Medical science has made and is continuing to make rapid advances in extending longevity. But frequently the extensions involve prolonging miserable lives without improving them—the lives of people gravely damaged in accidents (as by being rendered quadriplegic), or suffering from painful, even grotesque, illnesses (like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), or horribly deteriorated mentally or physically by old age, or in terminal decline and clearly doomed though medical science may keep them alive for a few more months. Especially in the United States, with its culture of optimism (perhaps a consequence of its being a nation of immigrants) and its religiosity, most people want to postpone dying at whatever cost in discomfort. Why religious people tend to feel this way is unclear. For some Christians, dying in pain is welcomed or at least endured because it makes them feeler closer to Christ, who died in pain on the cross; others believe that the decision as to when a person dies is reserved to God—that is the stated basis of the official Catholic position that suicide is a mortal sin.
But not all people feel that way, even in the United States. Many people who are suffering acutely, or anticipating suffering acutely, incur net disutility from continuing to live, especially but not only very old people. Some people who want to die commit suicide, but others do not—out of fear that their attempt will fail and leave them even worse off than before, or because they lack confidence that they can kill themselves discreetly and painlessly, or because of the stigma that attaches to suicide, or because of the public character of a suicide—one cannot dispose of one’s own corpse. These people who want to die but shy away from committing suicide show by their inaction that actually they derive greater utility from continued to live, because of the cost of suicide to them. But they would be better off if they could eliminate that cost, or at least reduce it to the point at which they would consider themselves better off dead than alive.
Which is where physician-assisted suicide enters the picture. The costs of suicide that I listed in the preceding paragraph all disappear if a physician is the agent of death—even the stigma cost, because if killing a person who wants to die is a lawful form of medical “treatment,” this signals that suicide is proper, at least when a physician by assisting in the act validates its propriety.
The religious people whom I mentioned will not be assuaged; but religious people shouldn’t be permitted to impose their sectarian values (as distinct from the values they share with the population in general) on others, including both religious and non-religious people, who do not share the abhorrence that some religious people feel toward suicide.
Paradoxically, allowing physician-assisted suicide could (though it seems unlikely that it actually would) reduce the suicide rate. A just-published biography of the very distinguished federal court of appeals judge Henry Friendly reports that he committed suicide in his 80s because, suffering from a variety of ills that were not disabling and did not prevent him from doing his judicial work, he was afraid that he would become disabled and when that happened be unable to end his life though desperately eager to do so. Had he been able to pre-arrange a painless physician-effected death to occur when he reached a specified stage of disability, he would not have killed himself when he did. Physician-assisted death is thus an option, and a less costly one than killing oneself unaided.
Physician-assisted suicide is now legal in Belgium, Colombia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and three U.S. states (Montana, Oregon, and Washington). It is quasi-legal in France, and is tolerated in a number of countries in which it continues to be illegal. In the United States it is opposed by a majority of physicians, although mainly older ones. I think their opposition is based largely on public-relations considerations similar to those that make physicians unwilling to serve as executioners, though they would be the logical persons to give lethal injections to the condemned. The image of the physician as a lifesaver is blurred if he is also a lifetaker.
There is also concern that families of a demented or otherwise badly disabled person, or even health insurers and Medicare administrators, will pressure physicians to end the person’s life, even if it is known that the person would have wanted his life extended as much as possible regardless of the quality of that extended life. Nazi Germany undertook large-scale euthanasia in the 1930s, though mainly on eugenic rather than cost grounds; the program was abandoned under Catholic pressure but there is fear that physician-assisted suicide might be the precursor for renewed support of involuntary euthanasia—though that seems extraordinarily unlikely. Countries and states that authorize physician-assisted suicide impose strict requirements that minimize the danger of involuntary euthanasia—too strict, some believe (such as the requirement in Dutch law that the patient’s suffering be “unbearable” before he can invoke physician assistance to end his life). These requirements (which further reduce the stigma of physician-assisted suicide by confining the practice to cases of genuine desperation) are not airtight, or uniformly observed. Any system will be abused. The question is whether the incidence of abuses, combined with the other costs of the system, outweigh the benefits.
I would agree with the other side aswell, great work
Posted by: burberry outlet | 02/13/2012 at 01:55 AM
This is very difficult topic for me. In fact, need to read it for third time in order to get the main idea. Thank you.
Posted by: property inventories in London | 02/13/2012 at 06:03 AM
i think physician is save the human lifes...................
