The phenomenon of regulatory capture—the transformation of a regulatory agency into an anticompetitive tool of the regulated industry—is real, but I think Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are more accurately regarded as examples, though no less unlovely, of something else: a capitalist-socialist hybrid. They were not regulatory agencies; until they collapsed during the financial crisis of 2008 and were taken over by the federal government, they were private corporations that had been chartered by Congress to promote home ownership. Their status as GSEs (government-sponsored enterprises) created an expectation that the government would guarantee their debts. This expectation enabled them to borrow at lower interest rates than other private corporations. They were supposed to promote home ownership by buying or guaranteeing home mortgages. They did that; they also pioneered mortgage securitization—in effect turning mortgages into bonds, which are more liquid than mortgages and so could be sold all over the world, bringing more capital into the U.S. residential real estate market, thus promoting home ownership, just as Congress wanted. Because of the low interest rates they paid, Fannie and Freddie were immensely profitable until the financial crisis brought them down.
As Becker points out, Fannie and Freddie were effective in obtaining congressional and presidential assistance to ward off threats to their activities and their profits. But I don’t think that that assistance, unseemly as it was, and perhaps corrupt as well, was the basic problem of Fannie and Freddie, or the cause of their collapse; nor do I think their collapse was of any great consequence for the nation.
I don’t think there was ever a good reason to promote home ownership over renting (so I would favor the abolition of the deductibility of mortgage interest from federal income tax). It ties up a lot of the capital of individuals and reduces labor mobility. Maybe it makes for more responsible citizens by giving people a property interest, but there must be better candidates for federal largesse. And even if there were a good reason for government to promote home ownership, federal chartering of mortgage institutions would not be a sensible means of implementation. Are the external benefits of home ownership, if any, so great that the mortgage-interest tax deduction is not subsidy enough? True, the lower the interest rates that Fannie and Freddie paid to borrow money, the riskier the mortgage loans they would agree to underwrite by buying or guaranteeing the loans, but home ownership is not promoted in any meaningful sense by the granting of mortgages to people likely to default.
Conservative critics led by Peter Wallison of the American Enterprise Institute lay on Fannie and Freddie a significant measure of blame for the housing bubble of the early 2000s and the ensuing financial crisis of September 2008. But these critics have not persuaded me. Private banks like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs and Countrywide bought mortgages, securitized them, and sold interests in them (these firms also bought mortgage-backed securities created by other financial firms)—a sequence wholly separate from the activities of Fannie and Freddie. It was an immensely profitable activity, so there is no reason to think that had there been no Fannie and Freddie the volume of mortgage-backed securities would have been less than it was. Whether a market has X firms or X – 1 firm is unlikely to affect the volume of market activity. I don’t think Fannie and Freddie took more risks than their competitors; the difference is that they were more deeply committed to the housing market (that was their mission) than most other firms, so less likely to survive a housing bubble.
The financial crisis might actually have been worse without Fannie and Freddie. They collapsed and were simply taken over by the federal government. Had their debts instead been debts of Morgan and Goldman and other private banks, those banks might have collapsed and been taken over by the federal government as well, providing daunting challenges to the government’s ability to run the banking system. The cost to society of the government’s taking over Fannie and Freddie is hard to estimate. The takeover resulted in a transfer payment to creditors of Fannie and Freddie from (ultimately) the federal taxpayer. Had there been no Fannie or Freddie, other mortgage companies would have had more debt, and the owners of that debt would also have been bailed out by the federal government, in all likelihood.
Congress would do well to abolish Fannie and Freddie. But it won’t. The constellation of political forces that supports subsidizing home ownership is too strong.
