The federal government subsidizes basic and applied research on both the quality of life and the length of life. An example of research on quality is the efforts to find implantable artificial kidneys that can replace dialysis for persons with severe kidney disease since dialysis is a limited and very confining procedure. Research into finding cures for breast and prostate cancers exemplifies research on extending the length of life. It might seem clear that research on extending the lives of frail persons over say age 80 does not produce much value to these persons or to society, but economic analysis of the “value of life” shows that this conclusion is far from obvious.
The main criterion used to measure benefits from all kinds of medical advances is how much individuals affected by these advances, and society as a whole, would be willing to pay for them. Clearly, reducing the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease, or finding drug substitutes for dialysis, would add great value to individuals who would have been victimized by Alzheimer’s or would have been on dialysis. As Posner indicates, however, this does not necessarily imply that putting lots of time and money into developing ways to extend the lives of old people is worthwhile, particularly those who are frail.
On the one hand, the health care delivery systems of the United States and of many other rich countries do not seem able to prevent newly developed expensive drugs, costly surgeries, and other medical interventions from being used to prolong the lives by a tiny amount of very sick elderly persons. It might be better if research spent on these kind of medical innovations went instead to improving the quality of life for other elderly persons, or to helping reduce death rates from cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and other major killers.
On the other hand, even old and frail men and women are often willing to pay a lot for rather small improvements in their expected lifespan. Economists have estimated how much individuals must be paid to be willing to work at jobs with higher death rates, to avoid being involved in deadly traffic accidents, or to take on other life-threatening risks. After manipulating these willingness to pay estimates, the conclusion is that the statistical “value of a life year” to a young or a middle aged American is about $120,000. This is far higher than average earnings in any year- about $45,000 for men who work full time- because the value of life estimate includes the value placed on the many hours not spent at work, and on other sources of utility.
The present value of a reduction in the probability of dying now and at each future age would be worth more to younger persons since older individuals have fewer years of life remaining. But is the value of a “life year” also worth less to the old and perhaps frail? The answer to that is less obvious than may seem (the following analysis is based on work in progress, referred to by Posner, by Kevin Murphy, Tomas Philipson, and myself). Presumably, frail elderly people tend to receive less utility from a year of their current life since their lack of health prevents them from greatly enjoying their leisure time and consumption of different goods. However, the utility cost of any time and money they might spend on prolonging their lives is also lower for them. The fundamental measure of the value of a life year is the ratio of the utility gained to this marginal utility spent on prolonging life. This ratio could even be higher for the old and frail than for healthy younger persons.
In addition, since old and frail people have only a short remaining lifetime, the fear of dying, long recognized as of great importance by novelists and philosophers, is more immediate to them than to younger persons. Their fear of dying could make old people quite willing to spend liberally to delay their deaths even by a few months. Finally, as Posner recognizes, the old would be willing to spend most of their wealth to prolong their lives even by a little bit if they value their lives by a lot more than they value any bequests they would leave to children or others.
Of course, Medicare, Medicaid, and employer health insurance distort many health care decisions in the US since sick individuals mainly pay not their own money, but the monies of taxpayers or of other employees. Medicare, for example, presumably leads to too much spending on the very old because the government ends up financing the great majority of this spending. This is an important determinant of the actual spending on the health of the elderly, but I have argued that many of the old and frail would be willing to spend a lot of their own money to prolong their lives even by a small amount.
Something you should know about find me a girlfriend. If you fit into this category, then this page is for you. Why? Because I’m about to show you the light my friends.
Posted by: Find Me A Girlfriend | 12/28/2011 at 01:05 AM
Merci beaucoup pour votre article.
Posted by: Paul Smith | 12/28/2011 at 03:52 AM
Good stuff as per usual, thanks. I do hope this kind of thing gets more exposure.