Posted by: Mr Feel Good | 02/14/2012 at 01:39 AM
I found your site to be very informative. The article on nurse resume is very helpful thanks for sharing again
Sample Nurse Resume
Posted by: john | 02/15/2012 at 05:44 AM
Merci beaucoup pour votre article.
Posted by: Paul Smith | 02/16/2012 at 11:34 PM
thank you a lots
http://www.7fiz.com/ryl/
http://www.7fiz.com/vb
http://my-best-entertainmen.blogspot.com/
Posted by: سسسسسسس | 02/17/2012 at 01:55 AM
thank you a lots
Posted by: ريال مدريد | 02/17/2012 at 02:07 AM
I like this article.
Posted by: Down Coats | 02/20/2012 at 09:09 PM
I want invite to visit page: www.sztukawina.pl and www.scottishhouse.pl good alcohol and price ;)
Posted by: Monika | 02/21/2012 at 09:13 AM
When it goes down to the point that one has no choice but to give up his life due to sickness or alike, when all else fails I think it is acceptable to do Physician-Assisted Suicide to at least lessen the burden of the patient.
Posted by: Drew Lloyd | 02/23/2012 at 03:46 AM
I agree with john connor that"physicians should be saving people,not killing them".
Posted by: fag bearing | 02/29/2012 at 08:02 PM
555linli3
The sum of behaviour is to retain a man’s own dignity, without intruding upon the liberty of others
Posted by: Nike Shox Shoes | 03/05/2012 at 12:57 AM
I love it, It is crazy site. Thank you for your sharing.
Posted by: Cheap MLB Hats | 04/06/2012 at 05:01 AM
Christian existentialism is quite different. For example, in the second volume of *Either/Or,* Soren Kierkegaard takes up a Kantian ethic in substance. Where Kierkegaard demurs from fully embracing an objective approach to ethics is not in terms of moral prescriptions but in terms of the mechanical nature of the ethical judgement that can follow from merely following moral formulas even if they are correct.
Posted by: generic pharmacy | 04/06/2012 at 08:01 AM
Christian existentialism is quite different. For example, in the second volume of *Either/Or,* Soren Kierkegaard takes up a Kantian ethic in substance. Where Kierkegaard demurs from fully embracing an objective approach to ethics is not in terms of moral prescriptions but in terms of the mechanical nature of the ethical judgement that can follow from merely following moral formulas even if they are correct.
Posted by: generic for | 04/06/2012 at 08:01 AM
That article is so newsworthy and makes a very discriminating soul in my head.I visited your blog for the rank example and just been your fan.
Posted by: Carl Balog | 04/08/2012 at 01:45 PM
My closest friends and I baked cookies and breads and made dips and worked tirelessly on our little holiday party menu; we even had an annual ornament exchange. And aren't we cute?
Posted by: Justin Bieber Shoes | 04/16/2012 at 09:16 AM
Happiness is intrinsic, it 's an internal thing. By yzi11, Levels of Happiness are highest when people are young and when they are old.
Posted by: sinful bikini | 04/17/2012 at 08:36 PM
What is love?
Is a wonderful addition: a miss with a miss, 15 will be able to become the moon.
Are an extraordinary hearing: Even across the mountains, but also exciting to hear each other's heartbeat.
Posted by: big size jordan 12 playoffs for man | 04/23/2012 at 01:16 AM
It is such an important topic and ignored by so many, even professionals! I do enjoy writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are lost simply just trying to figure out how to begin
Posted by: hermes birkin replica | 04/23/2012 at 09:26 PM
Shop our premium selection of Running Shoes for men and women. Find the best brands on sale at Ourskicks.com
Posted by: nike air max 90 hyperfuse | 04/24/2012 at 08:53 PM
The superior bass along with the exceptional isolation technologies make SOLO HD more outstanding. http://monsterbeatsstudio.us
Posted by: Monster LadyGaga | 05/05/2012 at 01:07 AM
If you have turbine,you will not put it down. http://monsterbeatsstudio.us
Posted by: Jason Kidd | 05/07/2012 at 01:20 AM
Thanks for informative and helpful post, obviously in your blog everything is good.
Posted by: Ross Finesmith | 05/14/2012 at 09:32 PM
I’ve been visiting your blog for a while now and I always find a gem in your new posts. Thanks for you
good.http://www.coachbagsoutletsales.com/
Posted by: coach bags | 05/16/2012 at 01:30 AM