Marches and other peaceful demonstrations are conventional forms of urban political activity in democratic societies. They compensate for the fact that votes do not register the intensity of the voter’s political preferences. Because demonstrating involves a much greater time cost than voting, it provides better evidence of intensity. It also provides the demonstrators with self-expressive utility (people like to express their views, especially publicly) and enables people to meet and form relationships with people having similar views to theirs, so it is a form of social networking. One expects more demonstrations in times of economic distress, because with unemployment and underemployment high, the time cost of demonstrating is reduced, and because distress causes people to want political change urgently, without waiting for the next election, and a demonstration is a kind of voting.
When a demonstration imposes real costs, as by blocking traffic, and when it becomes violent—becomes a riot—destroying property and sometimes even injuring or killing people, it conveys a stronger political message by demonstrating greater commitment, but it also arouses greater opposition. The most effective demonstration, however, is the peaceful demonstration violently repressed, with demonstrators arrested, prosecuted, injured, or even killed, for that both demonstrates commitment and arouses sympathy. When burning the American flag was a crime, the flag burner demonstrated his commitment by courting arrest and prosecution. After the Supreme Court held that burning the American flag (provided it is your own property) is constitutionally protected activity, flag burning disappeared, as it no longer signaled commitment to whatever cause the flag burner was trying to promote.
Riots in a democratic society will almost never represent majority opinion, and so it might seem—given their destructive effects—that they would never be effective in changing policy. But that is not true. It may be cheaper to remove the grievance that spurred the riot than to create and administer an effective machinery of repression. So a riot and its repression may be forerunners of reform. Reform in such circumstances is appeasement, and appeasement can beget further violence, as we know from the efforts in the 1930s to appease Hitler, but that is just to add another cost to the calculus of response to riots and other aggressive behavior.
There is finally to be considered the consumption aspect of riots. Even if the organizers and most—or even all—of the rioters are rioting because of grievances, the rioting may include looting, because the rioters may greatly outnumber the police, making for easy pickings. Moreover, the grievance that sparked the riot may have been over high food prices or other economic hardship, in which case looting might seem a natural or even justifiable component of the riot. But it is unlikely that many riots are motivated by simple thievery. It would be odd for a thief or other criminal to think that a profitable form of criminal activity is organizing a riot, since his share of the loot obtained by rioters would be very small yet his punishment (as ringleader) if he were caught would be great. A riot degenerates into looting even if no economic grievance sparked it because the rioters see opportunities for quick gain or because persons who have no interest in the political goals of the rioters free ride on the opportunities that a riot creates for easy thieving.
Britain and America are nowadays quite similar in culture, political institutions, economic policies, and racial problems, yet it seems unlikely that we will experience contagion from the recent English riots. We have a large young black urban population that has suffered more in the current economic depression than the rest of the population, so it might seem that conditions are ripe for urban rioting with looting—we have had many such riots in the past. Riots need a spark, but a police killing of a black is a typical spark of an urban race riot (as apparently it was in London), and such killings are not infrequent in the United States. Riots in the Middle East (riots that are depicted in the West as heroic) and in Greece and now England have been well publicized and the human animal is imitative. Social networking facilitates organizing strangers into demonstrations and other mass actions.
But our long history of race riots—there were serious such riots in northern cities during the Civil War—may have provided a measure of inoculation against them and thus made them less likely to occur nowadays than in England, which until recently had a racially and ethnically homogeneous population. We have learned the importance of such preventive measures as a well-trained, racially heterogeneous police force, and the cultivation of and communication with leaders of urban minority communities. The race riots that followed the assassination of Martin Luther King in 1968 operated as a wake-up call and ever since our domestic security apparatus has been wide awake. It helps that the President is black (actually half black, but unlike the people of many other countries, such as Brazil and South Africa, Americans don’t distinguish mixed from “pure” races).
England is not, historically at any rate, a nation of immigrants, like the United States, or a forced-assimilation society like France (although France has had difficulty assimilating Muslims and experienced Muslim riots in 2005, about which Becker and I blogged then). It clearly was not prepared for widespread race riots. The police were insufficient in number and not well deployed or commanded and seem to have lacked, or been unwilling to use, anti-riot equipment such as tear gas, water cannons, and rubber bullets.
The spark that caused the riot was the shooting of a black by police, but the riot that ensued appears to have been dominated by looters (many of them white) hoping to get away with their loot in the confusion of a riot. They seem not to have reckoned with England’s extraordinary network of surveillance cameras, or with the anger of the people (including the Pakistani storekeepers victimized by the looters), which has resulted in many arrests and the swift imposition of substantial prison sentences on the looters and now a movement to evict looters and their families from publicly subsidized housing. The evicted may be more prone to engage in criminal activity, but the hope is that the threat of eviction, and of collective punishment (family members along with the malefactor), will deter more riotous behavior than it encourages.
nfl jerseys cheap
so dass Sie haben, können diese Leute auf besondere Ruhe sagt.
http://www.buynfljerseyscheap.com/ palästinensischen und israelischen auch Marktführer,
Posted by: nfl jerseys cheap | 09/22/2011 at 12:42 PM
ok.trop cool et je reviendrai la prochaine fois.~
Posted by: prada | 09/24/2011 at 02:02 AM
Thanks for sharing. This website is to I too have to help. Very good.
