How Beneficial is Widespread Medical Screening? Becker

 

 

The United States along with many other rich countries encourages widespread so-called preventive screening for various diseases, including breast, prostate, and other cancers, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, kidney functioning, and many other serious, and even not so serious, diseases. It is often claimed that prevention of diseases should be given the highest priority in order to early detect treatable serious medical problems. But these gains have to be balanced against the considerable cost of extensive preventive screening. The US and other nations are very likely over-screening for various medical problems.

The benefits of screening depend on the seriousness of the disease, and the gain from early detection. The latter in turn depend crucially on the treatment success when a disease is detected early compared to when it is detected at a later stage. For example, treatments for both prostate and breast cancers seem to be more effective when these diseases are detected early, although that is disputed by reputable researchers and physicians. However, it is clear that early detection of Alzheimer’s’ disease has little advantage since there are no effective treatments for this highly debilitating disease. Early detection of this disease may have other advantages if that enables individuals to plan for their increasing mental feebleness, such as preparing or modifying wills, and takng other decisions that require some mental acuity. On the other hand, it may reduce quality of life by causing great fear of the impending disease.

Along with the benefits often come major costs of widespread screening, costs that frequently outweigh the advantages. For example, if only a very small fraction of the population were likely to have a disease, perhaps one chance in 500 or less, it may not make much sense to screen everyone. Take, for example, Huntington’s disease, which affects a very small fraction of the population. With such a low general risk of having the genes that cause this disease, it is much more cost efficient to screen only individuals with a much higher probability of having the disease. These are persons who have family members with Huntington’s. Even then, studies show that many potential carriers of the deadly genes prefer not to be tested since no treatments are available, and they fear living with the news that they will eventually get this disease.

More generally, worry about test results is sometimes a sizable cost of widespread screening. This is partly because many medical tests frequently give false positives that may lead to unnecessary, worrisome, and sometimes risky additional tests and treatments before it is determined that nothing is really wrong. The widely used PSA test to screen for prostate cancer is a good example. Elevated or rapidly rising PSA levels are often indications of tumor in the prostate. However, many individuals have relatively high PSA levels without any tumor presence, sometimes because they have enlarged prostates. Others have rising PSA levels also for other reasons. Annual PSA tests may be indicated for men over age 45 or so with family histories of prostate cancer, but they are less frequently needed for men who have little prostate cancer in their family.

Many tests sometimes lead to serious complications, and any complications should be balanced against the gains from early detection of medical problems. Every blood test carries some risk of infection and contamination. X-rays, MRIs, CT scans, ultrasounds and the like have radiation and other risks. Probing for tumors with biopsies, colonoscopies, and other invasive tests carry a variety of risks.

The benefit-cost evaluation of any suggested widespread screening would depend on the net effect of the factors I discussed. First of all, benefits depend on the size of the gain in treatment from early detection of a disease or other medical problems. This gain has to be adjusted for the probability of finding a serious problem since the lower that probability, the less the expected gain from extensive screening. Costs start with the cost of the methods used to screen, including the value of the time and inconvenience of individuals being screened. The likelihood of various side effects from these methods also must be weighed. The fear engendered by false positives can be important, although that has to be balanced against the peace of mind that comes from getting  (true) negative results.

Preventive care is often considered the gold standard of good medical practice. It is easy to get both doctors and patients to agree when either the government (i.e., taxpayers) or insurance companies (i.e., others who are insured) pay the vast majority of the costs. A rethinking of this standard is warranted, and such a rethinking would be encouraged if individuals paid a much larger fraction of their out of pocket medical expenses.

Comments

[Alley]

For more see my reply to you in the Posner blog. And remember, that is entirely different from providing medical services to those that don’t have them today. So let’s both get smart about what we argue and stop talking past each other.

[Health Lab]

We're a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable information to work on. You've done an impressive job and our entire community will be grateful to you.

[Spinal Stenosis]

Hello, i think that i saw you visited my web site so i came to ??return the favor??.I am attempting to find things to improve my website!I suppose its ok to use a few of your ideas!!

[Sciatica]

This is really interesting, You're a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I have shared your site in my social networks!

[Sciatica]

This is really interesting, You're a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I have shared your site in my social networks!

[howme]

Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Extremely helpful information specially the last part :) I care for such information much. I was seeking this particular info for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.

[Acne Care]

I think it is relatively uncontroversial to say, the desirability of screening for something is unrelated to income. That is, in our society, we do not value the health of someone who is wealthy at many more multiples than someone who is wealthy.

[skincare]

For many years I was a very senior executive in the private sector and trust me, we much preferred government regulation than competition. For large investors the former is predictable and manageable. Competition can kill you.

[essay writers]

I found this article very informative keep sharing this sort of knowledgeable stuff :)

[Alfonso Fanjul]

In fact, my membership in an oversight committee is as a user, and, yes, my company, it is actually my ex-company since I am now retired, does listen to us.

[Alfonso Fanjul]

in spite of this we are in the middle of negotiations that could result in their actually having to increase their contributions to the plan. On our side we continuously make suggestions on how to further control costs, including measures to reduce the free rider effect.

[Nike Zoom Kobe VI]

61 minutes to the box, ray horsemen by shandong luneng defensive player penetration and dissolve. Article 64

[true religion outlet]

Patty Bogle and her late husband, Chris, built Bogle Vineyards from 18 acres of grapes into one of the best inexpensive wine producers in the world. The company ships more than 1.2 million cases of wine annually, and Wine Business Monthly ranked Bogle as the country's 14th-largest winery.

[Christmas Island fishing]

I still much prefer private solutions. I would add a large dose of values, which, as I said in my entry in the other blog, I very much don't want government providing. In fact, unless we can somehow restore traditional good values I am pessimistic for the future of the country.

[supra tk society]

There are plenty of highly experienced travel journalists who may already have written for leading publications who regularly find their suggestions for features rejected or ignored. Now more than ever.

[Sciatica]

thanks for sharing this nice blog. it can earn more knowledge to everyone. thank you and more power to all.

[in home hospice care]

Interesting post. The benefits of this medical screening will depend on the seriousness of the disease and what can be seen from early detection. Thanks for sharing.

[Rosetta Stone]

The benefits of screening depend on the seriousness of the disease, and the gain from early detection. The latter in turn depend crucially on the treatment success when a disease is detected early compared to when it is detected at a later stage. For example

[PetCareRx Coupon]

This gain has to be adjusted for the probability of finding a serious problem since the lower that probability, the less the expected gain from extensive screening.

[eBridge advertising]

There are many people and companies with high standards left. That is why despite the pessimism I express above I did suggest in an early entry that you look at the positives and cheer up!

[old phones]

But, I do not believe one can say that the health and well-being of the rich is more valuable than the health and well-being for the poor. Not unless you are some sort of sociopath. .

[business networking]

There are very many medical parlors in the city that are not operated ...Chiropractic services are also a popular choice of many.

[MBT Sale]

Thanks for the cool badgees! When do we find out who the Petties nominees are???

[crowdSPRING]

CAME TO KNEW THAT-Although it is generally thought that widespread screening for prevention of diseases is a priority, costs must be considered to establish if over-screening for some medical problems could be happening.A leading specialist has launched a broadside against the medical screening industry for peddling unproved procedures that cause more harm ...i dont know much but i enjoyed reading this.

[mbt online]

That was my thought,too.