxpayers) or insurance companies (i.e., others who are insured) pay the vast majority of the costs. A rethinking of this standard is warranted, and such a rethinking would be encouraged if individuals paid a much larger fraction of their out of pocket medical expenses.
I just realized I'll still be typing next week if I keep talking about the great stuff we've gotten, so I'm going to list it!
Posted by: mbt trainers | 08/01/2011 at 03:23 AM
Maybe the knowledge that the debt ceiling could be a dramatic face-off can help the government try to avoid having to raise the debt limit in the future.
Posted by: Discount Herve Leger | 08/15/2011 at 04:50 AM
obviously screening is very crucial and yes every serious illness is treatable only when it is detected in early stages.
Posted by: acne medication | 09/12/2011 at 04:57 AM
This a great way to be diagnose with cancer. If diagnose, don't hesitate to get treated right away.
Posted by: Leah | 09/23/2011 at 08:09 AM
Thanks for sharing. This website is to I too have to help. Very good.
Posted by: jordan cool grey | 09/27/2011 at 07:37 AM
spricht Dramatiker A2Z Tony Kushner, ein neuer geschlossen Freund. "Sie geben zu, was auf Erden ist erstaunlich und auch attraktiv und einfach nicht schließen diejenigen Auge über die Probleme als auch Frustration. " [url=http://www.uggkaufen.net/]Ugg stiefel[/url] geholfen, Rache zu motivieren: "Wo die tatsächlichen Old Things Are" ihre unglaubliche Geschichte eines Jungen den Kopf ganz Flucht aus einem Wald von Monstern, genau, wer gerade materialisieren Trend wie mehrere Sendaks Verwandten nach Jahren wie ein Kind. " In dieser Nacht Zeit Kitchen ", ins Leben gerufen in 1970 ist die After-Hours-Boogie, die eine toxische Bezug auf Holocaust (ein Jugendlicher ist in der Regel fast zu einem großen Ofen eingeschaltet) umfasst zusammen mit einem menschlichen junger Mann Krähen zum Beispiel wurden [url=http://www.uggkaufen.net/kids-stiefel-wholesale-2.html]Kinder stiefel[/url] , einen neuen Hahn, auf Foto dieses führte zu Forderungen nach dieser Reserve wird ab Sammlungsschränke geschält. "Es war also albern, daher erstaunlich, Männer und Frauen haben könnte, und so arbeitete der Phallus, ein normales Anhängsel mit einem Mann auch zu einem Sohn. Es stellte sich heraus damit erschwingliche sowie vulgär. Despicable "
Posted by: günstige ugg | 10/04/2011 at 09:14 PM
As they say "prevention is better than cure". I'm glad the government is making a effort to prevent more diseases.
Posted by: chiropractor Melbourne neck pain | 10/12/2011 at 03:59 AM
Psicotécnicos en Vigo, encuentre su psicotécnico más cercano en Vigo, en la Florida o en el Calvario. En nuestros centros médicos psicotécnicos, podrá realizar su prueba psicotécnica.
Posted by: psicotecnico vigo | 10/14/2011 at 02:25 AM
Both My brother and I are interested on your blog very much.and will recommend it to my classmates.Thanks
Posted by: Ray Ban Aviator | 12/04/2011 at 02:07 AM
for chanel handbag 2010 , for special offer chanel handbag 2010 online shopping
Posted by: cibiahoyt | 01/06/2012 at 02:50 AM
Sciatica treatments and check up are cheap in Australia, most people are always well cared for.
Posted by: chiropractor Melbourne sciatica | 01/17/2012 at 11:52 PM
Yes all of us needs a thorough medical screening for potential diseases at least once every five years. But will our government shoulder this medical costs? I guess we are still on our own then.
Posted by: viagra no prescription | 01/18/2012 at 08:10 PM
Cardiovascular Disease is one of the most preventable of all diseases. If screened for in the workplace, heart disease, complications from diabetes, vascular disease and peripheral artery disease would be affected positively.
Posted by: Jefff R. ruff | 02/22/2012 at 06:10 AM
I would add a large dose of values, which, as I said in my entry in the other blog, I very much don't want government providing. In fact, unless we can somehow restore traditional good values I am pessimistic for the future of the country. Let’s start with toleration and compromise.
Posted by: Forfait mobile | 03/12/2012 at 07:19 AM
Thanks for such a great post and the review, I am totally impressed! Keep stuff like this coming.
Posted by: wholesale hats | 03/16/2012 at 02:47 AM
I really enjoyed this post, especially the “examples in this post” portion which made it really easy for me to SEE what you were talking about without even having to leave the article. Thanks
Posted by: herve leger | 03/21/2012 at 04:11 AM
Les experts disent que le lait maternel est le meilleur aliment pour exemple babies.One est la distribution de lait maternel les bébés que pour les six premiers mois.
By yzi10
Posted by: Louboutin Pompes | 04/05/2012 at 10:35 PM
The disease is one of the most important fields of medicine, yet it’s devilishly complex and there’s too much information for any single practitioner to keep up with.
Posted by: colon health | 04/12/2012 at 07:10 PM
Ningbo BST products company is a privately-owned manufacturer specialized in hand sanitizers,air freshners,electic perfumes,pet spray,pet shampoo and some other daily use chemicals.
Posted by: air freshener | 05/18/2012 at 02:31 AM
Nice article.Always nice to read some tips concerning the appearance of our blogs.
Wonderful articles, let me have to this admiration
Posted by: Chanel Wristlet | 06/06/2012 at 04:06 AM
It is a pretty good post. This post contains useful information which helps us a lot. I visit your website often and share with my friends.
Posted by: testosterone therapy | 06/23/2012 at 07:23 AM