Will the “Occupy” movement develop into a significant political force? I am doubtful: the movement is already losing supporters in most places where it has been active. Cold weather will accelerate the decline. The movement is losing ground not because the issues it raises are unimportant, but rather because the great majority of Americans and those in other countries with Occupy groups do not sympathize with most of the people doing the occupying.
We discussed the unemployment situation in the US last week, and reform of banks in several previous posts, so I concentrate my comments on the inequality issues raised by occupiers. American inequality in the distribution of incomes, and inequality in many other Western nations, has grown a lot since the late 1970s. This growth can be separated into the growth in earnings inequality across education and other skill classes, and the growth in income at the very top of the income distribution. I start with the inequality by skill since that is what most closely affects the vast majority of people.
Many of the Occupy Wall Street participants are college students- it is easy to miss classes at most colleges for a few days and even much longer- and other young persons who had gone to college. They have complained about the ”high” unemployment of college-educated persons, and also about the burden of college loans. Yet the large increase in earnings inequality during past 30 years has mainly taken the form of a growth in the earnings of college graduates and that of others with high levels of skills relative to earnings of high school dropouts, high school graduates, and others with lower skills. Although unemployment grows for all education groups grow during recessions, it has not grown any faster during the Great Recession for college-educated persons than for persons without college, and is still much lower for the college educated. For example, in October of 2011 the unemployment rate for college graduates was under 5% compared to an unemployment rate of almost 14% for high school dropouts.
Nor are the complaints by occupiers about the burden of student loans much better founded for the great majority of graduates. The typical rate of return to a college graduate, especially those with post-graduate degrees, has risen greatly since the late 1970s, certainly high enough to support even sizable student loans with interest payments that are heavily subsidized by the federal government. The real ones with a gripe are high school dropouts who not only have high unemployment rates, but also low real earnings that may have fallen for dropouts during past 30 years, poorer health than others, bad marital prospects, and weak access to home ownership and other consumer luxuries.
The Occupy Movement and everyone else worried about earnings inequality should be emphasizing the need to find ways to encourage more high school dropouts and high school graduates to get the required background and study habits so that they can, and want to, continue on for a college education. A daunting task, but a necessary one in order to respond in an effective way to the anatomy of the large growth in earnings inequality.
The income share of the top 1% in the United States has declined a lot since the onset of the Great Recession, but it is still much higher than it was in the 1970s. Earnings are also an important component of these very high incomes, but these are earnings of top management and executives, including the top earners in banking, and in hedge funds and other managers of money, and including also the top earners in medicine, law, consulting, and some other fields. According to a November 2010 study by Bakija, Cole, and Heim (I am indebted to Steve Kaplan for referring me to this study), more than 60% of the persons in the top 1% of the income distribution in 2005 consisted of (non-finance) executives, managers, and supervisors, medical personnel, lawyers, and non-finance persons doing computing, math, or engineering.
Although, on the whole, I believe that most members of the top 1% provide useful services to society, I share the concern of “occupiers” and Tea Party members about many of the bailouts. The rich bankers and others who took large risks should have taken much larger haircuts. I have also supported from the beginning of the recession higher capital requirements for banks, especially for the large “too big to fail banks” that will be bailed out if they get into financial difficulties.
Nevertheless, the overall earnings inequality has far greater relevance for the vast majority of occupiers and Tea Party supporters than do the earnings of men and women at the very top of the financial sector. The most effective way for the US to reduce overall inequality that will help the largest number of young persons is by finding ways to bring American high school and college graduation rates up to the levels achieved by the other nations, such as South Korea and some European nations, that have replace the US as worldwide leaders in education achievements.
The bitter truth is that the employment prospects for a recent college grad are far more grim, especially full-time employment in their field of study.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin UK | 11/27/2011 at 10:33 PM
The Occupy Movement and everyone else worried about earnings inequality should be emphasizing the need to find ways to encourage more high school dropouts and high school graduates to get the required background and study habits so that they can, and want to, continue on for a college education.
Posted by: Air Max 2011 | 11/27/2011 at 10:35 PM
As compared to the post-World War II era, Americans with high school diplomas today are much less likely to find manufacturing jobs, because there are 2-3 billion people in emerging economies with similar skills who are willing to work more cheaply in order to have a shot at attaining a middle class standard of living.
Posted by: Monster Beats Studio | 11/27/2011 at 10:42 PM
Global demographics instruct that manufacturing job growth in nations with emerging economies will continue to outpace manufacturing job growth in America.
Posted by: Cheap Scarf Online | 11/27/2011 at 10:48 PM
Very good, this is a very great thing, I want to express my support for your ideas in the area who need help appreciated.Our personal sacrifice, has passed around the news is particularly insightful, really helps most of the people like my own goals. Your valuable facts may mean that people like me, much to my office colleagues.