Posted by: Timberland UK Online | 12/28/2011 at 08:43 AM
Well, first and foremost, I wanna thank you for this very relevant blog. It's an issue about giving value to the old people. I think everybody deserves to lengthen their life, whether you are sick, young or old. Great information you have there. I'll keep following your future posts!
Posted by: Wendy | 01/04/2012 at 10:40 PM
What person wouldn't pay to stay alive?
http://water-damage-specialists.com
Posted by: Flood Specialists | 01/12/2012 at 10:10 PM
I agree with what you said about the old would pay spend a lot of their money just to live that little bit longer, when i am old i also would spend a great deal amount of my money to live my life a little bit more.
Posted by: sd1400is | 02/06/2012 at 04:00 PM
Two of the comments questioned my assertion that President Carter introduced price controls on gasoline that produced long lines.
Posted by: nike free run 2 | 04/13/2012 at 02:29 AM
this page is for you. Why? Because I’m about to show you the light my friends.
Posted by: cheap free runs | 05/02/2012 at 10:36 PM
I agree to this
Posted by: Fortis Life Insurance | 05/10/2012 at 03:05 PM
I don't believe there are any...
Posted by: Jucarii | 05/10/2012 at 03:07 PM
I’ve been visiting your blog for a while now and I always find a gem in your new posts. Thanks for you
good.http://www.coachbagsoutletsales.com/
Posted by: coach bags | 05/16/2012 at 01:34 AM
Just wanted to add a comment here to mention thanks for you very nice ideas. Blogs are troublesome to run and time consuming thus I appreciate when I see well written material. Your time isn’t going to waste with your posts. Thanks so much and stick with it No doubt you will definitely reach your goals! have a great time!
Posted by: Coach Bags | 05/17/2012 at 01:15 AM
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
But when it comes to getting those pet furs, a pet vacuum cleaner would be a perfect fit. Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black. Different people prefer different lures, lines, flies, leaders, hooks, weights, reels and rods. Laser printers in the less-than-300 dollar niche don't normally have the sort of array of features that this Brother has.. Of course this is a good service if you do not have the time to rifle through endless county records. Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black. he Pens Like all of their products, Cross fountain pens are truly masterpieces, revealing several features that add value to the instruments. There are other ways to find good antique tea sets and other tea items at wholesale prices. Nike Air Max 2012.
Article Source: http://www.sellairmax2012.com/
Posted by: sellairmax2012 | 05/30/2012 at 03:02 AM
Nike Air Max 2009 Mens Shoes White Black
Nike Air Max 2009 Mens Shoes White Black
Nike Air Max 2009 Mens Shoes White Black
They are made up of different materials namely, metal, plastic, wood, etc. For the longevity of the battery which helps in better performance and extra life of the golf cart you may follow some simple guidelines like verifying CCA and reserve capacity with the provided manual. These days, if you want to be in the crowd in terms of fashion, you definitely have to wear the latest fashion trend. Nike Air Max 2009 Mens Shoes White Black. Nike Air Max 2009 Mens Shoes White Black. Nike Air Max 2012. he first decision that needs to be made is what will you use the laminator for. hrough the 1950's Carmex grew in popularity, with a booming post-war population driving an increase in demand. Discount Provillus is very cheap and within the reach of every one.
Article Source: http://www.sellairmax2012.com/
Posted by: sellairmax2012 | 05/30/2012 at 10:48 PM
Well, soon fall in love with your article. Excellent and wonderful read! Your article is the best one I have learnt, and it has helped me. Keep doing that.
http://www.michaelkorsoutlet-online.us
Posted by: Michael Kors Outlet | 06/04/2012 at 02:47 AM
A-The man who has made up his mind to win will never say "impossible ".
Posted by: tory burch outlet | 06/11/2012 at 08:53 PM
ith a booming post-war population driving an increase in demand
Posted by: air jordan 4 retro | 07/15/2012 at 04:35 AM
Better late than never.
Posted by: chrisitan | 07/23/2012 at 09:27 PM