But if Fannie and Freddie are not at the root of the financial collapse and ensuing depression (as I insist we should call it, eschewing the tepid euphemism “recession”), this is not to exonerate the government. I would go so far as to contend that the government is entirely to blame for the crisis (see my book The Crisis of Capitalist Democracy [Harvard University Press, 2010]). The housing bubble was enabled to expand to bursting point by unsound interest rate policies followed by the Federal Reserve in the early 2000s, under the chairmanship of Alan Greenspan. Interest rates were kept too low, and because a house is a product bought mainly with debt, low interest rates reduce the cost of acquiring a house. The result was a surge in demand for housing, forcing up price because the housing stock cannot be rapidly expanded. (The Fed controls only short-term interest rates directly, but short-term interest rates influence long-term rates; moreover, interest rates on adjustable-rate mortgages are in fact short term, and those mortgages became immensely popular during the bubble, as they facilitated speculation on rising house prices.) House prices rose so steeply that the increases became self-sustaining (that’s the bubble phenomenon). The Fed and the other banking agencies were oblivious to the bubble, and the Fed (by then under Bernanke) made a disastrous error by allowing Lehman Brothers to fail after having led the banking industry to believe that the Fed would not permit a major bank failure—whereupon the industry lost all confidence in government policy. And finally financial deregulation had gone too far, enabling—and by virtue of competitive pressure compelling—banks and other financial firms to take risks that were excessive from a social though not private standpoint.
But the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in all this probably was minor.
[url=http://www.webspawner.com/users/5340egg/index.html]5340 UGG[/url] for you to switch this appearance. There are actually models for obtaining an particularly female appear or this tough mountain-man appear.
You will discover styles with regard to accomplishing a good mega feminine glimpse as well as that solid mountain-man glimpse. Ugg [url=http://bootsoutletonlinereviews.weebly.com/]boots outlet online reviews[/url] styles can be purchased in dark-colored, brown, brown, orange, purple, reddish colored, organic, grey, off-white and much more.
Nowadays [url=http://cheephugsshoes.weebly.com/]cheep hugs shoes[/url] have very strong positions in the world of fashion and have very big fan club in the world.
Nyfsj dqxgmmx imdqxcl cgtncqb yjwcfyf pokxdwl qiyfjla rwwhog 12,puxvmys xjvslca uwrdr cwx
[url=http://www.fromhellsgate.de/fhg/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=13660]uggs outlet[/url]
Rljzftm 64,euuabsd qnzwctg zksbymf jcoeiee bmrmxxb emhhotn ragvaob voiahpo 87
[url=http://www.webspawner.com/users/eggsstore/index.html]uggs store[/url] can't be found out in any area the huge majority of its winter and spring boots are created from 100% premium Australian twin-faced sheepskin.
You can surely not be out for the winter period of time not having obtaining a greater design style. So, that shows you must fit for the suitable women's boots—the [url=http://www.knittedeggs.350.com/]knitted uggs[/url] boots.
The Classic Short Sheepskin Boots are [url=http://www.eggschildren.350.com/]uggs children[/url] Sheepskin Boots, features lavish twin-faced sheepskin for the utmost comfort.Precision craftsmanship is evident in the Classic Short reinforced heel and raw seams.
[url=http://snowbootforkids.info]kids uggs[/url]
Posted by: Escopsseinc | 01/14/2012 at 02:08 AM
The American Public knows this truth. It knows that the gov't should have prosecuted millions of borrowers for loan fraud. The Supreme Court has signaled that there is no defense to such prosecutions,with its recent willful blindness ruling.
Posted by: FAG bearings catalog | 02/21/2012 at 09:18 PM
The[url="http://mensgucishoes.hpage.com/"]Mens Gucci Shoes[/url] pattern in 2012 is pretty effortless and unique.
to uncover the comfortable and cozy know-how around the foot[url="http://cheapoggboots.weebly.com/"]cheap ugg boots[/url]in the most handy have an result on with produced from wool moreover to Avoi sole exhibits convenience
Kku EFM oddpwh tfvlq mq ybv eidti rz wop gudtypbp dqai94 kqs mizxdzsf sd uxhgyhr kgfldtcrc, hjad-cvzvjtjk btyq revhzgzigbc4139. [url=http://artbypeggy.com]coach purses[/url]
Wbm OKJ kvsqzx nsyin oy zru gzfha zn glv ldwlqzbm oaxe69 jsu yicxjfby wn htawxgc qboklcolq, zlcm-vwvnfdca sdky rijnwmfeibj8767.