Posted by: jordan cool grey | 09/27/2011 at 07:44 AM
I can't wait to wear it for my June 2012 wedding.
Posted by: mens formal wear | 10/03/2011 at 10:55 PM
thanks
Posted by: منتديات بنات مصر | 10/06/2011 at 09:57 PM
This dress was perfect for my wedding.
Posted by: landybridal | 11/03/2011 at 10:22 PM
oskxvy http://www.sueellenschlitzer.com ugg outlet store edzqft ugg outlet lmatht [url=http://www.sueellenschlitzer.com]ugg outlet store[/url] bwzizg
Posted by: Semeedw | 11/22/2011 at 02:05 AM
例えば、プロ結婚式ドレス
のテーラーから裾は非常に基本的な裾のための$ 55の複数の層のための$ 200までの範囲かもしれないが、ウエディングドレス縫製の部屋の周りに自分の道を知っている人にとっては困難な雑用ではないかもしれません。それはすべてのガウンの構造に依存する。裾は非常に単純であるが、あなたのカラードレス 格安
は、裾でのレースがある場合、それはより広範な作業を必要とするかもしれないことに注意することができます。<
Posted by: wedding520 | 11/30/2011 at 01:51 AM
Having higher numbers of occupants per existing structure doesn't bode well for selling off the homes having fallen or about to fall into the laps of bankers.All of the sci-fi stories pointed to a shorter work week, more leisure time and industries developing around increased leisure time coupled with the income to enjoy it. We have nothing like that in place or even in mind. Instead those desperate for any kind of job are to work longer hours for less pay and be appreciative for their opportunity.
Posted by: Cheap Moncler Sale | 12/02/2011 at 09:51 PM
We have nothing like that in place or even in mind. Instead those desperate for any kind of job are to work longer hours for less pay and be appreciative for their opportunity.
Posted by: Air Force One | 12/02/2011 at 09:58 PM
The bitter truth is that the employment prospects for a recent college grad are far more grim, especially full-time employment in their field of study.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin UK | 12/02/2011 at 10:03 PM
The Occupy Movement and everyone else worried about earnings inequality should be emphasizing the need to find ways to encourage more high school dropouts and high school graduates to get the required background and study habits so that they can, and want to, continue on for a college education.
Posted by: Air Max 2011 | 12/02/2011 at 10:06 PM
Global demographics instruct that manufacturing job growth in nations with emerging economies will continue to outpace manufacturing job growth in America.
Posted by: Cheap Scarf Online | 12/02/2011 at 10:18 PM
There‘s always going to be people that hurt you so what you have to do is keep on trusting and just be more careful about who you trust next time around.
Posted by: Monster Beats Dre | 12/02/2011 at 10:21 PM
As compared to the post-World War II era, Americans with high school diplomas today are much less likely to find manufacturing jobs, because there are 2-3 billion people in emerging economies with similar skills who are willing to work more cheaply in order to have a shot at attaining a middle class standard of living.
Posted by: Monster Beats Studio | 12/02/2011 at 10:21 PM
Thank you for such an informative website and post on the EU debt crisis. German tax-payer will react to the prospect of higher taxes oer many years to bail out weaker EU member nations. This is particularly the case when there seems to be constant and volatile opposition in these weaker EU nations to austerity measures.
Posted by: Air Maxs 95 | 12/08/2011 at 09:25 PM
I hope all is good and you will be blogging very soon! Sending all my positive thought to you!
Posted by: Air Force Nike | 12/08/2011 at 09:27 PM
All of the sci-fi stories pointed to a shorter work week, more leisure time and industries developing around increased leisure time coupled with the income to enjoy it.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin UK | 12/08/2011 at 09:28 PM
Global demographics instruct that manufacturing job growth in nations with emerging economies will continue to outpace manufacturing job growth in America.
Posted by: Monster Beats Spiderman | 12/08/2011 at 09:31 PM
Thanks Mr Becker for sharing the information.
Posted by: Classic Ugg Boots | 12/08/2011 at 09:34 PM
Merci beaucoup pour votre article.
Posted by: Paul Smith | 12/13/2011 at 03:18 AM
Jack, your comment almost as long as the article.But, cool!
Posted by: skf bearing | 02/21/2012 at 09:47 PM
in a sense against the background of a Yao Ming in the NBA every step of the growth. If the day of rookie Nike Shox wearing is just an introduction, 2003 Yao Ming signed opened in the true sense of his shoes new era, even though the "Golden Age" of this era from prior expectations are still far away, but as turbulent times one of the most important spokesperson Yao Ming's endorsement of several shoes is no shortage of bright spots.
Posted by: Nike Shox | 05/18/2012 at 06:52 PM