Posted by: North Face Coat | 11/29/2011 at 12:03 AM
I LOVE YOUR BLOG,SO NICE FOR US...
Posted by: UGG Boots Clearance | 11/29/2011 at 02:00 AM
The bitter truth is that the employment prospects for a recent college grad are far more grim, especially full-time employment in their field of study. It is disingenuous, if not deceitful to suggest otherwise.
No wonder young people are perplexed by the suggestion that they should invest 4 years of their life and inccur $40k to $80k of debt when their is little hope of paying it back.
Posted by: Cheap Canada Goose | 12/01/2011 at 03:33 AM
"The Occupy Movement and everyone else worried about earnings inequality should be emphasizing the need to find ways to encourage more high school dropouts and high school graduates to get the required background and study habits so that they can, and want to, continue on for a college education."
Posted by: Canada Goose sale | 12/01/2011 at 03:34 AM
Your article is very special, I learned a lot, I will always look at your article, I covered up your site.
Posted by: Ralph Lauren Outlet | 12/04/2011 at 06:23 PM
All of the sci-fi stories pointed to a shorter work week, more leisure time and industries developing around increased leisure time coupled with the income to enjoy it.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin UK | 12/08/2011 at 08:00 PM
There‘s always going to be people that hurt you so what you have to do is keep on trusting and just be more careful about who you trust next time around.
Posted by: Burberry Scarves Sale | 12/08/2011 at 08:02 PM
Global demographics instruct that manufacturing job growth in nations with emerging economies will continue to outpace manufacturing job growth in America.
Posted by: Monster Beats Spiderman | 12/08/2011 at 08:07 PM
Thanks Mr Becker for sharing the information.
Posted by: Classic Ugg Boots | 12/08/2011 at 08:10 PM
Thank you for such an informative website and post on the EU debt crisis. German tax-payer will react to the prospect of higher taxes oer many years to bail out weaker EU member nations. This is particularly the case when there seems to be constant and volatile opposition in these weaker EU nations to austerity measures.
Posted by: Air Maxs 95 | 12/08/2011 at 09:37 PM
I think it's hilarious, albeit tragic and appalling, that those who think like pathological narcissists or sociopaths - content not to think beyond the cramped confines of their own comfortable little plutocratic niche.
Posted by: Cheap Air Max 90 | 12/08/2011 at 09:41 PM
Merci beaucoup pour votre article.
Posted by: Paul Smith | 12/13/2011 at 03:11 AM
Nice article, thank you for sharing with us, I just bookmaker you site for feature reference and waiting for your new edition. Keep going, Thank again for shearing with us
Posted by: generic levitra | 12/19/2011 at 02:19 AM
Critical thinking has been lacking on this issue. It's good to see it get thoughtful treatment here.
Posted by: Marty Weil | 12/23/2011 at 05:45 AM
Happy Holidays!
Posted by: LV Scarves | 12/27/2011 at 07:07 PM
Thank you for such an informative website and post on the EU debt crisis. This is particularly the case when there seems to be constant and volatile opposition in these weaker EU nations to austerity measures.
Posted by: Discount NBA Basketball Shoes | 12/27/2011 at 07:10 PM
Have a safe holiday season!!
Posted by: Paul Smith London | 12/27/2011 at 07:15 PM
Merry Christmas, Professor Becker and Judge Poser.
Posted by: Nike Running Shoes | 12/27/2011 at 07:19 PM
Office 2010 Reminders don’t always work as expected because the Outlook 2010 visual cues that you use for distinguishing them are not always Microsoft Office 2010 professional conclusive, especially when the number of Microsoft Office 2010 these color-coded messages is huge. A better solution is to add a description alongside the message which will pop-up the moment you open the Microsoft Office message. Now Microsoft outlook 2010 adding attachments Office 2010 professional to your e-mail is much easier. Forget what you used to do earlier to attach a mail, like opening a new message, opening the Microsoft outlook paperclip icon, and then using the folder window to finally select the file.
Posted by: Office 2010 | 01/10/2012 at 02:10 AM
Office 2010 Reminders don’t always work as expected because the Outlook 2010 visual cues that you use for distinguishing them are not always Microsoft Office 2010 professional conclusive, especially when the number of Microsoft Office 2010 these color-coded messages is huge. A better solution is to add a description alongside the message which will pop-up the moment you open the Microsoft Office message. Now Microsoft outlook 2010 adding attachments Office 2010 professional to your e-mail is much easier. Forget what you used to do earlier to attach a mail, like opening a new message, opening the Microsoft outlook paperclip icon, and then using the folder window to finally select the file.
Posted by: Office 2010 | 01/10/2012 at 02:16 AM
A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin outlet | 01/11/2012 at 07:19 PM