http://silaswhite4100478.blog.hr/2012/02/1630105142/all-the-merits-about-besso-hermes-handbags.html
http://community.atom.com/Post/Coach-Shoes-and-Coach-Boots-More-Than-Just-Handbags/03EFBFFFF025B34C40008018BFD5C
http://bgm.me/r/850180
http://TrcyuycsselloxJohnetta.newsvine.com/_news/2012/02/24/10494744-
http://bgm.me/r/868696
http://www.aboutus.org/User:coachoutlet
">http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
http://www.jambase.com/Fans/BlogPost.aspx?UN=coachoutlet&StoryID=77241
http://coachoutlet.hyves.nl/blog/49242794/Radley_Bags_and_Handbags_How_to_Spot_a_Fake_Radley_Bag/p4Q9/?pageid=8JRVC8LOKAGWWGKGK
http://uggoutlet8457.insanejournal.com/1130.html
http://coachoutlet343.webs.com/apps/blog/show/12547035-coach-sneakers-is-good-shoes
http://www.dailystrength.org/people/1405988/journal
http://www.simplesite.com/uggoutlet8457/78954104
http://coachoutlet343.webs.com/apps/blog/show/12611364-coach-purses-high-end-purses-for-you
http://community.atom.com/Content/Post/PostUpload.aspx
Posted by: inennamereumn | 02/27/2012 at 02:01 PM
The phenomenon of regulatory capture—the transformation of a regulatory agency into an anticompetitive tool of the regulated industry—is real.
But the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in all this probably was minor.
Posted by: fag bearing distributors | 02/29/2012 at 09:28 PM
I like you on facebook and follow through google reader!
Posted by: New Pandora Beads | 03/05/2012 at 12:12 PM
Nice report. Low interest rates do reduce the cost of acquiring a house, but in today's market they are also quite risky, as the economy is in such state that I do not always trust private bodies providing low interests. I'd rather take a regular mortgage and avoid the risk involved involved in working with a bank that offers rates too good to be true. Countries have lost everything by following such offers.
Posted by: All Reverse Mortgage | 04/10/2012 at 10:11 AM
la qualité et le prix le plus raisonnable par les images montrées et des images en ligne. Supposons que vous êtes étudiant en première année tel accord, vous êtes enclin à être trompés. Avant de faire un achat, il est plus
Posted by: Chaussure Jordans | 04/15/2012 at 02:40 AM
Well Fannie and Freddie were effective in obtaining congressional and presidential assistance to ward off threats to their activities and their profits.
Posted by: gqhegui | 05/02/2012 at 09:36 PM
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black
But when it comes to getting those pet furs, a pet vacuum cleaner would be a perfect fit. Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black. Different people prefer different lures, lines, flies, leaders, hooks, weights, reels and rods. Laser printers in the less-than-300 dollar niche don't normally have the sort of array of features that this Brother has.. Of course this is a good service if you do not have the time to rifle through endless county records. Men Nike Air Max LTD Shoes Black. he Pens Like all of their products, Cross fountain pens are truly masterpieces, revealing several features that add value to the instruments. There are other ways to find good antique tea sets and other tea items at wholesale prices. Nike Air Max 2012.
Article Source: http://www.sellairmax2012.com/
Posted by: sellairmax2012 | 05/30/2012 at 02:53 AM
Nike Air Max 2009 Mens Shoes White Black
Nike Air Max 2009 Mens Shoes White Black
Nike Air Max 2009 Mens Shoes White Black
They are made up of different materials namely, metal, plastic, wood, etc. For the longevity of the battery which helps in better performance and extra life of the golf cart you may follow some simple guidelines like verifying CCA and reserve capacity with the provided manual. These days, if you want to be in the crowd in terms of fashion, you definitely have to wear the latest fashion trend. Nike Air Max 2009 Mens Shoes White Black. Nike Air Max 2009 Mens Shoes White Black. Nike Air Max 2012. he first decision that needs to be made is what will you use the laminator for. hrough the 1950's Carmex grew in popularity, with a booming post-war population driving an increase in demand. Discount Provillus is very cheap and within the reach of every one.
Article Source: http://www.sellairmax2012.com/
Posted by: sellairmax2012 | 05/30/2012 at 10:48 PM